I think Zelda GFX is OK. It is not a "next gen" title indeed, just a nice GameCube game.

can the Wii support the type of graphics people really want? don't get me wrong, I love the Wii and so far it is the only n-gen I own... but I think people are trying to compare apples to oranges here. 360/PS3 are the graphics gurus... we should be comparing Zelda's uniqueness in gameplay/control schematic- not how pretty it is compared to Gears of War or another similar... to be honest with you I think it fell a little short in this area too. (still love it though!)

I think the question is in the graphics of the other Wii titles. Zelda is the best looking Wii game I've seen so far, and we all know that it only pushes the GCN's hardware limits. This puts the other titles to shame, since they had the whole Broadway and Hollywood chips to exploit.

Have you seen wind waker?? The graphics were terrible. The sailing was tedious and only included to make the game seem longer...any zelda game that doesnt have 25 hours of sailing is ok by me.

Personally, this guy has it all wrong, I can go play an Xbox 360 or a PS3, yet I would still rather be playing Twilight princess then any of the games on Xbox 360 or PS3.

Sure the graphics might be nicer and of a greater quality on Xbox 360 and PS3, but I don't play because of graphics, I play because of story and gameplay. And guess what Twilight Princess truely has that, as well as some pretty aesthetically pleasing graphics as well.



So all in all, you don't need to glam everything up with these new HD graphics and picture perfect pixels, it's a waste of time, because I would never buy a game just because its graphics are better.

zelda in general isn't about graphics

it's about game play and story

but it does look great in 480p not to brag

zelda is the reason i bought a wii (and smash)

wind waker was a great game, the thing you have to remember about the graphics is that nintendo wanted something different to portray a young link, and this is the risk taking that nintendo does that other companies don't. As for TP, the game was meant for the GC and the graphics are very nice, trufully, i think people should be disapointed by the graphics of the other games.



It's a tale of two sides, would you like a game that lasts for 30 hours and has amazingly great graphics, or would you prefer the graphics to be cut a little and have 60 hours of game play?



People seem to forget that graphics also take up space on the disk, and then either complain that the game is too short, or if the graphics are not so good. And i'm sure that Resident Evil 4 used pictures as backgrounds which is just cheating as it's easier to make it look good.

Twilight was OK. Nothing like Link to the Past or Ocarina of Time. Okami was really good. Wind Waker was a disgrace to all things Zelda.

Just because its celshaded doesnt mean they are good graphics. If you've played ToS, Jet Set/Grind Radio, etc you would see WW isnt that great in its department. Its just one mans opinion. I myself prefer TP visuals over cartoon. Should of used celshading for Mario, not Zelda.

80000002