Only one of those will come out on PC.



:(

glad i own a ps3 ^_^

Resistance 3: Bring back split screen story Co-op with the same AI as the 1st game. 2nd game was too easy.



Killzone 3: Add more content to Single Player mode for re-playability. Things such as weapon select and cheats would be cool. Make running more realistic. You can't turn that well when running in K2. Split screen story co-op is a necessity now-a-days.



World at War 2: Needs to not exist unless it's CoD4 quality.

so besides MAG we also have these!

Your living in the past. Look on the nVidia website and see if you can find your graphics card on there. Then go to the Sony site and see if the PS3 is still there. Should make my point clear.

@h1web



I remember when people said that resistance 1 was the best looking game, then mgs4, then KZ2, and now UC2, they just get better and better don't they, hmmmm...

For 300 you can't get a decent PC to run HL2, the overall cost of a PC will be upwards of 1,500, to play a 40-50 dollar game, meanwhile you pay 300 for a PS3/Xbox 360, ok so you get gipped on the game an extra 10, but it is GUARANTEED to work when you open it, and the fact you don't have to wait 20 min- 1 hr to install is awesome.

World at War 2....

this one was obvious....



Resistance 3...

only a matter of time.... + http://shortr.de/e40tixi



Killzone 3....

I expected this not that early, actually I thought it would come to PS4....

what could they possibly put in? more ww2 battles?

Well, I am not really surprised



W@W 2 is expected



Resistance 3 had earlier rumors, which involved a movie going to be released in 2011 with a Resistance 3 billboard with the New York Skyline etched in the name.



Killzone 3 wasn't much of a surprise but I was not expecting the release that early.

I have a PS3. In fact, I have a PS3 Slim that I bought to replace the 40Gig PS3 that got stolen 2 years ago. And the only games I play on it are the few RPGs that simply will never come out on any other platform, like Disgaea 3 and Valkyria Chronicles.



I could care less about any FPS on the PS3, but not by much. I've tried time and again to give them a chance, but without the keyboard and mouse support, I can't aim worth crap.



However, I can build a 500-600 dollar computer that can play all the new games at higher than console settings, don't have to pay for general online play (Xbox360 anybody?), have the option to use either M/K OR controller in-game (none of the consoles have it), can do multitudes of other stuff easily (such as documents, schoolwork, programming, video/music), and looks however I wanted it to (custom and cheap cases are easy to come by).



If you want to talk about technology being obsolete... well, the consoles are already far behind and have been. At least on the PC you have the option to make it run better and look better if you want. And you don't have to buy the best card there is. The 5750 can play Batman at 2560x1600 at 30frames. Guess how much it is? $130. And it's a NEW card, the LOWEST end new card. Needless to say, there are even cheaper cards that will give you comparable to better results than consoles.



But none of that was criticism of the actual games. I'm sure they're fun to play for people that can put up with the controller. Unfortunately, I'm just not one of those people.

What has the gaming community come to? I'm so tired of seeing 'rumours'!



Seriously.. any idiot looking for a bit of internet spotlight can pull something ridiculous or obvious out of their ass and call it a rumour.

I mean... hasn't Cross game chat been 'rumoured' to be implimented into the PS3 since FW 2.30/2.40?

I know this 'rumour' comes from PSM but still... its another god damn rumour isn't it?



Killzone 3? In 2010? Seriously...?? KZ2 took years to develop! Even granted that they can slash the development time of a new title now from working on KZ2, it still doesn't justify a 2010 release window. Sure theres a chance KZ3 might be ANNOUNCED in 2010 but certainly not released.



Resistance 3 is a given. The time inbetween the development and release of the previous title fits nicely. We'll definately see some announcement for that in 2010. I'm looking forward to this particularly.

that that is EXACTLY WHAT I MEANT.



Here is my sentence, if you had deemed to actually read the whole line:



"I could care less about any FPS on the PS3, BUT NOT BY MUCH."



Obviously I DO care a little about FPS's on the PS3, as I'm posting about it. I just don't like being forced to play them with a controller.



So STFU, and go correct somebody who actually made a mistake.

Go onto the ATi site and see if your graphics card is still there. Then go to the Sony site and see if the PS3 is still there. Should make things clear.

A new PC component is released every 2 months. Enabling devs to make games which outclass PC's 3 months back. For a computer a person can be up-to-date for 3 weeks max. For a console its 5-8 years. A console cannot be upgraded and devs cannot code anything outside of the consoles ability.



Its fairer than PC gaming. Imagine running crysis on a PC which was released at the same time of the game release, you would hardly get 30Fps. Now though onboard graphics can probably outrun that.



Would you spend 500-600 dollars every 3 weeks to play one game? If you can tell me where you live, ill take your old computer.



Dude just go to sleep.

First off, guess what my card is? It's Nvidia. Specifically, an 8800GT. Don't assume, it makes an *** out of you and me.



Second off, did you know I bought my card 2 years ago? Did you know that Nvidia supports (or at least has) drivers for cards all the way back to the Geforce 4 MX? ATI has stuff all the way back to its Rage cards in legacy drivers.



Or were you talking about buying new cards? Newegg has Geforce 2 cards for sale and Radeon 7000 cards for sale. No, Nvidia and ATI don't market those cards anymore, they're old and they've moved on (you know, sorta like Sony doesn't market the PS1 and to an extent, the PS2 anymore). On Nvidia's site, you can still compare a few 8000 series cards to see what you need. Didn't bother to check ATI's site extensively.



Fairness? You're talking about the console being fair? So, my 2-year-old video card (which admittedly came out about a year after the PS3) that can WAY outperform the console is considered "unfair?" I'm running just about all games except crysis at highest settings with at least 2x AA at 1920x1200, and that's unfair? Sure, it's a little bit more money than a console... but you get so much more in my opinion.



Console games this generation are apparently stuck at an internal resolution of 1280x720, with no or limited AA, no options on controls, no options on internet gameplay, and very few if any options on modding. You call THAT fair?



Actually, one redeeming quality of the consoles is that games are actually having to be optimized better, meaning older hardware CAN run newer games at acceptable framerates and resolutions.



Now, just to make sure everyone understands me, I DON'T HATE THE PS3. I'm one of those people that just can't play FPS's on a controller. It's not usually the games fault, it's simply a limitation in my own motor capacity and the console's options. So my consoles are almost exclusively RPGs and 3rd person action/platforming games. Plus, my PS3 is a heck of a lot more portable than lugging around my computer tower and monitor everywhere (heh, the PS3 is portable).



Everything I said here is a mashup of facts (dates, video settings, prices) and opinion (this one's better, no this one.)