Sony: we deliver quality hardware, shoddy machines won't grow the market |
Ohh I haven't written a mud-slinging article in weeks. This mud-slinging event is from David Reeves, president of SCEE. In an interview, he explains Sony's commitment to quality:Another thing we have committed to for supporting market growth is putting out quality hardware - you don't grow the market by putting out shoddy machines.
So we try to make sure that PS3s have a failure rate of just two to three percent, which is very low by industry standards.
Taking potshots while Microsoft's down, Sony? While he didn't explicitly mention the Xbox 360, I doubt that he was talking about the Wii. Well he does have a point, whether or not he was talking about the 360; of all the things you can call the PlayStation 3, "shoddy" is not one of them. And he does have good things to say about the competition either way:
On the competition, I will say Nintendo have only done good things. They have expanded geographically and dramatically extended demographically. They have never been afraid to try new products, be that hardware, or software or peripherals.
For Microsoft, again, I can understand that, again, they have put money into the market and have initiated growth. In some ways what they have done is brought forward consumers from next year into this year.
By bringing the price down they are trying to establish themselves quickly, as they did with the first Xbox. But they have built online in a meaningful way and the competition they have brought to the market place is great.
Related Articles:
- Woe is you: New Xbox Experience update says hello with RRoD reports
- Microsoft replies to lawsuit: scratched discs affect less than 1%
- Sony execs comment on PS3's failure rate
Via MCV UK
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
when you buy a PS3 you buy a quality console. when you buy a 360 you get a shoddy console. i wont be surprised if microsoft makes another console cuz they will realize they have a console with old components like a disc tray that scratches. and they make you buy all these add on's that cost more then what they should. Again, if you want a top notch quality console do youself a favour and pick up a PS3 you wont be sorry and it will outlast other consoles out there.
before u class me as a fan boy i own both consoles and my ps3 has lasted considerably longer without problems, microsoft rushed it and they bullsed up, this bad rep they keep getting is their own creation which they still havent fully fixed, if it isnt the xbox 'rod'ing its the power pack 'rod'ing and if it isnt that its problems with the cd drive, not to mention the amount of innocent people that where banned when they scanned the drive speeds, they obviously forgot what drives they were sticking in, although i must admit xbox live is better apart from the price tag to get online and they dont screw different markets on it because of location. sony charge 9.99dollars for crash commando in the usa while were paying about 12 dollars in europe, they have choosen which markets to scam and the problem is they are getting away with it and people are paying the extorinate prices, and it works out on xbox live to be around 5 pounds, just because we have the better system doesnt mean you can exploit us, and its up to us to take a stand on it because else they will continue to do it, and before you reply its only 1 game, you obviously dont have an xbox account and a us psn account, it is blatent on all games. new lbp content is 2.99dollars, where as its 2pound 79 in europe, and that is only the begining or should i say their latest cons not to mention the ps one games, sim city, bowling, wolf of the battlefield, and so on, the list goes on, so really they both have faults just microsoft con you for going online in the first place
Took SONY awhile to say something but they nailed it. It's like comparing a BMW to a Hyundai. Yeah they both have wheels but which one's gonna last. You have to pay for quality. I'm sure the boys at X-Play are gonna be pretty pissed about this one.
I agree in that the xbox360 has a low reliability compared to the ps3. However, your example isn't really correct. BMW is known for expensive repairs and a reliability of about 3-4 years. Hyundai's reliability, on the other hand, has improved alot since the 1980s. In terms of reliability, they are both roughly the same. quality of materials and components, on the other hand, are different.
Anyways, i digress. back onto topic. the difference in price between the 360 and ps3 would explain the quality differences.
...then again lack of a good games library wont help grow the market either.
I've been looking for any excuse I can find to buy a PS3. Blu-ray alone wont do it for $400, when stand-alone players are only $200.
Untill some of their good games come out in 2009, I'll just have to keep looking for an excuse to buy one. By then they will be cheaper anyways.
almost all good 360 games are on ps3 too except gears 2 and fable 2
Is everyone here 12 years old? I'm not talking from an intelligence perspective: you guys sound fine there (and far nicer than IGN standards)
I mean that if you're over 12, you must have a substantially bad memory. Is SONY calling out someone on bad hardware? Did everyone forget the Playstation? The Playstation 2?
The PS3 is the first Sony console without major, obscene flaws in its hardware the first year out the door (It helps that, like the original Xbox, they didn't mind making a system that was huge. Oddly enough, MS 'n Sony swapped on that one). Both of its predecessors would either overheat (if you'll remember, most of the PS1's passive, fanless heat vents were on the console's underside, completely ignoring the law of convection) or end up with dead drives (exceedingly common on the PS2).
The difference between Sony and Microsoft? MS actually manned up and decided that they were going to foot the bill for their biggest mistake, the RRoD. Meanwhile, Sony told everyone whose Playstation or PS2 borked out to go buy a new one or pay to have it repaired.
Even the drive issues only sound bad to those without memory of how things were a single generation ago. When the PS2 first arrived, if it was arranged vertically, and a PS2-CD title was put in, it would scratch a ring into it that would render the title unplayable. I saw this happen to a friend of mine when I came over once; it ruined their brother's copy of Tekken Tag (years before 4 or 5 arrived). It didn't scratch while tilting the console, it scratched it while the console was completely stationary and being used as it was intended. Put this in perspective: The Xbox 360 has been out for nearly 3 years now. You can't find an Xbox 360 tray "scratch prevention" pad. The PS2 had those for sale on Hong Kong niche ships six months after it launched.
I'm not an Xbox fanboy, if you wanna go there I'm far more of a Nintendo fanboy, but man, seriously, did everyone forget the ten years of Sony that preceded the PS3?
here they are with nothing to say anymore but "no games" which everybody knows is not an issue anymore for the past year and last year was basically the launch year.. anyway i understand u must have gotten hurt or something and you really have nothing to say so just blurt something out...
oh and racing59 the 360 has been out a year longer and anybody with a PS3 can definitely afford a 360, i haven't bought one yet inspite of it, the 360 must have a crappier library...
It all boils down to what games there are. Sure alot of good games are multi-platform, but what exclusives does PS3 have? I just cant justify buying a PS3 solely for MGS4 (was never a fan of that series), LittleBigPlanet , and Drake's Fortune. PS3 might have many good multi-platform games, but I see no exclusives that justify the $400 price.
Quixand, I%u2019m sure everyone with a 360 can afford a PS3 also. Its not about being able to afford it, its being able to justify the purchase. What does PS3 offer me besides blu-ray? I admit I%u2019m interested in high-def movies, but the extra $200 you spend to get the PS3 over blu-ray just doesn%u2019t cover what little top-notch games there are. The fact that you don%u2019t have a 360 shows me that you are either a fan-boy or are too cheap to spend $300 on the most enjoyable gaming experience currently out there.
It's not like I hate the PS3, I want one. It has superior technology that makes it very intriguing. But yet it isn%u2019t the technology we purchase consoles for, it%u2019s the gaming experience. I%u2019ll probably get a PS3 next year when all the exclusive games for it come out. And as I said, the price will most assuredly be cheaper then too. Until then, I%u2019ll have fun playing a couple exclusive games over xbox live and playing the many great multi-platform games that both camps can agree make this a very good year to game.
time and it's been some time since i've posted, and you know why??? it's because of this "no good game" garbage that every 360 fanboy keeps on spewing...
first off if i'm cheap i wouldn't have 27 PS3 Blu aGames in my shelf now and over 90 Blu Ray movies, u don't believe me a ton of QJers regs know me and they can tell you that, as I told you i've been here a long time...
2nd you don't have a PS3 so you must be a fanboy then based on ur analogy, and basically i just replied to someone who brought one a statement first with fanboy logic in it.
that is before and then is now, mistakes were made and apparently lessons learned by Sony are lessons learned by the industry... so what did Sony do??? they progressed from that, look at the PS3 it's rock solid... they improved from the flaws from the last generation.
Microsoft went backwards... and that is a big difference... as foot footing the bill, they had no choice and everybody knows that or things would have gotten ugly..
on a lighter note a "scratch prevention pad" sounds nicer than "towels".
I didn't have any 'fanboy logic' but apparantly thats all you are capable of responding with. Since you arnt cheap, then you must be the alternative: fanboy.
I'f you had actually read what I said, instead of moving your eyes from left to right in what could only be described as a mimic of reading, you would have seen that I said I wanted a PS3. I just can't reasonably justify it with myself that a $400 console is worth what 4 exclusive games are currently out for the PS3.
I'm sorry if you dont think that the quality of a console's game choice makes for a good reason to not purchase a console. I'd be willing to change my mind if you know something I dont about what games are out for a PS3. Whenever I look at the highest rated games and all game lists, I see nothing but the 3 games I listed and a bunch of ports. I am not saying those 3 games arn't any good, they just arnt worth spending $400 to play.
Possibly, since I cant justify my expense in a PS3: neither can you. That is why you have to belittle my responses, its the only way you can live in a fantasy world where the PS3 is a justified purchase.
I guess the PS3 is a good purchase if its your only console, but currently it doesnt play well with the 360. Most of its games are already out on 360, or not worth buying. I can see that the sony fan base hate it when they are pointed out to the fact that all the promised games for the PS3 arnt out yet. Maybe next year they will stop being so defensive, because it sure isnt that way this year.
well, well, well. look who's come to drop by again. :) we've actually missed you. hehe.
and reading more....
the "lack of good game library" just ticked me off.
this guy apparently is easy, already fell for the twisting-the-logic tactic to piss them off and get them clicking over and over again to see if someone replied already.
didn't even have to work on that one.
....checking cause i'm waiting for a good debate, or atleast one thats remotely challenging.
Ill pretend with you that pissing me off was your original goal. That way you don't have to look like a loser ;).
It's not that the PS3 doesn't have a good games library, it certainly does.
It's just not as good as the 360s library, IMO of course.
Lets face facts, most multi plat titles perform better on 360 (with several notable exceptions of course), and no amount of quality hardware will overcome sub-par programming.
either way, the 360 internal build quality sucks ass.
The only thing the "improved heatsink" accomplished with the v2 Zephyr build is that instead of getting the RROD, you get a HANA encoder chip failure that MS only gives ONE YEAR warranty on.
utter crap
very well put :)
the reliable consoles don't always win the format war. Look last gen at the xbox being reliable and the PS2 with the dreaded DREs. The PS2 was still bought over Xbox because of the game library.
I'm not a fanboy of the 360, I own a PS3 and NOT a 360. I'm just stating the facts.
first i have both consoles and i can say the 360 has a good game library, but guess what the only the one and only thing the PS3 is missing is the good game library.
And people please David Reese (the guy from sony) is only talking about the perfectness of the ps3 (please dont get jinxed). In this post who gives a ***** about games, not that it doesnt help the consoles grow.
360 has a lot of games good
360 lacks quality, has faults, etc now thats bad
PS3 has a small lacking library thats not good (bad)
PS3 has unimaginable quality and reliability, etc (yet) AWESOME
my day...
saving face ha... i've dealt with more worthy challenges than yours.
as i said ur easy
have to give to you though, not writing essays anymore, that's good kid.
tell you honestly i was after BIH not you, now BIH i know already and his post is sooo predictable... but he didn't reply he probably already knows better than that, a disappointment really instead i got an over eager pinto kid who it only took me one sentence to have him write essays...
as i said didn't even have to work for it.
QJ what happen to MCS, Shatterdome, Devise, Aoxxosomethingx xOA and the rest?... the quality has really gone done if we're down to this pinto kid.
I own a Ps3 and have played friends' 360s and in my opinion the 30 is slightly better. 360 has more good exclusive games like halo 3, fable 2, left 4 dead, gears of war 2, and many others while the only exlusive games I have found really good on my console are MGS4 and Ninja Gaiden. I prefer the xbox-live service because you can easily find your friend and join their games on a lag-free good looking interface, while on my PS3 is not like that. I do like of my Ps3 that i don't have to pay any monthly fee but I wouldnt mind paying those 50 bucks a year, I find it worth it. One complain I have an both consoles is the price for renting or buying movies, even though its slightly cheaper on live its really stupid that you actually pay for that, especially since you can just download them and/or watch them on your laptop or pc. About quality I give it to my PS3, it has almost a year now and it hasn't given me any troubles, and it hasn't gotten even a scratch. Most of my friends with 360s have gotten RROD in around 2-3 years (and I mean like 60% of them) though all of them got them fixed for free by microsoft and they get their 360 in less than a week after leaving it on the mail office. Controller-wise even though most people prefer the 360 controller I actually prefer the PS3 controller because I have small hands and fingers, also the PS3 controller is better in that it doesnt use AA batteries. Yet, I prefer of the 360 controller that it has rumble feature. Now graphics-wise I have to give it for the 360. Most games I've played look slightly better on the 360, especially the third-party titles, and this is really odd because I have hd-cable on my ps3 and hdtv 1080p and 360s aren't hd. Also, the 360s price is cheaper, though I don't mind the price of the ps3.I really think the 360 is better though the PS3 is still good.
personally i think only two xbox exclusives brings a different experience this gen that is currently not replicated on the PS3 and that is Mass Effect and Fable 2, which is why those are the two things i've really enjoyed in the 360... everything else the experience is not unique on the 360... everything else you can get a similar experience from in other games that could be on other consoles... and Mass Effect was a last year release, so for this year only Fable 2.
I do believe that MGS4 is a unique experience, everybody knows LBP is and although Resistance2 to me isn't really that good and is just another shooter just like EVERY shooter that has come out may it be 1st person, 3rd person, tactical or not still the 60 player multi is unique..
the unique experience of PoP and Mirror Edge is in both console, Fallout is on both as well but I would always play any multiplat game on the PS3 just because I wouldn't have to worry about the possibility of it killing itself.
as for your controller comment, personally i've been holding a PS controller for over 15 years, i mean how more comfortable can you get????
idk about all you but for me
my ps2 works perfectly fine and i got it a year after launch
on the other hand
my xbox i got it about 2-3 years after launch and it went haywire a year ago
shows much about quality, for the most part most of my sony products have proven themselves in being of better quality than anything else
and getting a bit off topic RCA has been another good brand to me
back on topic i would like to go into the library thing but i'm sure others will handle that just fine or so i hope
got my PS2 Aussie launch, i could still play it now if i wanted to and lord knows what kind of a workout i've given that thing.
Sorry Quixand, didnt know you wanted mindless one line posts. Not my style, I go for quality of content....not quick to read.
However, I like how your longest post was the one trying to back up from your surrender. That was easy too.
About games, by your very conservative estimate only 2 games on xbox are 'unique' which ties it with the PS3. So whats so great about the PS3 if it isnt any better in games than the 360. And while LBP might seem 'unique' it sure as hell isnt fun.
And your choice to always pick ported games for PS3 seems like a bad one. All the exclusive content is on the 360, have fun going through fallout for the 4th time.
racing59pinto, seriously, if you don't even OWN a PS3, then why the hell would you even be hear posting? How much free time do you have? I cannot even imagine going to a 360 fansite and stirring the pot.
Dude, you need a girlfriend...
no argument there lol.
But this also pops up in the 360 page, because sony is trying to stir up some momentum for the PS3 by bashing 360. Momentum that should be created by a good game release season. Something that has been lacking since the PS3's release.
I do check up on the PS3 section. I really do want a PS3. I think its a sexy piece of hardware, and high-def movies appeal to me.
But it all comes back to the games, I cant find more than 2 games that I would currently want to buy for the PS3. So I check up on the news, hoping that maybe a good game slipped past my radar that makes th PS3 worthing owning ALONG SIDE my 360.
what an idiot..
take a look at how many potshots microsoft has taken against sony, and none are in any way comes even close to the diplomacy and D Reeves... just look at Shane K and Aaron G...
and D Reeves is just telling the truth, 360 is crap... deal with it.
bingo... ur a fanboy!!!! just love it when they deny!
cheap bastard trying to justify NOT BEING ABLE to buy a PS3... sad really.
and if you don't know i don't have a 360 but i had one, bought it with Mass Effect then gave it to by nephew as a XMas gift last year... why? because i can... don't believe me then ask around.
i'm not a sad loser who has been has been going to PS3 sites without owning a PS3 trying to mingle with the big boys and showing everybody how insecure he is.
Hey Racing59pinto what two games are you talking about? You should just buy the PS3 and the two games if you can afford to spend that much. After I got my PS3 I could only afford to buy one game with it. I'm pretty sure once you own the system you'll see more of the games will spark you interest.
i'm not dissing on any other people who have been looking at websites for 2 years now trying to justify $400... oh sorry there's only one guy in this article who's that sad.
$400??? hahaha... spent more than that last night at the club.
'm not dissing on any other people who have been looking at websites for 2 years now trying to justify $400... oh sorry there's only one guy in this article who's that sad.
$400??? hahaha... spent more than that last night at the club.
Someone who will actually post something intelligent.
I was thinking that resistence 2 looked enjoyable. FPS games are usually solid games. Besides that I guess MGS4, but I would probably rent it first. I never enjoyed MGS, but its the only game exclusive to the PS3 that came out this year (besides LBP...right?)
Maybe if yall could come up with a list of the top 5 exclusive PS3 games, I would reexamine my idea that the PS3's game library isnt anything to buy a PS3 for.
I dont want to just buy a PS3 and not use it, seems like an aweful waste of money (even if I can afford it). Especially because it will be cheaper by this time next year.
I have to agree with what Quixand is saying.
The argument that the 360 has more or "better" games is a false, idiotic one. Sure there are more titles available for it, but if anything the PS3 has a more popular range of games (that are played more) than the 360.
It is funny though how you have this really
'solid' view about the PS3 when you don't even own one. Heres a thought - why don't you go out and buy one and play it for a few months before making comments about it and comparing your 360 to it? Until then, you really have no reason to comment on the quality of its games range.
Dem's fightin words!
Unfortunately, that's not going to save Sony this gen!
give him two more years of looking at websites.
Quix, Your posts have gone past the point of being worth responding too. All I say is that I hope it makes you feel like a 'big man' saying that you burn through money faster than toilet paper.
Why does everyone say I should just buy a PS3 just to test it out? Do I need to put my hand in a blender before I know its going to hurt? No, its called foresight. I'm not saying anything about 360 being better than PS3, all im saying is that there are more high-production games for 360 than there are for PS3. I would love to be wrong about this, as I would go out and buy that PS3 and all such games. As it stands now though, I wait untill fall 09 and hope for a change.
you can wait for faster internet for a better trolling experience...
and it's amazing you're even asking why everyone is saying this things to you, isn't it obvious that you are looking like some loser who does nothing but moan about something that apparently isn't true??? and that everybody here realizes that you are such a moron that no matter how much they type nobody could smack sense into ur idiotic skull that they are just saying to you to just buy the darn thing if that would shut you up.
This has got to be one of the longest reply's list on qj. It takes up a good amount of the page.
Well you could get some cheap exclusives right now, theres Warhawk and Ratchet and clank which are great and you could get Uncharted, those games are all under 40 bucks right now. Trust me if you owned one you'd use it, and you could go right into home and join a bunch of War hawk and Resistance 2 clubs. Plus youd have a nice blu ray player for movies if you have a HDTV.
not even, this is really very short compared to before...
i miss those times.
people didn't need to register back then so more gamers post stuff and the PS3 was new so the xbox fans were really defensive and really into it and the PS3 fans just got their credit cards swiped so they wouldn't take it lying down.
glory days they were...
hey qj imagine if more than just Quixand started posting again, there will be more people stirring things up, then we can get back to badmouthing QJ writers.
i got first dibs on Gino and Cesar.
@ Quixand
"first off if i'm cheap i wouldn't have 27 PS3 Blu aGames in my shelf now and over 90 Blu Ray movies, u don't believe me a ton of QJers regs know me and they can tell you that, as I told you i've been here a long time... "
I say bullsh*t unless you have images to prove it. So your bragging mean doesn't mean sh*t over the net and there's no point in talking to your fellow fanboys about wether or not you have the items you say you do. So until you have proof, then I just don't believe you and that you are just another loser who uses the internet to make himself look better than he ever could in real life.
"tell you honestly i was after BIH not you, now BIH i know already and his post is sooo predictable... but he didn't reply he probably already knows better than that, a disappointment really instead i got an over eager pinto kid who it only took me one sentence to have him write essays..."
Just because this BIH person didn't reply, doesn't make you better than him. Maybe he doesn't care about your fanboy perspective and maybe he has a life to live, unlike you who spends his time on here starting fights and waiting for people to reply. You even said it yourself that he didn't reply and yet you comment on it like your pathetic life depended on it. So just like quicksand, you suck.
but QJregs don't only know me as Quixand, they already know me personally... nope, not just on PSN or facebook but in real life...
two regs here are from Sydney as well and are already my friends...
as i said don't take my word for it, ask around but i ain't giving u names and u'l soon find out that the 90 Blu Ray thing was actually an UNDER estimate especially since some of them are box sets like Tudors, Heroes 1 and 2, Firefly etc...
call BS on me all you want... but one thing i know even if i send u pictures u would find some way to say that it's not even mine.
but if ur game to really find out add me on PSN it's madicemann as most people here know cause i'm guessing u have a PS3 based on ur name then i'll send u some pics...
if you want do it now and i'll accept asap and send u pics asap just so u know i didn't go around borrowing games and blurays...
i'm waiting.
read my post at the bottom
can't wait to prove u wrong.
Is a beautiful machine, finely crafted and it oozes quality. The media playback is excellent and the open platform for installation of Linux and use of 3rd party peripherals is commendable. But in the 3 years since I've owned next gen consoles I've probably used it about 1/10th as much as I've used my 360. I'm on my second 360 (both are working now because of the warranty) and I was not best pleased when I got the RROD but the console has seen that much more use than the PS3 that I can actually justify the cost of it breaking more often. Yes, reliable hardware will always make sense... But, when faced with a bigger library of games I actually want to play, I'll sacrifice some of that reliability.
It's sad to see Sony's lead in this console market diminished so quickly, but they've made some fundamental mistakes this time round. I won't ever regret buying my PS3 as a media hub for the lounge, but as a gaming machine it isn't living up to the hype. Combine this with the lukewarm PSP and I can understand why there are a few nervous gaming companies about.
Oddly, Nintendo, the forgotten console last time round has utterly nailed it this time. Based on simple technology with a few gimmicks they've actually opened gaming as a market up to those people who would never have bought a console in the past. They're reaping the benefits now. Their family friendly agenda has never looked too healthy when compared to the shoot em up in your face markets of the more recent consoles... But now they have family gamers and first time console buyers on their side they're not looking too stupid.
I hope Sony can recover with their reliable PS3, I really do, I have friends who depend on it... The console is great, it just needs some titles to sell it to the average consumer.
you call someone out, next time u stereotype against people who go on forums and share and express themselves to the community and call BS on them..
be sure you've got the balls for it, change ur name cause apparently u dont deserve it.
cause apparently ur looking like somebody who "uses the internet to make himself look better than he ever could in real life" cause u ain't got the balls to back back it all up.
you call someone out, next time u stereotype against people who go on forums and share and express themselves to the community and call BS on them..
be sure you've got the balls for it, change ur name cause apparently u dont deserve it.
cause apparently ur looking like somebody who "uses the internet to make himself look better than he ever could in real life" cause u ain't got the balls to back back it all up.
Im looking for it (really)
I just got a 50" HDTV-wish i REALLY want to feed...im looking at the ps3 at the moment STILL i cant set my mind to do it
Every time i go to the store to buy it i can't help to feel that my wallet is getting raped by Sony.
So PLEASE tell me wish game do you recomend and why i should buy it
I Want something that my WHOLE family can enjoy (music, photos and my 250 avis) the PS3 delivers BUT i still cant do it
QJ regs know me personally too. I have 580 blu-rays, and 30,000 ps3 games. Don't believe me? Ask around...
ps3 can play all types of media. No matter what anyone in ur family is into they'll find something on the ps3. And if you really want to feed that TV you'll need a blu-ray player. On a 50 inch TV the diff between a DVD and a blu-ray is ALL too obvious. Its kinda like going to an optometrist after 10 years and getting new glasses...
As for games, LittleBigPlanet + family fun. ANyone of ANY age will enjoy it. I'm a 17 year old guy whose other fav game is MGS4, and I love LBP!!! Of course Metal Gear Solid 4 is in a league of its own. The way that story is told, and the revolutionary gameplay is just amazing.
we play Guitar Hero World Tour sometimes but the entire set is costly, also it could be played on other consoles as well so if you already have a Wii, you can just get the game on that console and it's cheaper as well.
Buzz is exclusive on the playstation and it is quite fun to play as well, when i bought mine i got the bundle that would include the wireless buzzers and it is a pretty good deal as well.
Little Big Planet is fun there is something for everybody, my wife's little sister spends a lot of time just customizing her sackboy/girl cause that's what she does... you can all play endless amount of levels and make some of them yourselves if you want.
and their singstar.
pls note that some of these games can be experienced on the PS2 as well.
a lot of platinum games which are very cheap are in the market already so you can buy ur kids rachet and clank and maybe drake and heavenly sword if they are a old enough for some bit of gun and sword play.
there are also a lot of games which u can use a Playstation Eye for which ur family can enjoy, some of them can be downloaded... which reminds me a lot of games can be downloaded which ur family can try like Calling All Cars, Pixel Junk, Super Rub a Dub, Everyday Shooter etc and they only cause a couple of pocket change.
Shatterdome is still quite regular
but i havent seen mister common sense for a couple weeks
u can't even afford ur own place...
just finish school first ok?
I have a Ps3 and an Xbox 360. Yes, I would admit that the Xbox 360 does currently have a more extensive game library and of course it has more exclusive games because it's been out longer.
Now, in my opinion I thought Halo 3 was a step back and in all honesty I found it quite boring. Saying that Metal Gear solid 4 wasn't perfect but was a fantasic game.
My Xbox 360 disk drive started to scratch my disks and has needed to go back to repair as did my original Xbox.
Saying that my Ps2 had disk read errors but i must say I bought my Ps3 at launch and it has never given me any problems what so ever. I'm a big street fighter Fan and i Could never use my Xbox 360 pad to play it, it has the worst D-pad on any Console to date, although i Prefer playing shooters on it rather than my Ps3 pad. Overall I've always loved the Playstation pad, starting from PS1
Both have Strenghs and both have weaknesses
phuck!! 30,000 games
who said ps3 has no games ;)
Of course you are waiting, what else do you have to do in life but wait for other people 's responses. Like I said BS, and now you want my PSN ID so you can send me the pictures? What, you don't know how to use image hosting. Real or fake? All you have to do is take pic of your items, have a piece of paper in each pic saying "Quixand haha at HIDEO", is it that hard for you to do? Of course it is cuz you are all talk. You're saying the same ***** over and over by telling me to ask other people. I don't need to talk to these guys, I'm talking directly to you, so man up.
Oh and yeah, as for the comment about using names as cover up... like Quixand is your real name, oh and also let's not forget madicemann!! Like that's your real name too. So the comment you made is also directed to you.... idiot.
i still see him around...
as well as chuckingspace... some others that i don't see here anymore like folding, man the king, vsions etc are in my PSN and others but most of them i only see in PSN that i've forgotten what names they used in QJ.
there is another one who i used to always team up with Shatterdome called Hellraiser... i don't see him around here anymore either.
online...
and way to go trying to save face for not wanting to be proven wrong.
as i said u want my pics then come and get em, you've got two ways to find me now...
here's the ball... it's your court.
as for my comment on the name, it's quite obvious that you are a *****head if you don't see the difference of my using Quixand/Madicemann to u using Hideo Kojima (very original if i might add).
i havent seen chuckingrocksat spaceships for ages and i think freeplay has been quite round here too
qj is losing its intellegent members
this site was better when it was pspupdates and was fairly unknown
anyhow i see youre australian, im west aussie
moving to perth next month around baywater area
which part you from
baywater-bayswater
quite-quiet
Why do put this on wii, 360 section. why not just get rid of sections for god sakes.
hell my cousin uses 360 more than his ps3.
maybe because Microsoft has great games but shoddy hardware?
I actually dont really care for ps3 games except MGS4 and oh wow blue ray!
probably the only reason ps3 good for is more media but less game content.
right smack in the middle of the city, a stone's throw away frm Central, i'm on George Street.
I have to admit i haven't been to WA and SA, but I've been to QLD and MEL a couple of times when i get a vacation but not long enough to be able to go somewhere else but within the country...
i've always wanted to go there, my wife has visited stayed in a hotel on St Georges Terrace for a couple of weeks but not me.
There you go again asking for my ID. What do you plan on doing? Hack my account. Just post it on here so that everyone can see it and prove those who don't believe you wrong. I don't why you are so chicken sh*t about posting your so called "collection", the only reason is that you don't have anything to back it up.
Again with the names, listen, I don't care what your name is because it has nothing to do with "uses the internet to make himself look better than he ever could in real life", it's what YOU do and how you act on the net, not what your name is.
So if all you are going to say is the same ***** over and over, then you're obviously a waste of time. So until you actually have that pic of your collection to share with the world, you just ain't worth talking to.
PS3 is just a DVD aka Blue Ray Player.
all its games SUUUUUUUUUCK expect MGS4
If you a media center hog, Go with a PS3
If you a game but dont give a f*ck about photos, music, and videos. (like me) go with a 360
Only thing wrong with my ps2 now days.
- My Fan always been louder than any ps2 and 360.
- Only play PS1 game one time. no longer works at all. hmmm
-Gameshark takes few trys to start.
but give micrsoft a break. This is their second gaming hardware. 3rd times a charm. like the PS3.
Ture!
You must live around near me. Around the Croydon/Kilsyth area ;)
But to settle "good games"
Just look at IGN's best of 2008.....
http://ps3.ign.com/articles/939/939461p1.html
and ur the one who are asking for it so if you want it go get it and if not then u ain't got balls to be proven wrong...
i'm not posting anything on public just to satisfy an idiot like you when i've got nothing to get in return anyway... u want it go get it, i've already told you how...
so unless u have balls enough to be proven wrong then u are the liar cause u'r too scared to find out the truth for urself.
u are the one hiding behind the internet not me, i've given u my details... don't want it then shut up, get some balls as i said you know where to find me... stop acting tough and just do it Hideo Kojima... u accuse me of being a liar well find out for urself and i'll prove it to you, you've been sidestepping it the whole day cause u know u don't know sh*t and that u opened ur big mouth too soon... now you don't know what to do cause somebody is actually calling ur bluff.
not in perth yet
mallowing out in kalgoorlie
im a geo
I got a PS2 SCPH-30001 R and it works fine, that is after my original one a week after launch broke. It did fall off a table though. Still worked after that but started deteriorating before that. If you don't believe me about the DRE on PS2, just google PS2 DRE
lab i work for is moving to perth next month (i smoke pot so labs are easier to get work...no drug tests)
i been doing analytical since i was 15 and 9 months old
i'm 31 now
think actlabs is moving to john st in bayswater
i specialise in leachwell and reading DIBK extractions on varian AAS
i had opportunity to learn XRF but didnt take it :(
thank you for advertising your life on a ps3 forum.
Also, I think you're an idiot for letting a drug addiction decide your job opportunities.
sony may deliver "quality" hardware...but how come im on my fifth psp and my second ps3 seeing as i had a Bluray Drive failure???
then again i had the same problem with my xbox's b4 i stopped bothering with the xbox altogether
look here, the ps3 and xbox360 are both great systems. but how'd you like to get free legit games for the two. we'll you can by sign up at prize rebel and earn points to get anything from games to prizes. want proof, sign up and receive 10 points free at the link.
http://www.prizerebel.com/index.php?r=813044
You certainly have an obsession with balls.
Hiding behind the internet? Looks who's talking: "i'm not posting anything on public". Yeah, good one!!!
"i've got nothing to get in return anyway"
Well apparently you want to prove me wrong, and yet you are too stupid to see that that is what you want.
How am I a liar? I told you to prove it and you said not unless I do something. That has nothing to do with being a liar, dumbass. I'm not the one saying I have things. I never said anything that would relate to me having to prove anything, its you. So calling me a liar because I called you one makes you stupid and very childish.
Wow, I'm surprised you didn't bring up the topic on names again, probably because I was right!!!
Fine, I'll agree with your terms. Message has been sent to you. You don't need to be added for you to reply.
no worries
personally i think if you put marijuana next to alcohol
you'll see marijuana is the lesser of the two evils
yet i wont lose my job if i'm an alcoholic
go phuck yourself
So how long is it going to take you to get the images from your friends so that the items add up? Don't forget to add a piece of paper with your name on it.
I love my PS3 and I love my Xbox 360. I often have to convince myself what system I want to turn on first because I usually just stick with that system until i'm done playing. I've had two 360s, not because one of them failed but because I wanted the elite model so I sold the original I bought on release day to a friend. I've had 3 PS3s (I'm not even kidding) and no, its not because they broke either. My first one I gave to my brother over seas and the second one did break but it was because my niece bumped into it and it fell off 3 feet. Not her fault and not sony's fault. I guess what I'm saying is, I like both systems enough to buy the hardware over and over again if needed.
Oh and even though I love playing games on the PS3.. right now.. its just a blue ray player for the dark knight! love that movie.
most 360 fanboys SAY they are looking for a reason to buy a PS3. I think YOU 360 FANBOYs cant find a good reason not to buy a PS3.
I have both systems the 360 elite and the metal gear solid special edition 80gig. I dont play games on my ps3 anymore because its not worth it right now. there are no games out right now that wow me enough to go buy at the store. If im going to buy a game im going to get my money'swort. All the 360 games have achievements meaning i can go back and replay the game to earn cool achievements which are viewed by my firends. A ps3 game all i do is play it finish it and of to gamestop to sell it. The only reason i got the metal gear solid edition was because it was backwards compatible with all my ps2 games that i love ex. kingdom hearts, star ocean,ZOE, devil may cry, god of war, killzone and many more. If all the systems have same game library then i can just buy the cheapest one right.... I mean what good exclusives are out right now that would convince me to buy it remember guys next year dont count thats next year im talking about right now!!!!!!
lol what ever sony. If you guys don't make a Price cut like a huge price right now the PS3 will always be last on the sale's list.
Just a few responses, because I felt this merited it:
I keep seeing people say, 'If you dont own a ps3 you can't talk'....How many of you people touting the superiority of the PS3 own a 360? Not many.
I keep hearing of all these great PS3 exclusives: Name em.
What I do know? PS3 lost FFXIII in the US because of the inferior user base. SE decided it'd be worth more money to them to port a game to a new console for the NA release. Coming from a usually miserly company like S-E, thats saying something.
http://www.vgchartz.com/
This really says what needs to be said regarding the market and popularity.
Microsoft made a mistake. That I will agree to. They tried a new design and it came out flawed. They've at least been trying to fix it.
I don't really care either way. I'm a gamer first and foremost. I get what I can and play whatever games strike my fancy. I just think people need to stop gloaming to their bias so damn staunchly. Who the hell cares what console it plays on. Is it good? Great. is it not so good? Sucks.
What do I play on 360?
Ace Combat, Fable 2, GoW, CoD(*), Left4Dead, Castle Crashers, FFXI, Mass Effect, Armored Core, Banjo & Kazooie, Bioshock(*), Burnout(*), Fallout(*), Lost Odyssey, Blue Dragon, Last Remnant,
PS3: MGS4, LBP, Assassin's Creed(*), Naruto Ninja Storm, folklore
The ones with the * are the ones I can recall being multi-platform off the top of my head.
(Wii is its own little beast, so I left it out of this.)
So far the PS3 has been... decent, but MGS4 and LBP didn't live up to the hype. Oddly, Folklore, Naruto and Warhawk are the reasons I enjoy the PS3 right now. (That and the Ad Hoc party stuff. Mm, Dissidia online.)
PS3 takes the cake hands down when it comes to machine quality, the PS3 is sleek and stylish, it's built tough, it's build to last, it's build with top notch technology, it's definitely the big cannon, but Microsoft has the games.
UNDENIABLY!
PS3 has a couple games coming and it's got few under its belt that can rival games like Gears or halo. (to name only a few)
Thing is, in the world of video games not always the best machine will win. Example?
Ps1 won over N64, PS2 won over Xbox, Snes won over Genesis (much better visuals on the genesis [initially!])
I can explain to you the current situation in a non biased way.
First Microsoft released their console 1 full year before Sony and Nintendo. They also used cheap parts (low production cost=low retail price) They also secured many exclusive deals, they also broke some Sony exclusivity; RE5, DMC4, FF13...etc. AND IMO the biggest advantage of all, Xbox Live, which is the undisputed champion when it comes to online play, it's a cheap, reliable and most convenient system, and it's super well integrated to the core of the xbox experience. All of this gave them their position as leader right now.(well deserved)
BUT! Many of these advantages are also factors that could potentially kill them in the long run as it lacks a built in HD reader, which gives more storage space (bigger games). Imagine if GTAIV had been a PS3 exclusive, I'm convinced the game would be better than it is right now. More music, more tv content, more missions, more voice overs, maybe it wouldn't be out now though, but I'm just thinking here, imagine PS3's position if it had GTA to itself.
Now comes the early release, YAY 1 year of sales before you even sell one ps3! YAY indeed, but it then comes with older tech, with more design flaws and with all the known XB360 issues.
Then, we have the models themselves, MS started with a 20GB hard drive disk, then came the 120 GB then the 60GB, some might think HDDs aren't a big issue, but with Xbox Live and all it's wonder a big HDD is a must for any serious gamer. If you get a Xb360 at launch you most definitely got a 20GB HDD which is now obselete (Rockband DLC anyone?)
Really, the situation here is what it is, MS leads, Nintendo follows. I can't say it leads because it's truly crap, they ruined so many good possibilities... take Zelda for example, imagine if Zelda was like Assassin's Creed (in thems of world and visuals), imagine if they made it as photo realistic, imagine if it had as much intensity [you can't deny the quality of AC, even with its repetitive gameplay, as big of a flaw it can be. Sony follows with slow sales but a definite plan and a good selection of games built by 1st parties.
Really, this generation brought the best and the worse, ON each consoles.
Nintendo whored... (screw you for becoming baby toy makers, still they made Mario Galaxy which is THE best Wii game, a good example of what Nintendo should always do!)
Microsoft rocketed in game quality... but buttsexed everyone (OMG Gears, Microsoft went to Japan anc came back with Capcom as a fierce ally, then charmed Square!)
Sony brain farted many times, they underestimated their competition, but they concentrate on their stuff and they deliver on their good games.
WOW! what a post!
hope some people read it, even if it's really far from the top...
Keep the console you like, and don't bash on others opinions.
Hey, being mature CAN be fun!
I always wanted a PS3, I thought the PS3 was top notch hardware, which dont get me wrong it is. But...I had to settle for a 360 because all my friends were begging me to go out and buy one. So I did. I've had mine for two years now and I have yet to have a single problem with it. I don't like the 360 because of Halo (which is not that great of a game really....) I like it because of the quality of games and the variety of games. To me....the 360 is like the new PS2 it has alot of great games and in many varieties. My cousin has a PS3 and I play with him alot and to me its not really what I expected it to be in terms of games. The new Home thing is really neat, but as other people have said before its more for entertainment like Blu Ray videos and such. When people say the 360 sucks because you have to pay for your online you really have to think about that. When you pay for your online (which 60 bucks a year isn't even that bad) it gives the people at MS a better incentive to create better software, like the regular Dashboard updates with sometimes great features, and better online games. For me when I play there is rarely any problems with the servers of games and if there are Microsoft fixes them pretty quickly. So as much as I wanted a PS3 and as much as I like it. I have to say the 360 is the better system gaming wise. They both have their pros and cons and I'm pretty sad the way the PS3 is turning out to be because its hardware itself should have had all the software developers making games for it left and right.
If your a gamer i mean a hardcore gamer just get an xbox360 elite. If you kinda wanna use it for movies get netflix and stream the thousands of tittles available. If you love HD graphics and blu ray the PS3 is the system for you voted number 1 by Cnet and many other home entertainment magazines just google best blu ray player and wham PS3. I love my PS3 cause its a blu ray player works perfect with my 120Hz samsung 1080p tv and yes i can a see a big difference with 120Hz you get a 3D effect. The only games worth playing on the PS3 in my opinion are Drakes furtune, Singstar, rachet and clank and my PS2 library of games with plenty of RPG's.
it's 9 am in Sydney now...
just sent it to you, look for the dominos voucher, took a pic of this forum page as well just so u know it's me.
tell me if you got it or not and if you didn't i'll resend it to you....
does this statement includes the psp 3000 and its screen?
Buzz and Guitar Here World tour is not in the shelf cause i like to keep the buzz game with the wireless buzzers for when i need to take it to some gathering and i put my guitar hero full set back in the box when not in use...
this may sound like an excuse but my Rachet and Clank, NBA2k8 (i've got the 2K9 in my shelf) and Smackdown vs Raw 08 (i've got 09 in my shelf) are with my brother and i since they are over a year old i don't miss them and have never yet asked for them back and besides the kid plays them.
with the pics i've already sent you it would amaze me if you still think i'm lying and i don't have those games i mentioned above.
arguments? contests?
u know where to find me.
Singstar... LOL
No seriously I don't care what your favorite game is on PS3.
120Hz 3d effect? WTH?
your foot won't taste so good in your mouth without it...
Just got them, yep you were telling the truth (I didn't count them, even though some were standard dvd cases, but whatever). I was wrong, not afraid to admit that.
has some dvds in it (box sets those that don't fit in my dvd rack) cause i don't have enough BDs to fill up both shelves yet...
not everybody lies on the internet.
Let's not make this personal, but are you really the famous Japenese game devoloper? I don't need proof, all I want to know is this...
Why the comments about not having a life, posting, being way more cool on the web, ect.
So, point being, we all love QJ, trash talking. We are all 'nerds'.
PS PS3 and Xbox 360 have almost identical libraries. Halo 3 sucked. How is Fable 2 and Gears 2? If I had enouph cash, I'd buy back my 3*****ty. PS3 is a better machine.
...in the 360-fanboy posts trying to backpeddle out of the "hardware quality" comparison. I mean, is there really *ANY* defense that can be made (whatsoever) for Microsoft's amazingly POOR piece of rushed hardware? --We're talking about the hardware with a WiFi component (when first released to WalMart stores) interfered with POS register systems. Hardware that STILL appears to have that same wireless transmitter that has been found to interfere with a College campus' wiFi network. --Hardware notorious for RROD, disc drive failures, and a HONKING LOUD FAN. --A fan which, even after minor hardware redesign (to stem the bleeding of the 30%? failure rate) still is HONKING LOUD ... even on the expensive "Elite" model. THERE IS NO COMPARISON. I have both 360 and PS3. The 360 usually sits dormant, unless maybe I want to try out a demo that's not on PSN, or rent an HD download that's not on PSN. --It's the biggest red herring and "urban legend" (fostered by the 360 Fanboys of the World) that PS3 has no good games .......this, from a group of people who hold-up Halo 3 as some genre-redefining piece of art that no other game in the world could ever touch. On a final note: one can also not diminish the incredible VALUE of FREE ONLINE. I have 3 PS3's for LAN game nights. Not only do I *NOT* need to shell-out $150 for Gold memberships (as I would have to if it were 3 360's), but I can also take that same single purchase of Crash Commando (be it $9.99 in the States, or $12.99 in Europe) and install and use it simultaneously on all 3 consoles. ---Try that with the "DRM Kings" and "Nickle-and-Dime Masters" at Microsoft. :-O
and to racing59pinto,
if you want a good reason for a PS3, why don't you look at the fact that from the start, the PS3 has been wireless, (apart from the 20gig) had HDMI, had a hard drive built in(unlike another rival console), and never have to buy batteries for the controllers.........ever.
at least you didn't have to wait for these things to be put in internaly.
yeah i know it did'nt have a great start, but it's a LOT better now. anyone who says different, is speaking through their rear hole.
i must be a cheapskate then,
24 ps3 games and 10 blurays
but then, its only a few days to xmas. lol!
Because I got my PSP a week after launch, and other then one dead pixel, it's worked perfectly ever since. It has be dropped from 2-3 feet at least 6 times and 3-5 feet 3 times, and I've sat on it countless times (forgot it was in my back pocket when I sit down on bus)....works great...
1gen xbox, bought one at launch as well, still works (heavly mod'd, opened many times), xbox 360, mine died after 2 years(never opened). So ya.....I think you have to go by overall statistics, not personal experience as far as system quality goes.
Games, Well IGN did an article that averaged out scores of games on the 3 consoles for 2008 (their scores obviously, but IGN is generally fair) and PS3 scored Highest in everything, 360 2nd and of course Wii had the most worst games....So I don't think it's valid to say PS3 has worse games, maybe a few less, but they are of overall better quality as well.
Binary, the 360 is just as much of a media center as the PS3
PS3 didn't lose FF13, it went multiplatform. It had nothing to do with the PS3s user base. Having the game made for both systems increases their chances to earn higher profits, which is why Bioschock, lost planet and ninja gaiden were ported to the PS3.
has not bee a bad year for the PS3, it's been quite good for games. I too have close to 30 games for my PS3, all high scoring on the metacritic ratings (90% of them score above 80 - none below 70). There could be more titles in my collection but games like Far Cry 2, Fallout 3 and the new PoP have no interest for me.
@ Tyrant156
Sure the 360 has some media capabilities but I (as a media type of person) prefer being able to stick over 280GB worth of HD films on the internal HDD (500GB) without having to rely on external drives or streaming from a PC. Being able to copy music from the PC is also great, instead of having to rip from a CD which I may or may not own.
The media capabilities of the 360 are a not as extensive as as the PS3's.