well first how the hell does this vid make it look like Unreal.. it looks liek halo to me.. most likely the best halo too,nothing looks like it will be a dissapointement in the vid



also



"You Can’t Use Weapons While Using the Shield Bubble"



first off they didn't say or show this in the video so... wtf!?

second most the bubble will stop bullets and possible even vehicles, however you can easily walk into it and melee the person inside and well as shott him on the inside and he can shoot back..

most of your bullets up there are either A) Your opinion, or B) unverifiable at this point



This post is worthless and should be saved till some of this can be verified, or replace "The Assault Rifle Has Longer Range?" which you cant verify in any way, with stuff like "Both the Assault Rifle, AND the Battle Rifle will return"



this is an amateur post and whoever blogged this needs to quit filling an amazing blog with worthless crap

the ar will have Longer Range but smaller clip read it at bunige

(one of thoes older weekly updates)

* Halo 3 will be trampled and humiliated by Lair, Ratchet & Clank, Warhawk (true next-gen Unreal Tournament 3), Heavenly Word (true next-gen God of War) and Killzone 2. All these will be released in Sep. 2007.

* Halo 3 is NOT made from scratch. Halo 3 is an updated version of Halo 2 which was made in 2004 by using Renderware engine (confirmed fact; Bungie chose this method to save huge amount of development time and budget); therefore, Halo 3 is NOT a true next-gen title. Halo 3 can’t even use X360 console’s most power. Renderware is far inferior to other advanced engines such as, Source, Unreal, CryEngine, etc.

* This is why Crapalo (Halo) 3 looks like Halo 2.5 in terms of graphics and gameplay (no breakable buildings, no deformable objects, etc). This new Halo 3 alpha footage looks crappy. There're alpha footages of Gears of War and Resistance available online, unless you are blind, you must know the fact that alpha builds are 90% same as the final versions.

* Halo 3's world (in alpha vid) is as shinny (bright, flashy with HDR lighting effects) as the one in Perfect Dark Zero. PDZ was the best looking game when it was released in 2005. PDZ and Kameo were made by Rare which is a subsidiary of Microsoft Game Studios (MGS, not the Metal Gear). MGS also owns FASA (which makes Shadowrun) and Bugie (Halo 3). All these companies share all kinds of technologies (DirectX based) which are used to make X360 games. This is the biggest reason why Shadowcrap, Perfect Dark Crap, Kameo and Halo 3 have extremely similar graphical quality (artistic design).

* Bungie's officially announced in Nov. 2006 that Gears of War has too much superior graphics to Halo 3's final (retail) version (GameSpot’s editor asked “What game has better graphics, GoW or Halo 3?). If you know the definition of ‘paraphrasing’, above statement means “Halo 3 will look very much inferior to GoW in the graphics department.

* Killzone 2 is built from scratch (true next-gen); therefore, KZ2 can use most potential power of PS3 hardware. Guerrilla which is a subsidiary of Sony has 120 employees (programmers and graphics designers). The total budget for KZ2 is $21 million (for your reference, Epic spent $10 m to make Gears of War with 90 devs).

* All Sony’s internal developers and Sony’s very close world class companies share all kinds of technologies which are used for making PS3 games (OpenGL 2.0 based). These world class developers are those companies which make games like: MotorStorm, Metal Gear Solid 4, Warhawk, Ratchet & Clank, Virtua Fighter 5, Resistance, Ninja Gaiden Sigma, White Knight Story, Tekken 6, Heavenly Sword, Gran Turismo 5, Final Fantasy XIII, Lair, Uncharted-Drake's Fortune and of course Killzone 2.

* Polyphony’s Gran Turismo 4 on PS2 is world's most popular racing game in the entire gaming history based on the number of copies sold. GT HD (4.5) demo was released in 2006; all game reviewers were surprised that GT HD was just good (80/100) when they expected that this new GT must get review scores of 95/100 just like all its predecessors. After this shock, Polyphony officially confirmed GH HD was an upgraded version of PS2's GT 4; that's why it looks just good. Polyphony then confirmed that they totally scraped the whole GT HD project and working on GT 5 entirely from scratch. Bungie must take a leaf out of Polyphony’s book; Bungie should scrap Halo 3 then make it from scratch then released it in 2009.

* I have to admit (even though I don’t want to) that Halo 3 will sell 10 millions more X360 consoles because Halo 3 is the only game on X360 which is worth $60 (99% of all X360 games are pure garbage; It's more fun to play catch-with-the-box than it is to play the games)

* I’m NOT a fanboy; if you disagree with me, then you HAVE TO say that I’m an X360 fanboy due to the fact that I’ve owned my X360 console since the release date in 2005. I spent a hundred times more time on my X360 console than I did on my new PS3 (I recently bought it).

hes right, halo 3 seems to look pretty lame. Seems like they are cutting corners (using xbox 1 engine) to get it out quick, but xbox 360 has been out for a year and a half which is ample time to create a game from a better engine. You didnt even need to mention ps3 games to make your point, but everyone must be a little bit dissapointed this is just halo 2 HD



i dont really like the game so i dont care, but if i did i would be pissed.

Actually Halo 3 is doing what GRAW did. I5t is using a custom(and beautiful) engine for the single player but using an upgraded version of the last games engine for the multilayer. Alpha builds do not have final textures, the final lighting engine, or the final particle effects so it could still look awesome. And FYI, even Halo 2 had partial destructible environments so they could easily add more in Halo 3.



It's obvious you have no idea what renderware is you delusional fanboy POS.

First of all guys, the game is shown in Alpha stage, it isn't supposed to have polished graphics.



Secondly, whoever wrote this article should maybe know the halo franchise before writing on it.



I mean come on.. Assault on the Control Room from Halo Returns… in Multiplayer. Please tell me you were joking when you said that.

They are there, fact. Look at the placing of that lift, it bypasses the entire base wall and lets him right in. That is not there by default, he placed it.

I feel I need to point people to another link, since it pwns that one 100 times over. Those freaks at Rampancy.net have the best analysis of the vid, in the form of annotated screenshots.



http://rampancy.net/images/halo_3/halo_3_public_beta_vidoc_screencaptures

yeah...whoever posted this is a *****ing idiot...

wow i love how you say Halo 3 is Dead No Matter What [End of Discussion] period then you go and write a whole entier essay just to show how much you hate it and make your e-peen grow 10 sizes for winning an online fight. if halo 3 is dead then why do millions of people allready have it preordered. and why would you write a whole *****ing book about it if its the "End of Discussion" ?

i find it funny that some people are so stuck up that they dont even bother reading what people have to post like" ITS A *****ING ALPHA" or "ITS NOT COMPLETE". Halo 3 will be the best no matter what.



As for the 19 captions bull***** i got 2 they even they over looked.



1. X button is most likely used for flag/bomb/whatever speed. If you look at the vid where the asian guy is running with the flag...you can see right before that, that it looks like hes tapping the X-button and the bar on the center screen is increasing. +1



2. you have a choice between 4 normal grenades, 4 plasmas, and 4 spikes...meanwhile you have to pick up the bubble shield/trip mine. +1



EAT IT