Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Nintendo gets sued anew over Wii technology |
Listed in: News Tags:
Now, patent lawsuits like this aren't anything new for Nintendo, especially after they launched the Wii console, but what's unique to this case is that ThinkOptic has also included manufacturers and retailers, such as Wal-Mart, Nyko Technologies, Imation, GameStop, RadioShack, and JC Penney as defenders.

According to the lawsuit, Nintendo infringed upon U.S. Patent Number 7, 796,116, or the "Electronic equipment for handheld vision based absolute pointing system" patent.
"The rejection of [...] applications - assigned to Nintendo Co. Ltd. - based on the 116 patent is proof that Nintendo defendants knew or should have known of the objective risk that one or more of their products infringed at least one claim of at least the 116 Patent," read the complaint.
Because of this, ThinkOptic is praying for an injunction from the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Texas against any products that vioate the patent, on top of royalties, attorney's fees, and of course, monetary reparation for profits that they allegedly lost.
Nintendo has yet to comment on the matter, but last we heard, a jury trial was also requested. Back in April, a patent for "Wii Light" was uncovered, which was originally applied for in 2009.
Via [TechCrunch]
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|












Comments
Reply
You couldn't sue Sony nor Microsoft for their gaming platforms as they don't use a central system sending the signal to the device like a wii-mote, they are both motion tracking (that's why the ball is lit up on the end of a Move)as well as using Bluethooth to send their signal.
The Wii-mote uses an infrared tracking system for positional awareness. That's their patent claim. (Mind you it's a pretty weak case if you ask me...)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply