Now what Nintendo fanboys?! Who stole who?! Speak louder I can't hear you!

This article rocks for the sole reason that it has an old ZDtv clip with Kate Botello and Adam Sessler(with hair)

Sony has had that SAME unoriginal design for a controller for 3 generations now. The boomerang controller was stupid looking, but hell, at least it was a change. When i saw that they reverted AGAIN back to their old controller, i was shocked. And about the motion thing, no one copied anyone, but it "could" have been realized by Sony, that it might just be the right time for people to accept this as a standard in controllers. I am not a "fanboy" of any of these systems, hell, when/if the price goes down in PS3's, i'll probably buy one regardless of the controller. The controller should be treated like a pet peeve, not the "ALMIGHTY DECISION" on whether or not to buy the system itself. If i were you, i'd wait for that price drop too.

if you think about it, this controller will fail again. There's a reason why it didnt catch on back in 1999 besides being from 3rd party. Who copied who? doesnt even matter now Sony fanboys. The real question here: is PS3 going to succeed with that controller? Once people realize that the tilt function is really limiting, why would they want spend $600 when Nintendo's controller (and system)is cheaper AND can do so much more?

sony announced it in 2003 and they have a patten so....

Microsoft and Sony had the idea before Nintendo...



Sony had a patent 4 years ago... And the controller was the 'original' idea for the PS2's Dual Shock 2 Controller...



So nintendo can go eat *****... stupid fools...



They need to get over it.. there is totally different technologies involved in the Wiimote and the Dual Shock 3.

now of course you are all forgetting the fact this this is third party and sony could never come up with something as smart as this because they are uninnovitive.



also, this is so old, nintendo doesnt look at other companies ***** for ideas, they come up with their own, and it wasnt copied, although it may seem, they never knew about the origional idea.





also, the last post really makes me sad and shows the stupidity of fanboys, you sir are clearly an idiot because the controller actually CAN do more than the dual shock, everything you mentioned is console hardware related, not freaking dual shock hardware related. also, the motion sensing will be not be utilized very much, or every used for a full game, maybe mini games, and the sad fact also that the ds3 controller wont even have rumble. the wiimote will have rumble, more motion sensing abilities, a speaker to add more immersion so like you can hear the ball or whatever hit your racket or whatever right up close, and also, nobody needs all that other crap sony has put into the ps3. ITS A GAMING CONSOLE NOT A ****** MULTIMEDIA PLAYER. SONY, GET OVER YOUR SELF. STOP MAKING CRAPPY CONSOLES AND GAMES.





lol



kthxbai

Ok. Here's the deal. Everyone says how Sony patented it a long time ago, well Nintendo patented it even longer ago.



Benchmark: Fanboys: 0 Me: 1



Nintendo is still innovative. All these other controllers are basically just tilt (Kind of like Warioware Twisted, shame on you Nintendo), with the motion sensor stuck on the front of them, a la PS3. These kind of suck, which is why the PS3 answer to motion sensor is:

A) More of a takeoff on the Wavebird and PC than the Wii

B) Gimmicky



Benchmark: Fanboys: 0 Me: 3



Nintendo on the other hand has completely redesigned the motion sensor idea (making it of cetral focus instead of abitrarily sticking it on), so really it's not fair to say that Nintendo is copying anyone. I'm not a huge fan of Nintendo, if fact I would say I'm more of a PS fan than Nintendo, but these are all just undeniable proofs. You disappointed me, Sony. I'm going to go cry now.



Final Benchmark: Fanboys: 0 Me: 4

Fine development companies that suck now: 3

Who cares e3 is over its not like nintendo and sony will fight over this and have a war. The dualshock and wii are completely different. and if we find about the pelican dualshock now, why are people accusing nintendo that they stole it. thay most likely never knew about the pelican until probably now. The wiimote imo is very creative making the possibilities almost limitless for gameplay. It makes me mad at both nintendo and sony fanboys going at each other just to say whos copying who. Lets just give up the copying with sony and nintendo and focus on the real problem here. The price of the ps3

"They help us be more patinate about gameing and keeps the interests in them alive."

They also help put you one step farther from ever getting laid.

Fanboys fighting Fanboys....

Cant we all just get along......

Every console is going to have its own great exclusive games.

Some may be more innovative than others, but each console will have its own great games...



360 - Gears of War....Halo3

PS3 - Metal Gear Solid 4....Grand Turismo

Wii - Smash Bros Brawl....Zelda-Twilight Princess



The times of one completely dominate company is in the past.

Embrace the future, even better things are yet to come.

Stop playing dumb Sony fangirls, I have a PS2 and PSone and I know Sony's ideas all came from Nintendo. Remember Rumble Feature anyone? (copied from nintendo,) (Yes, Nintendo was first) Wait, lets compare the PS12&3 controller to SNES controller. (Wait, not a whole copied controller because they added shapes on the buttons and added extra shoulder buttons) Hold On, Nintendo 64 come's to the seen with a Analog joystick and somehow Sony gets it too. (Dual Shock 1&2) Then out comes the Wavebird wireless controller (Nintedno too by the way) and now PS3 and Xbox 360 have it. PS3 is now also coping Xbox live online service.

Sony always copies, to steal the thunder away from another system to make you buy their system. Because if their system has the best of both worlds (Xbox360 & Nintendo Wii), you'll buy their system.

I believe its how they make alot of money.

The way I see it, Sony should keep "copying" Nintendo. It's just sweet, sweet payback for that whole SNES CD scenario. Bottom line, what goes around, comes around.

lol im not a fanboy to anything yea gears of war n halo looks hot but how does mgs4 look boring?? thats the most xbox fanboy comment ive ever heard lol

who cares if sony copies other companies/consoles (apart from the other companies lol) it just makes it better 4 us because we get the best bits from each console without having to buy them. so i say rok on sony and ps3! and who is adam sessler?

What are you Nintendo fanboys doing on a PS3 site anyways? LOL...I suppose it takes people of your guys' lowliness to come and flame these PS fanboys. ^_^ My my my...

Whoever makes it in the end we all have the great features so what does it matter who akes the idea?



Oh, and for the "i cant think of anything we copied off of Nintendo" How about joysticks, rumble, saving and the playstation itself. (Nintendos idea at first, they just didn't want to keep making it, Sony were hired by Nintendo to develop it for the 64 and decided to take the idea and make their own consoles since theyd mde almost all of it already.)



They were all taken from Nintendo, but now every console has them, we all benefit from Nintendos ideas so what does it matter that Nintendo made them first?



(oh, and Nintendo fanboys are on here because its also on qj.net front page, not just ps3updates...)

Listen: Everything, from ducks to Formula1 Cars to the Playstation 3 itself, are just enhanced or different versions of something that already existed. The creation of something completely new... It doesn't happen too often. It only happened a few times during the last century.



Would you say that they should never have made the arcade machines because they copied the world's first electronic game, pong? Would you prefer that noone made a RTS after Dune II? Do you have any idea how identic things are?



Talking about copying is completely foolish in itself. In order for something new to survive, it must have an advantage.



We're talking evolution here. When something new and better arrives, it sets higher standards for the competition. No matter what happens, motion sensors will be part of the new standards in the console gaming industry. All the next-next-generation consoles would have had it anyway.



#41, Sony was hired by Nintendo to develop a Compact-Disc player and hardware enhancement for the SNES called the Playstation. But soon, Nintendo abandoned the project, and Sony were left with a half-finished console. Rather than scrapping the entire project(which had obviously cost them a lot of cash), they decided to keep working and soon released a complete stand-alone console.



Actually, PC gamepads and joysticks(Micro soft) were the first to develop most controller features, like vibration and the joystick itself(-->analog stick). What Sony did was making vibration a standard feature which everyone had.



When the next-next-gen computers and consoles arrive with Blu-Ray Roms and RW's, will you complain about them copying the PS3?



What I'm trying to convince you to stop saying that Sony are not copying the Wii remote. If my logics are not enough, I happen to have the link to the PS3 controller's motion sensors in the Patent list:



http://v3.espacenet.com/textdoc?DB=EPODOC&IDX=JP11099284&F=0



As you see it was put there in 1999. It's a hard fact.

You guys need to grow up!!!!



Sony is only one who is very mean and very ***** because they tell any companies not to development 2-D ?! Thats not their *****ing decision! And I am happy that it is very expensive and they wants our cash to go waste for this!



I am smarter and wiser to buy cheaper and worth system. I am moving on to Wii. Sony, go ***** yourself you ***** bastard!!!!!

The controller wasn't even made by sony. Man you guys are idiots.

nocomment

Just to clear something up. Wii's controller can do tilt sensing too, it does detect any kind of movement you make. So you could also make flight combat games.



The whole "problem" isn't the fact that Sony included a tilt sensor on the DS3; it's the fact that the intention to why they included it is so lame. Sony just wanted to hurt Nintendo by telling their fans that the DS3 has the same abilities as the Wii controller. Which many uninformed people could take as a fact. Sony doesn't know the definitions of honor and respect.



As for Microsoft. I just love that they're not losing their time by bashing or worrying about other consoles too much. That is why Microsoft will succeed with the 360. Sony will fall back to second or, dare I say, third place. Nintendo has a chance on regaining their throne IF they polish their technology and people are open to their new way of playing games.

stupid sony fan-lovemelongtime-boy-mother*****ers, read some background history before making dumbfounded comments whith your pre-adolescent blather. youd be suprised how much a little research and some common logic would get you.....but thena again what to expect from little kiddies who find it way cool to blow the crap out of things on screen ;)

Stolen from another forum

--------------

Whos copying who?



One word.



"Powerglove".



Tech isnt all the same, however the basic idea was there, and as far as I know, Nintendo was the first to actually try and sell it.



Bah..



Like there should be any question here.

-------------

sony... Nintendo... Doesnt the games matter!? If one console is more fun to play than the other, I'd go for the one of the fun factor.



I'm both a Sony and Nintendo (not Microsoft though) fanboy, so I'm not picking any side. I'm just hear to say HUT THE ***** UP! Instead of insulting with bad internet grammer showing yiou truely have no *****ing life than to make others feel as though they should put put a bullet in their heads, though most probably should.



The truth is there was no copying. Sure, Nintendo had the pointer like function, but didnt reveal that the Numchuck has motion sensor until this E3, thus it was more of a turn of event. What next? Are the Nintendo fans gonna say that Sony copied DVD players or Gaming for being a game console developer? Or will Sony fans start flaming about Nintendo Wii having DVD player options?



We can keep arguing about who stole what, but why the ***** do so? No the facts and dont feel like you have to whipe the companies' asses, as they can do so themselves. If they havent yet, obviously they dont want to!



Now, how about you all stop *****ing *****ing and just choose the console you like best and not try to put the other company down.

Oh come on what are you all figthing for. Certainly the Wii has a awesome and interesting controller. Its true it surpasses ps3's controller. But are you able to play Wii in the same graphics as the PS3? Does Wii has a blu ray player or something like that? conclusion: Wii is just a complement to the other consoles. People who want to have fun by moving around a controller will pick up the Wii. People who want high quality excellent gaming will either pick a ps3 or a 360. Hell stop fighting and just buy them all! This fights ocur because people can't get them all and fight about how theirs is the best to try and feel they've bought the right machine. Don't fight just enjoy. Don't hate and be friends. This is why real wars ocur because people want to prove something better and just can't get along.

wow your full of SH*T, you messed up in your delusion

heres how

1a) Nintendo treated any third party developer/comp like crap since the NES day, guess what third party developers did to make games? they hacked the NES.

1b) On the SNES nintendo let them make games but took over on all says and treated them like crap.

1c) they wanted to battle sega saturan, made a deal with sony and while everything was contracted found someone to do it cheaper and broke the contract, thus Playstion was born. If this didnt happen guess what? Thrid party devs would still be treated like crap.

2) Yes both of them are arrogant bast**ds, but Nintendo has done the most damage, nostalgia aside, their evil doings are on par with M$'s faulty software and hardware.

3)Wii is geared to general non gaming populace while ps3 is for gamers, 360 americanized gamers that like thier american pride and to shoot things.



My two cents.

Nintendo is trying to redeem itself by doing 3, sony is pushing new hardware to give people the most in the future, they always have. Beta-max? quality was gorgeous for magnetic tape mediums, badly named, lost to lower quality vhs. UMD's? great idea, wrong medium. Should ahve been geared towards music and made more periphs to go with it (would have solved music pirating pretty well for a bit), DVD's? Success, eccellerated the immersion rate enormously. Blu-ray? 25-50gb disc, content value is astounding, porn industry is swearing by it, same with alot of major motion picture companies(major ity of them i may add). I love nintendos wii concept but i also see alot more limitations to the gaming experience than conventional controlers right now. Give me a wii and some VR with some better variaty;and ill cream my pants. But for now without VR im getting me a ps3, i want my variaty, and my brew of coffee(the style of games i like). No matter the price, and yes im poor but ill live... thats what ramen is for mofo's

oh how bout the game gear with its analog brightness control? dont forget where it was originally copied from

when the new PSP2 comes out with touchscreen, then what do sony useless fanboy tools have to say?



First you fanboys say its gimmicky! now look, DS is straight whoopin that ass.



now look at Wii's controller. Almost every sony and MS fanboy said its gimmicky! now look. Sony just had to implement some kind of inferior motion detection from Pelican.



Rumble. shoulder buttons, analog, motion detection, and eventually TOUCHSCREEN for their next portable. Why do fanboys insist on defending Sony? Why? they're not paying you $hit. You're paying them.



The proof is there. Just stop and enjoy the games for phucks sake! Don't even think about defending SONY when the touchscreen is announced down the line.

it started with the atari's motion sensoring controler for the 2600, so nintendo doesnt have sh** to dreams. They took it off of atari. So how bout you get your facts straight as well. Nintendo copied Atari, Nintendo implemented it with wii, people said the boomerang controler sucked, sony went back to the ds design, modded it, people liked the wiiremote enough for sony to hear enough people thinking it would work so they took the original concept for the ps2 controller and put in the motion sensor. is it so much copying or is it really sony listening to your whinny as**s to try and give you what you want while pushing new hardware formats?

now how can you look at the wiimote and say it looks like tiltforce 2? nintendo anounce their controler before sony but the wiimote looks like tiltforce 2? duelshock 3 (is that the name?) on the other hand had the idea right infrount of there noses but they dicieded to leave the 3rd partys to themselfs, until now, now that they hear about the wiimote, there scared that they will lose pertential buyers, so they need an idea that will atract new gamers but at the same time, no one can call them copy cats, so they look back and copy the idea off pelican, tell me its not true, but it is

Doesn't the Wii have a DVD player in it? If no, oh well. But M$ still copied that off of Sony.

Copy copy copy, I don't give a crap about copies, almost EVERYTHING is a copy nowadays, innovation is so rare that it fscking rocks when it show's it'self. What i really hate is when a company like Sony, who's tried to take the floor out from nintendo ever since it came out with the PS1, senses it's rapid decline and decides to capitalize on another's ideas. Namely, the Wii-mote.



The wii-mote is almost total innovation, sure it uses god-knows-how-old motion sensing technology that was almost certainly not Ninty's idea, but it uses it in a way that was never before seen on any console. It's not a crappy tilt function that tries to mimic an analog stick, it's a full blown all sensing device that, combined with the infrared sensor, can sense every movement and position of the remote in a 3d space! This is VR technology finally in a home gaming console, I for one have been waiting for something similar to this ever since i first touched a controller.



Tilt functions have been around for almost as long as consoles have, but the Wii takes it farther than ever before they really didn't copy anyone, sure, the technology may be the same, but it's utilized in a way never before seen, and that in my book, makes it super.



PS: The same tilt sensing idea that was present in the ps1 controller by pelican was present in a n64 perhiphrial that combined it with a rumble pack, made by a 3rd company, exact date and company i don't know, i remember it from an old Tips and Tricks magazine.



PPS: If im a fanboy, the most I am is an m$ hater, i now own almost all the main systems created to this day including all sega , ninty, and sony systems, including psp, ds, all forms of Gameboy, CDX, gamegear, 32x, and atari, the only reason i don't have an xbox is that there arent that many games for it i'd want to shell out the cash for that i can't already play on some other system, and i dont call 5+ games a reason to buy a system.

Wow thas ALOT of Posts!



Im pleased $ony stuck with the Dual Shock Design and added L2 + R2 trigger ITS BETTER THAN THE BATRANG!

And as much as I like the Wii I have to face it the Dual shock 3 will be geat for games, much like the other daul shocks before it. $ony has realised that their controller is well known and recognised, but needed some adjustment and improvements. THe gyro however, dosent seem like the selling point, unlikie the Wii, which is completley based around its revonlutionary controller.



Im not attacking the Wii mote but, I have to admit though for certain types of games the Wii-mote would be shocking, and I much rather a DS3.



The Wii's design perfectly suits certain games, but also limits itself, $ony has played it safe, and fixed up their controller and added the gyro, which seems to be more or less another controll option, and $ony admits its not trying to be innovative and out there like the Wii.



'Sigh' im sick of hearing the Nintendo's innovative and Sonys not argument. Get over it. I will be buyin g a Wii and a PS3, and you have to realise that these consoles are EXTREMLY different, and you just cant start waving your arms about flaming one of them, unless you hold a personal vendetta against $ony or Nintendo

BTW all the cntroller with a motion and analog is a middle of a n64 controller other ***** is tv controller who is copying now

Listen without nintendo there would beno sony so stop saying they suck. Oh and xbox is not better your opinion. Bsides the LIIIIIIISSSTEN YOU FANBOOYS WHO THINK SONY IS SO GREAT. Look at the wavebird it wasnt the 1st wirelles controller but it was the first non crappy 1 its the same with the wii. Withou nintendo there would be no sony or microsoft weel at least no gaming consoles from them. And about 3rd mistretmen at least they dont bribe them like micrsoft. Stil you have to admeiit thay this is cheap. So stop you gay sony fanboys and admit that theyre idea came from nitendo already dorks.

Internet is filled of stupid 14 yr old kiddies that think that after reading 4 lines they know everything. Don't brag and spit words without knowing what are you talking about... for example:



- "Sony copied the Nintendo motion sensor...."

- "But Sony has the sensor patented from 1999"

- "In the PS3 you'll have a web browser and blablabla compatibility with PSP, and Nintendo don't offer this things..."



Patetic. Sony didn't stole anything... they're different systems, different kind of sensors (Sony -> 6 directions; Nintendo -> 3D). Nintendo have the Opera Browser for DS and Wii.



And you better go to school, you're losing too much neurons spitting no-senses.

if theres no dual shock why is the ps3 controller still called dual shock 3

well to be honest, for the first time im actually going with nintendo this round of gaming counsels. i am doing this because of the gameplay will be so much better, i dont care about graphics and if it can heat my entire house, its the gameplay and use of controllers that will get me to have fun, n ill be able to afford it now. then eventually, after a while ill pry get a ps3, itll be a few more years at least tho cause i think bluray wont be everywhere real soon seems how its so expensive right now, i like to let the new technology simmer down to half price ;)

OMG WHO ARGUES OVER A GAME CONSOLE WOOOOOOOW GET LIFES ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UP ALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT THE ***** UPALL OF YOU NEED TO SHUT TH

Wow, so much flaming, ignorance, and pointless arguing.







POWER GLOVE, anyone...?

Sony rocks!

Nes had a motion sensor control that wasnt so successfull, Atari had one before that, considering the current release of sony and microsoft games, i'd say they're copying nintendo down to their main games. Sony and Microsoft are for those fatasses that chill and play MW2 all day, Wii you can actually get people who dont play many games, and actually have fun. Wii has indeed led to sex many times. sorry but i'm a fanboy of that outcome, i dunno about you guys

They've all copied each other at one point, but thats because of the fanboys of each system keeps bitching and complaining, why cant they just play the games and shut up. i personally grew up with mario and i intend to stick with it, though i have a 360 and ps3.

TL;DR version = Haters Gon Hate, Bitchs Gon Bitch, just walk away and move on with your shit. Werd

2 words....
power glove




motion controlling in the 80s