Wish it was set in "modern" times, dont see why they have to go back to WW2.

Oh well looking forward to the vehicles and such.

it definetly wont sell 10 million

To be honest, I would have preferred if the didn't release COD5 for the moment. COD4, in my view, is an absolutely perfect game with a really addictive Multiplayer mode (well, actually that's the only mode I have played on COD4. I couldn't be bothered with the storyline.) Therefore, rather than focusing on a new game which goes back to WWII, I would have liked them to design and release more maps for the COD4 Multiplayer. In fact, the new maps could include vehicles and other new features.



That's just my opinion though... Perhaps COD5 multiplayer might end up being much better than COD4 Mutliplayer.

I'm sick of wwII games, Modern warfare is freakin wicked, why ruin it? vehicles and such sounds good but theyve got a hell of a lot to do to top cod4

Blame it all on Piracy. Those damn dirty pirates. /cop-out excuse



Gripes aside, Do we really need another CoD so soon?. 4 Just came out ffs and it is great fun. Quick! Milk that franchise!.

why the heck did treyarch get call of duty 5.......infinity ward did way better..and they would make call of duty 5 alot better whith a modern setting or future setting...it would of been called futuristic warfare or something fun if infinity ward did it.....but now its gunna b a gay ww2 game...they mine as well call it call of duty 5 :the big let down

There was a lengthy 6 page article about the new COD in GAME magazine. After reading it, it looks good. It still uses the COD 4 engine, aparenty even the wii uses it which they plan on adding to.



Also they are adding flamethrowers which is supposed to fire the most realistic fire ever seen and water is going to paly a mjor part in the game.



As for multiplayer, there are going to be small squads and there will be team perks.



All ai all it looks good, lets hope treyarch can live up to infinity ward

Treyarch is a very good developer, so I don't see where all the flak comes from. Just because YOU don't like WW2 games, doesn't mean THEY suck as a developer. The COD games aren't all they made.



Since this game has a subtitle it leads me to believe it probably won't even be an actual title but more of a spin-off. Either that or they simply wanted to drop the silly numerical subtitles.

They are the ppl that raped CoD3 possibly the worse CoD title EVERY. IW needs CoD Exclusivity.

Ok, I know people hate treyarch, but why? There not a bad developer. Yes some may say that COD3 sucked. I on the other hand really liked it, although the glitching bastards did get a bit out of hand sometimes. Remember people Treyarch made COD: United offensive and COD: Big red one both of which were phenomenal. Now to those people who say ‘why can’t infinity ward make it’ If you haven’t noticed, they just made a game, do you really think they are going to rush and get a game done in under a year, I don’t think so. That why Treyarch have the odd numbers.

I myself welcome the return to WW2, I love the weapons, and I love the stories that are told. Now I know people say ‘o not another WW2 game’, but have you ever stopped and thought for a moment, and thought about other games. How many RPG’s are there that involve you having something/someone you love taken from you and you have to set out to get it back. How many alien based shooters are there, how many driving games are there.... the list goes on. It doesn’t matter about the setting. So people before you bash a game and suck up to infinity ward, please think about what you’re saying before you make a fool of yourself.

Nathan

like Battlefield 2142? Yeah, that would be cool.

I hope the team behind the Wii version can find a way to set up an online multiplayer experience similar to Medal of Honor: Heroes 2, as it's the only online FPS for the Wii, has accurate controls, and it supports up to 32 players on one map (using EA's servers, but Treyarch can probably make their own).They'll be able to sell quite a bit more copies to keep Wii users occupied with a shooter if they have nothing else to play.

the guys who made call of duty 2 made 4, and the guys who made 3 (the *****ty one) are making this one. six will be modern. thats confirmed. and six will be made by infinity ward, the same guys who amde 2 and 4. oh and 2 had vehicles, and 4 had the AC-130 gunship mission. not exactly your regualr vehicle mission, but fun anyways.

I hate the theme of "the past". It already happened, thats just boring in my opinion. Another thing is I hate the guns. I like modern or futuristic guns (not lasers or anything like that --_--). The fire rate on almost all of them besides the light machine guns are slow as hell. No p90's, M16's, Uzi's, and other guns you love in cod4. Not even the easy to use scopes will be there.. Idk, I like for the game to have things I recognize, not something a grandfather would.



I like games like Metal Gear because Kojima productions can come up with their own story, set it in the future, and make it damn good at the same time. When in this game.. the developers just read a history book and copy it onto the game. Boring..



Come to think of it, IW did their own story set in modern time in an imaginary place lol, and it turned out pretty good.

A lot of you people seem to think Infinity Ward is doing nothing right now. They're undoubtedly working on what is presumably "Call of Duty 5", considering Treyarch is making "Call of Duty: World at War", which doesn't continue the numerical increment.



So yea... all you guys shouldn't get your manthong's up in a bunch; IW is still working away... who cares what Treyarch does, if they make a good product;yay.

Please don't tell me Big Red One was good. It wasn't. I never played United Offensive though. Anyway, they are a pretty bad developer. They are the kind of developers who rush a game onto every single system because they are greedy and don't care about quality. They are the ones who made all of the Spider-Man games (which came out on every system) and Minority Report. They suck hands down. Please don't feed the machine.

It's not that it's boring, it's just too overdone.



COD4's locations were HEAVILY based on real-life events (Iraq is obvious, Chernobyl and Russian areas are too) so it's not completely imaginary.



I don't know where MGS came into this, but ok.

if two call of duty title slip into the same year timeframe. Hopefully cod5 (assuming your right) will come out next year because I want it to cook for a long time so we can see lots of new stuff added.

another WWII game

=P

no nooooo no! not another ww2 game which will not sell at all. What are they thinking? too bad they will lose a lot of sale. you sell a war game with modern weapons, it well sell more than any other war game because people and fans are sick and tired of playing same old ***** every time. Come on Infinity! make COD 5 with new with weapons in another different modern day setting and it will sell millions!!!! thats for Sure

Not being a fanboy here, but honestly, Halo 3 just looks like Halo 2 in HD and with better lighting effects. That's all it really is. It doesn't look like a true next gen game.

BOOOOORRRRRRRRR RRRRRRIIIIIIIII IINNNNNNNNNNNNN NGGGGGGGGGGG





Wake me up when COD6 comes out.

I know ur not being a fanboy. We all know Halo3's graphics are the outdated Halo2 engine.

Call of Duty 5 was being developed before COD4 was released so they thought the whole "Modern Warfare" idea wouldn't be a success so they went with the WWII concept. I forgot what article I read that from but google around and you'll find it.