Rumor: Killzone 3, Resistance 3, World at War 2 coming in 2010 |
Ó
PlayStation: The Official Magazine. How big? Try Killzone 3 big, with a dash of Resistance 3 and a side helping of World at War 2.
The next entry in the Killzone franchise is being pegged by the magazine as one of its "secret games of 2010". Here's what the blurb in the advance December 2009 issue apparently said:
Insider slips reveal three big names you can already pencil for the next year. Killzone 3 is reportedly deep in development, Insomniac%u2019s Full Moon Show podcast hints at a project we can only conclude is Resistance 3, and a Treyarch employee%u2019s online mentions a Call of Duty: World at World sequel.
So first Resistance 3 and now Killzone 3? And World at War 2 (which isn't that surprising considering Activision's push for yearly CoD releases)? Wow, shooter fans are going to have a field day next year if this proves to be true.
Related articles:
Word is that there's a huge rumor running around in the pages of Spotted: Resistance 3 billboarded- Guerrilla Games already working on Killzone 3, Liberation 2?
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
Only one of those will come out on PC.
:(
fact is the ps3 is a better bang for your buck, you'd pay like 300 for a moderately good card on PC that you'll need to Cross Fire or SLI in the future with another 300+ dollar card. I'd rather game on a console nowadays, unless they start doing the crap they did last gen and make inferior console versions.
glad i own a ps3 ^_^
This is exactly why I bought a PS3. Technology is accelerating at an ever increasing rate, and by the time you buy a new PC, a new piece of technology becomes available , rendering your PC obsolete. The only way to have a reliable platform is console gaming, then at least you get a few years, or maybe 10 out of it before upgrading to the next console. You also get games that you don't find on PC, such as Tekken, Little Big Planet, and stuff. Anyway, this is great news, 3 amazing shooters coming, how many are on PS3? All of them.
Resistance 3: Bring back split screen story Co-op with the same AI as the 1st game. 2nd game was too easy.
Killzone 3: Add more content to Single Player mode for re-playability. Things such as weapon select and cheats would be cool. Make running more realistic. You can't turn that well when running in K2. Split screen story co-op is a necessity now-a-days.
World at War 2: Needs to not exist unless it's CoD4 quality.
As bad as KZ2 did why would they think about KZ3? PS3 fans ripped it to shreds it was a blood bath in a game that was considered to be a flag ship title. WAW 2? Hahaha. Resistance 3? pfft...yea were excited alright. Only noobs compare PS3 to PC, if you knew something about PC's and hardware the PC has the advantage and ever growing and rapidly pacing increase in power not the consoles, consoles remain the same for years and years and consoles are for the gamers on a budget but the PS3 will never see anything better than uncharted 2 and xbox will never see anything better than gears of war which is very poor.
My 360 sits hardly touched, my ps3 sits untouched at all before and after UC2 even, very mediocre console game.
so besides MAG we also have these!
From the looks of it. Playstation magazine is well informed. I was sure about WaW2 as they are copying Infinity's MW2 :|.
Resistance 3 is a defo as its now a money cow, just milk away :D. But KZ3 wasn't thinking about that.
But i think all of them should come true by 2012 (KZ3 takes time to make e.g. 2 years more :D)
Your living in the past. Look on the nVidia website and see if you can find your graphics card on there. Then go to the Sony site and see if the PS3 is still there. Should make my point clear.
True That!
@h1web
I remember when people said that resistance 1 was the best looking game, then mgs4, then KZ2, and now UC2, they just get better and better don't they, hmmmm...
WHAT HE SAID
For 300 you can't get a decent PC to run HL2, the overall cost of a PC will be upwards of 1,500, to play a 40-50 dollar game, meanwhile you pay 300 for a PS3/Xbox 360, ok so you get gipped on the game an extra 10, but it is GUARANTEED to work when you open it, and the fact you don't have to wait 20 min- 1 hr to install is awesome.
Hey your opinion, sits and dies with your comment that uncharted is a mediocre game...you may not love it, may not even like it (how in the world!GOD!...but ok...)but mediocre? Mediocre in here just your opinion...
World at War 2....
this one was obvious....
Resistance 3...
only a matter of time.... + http://shortr.de/e40tixi
Killzone 3....
I expected this not that early, actually I thought it would come to PS4....
oh
what could they possibly put in? more ww2 battles?
W@W2
Well, I am not really surprised
W@W 2 is expected
Resistance 3 had earlier rumors, which involved a movie going to be released in 2011 with a Resistance 3 billboard with the New York Skyline etched in the name.
Killzone 3 wasn't much of a surprise but I was not expecting the release that early.
Take a look at fallout 3 360 vs ps3 vs PC
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/fallout-3-triple-format-face-off-article
Go to the 3rd page for the 720p comparison gallery.
The PC definitely looks better, but only by a tiny bit, not enough to warrant the $1500+ PC they needed to run it on.
I too will stick to console gaming, it's overall a better experience in my mind.....not to mention laying on the couch and playing on a big screen is priceless....
I have a PS3. In fact, I have a PS3 Slim that I bought to replace the 40Gig PS3 that got stolen 2 years ago. And the only games I play on it are the few RPGs that simply will never come out on any other platform, like Disgaea 3 and Valkyria Chronicles.
I could care less about any FPS on the PS3, but not by much. I've tried time and again to give them a chance, but without the keyboard and mouse support, I can't aim worth crap.
However, I can build a 500-600 dollar computer that can play all the new games at higher than console settings, don't have to pay for general online play (Xbox360 anybody?), have the option to use either M/K OR controller in-game (none of the consoles have it), can do multitudes of other stuff easily (such as documents, schoolwork, programming, video/music), and looks however I wanted it to (custom and cheap cases are easy to come by).
If you want to talk about technology being obsolete... well, the consoles are already far behind and have been. At least on the PC you have the option to make it run better and look better if you want. And you don't have to buy the best card there is. The 5750 can play Batman at 2560x1600 at 30frames. Guess how much it is? $130. And it's a NEW card, the LOWEST end new card. Needless to say, there are even cheaper cards that will give you comparable to better results than consoles.
But none of that was criticism of the actual games. I'm sure they're fun to play for people that can put up with the controller. Unfortunately, I'm just not one of those people.
of Killzone 3 being released in 2010. Resistance 3 I can see coming out in November 2010 but if KZ3 was ready, Sony would delay it until 2011 so the two games don't compete against each other.
What has the gaming community come to? I'm so tired of seeing 'rumours'!
Seriously.. any idiot looking for a bit of internet spotlight can pull something ridiculous or obvious out of their ass and call it a rumour.
I mean... hasn't Cross game chat been 'rumoured' to be implimented into the PS3 since FW 2.30/2.40?
I know this 'rumour' comes from PSM but still... its another god damn rumour isn't it?
Killzone 3? In 2010? Seriously...?? KZ2 took years to develop! Even granted that they can slash the development time of a new title now from working on KZ2, it still doesn't justify a 2010 release window. Sure theres a chance KZ3 might be ANNOUNCED in 2010 but certainly not released.
Resistance 3 is a given. The time inbetween the development and release of the previous title fits nicely. We'll definately see some announcement for that in 2010. I'm looking forward to this particularly.
"
I could care less about any FPS on the PS3"
^^
Its "couldn't care less"
how can so many people be dumb enough to make that stupid mistake, it doesn't even make sense.
that that is EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT.
Here is my sentence, if you had deemed to actually read the whole line:
"I could care less about any FPS on the PS3, BUT NOT BY MUCH."
Obviously I DO care a little about FPS's on the PS3, as I'm posting about it. I just don't like being forced to play them with a controller.
So STFU, and go correct somebody who actually made a mistake.
I get voted down for having an opinion on console FPS and defending my position, and for defending my own grammar, while the guy who incorrectly "corrected" me gets voted up?
Heck, I didn't even say the games OR controllers were bad, I just said I didn't like using a controller, and compared the PS3/Xbox360 to the PC.
You people are harsh.
Go onto the ATi site and see if your graphics card is still there. Then go to the Sony site and see if the PS3 is still there. Should make things clear.
"As bad as KZ2 did"
Couldn't bother to read past this. The game has sold something like 2 million units to date. That isn't a failure by any stretch of the word. Some games don't even break 1 million or even 500k sometimes. They made huge profits with KZ2 and the expansion packs that also did very well. A sequel is well warranted.
Go back to your master pc gaming race you pompous ass.
A new PC component is released every 2 months. Enabling devs to make games which outclass PC's 3 months back. For a computer a person can be up-to-date for 3 weeks max. For a console its 5-8 years. A console cannot be upgraded and devs cannot code anything outside of the consoles ability.
Its fairer than PC gaming. Imagine running crysis on a PC which was released at the same time of the game release, you would hardly get 30Fps. Now though onboard graphics can probably outrun that.
Would you spend 500-600 dollars every 3 weeks to play one game? If you can tell me where you live, ill take your old computer.
Dude just go to sleep.
For rumoured Sony projects, the rumour is usually true. And then when asked about this rumour they say and i quote "We do not comment on rumours or speculation".
First off, guess what my card is? It's Nvidia. Specifically, an 8800GT. Don't assume, it makes an *** out of you and me.
Second off, did you know I bought my card 2 years ago? Did you know that Nvidia supports (or at least has) drivers for cards all the way back to the Geforce 4 MX? ATI has stuff all the way back to its Rage cards in legacy drivers.
Or were you talking about buying new cards? Newegg has Geforce 2 cards for sale and Radeon 7000 cards for sale. No, Nvidia and ATI don't market those cards anymore, they're old and they've moved on (you know, sorta like Sony doesn't market the PS1 and to an extent, the PS2 anymore). On Nvidia's site, you can still compare a few 8000 series cards to see what you need. Didn't bother to check ATI's site extensively.
Fairness? You're talking about the console being fair? So, my 2-year-old video card (which admittedly came out about a year after the PS3) that can WAY outperform the console is considered "unfair?" I'm running just about all games except crysis at highest settings with at least 2x AA at 1920x1200, and that's unfair? Sure, it's a little bit more money than a console... but you get so much more in my opinion.
Console games this generation are apparently stuck at an internal resolution of 1280x720, with no or limited AA, no options on controls, no options on internet gameplay, and very few if any options on modding. You call THAT fair?
Actually, one redeeming quality of the consoles is that games are actually having to be optimized better, meaning older hardware CAN run newer games at acceptable framerates and resolutions.
Now, just to make sure everyone understands me, I DON'T HATE THE PS3. I'm one of those people that just can't play FPS's on a controller. It's not usually the games fault, it's simply a limitation in my own motor capacity and the console's options. So my consoles are almost exclusively RPGs and 3rd person action/platforming games. Plus, my PS3 is a heck of a lot more portable than lugging around my computer tower and monitor everywhere (heh, the PS3 is portable).
Everything I said here is a mashup of facts (dates, video settings, prices) and opinion (this one's better, no this one.)