Wii vs. PS3 - The Real Difference in Size

Posted Jul 1, 2006 at 12:53AM by QJ Staff Listed in: Wii, PS3 Tags:
Ó


There have been lots of pictures and images lately showing the actual sizes of the next-gen consoles. The dimensions of the PlayStation 3 are about 13.5" x 3.25", but the Wii dimensions are way smaller. As you can see from the pictures below the PlayStation 3 is pretty much double the height of the Wii. So you're thinking... how did they get both consoles in the same room?

Well, guess what? Some fans actually recreated both the upcoming consoles in... cardboard. That's right, cardboard. And they even painted it for your viewing pleasure. This is different from the other cardboard Wii posted earlier. Check out the pictures:

Size - Image 1 Size - Image 2
Size - Image 4 Size - Image 3



Via PSzone

 
 
 

Comments [refresh]

by Hunter - 2006-06-30 19:26
» Ps3 is huge

Im not a fan boy but dam!! the Ps3 is huge >_> Ide much rather have a Wii it defanly looks alot cooler then ps3.

by iNCREDiPiNOY - 2006-06-30 19:26
» Thanks for making the PS3 cardboard from me!

I love it!

by Emil - 2006-06-30 19:53
» .

With the cell structure I guess it is no big surprise that the PS3 will be a huge console. But seeing it next to a Wii makes it seem too big all over again. Personally I don't have the space for the PS3 next to my TV and stereo.

by stevieb - 2006-06-30 20:20
» oh i see

wow cardboard consoles, and painted as well. Eh.....okay interesting...actually no....not interesting at all. Can't wait till both consoles are out we might actually stop with all this guff.

by PS3 is too big - 2006-06-30 20:24
» So...

why did the other guy get a newspost for his cardboard Wii and this guy didn't, even though this one looks way better than the other? Not like I care, just doesn't seem fair

by Lefamaster - 2006-06-30 20:30
» Casualism for everybody.

I can't believe it. I know people who say "PS3 is too big, I prefer Wii" are already Nintendo fans who would buy anything from Ninty, but really this makes me remember one day we were doing a kind of 'poll' with the different perspectives of old gamers, casual current gamers and people who didn't give a ***** about consoles.



Guess who was the only one who gave importance to the size of a desktop console? YES, the girl who had never played any console and said she didn't like XBOX because it was "too big".



That's what Nintendo wants. Not the 'Revolution' or the 'salvation' of the games. Not even a good and balanced machine. Only a small thing to sell to people who doesn't give a ***** about games, while the gamers will have to pay that enjoying GC graphics for the next 5 years (if they don't make Wii Advance in 2008, which wouldn't surprise me at all).

by CeCiL - 2006-06-30 20:30
» Damn...

I'm just picturing what the actual ps3 would look like in comparison.. .damn it's a sexy machine..

by a - 2006-06-30 21:12
» a

Who the hell cares, it's not like you keep the console in your pocket or anything. Nintendo fanbois are searching for reasons to make to their we seem better.

by Muscrat - 2006-06-30 21:29
» Missing the point

The Wii's hardware is nothing in comparison compared to the Ps3, im not saying the Wii is bad though THe PS3 has a freakin blue ray drive, Hard Drive, Cell CPU, Gpu ect. lots more in it...

by TSPhoenix - 2006-06-30 22:44
» That mattered since when?

"Guess who was the only one who gave importance to the size of a desktop console? YES, the girl who had never played any console and said she didn't like XBOX because it was "too big"."



Her and most of Japan. Anyone who lives in a highrise doesn't have unlimited space and the shrinkage of an appliance here and there does make a difference. Also ever considered the difficulty involved in taking the PS3 over to a friends house the PS3 is both large and heavy making leaving it at home seem all the sweeter an option. Heck I even leave my GameCube home sometimes because its too big. There is nothing less fun than NOT having a Halo 2 LAN game because the other XBOX didn't fit in the LAN bag.



"while the gamers will have to pay that enjoying GC graphics for the next 5 years"

Yes, but we will be enjoying them, so does it really matter. GameCube level graphics didn't stop me from enjoying my GameCube, and I missed the part where PS2 owners couldn't enjoy their games because the competing consoles' games looked better.



Graphically RE4 was the GameCube's swansong and to be honest even if the Wii is only 10% better than that, I'm sure a large portion of gamers could live with that for more than just 5 years. You could say similar statements about the PS3 and no rumble, or the 360 and its lack of free online. If graphics were that important the PS2 would have failed and the DS with it, but none of those things ever happened, so maybe you need to reasses how you judge your games.

by Lefamaster - 2006-06-30 23:25
» Size as important as graphics... wahahahaha

"Graphically RE4 was the GameCube's swansong and to be honest even if the Wii is only 10% better than that, I'm sure a large portion of gamers could live with that for more than just 5 years."



We could be amazed and happy with SNES graphics in the 16 bits era and that doesn't mean they would have made us happy during another 5 years during the PSX-N64 era. And don't compare the difference between PS2 and the other two with the difference between Wii and its rivals in graphics, because this time it's a whole generation. *****ing hell, the damned thing doesn't even have digital output or HD support. XTS lacking free online? Hahaha, good one. Let's see first if what the other two do deserves to be called 'online'. At least Sony tried hard with the PS2 and now have that experience, something that Nintendo can't say.



Wii is a machine of the past generation with a new controller. It's like taking the Slim PS2 and sell it again with a controller with motion and position sensors. Whatever Wii is succesful or not, there will be Wii Advance in 2 years, because Wii's technology is simply not enough. The only difference is that, if Wii is succesful, people will be happy of having a Wii Advance (except for those who expected 4 years of new games for their Wii) and if it's not, Nintendo will lose more prestige than Sega did.

by billy bob - 2006-06-30 23:38
» I must say

that PS3 is a slick looking machine. Makes xbox360 look like a 386 running windows95.

Gotta hand it to sony

by hush404 - 2006-06-30 23:57
» now that this useless info is out of the way

We all can sit back and hope for something better.

by h3inousguy - 2006-06-30 23:58
» Uugh...

I hated how Nintendo marketed the GC as a itsy bitsy thing compared to other consoles... If they do this time around they'll be total hippocrites... Because Nintendo always says it's about the gameplay and all that junk, but if they use this and an offensive marketing ploy, I will be mad... Because whatever console is bigger or smaller, it's the one that make me want the games that wins me over... I'd Choose a Xbox over a GC (have both) even though it's as big as a bathtub (exageration) because I preffered many of the games...

by Max - 2006-07-01 01:22
» lol

looks cute tho.. Little like Big Brother and Little sister :) I guess they can get along verywell when you have them both ;)

by Branden - 2006-07-01 02:16
» cool

the ps3 is big ,but if you really want the good ***** i guess u need to get the big cahona. the big the system the better the graphics more harware under the hood.the wii i have too admit looks pretty sexy. i could bring it in a binder. you get what you pay for i guess. $600 = a big hulking powerful machine. $250= a sleek and sexy and also power ful but not as power ful as ps3 .

by AllTheFacts - 2006-07-01 02:38
» A better comparison would be ...

nocomment

by AllTheFacts - 2006-07-01 03:06
» A better comparison would be ...

Does anyone know, if the psu is internal in the Wii? Because we already know that PS3 has the psu inside, and that is the primary reason it is so big.

Do you remember the huge size of the external (aka "brick") psu for the xbox2?

We usally never bother to consider the psu (if it is external) when we compare the console cases. And for the most part, the comparison of just the cases, is enough.

But if you want to be fair the whole console (console + psu if it is external) should be in the comparison. The psu is a necessary part, for the console to power on. Yes, the controller is also necessary part of the console if you want to use the console, but i'm not talking about the usage. Even if you can't see the brick of xbox2, that doesn't mean that the brick doesn't consume space somewhere. The PStwo is extremely small, but it has a big external psu.

by jroc - 2006-07-01 03:23
» b u l l *****!!!!

yo u ninntendo fanboys r just defending them because you r gay ,go to hell *****es,its not about the size of the system its bout the performance!!! and the ps3 has performance power wii dosent!!!!!its still good though!!!!not!! !!ps3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !yeaa

by james - 2006-07-01 03:49
» ps3 a piece of *****

dont buy a ps3 for 500 just get the wii. ilearned after buying the xbox 360 and dont even play that POS any more. ps3 isnt even tht much better.

by Eatstissue - 2006-07-01 04:14
» thats not a bad idea aculey

20# has a good point i think i may do that instead

by BloodiedWraith - 2006-07-01 04:14
» In the second picture...

The Wii is hitting the PlayStation 3 in its weak point for MASSIVE DAMAGE!

by Hunter - 2006-07-01 04:27
» .

will sony live through the attack or Die thats the quistion >_>

by ATALAVERA - 2006-07-01 08:24
» MAN I WANT THAT PS3 SO BAD!

I WANT THAT CARDBOARD PS3 JUST HAVE SETTING NEXT TO MY TV THAT THING LOOKS COOL I LIKE THE SIZE BECAUSE IT MAKES IT LOOK MORE POWERFULL AND Wii LOOKS LIKE CHILD TOY!

by Band Captain - 2006-07-01 08:33
» .

How big is the 360 compared to the ps3?

by ROFL - 2006-07-01 13:38
» hahaha

rember back in the day when all the sony and nintendo fanboys were like "dont buy a xbox because its so big" and "ahhhh my xbox fell on my baby and crushed it!!!" now the ps3 is the biggest console so all the sony fanboys have of coursed changed their opinions to "size doesnt matter, its the power" but wasnt the xbox the most powerful, and the biggest last gen and you hated it because it was big?

by cooljay - 2006-07-01 14:01
» hmmm

lets take a look at the dimension of the ps3 (according to ps3's site) and the 360 (according to xbox's site)



WxHxD

(all measurments in inches)

PS3:12.78 x 3.86 x 10.787

xbox360:10.16 x 3.27 x 11.61





that means if you buy a ps3 you are taking up ALOT more space than an xbox 360. i thought my 360 was big but the ps3 is going to be massive in terms of volume it takes up.

by sakura - 2006-07-01 14:55
» at #18

its already been mentioned a few times that the lower half holder of the wii is its power supply, so in the pic u actually see both the console and the psu for the wii. making it a hell of alot smaller then the ps3

by samoset - 2006-07-01 15:37
» the truth

i just have to say, for all of u who are dissing the ps3 about its size and those of u who are calling the wii a joke, SHUT THE !@#$ UP! the truth is, when u compare them both on the technical level, every sane person will say that ps3 is superior. the only real reason why people prefer the wii is because it's 400 dollars cheaper. if u have the 600 dollars, get the ps3, if not, get the wii.

by Oblivix - 2006-07-01 21:20
» !

The PS3 is better because if someone breaks into my house it will hurt them more.

by Danny - 2006-07-01 21:27
» -

#30

Or, if your parents give you enough lunch money, get both.



#31

With that logic, who'd want to mess with you?

by ssj3fox - 2006-07-02 02:18
» I can't wait

http://www.smashmyps3.com/

by h37 - 2006-07-02 02:33
» lol

The ps3 in that picture looks like a 1987 vhs VCR, and the wii looks like an external cd-rom drive... hillarious. You'd think they would make it cooler looking :)

by ssj3fox - 2006-07-02 02:36
» Let me say in it again "fo dummy who don't listen"


2. » errrrrr...



I'm a big Wii fan but don't get your hopes up. The Wii will not compete with the 360 and PS3 head on. We should see better that Gamecube and maybe better than Xbox graphics but still trying to compete in a power struggle is not a good idea. The Gamecube was the second most power console and no one cared. Nice try but lets not get over-hyped. We just don't what it can really do yet...



by ssj3fox, at Jun 25, 2006 at 07:47AM

26. » As good as it gets



The point of graphics to help immerse a one into the gaming world. There is only so much one can express with visuals alone. If the Mona Lisa was a photo would it have been any better? If Toy Story went for photo realism would it have been a better movie? No. In fact Toy Story may have been worst, but I'll get to that latter.



Image A

http://media.cube.ign.com/media/734/734926/img_2916513.html



Image B

http://media.ps3.ign.com/media/811/811232/img_3660058.html



Which looks better? The woman in B right? Is there any thing the woman in B can do other than look a little better than the man in A. No. Image A comes from a Gamecube game and B from a PS3 game. As you know Wii is more powerful than the Gamecube. As we can now conclude, the Wii's graphics will be "good enough". It can represent what ever it needs to create an entertaining experience.



Now about Toy Story...

"Although originally resulting from experimental data and applied only to robotics, the principle has been applied to computer animation characters. American film critic Roger Ebert has applied the notion of Uncanny Valley to the use of make-up and costumes of humanoid creatures in movies.



The Uncanny Valley was considered by some to be the reason behind the difficulty in creating computer-animated characters. Critics of computer animated films sometimes invoke the Uncanny Valley when explaining their dislike for a particular film. The principle leads to the conclusion that to generate a positive emotional response in human beings, it is often better to include fewer human characteristics in the entity, lest it fall into the Uncanny Valley.



One example of the existence of the Valley in films is the early Pixar production Tin Toy. There, the baby shown is fully computer generated yet looks less than human and can prove frightening or unpleasant to children. The effect is lessened by the two dimensional nature of the character, but the overly defined wrinkles and (comparatively) primitive rendering of the spittle makes the character appear evil or otherworldy. A similar effect is seen in the doll's head character in the film Toy Story. The character can be again frightening to children because it is in essence a mobile deformed human head. Even if it is not frightening, most children prefer the cute appeal of the aliens or indeed Woody because there is less human resemblance."



More here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncanny_Valley



and Here

http://www.thewiire.com/features/149/1/The_Uncanny_Valley_and_Wii



by ssj3fox, at Jun 26, 2006 at 08:03AM



11. » Balance



The system need the right balance in price, power durability (the real reason for lack of hard drive). The key is not to be better that MS and Sony but to off a system cheap a different enough that they don't really compete. Look at the DS and PSP. There not even really competing. The PSP is more of a ipod competitor then one to the DS. The PS3 is no different. It's a computer not a game system. It and the Wii have very different goals.



Drop a PSP. Now drop a DS. Which would survive? Drop a HDD. Now drop a flash cart. Which one has a higher chance of surviving? The Wii my be after a different crowd but Nintendo can not abondon the children market. For this reason Wii has to be cheap and durable. You don't want it to look like this



http://xbox360.qj.net/What-Happens-When-You-Drop-Your-360/pg/49/aid/56353



Also if it is to sell to non gamers, like the DS, it needs to be cheap. Wii will be more powerful than the Gamecube

http://media.cube.ign.com/media/718/718415/imgs_1.html

http://medi

by neogeo - 2006-07-02 08:20
» lol

***** systems,i play games.

by keekwy - 2006-07-03 02:26
» looks like

PS3 looks like a waffle iron from 1985! lols!



Any bets on the weight? I say over 20 lbs. (That's $30 a pound!)

by Wii SUX - 2006-07-04 11:00
» WII IS EMBARRISING

you guys who think the wii is good are *****gots...



how can you even compare the ps3 to the Wii





its like comparing a Honda to a Ferrari



Honda being the Wii of cioarse



the psp whoops the wii's ass...plz...





biggest joke since gamecube



just think...if the wii is that small...what good features can it offer

by brightside60 - 2006-07-04 13:13
» yeah but...

thing is power is nothing, its all about how the game is played, and what the acctual game is like, at least nintendo are trying to be orginal, trying to move the industry forward, its like the ps3 and 360, wooo yay they make games look better, but its all gunna be the same.

by hey cant we just get along - 2006-07-04 19:04
» ***** sony,

hey sony *****ing fanboys, xbox 360 will kick the crap outta the ps3 and so will the wii, think about it, on the gc there was limited games but they were all good re4,paper mario2 etc on the ps2 there where tons of games but the only good ones i can think of are the gta's go xbox go wii , ***** the ps3

by ps3 down - 2006-07-04 19:07
» WHAT???

poster 40 dam straight,



WHAT?!?!? thats a ps3 i was sure that was a george foreman griller LOL

by Warrior - 2006-07-05 11:34
» Numbers

# 20, 21, 22, 27, 37, 40, and 41 are all F****** idiots. This generation wants better graphics and more powerful systems. The PS3 has both and more. Think about it. Gamers don't have to buy the PS3 for games. It's the cheapest blu-ray player on the market and as blu ray is wanted more so will the PS3. All of you need to stop acting like children and grow up. #1 Sony's plan is more than games and #2 the PS3 is the "FUTURE". The Wii and 360 will only last about 5 years while the PS3 will last 10 or more.

by / - 2006-07-06 08:03
» Who Cares

I don't care how small the wii is it's crap anyway the ps3 isn't exactly going to take up the size of a house. It's smaller then a computer and is probably more powerful

by the smart kid thats trying to save money - 2006-07-12 09:11
» money wize

but why would u spend 500/600 for a ps3

if u ask me thats two much money, and im muslim so we cant afford that S**T



if u ask me id rather buy two wii's so me and my brother dont have to share

by nusar - 2006-07-12 09:13
» money wize

but why would u spend 500/600 for a ps3

if u ask me thats two much money, and im muslim so we cant afford that S**T



if u ask me id rather buy two wii's so me and my brother dont have to share

by KTM - 2006-07-12 13:45
» for all who think nintendo is gay....

WHOLY ****! MAn i know a 23 year old who plays super smash bros! LOL! man i havent see any xbox fanboy on here dissin the wii. Gee i wonder why....maby its cuz they all hate the ***** system three..like comon, i played many games on ps2 that take bout 15 mins to beat...man i swear they have good graphics...



Thing is the wii is nintendos come back, unfortunatly soney is diggin the same whole nintendo was shuved into. If the wii does good, think bout thier next system.

With 2000 dollar third party cost, for the wii, all those game companies from ps2, transfer to wii, and ps3's 20000 shoves them faster.



As well, nintendo has supped up their contoler with sound, rumbble tilt and distance sensing... what did soney do after they announced it? They took their 30 year old design, stripped the rumble pack out and through in a tilt sensor... man some REALISTICNES thats gona be when you get hit in the face and dont even feel it.



2 jokes



1st: if any one watched the E3 06 live show on G4, they would have saw the movie with the Companey representatives . What was soney's wepon? A little dager....WOA im gona shank you with a little nail clipper! like lol....but wait what did nintendos have? A friggin lightsaver! like dude you cant have a sword fight on the ps3! latter on they have reinforcements come it, soney had snake and god of war dud i believe areas( never played) Both of witch have only one game on the current consoles. Nintendo had 2 Mario and link. They could and probably should have had Samus (who never left a nintendo system) Kirby aka Kirbinator, and if they realy wanted to see some patheticness times 300 plus, all them pokemon (who i do not like either)



2nd My friend had a ps2 that instead of haveing all the blue dots flyin around, had ONE big blue dot... the fan was working so he opend it and burnned his hand on it! with it unplugged. We open and closed the thing after ponding it and it worked after a lot of grinding noise and clicks. The ame kept freezing but continuing..... We went to grab somethin to eat later on and he found one of his eggs had cracked... since the ps2 was in its last moments of life we took the egg and opend it up... onto the open ps2. It kooked almost instantly! We could not stop lookin at the thing! It coooked so fast you thought you had your element on max! After it finished cooking He took a bite out of it... now i have never seen someone eat a egg that fast before. He commented it was the best egg he will ever had...



So on a final note i have never haerd of anythin going wrong with a nintendo system...and besides i dont have a HD tv and know no one that does...so wats the point!?

My ps2 wont even read some games, and the ps flats scratch their games....eventualy the whole realiticness will lose its uniqueness. Untill then I will find every flaw Soney has!.

by tupac - 2006-07-18 13:13
» hello? *****!

shiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiit

by sny rxs - 2006-07-23 10:09
» embarrased

tbh as long as i have loved playstation and loved the games and the experiences which they have brought... i have to admit that the direction is all wrong, the age range which mainly bought ps2s were teenagers... how are they going to afford 600dollars for a console, most of its functions they arnt even going to be able to use, i have a decent size tv, 32 inches but its old and there is no chance of it supporting hidef...



sony has gone for overkill.. and jammed everything they can think of into a box, without thinking about the consumer...



im embarrased to a be sony fanboy... i cant see the wii not winning, and the section of the market which are willing to buy and overpriced console, prehaps for hideg, have already purchased a 360..

by ps3 cm - 2006-07-25 11:11
» Ps3 vS. wii

Everyone knows the wii will sell more than the ps3.(since its cheaper) nintendo seems more of a kid company does it even have in shooting games except resident evil? .Like who would play animal crossing on a ds except for a kid or some 1 daranged.Most people in thier twenties will get it because of the old games.The psp is way better than ds 3d graphics and internet features everything.But the ds had some better games.If u liked the psp just wait to sony has to offer with thier ps3.And it is really a bargain because u cant get a blu-ray player less than a thousnd dollars.Microsofts xbox 360 is a piece of junk and thier new stuff coming out for holiday 2006 is wack.All thier doing is coping off sony,with thier eye thing like sony's eye toy.Only good game xbox 360 i seen yet is going to be halo 3.But the second one was a dissapointment.Inconclusion the wii will win the war but the ps3 is better case closed.

by jshaw - 2006-07-29 09:13
» wii will win

nintendo is not at all a kids company anymore with games like mertriod prime resident evil. personally i think that gta will leave sony mainly since the first two years no one will be able to afford it. secondly point and shoot is what the wii was made for. but i have to say a 60gb storage and blue ray will make for a long term machine for use. all im saying is paople will buy the wii for games and the ps3 for the bells and whistles just like the psp vs ds or ds lite

by ps3 cm - 2006-07-29 10:33
» ps3,wii

u are mainly right and wrong gta will not leave sony i know that. And they will not join nitendo,But about wii some of the games are better than sony's but some are just for kids. im getting the ps3 for the features.The games dont look all that great.

by wii will kick ps3 ass - 2006-08-03 22:19
» ps3 is crap

the wii is soooooooooooooo ooooooooooooo much better than the ps3 i could name 100 reasons why will here is the main ones when you buy a ps3 it will probaply come broken in the box and if it doesnt it will last about a year and the games will break if u get them on launch day nintendo never does that plus who the hell needs a 60 gayga bite hardrive and the controler is the same it is crap. nintendo wii is the ultimate exprince like if your playing a sowrd fighting game on the ps3 u have to press buttons on the wii u just swing the controler around like a sowrd how cool is that

by madman200 - 2006-08-06 03:43
» Wii will do well

um, #38, do your research. The DS is outselling the PSP by millions. Everyone knows that.





Anyways, I personally think that the wii will do better than the PS3 and I'm buying the wii, but we still do not know yet which system is better so I don't know yet....



Also I heard that the PS3 is 12 pounds????



heh....



sleek is sexy not big and bulky

by ps3 cm - 2006-08-08 06:10
» ps3,wii

eh wii will kick the ps3 ass you are such a dumbass u *****ing ***** u dont know nothing.The wii sucks ***** compared to the ps3.What do u mean its so much better than the ps3.Its not better its just cheaper.I bet if the ps3 was 250 dollars u would get it.Ur problly Just getting it because its cheaper.Cheaper isnt always better u dumb *****ing ass hole.And u wanna know why the ds outsold the psp cause its cheaper u dumbass duh.Everyone knows the psp is better than the ds.And mostly everyone knows the ps3 is gonna be better than the wii except dumbasses like u.People like u talk good about the stuff hey can get,and talk ***** about the stuff u cant.Dont talk bout it just cause u cant *****ing afford it *****.

by madman200 - 2006-08-09 10:08
» lol

#54,



I laugh at you. I HEARBY LABEL YOU A PLAYSTATION FANBOY. "teh wii is teh suxorz!!!!1111!!!!"



Trust me if sony gives me a reason to spend $600 on a system I will.



But it looks bleak for sony.



And yes, if the PS3 was $250 I probably would buy it. But does better graphics make a system more fun? Sometimes. Graphics are important (the wii has decent graphics) but gameplay is key.



Nintendo is making a smart move to make their consoles cheap. They will get more sales that way so everyone can afford it.



and let me ask you this question. If sony was the creators for the wii, would you want one? You are saying that the Ps2 was better than the gamecube last gen, so therefore it will be better than the wii this gen. That's pretty stupid.



I know what I'm talking about fanboy, you don't.

by ps3 cm - 2006-08-10 08:40
» ps3 ,wii

suck a *****.U dont know anything.The ps3 is gona be better than the wii.case closed *****.

by wii fan 101 - 2006-08-10 08:45
» free nintendo ds

to get a free intendo ds go to http://thisdsliteisfree.com/?R=8339

by Madman200 - 2006-08-11 16:13
» :p

Ok, Ps3 cm, your name gives away that you are a fanboy. How do I know nothing? At least I have some facts behind my post. You just say the PS3 will be better than the wii. How? Give me facts. The Ps3 might be better, we don't know yet. You still haven't answered my question by the way.





Someday you will end up like this, fanboy. http://angrysonyfanboy.ytmnd.com/





Go to it.







P.S. Use proper grammar and stop whining

by ps3 cm - 2006-08-13 06:59
» ps3, wii

If sony was the creator of wii i wouldnt get it .Im getting the the ps3 for games and features.Is the only reason your getting the wii is for the motion sensing and the cheap price? Answer my question. And just because the wii is gonna be cheap doesnt mean is going to be any better. The hard drive and the computer in the ps3 is way powerful than the wii's.Ill be suprised if the wii's a little powerful than the orginal xbox. what the &@#$ kind of facts u got. And u know the ps3 is gonna be better than than the wii. wat are u a wii fanboy want some facts here they are.



ps3 has a 20 gb hard drive and and 60 gb now tell me how big is wii's its little. Does the wii have hdmi? i wanna know. Does the wii have a built in blu-ray player? The only good thing u seem to like about the wii is the price. We will see who will win the console wars ps3 or wii. I just like sony because the have good consoles and good features on them. If nitendo had games and features like the ps3 i would get it. I get consoles because of features and games not prices.

by madman200 - 2006-08-15 05:09
» Ok. let me explain

Thank-You for using grammar, Ps3 cm.



Yes. I enjoy Nintendo but that does not mean I am a fanboy. I wanted Ps2 last gen (which I have). I'm not going to argue who is and isn't a fanboy.



You do have the blu-ray point on your side. But will people buy a game system for just it's features. The answer is of course. But we can't tell if either system is going to be better yet. But technically, yes the ps3 will have more power, so it will be better. I will say power is not everything, a system can be better without the most power. But we can't judge what the wii is capable of yet because Nintendo hasn't released the specs, everywhere you read is just an assumption of it. Just because it's the weakest system does not mean it will have the capabillites to have beautiful graphics.



Also, Nintendo does have some cool features on it's system like the internet browser, IM service, optional DVD, Virtual Console, Wiiconnect24, Backwards compactibility, DS connectivity, Parental controls, SD card for memory, holding Pictures and music, and of course, its controller. That seems like a pretty good deal for under $250.



I want the wii because the motion sensing and games look fun, and it has cool features. The cheap price is only a good sign for me, it does not mean I want the system only for it's low price. I'd be willing to pay a lot more than the price they are offering.



I think that a lot of people will buy the system because it's cheap. But you see, people would not buy the system if it didn't have good games and a fun way to play them. People will buy it because it's fun at a cheap price. And that is why it might be the best system.



I am only saying that sony has to come up with a way to let the public know that their system is worth $600 instead of it's fanboys being the only ones to buy the PS3.





I will not bash the PS3 any more, If it's worth it I'll buy it.



Remember this is only my opinon, you can't change it, and I can't change yours. We just have to see which is better.



But please don't let me write another life story just to not let a person bash a system.

by ps3 cm - 2006-08-15 12:26
» ps3,wii

i atcually agree wit u for once.

by watashi wa Nihon-jin desu - 2006-10-15 08:48
» anate wa baka desu ne

True gamers don't give a rats ass about graphics, peripherals or power. It's all in the gameplay of the system and the games for it, and that is where Nintendo leaves you, Sony, and Microsoft sitting clueless in the dust.

by j - 2006-10-15 08:54
» j

Probably die. Everyone I talk to...even Playstation fans, arn't going to buy the PS3 'cause its so expensive. Most are going for the Wii if they don't have the 360 yet.

by Bob - 2006-10-15 08:58
» Pfft

Dude, even if I had the money, I'm not stupid enough to go waste it just because I have it. I could buy the Wii for cheaper, get better gameplay and go buy myself some games or a video card for my computer on top of that with 600 bucks.

by Xanon - 2006-10-15 09:01
» Well...

Personally I have played PS3 at E3 and while the PS3 has some nice graphics, it's not worth paying $600 for it.

by j - 2006-10-15 09:06
» j

Take some English courses.

Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!