Molyneux: Fable II ending brought in hate mail, resulted in adjusted DLC #1 |
Ó
Don't throw away it all away our love, our love
Don't throw it all away, our love
See (and here is the spoiler, in case you haven't played it), players weren't all too pleased of having to sacrifice everything at the end of the game. As in everything: your pet, your companion, everyone. It caused "such a furor" that the first DLC they sent out eventually had to make leeway for the dog to be returned. They love their dog.
How hateful was the hate mail? He did not elaborate on that, but the lesson we can all pick up here is that, hey, hating does get things done for you.
Related Articles:
Via GamesWatch
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
You know, I am always happy to see that consumer feedback is listened too and the developers try to work it into the games, because thats better for all of us-but hate mail to change the ending of a game?...That seems a little childish. My wife finished Fable 2 and complained about the ending, but if the rest of the game was so great, then don't you think the developer knew what he was doing and wanted the game to end the way he did? Of course, if the ending isn't worth the journey it took to get there, than what makes it worth $60...I don't know-but something about this still seems wrong...
Did you even read the article? They didn't change the game ending people were pissed that in order to get the "good" outcome they had to sacrifice their dog. The devs thought it was a good idea to make the player sacrifice but then they got slapped for it and put in a way to get your dog back, thats it. They didn't change the ending at all. Though in the future they should think twice on things like that.