Wii vs GC Graphical Comparision

Posted Oct 8, 2006 at 6:37AM by QJ Staff Listed in: Wii Tags: GameCube, Zelda
Ó


GC vs Wii Comparison

There have been several Wii graphical comparisons with the current-gen consoles. Many have found themselves comparing the Wii with next-generation consoles as well with the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3. However, we all know that the Wii is not anything spectacular graphics-wise, but we still find ourselves comparing it to these all-powerful consoles.

As we all found out in the past few months, the Wii is "basically" the Nintendo Gamecube with slightly increased graphics. So, people have finally realized that comparing the Wii to next-gen isn't going to provide us a sufficient view on the power of the Wii, so someone has taken the time to compile a Wii vs GC graphical comparison picture - GC is on the left, and Wii is on the right.

The most noticeable difference comes with Super Smash Brothers Brawl vs Super Smash Brothers (GC). Mario's textures are more detailed as well as our favorite adventure-hero, Link. Now that we look at the GC and the Wii side by side, we can see that the Wii is indeed very powerful. It may not be as powerful as the next-gen consoles coming out this year (and last).

The only "downside" to all of this is the fact that we are comparing "old" GC games to new Wii games. Considering The Legend of Zelda: The Twilight Princess is to be released on both the Wii and the GC with no graphical changes, one can argue that the GC has already been capable of these high-end graphics, just no developer has used them.



Via Gamer France

 
 
 

Comments

by OGTiago - 2006-10-08 09:04:07
well duh..

we already know its better than the gamecube, so whats the point of this?
by - 2006-10-08 09:30:24
pic

ooooold pic comparison from like february
by - 2006-10-08 11:45:15
ZOMG@1

omfg hs thats so awesome all my freinds said xbox360 would pwn my wii but tehy r so wrong luk at those pics omfg those r so good tehy probly even pwn ps3 so bad rofl my freinds r gona want a wii so bad omg i cant wait yay ninty is teh roxo|2x!!11
by - 2006-10-08 13:25:05
theirs is really not that much difference

no difference how sad
by jaydogg691 - 2006-10-08 15:31:58
Cool comarison, but

there isn't much of a difference, like e said. Some of the noticeable changes you can see is only higher textures on characters and environments. For me, the only game that shows Wii's power capabilities is Mario Galaxy. For me, the game looks beautiful and has shows lots nice things like strong lighting and bump mapping, while running at 60fps at 480p. I think we'll just have too wait until developers start using more of it's power capabilities.
by WC - 2006-10-08 15:46:24
High end?

The LoZ graphics aren't 'high end' at all. That's why the GC can handle them. The devs just went for real-looking instead of cartoon for a change. It's extremely tough to make 'realistic' look right and the GC isn't -really- up to the task. Wait until you've actually PLAYED it until you pass judgement. It'll just look like Wind Waker with nicer textures.
by - 2006-10-08 16:13:31
The key is..

lighting. Hidef is great, but bumpmapping and lighting techniques are what's really making games stand out visually these days (Read: Photorealism). Looking at PS3 and 360 stuff gets me giddy cause some of that (Especially the human forms and clothing) are really sexy. CoD3 is looking real nice on those platforms. I hope the Wii has made enhancements to the lighting schemes. Everything else I can live with as the GC if I have to.
by - 2006-10-09 16:05:51
Pointless

"Here is a comparison of the graphics capablity of the Wii versus the Gamecube." That should be how this article reads. Convincing us that the Wii's graphics are superior to the Gamecube's is just a waste of everybody's time and comments like "comparing the Wii to next-gen isn't going to provide us a sufficient view on the power of the Wii" sound like sour grapes and are fundamentally absurd. Comparing Wii to the 360 and PS3 is reasonable because they are competitive products! The Gamecube and the Wii are not competitors, so why compare them? That makes as much sense as comparing the Wii to the Atari 2600. Please, if you have something to say, make it worthwhile. I wouldn't have written this comment but apparently we are all hard up for something to read.
by - 2006-10-10 13:19:33
You could say that...

I cant really see how you can say there is no difference guys. You realize that all those "screenshots" except the first set are from the same half-year old video? You cant really compare the wii versus other systems without having actual screenshots from actual gameplay. And even if the wii does have "worse graphics", it has easily better games than PS3, and I cant really compare wii and 360, since they are both so awesome, and are better than ps3... anyway... Perhaps the "no graphical changes" thing with LoZ means that GC will have longer load times and simplified levels? =\
by - 2006-11-01 21:28:08
RETROTHINKING.COM

You'd have to be stupid to not see the difference here. The Wii is more powerful than people give it credit for...

Add New Comment




You must be logged in to post comments




Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!