Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

Will Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare ruin the CoD franchise?

Posted Jun 16, 2007 at 1:32PM EST by QJ Staff

Listed in: Xbox 360, PS3, PC Gaming Tags: Infinity Ward, Treyarch, World War II
Ó

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare (CoD4) is the fourth installment in the Call of Duty series. It'll be released for PS3, Xbox 360, and Windows / PC. This "Modern Warfare" version is the first Call of Duty game that isn't set in World War II. Instead, it's set in a fictional modern-day conflict in the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

CoD 4: Modern Warfare - Image 1 CoD 4: Modern Warfare - Image 2 CoD 4: Modern Warfare - Image 3 CoD 4: Modern Warfare - Image 4

The Call of Duty games stood out as WWII games - that was the franchise's niche, and the franchise did very well. The first Call of Duty game (made by Infinity Ward) won the 2003 Game of the Year award from the Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences. Call of Duty 2 (also by Infinity Ward) received near-perfect and perfect ratings from the major gaming news sites.

Heck, even Call of Duty 3 (this time developed by Treyarch) came out as a good game that was worth playing - and that was despite the bugs and glitches (that is, bugs and glitches would've made most gamers throw out the game, but we still played and finished Call of Duty 3 despite it all because it was that good).

So let's look at Call of Duty 4. Will branching out to modern warfare reduce the CoD franchise into nothing more than a clone of other modern warfare games? We think not. Far from being a clone of other modern warfare games, Infinity Ward's Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare is already setting out to carve its own niche in the image of the earlier CoD games.

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - Image 1 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - Image 2 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - Image 3 Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare - Image 4


For one thing, this game's take on modern warfare isn't just about a small force of Western soldiers with superior technology taking out large numbers of bad guys with primitive weaponry. Instead, CoD4's fictional setting has set up a formidable opponent: "The Four Horsemen." CoD4 places the devastating weaponry not just in the hands of the good guys but also in the hands of the bad guys.

And if the trailer is anything to go by, then you can already speculate that CoD4 is going to raise the bar set by earlier CoD games. The different environments, the rhythm of the battles, the stunning scenery, the sound (the sound! - CoD won the 2004 Game Developers Choice Awards for Excellence in Audio, and it looks like Infinity Ward wants another award like it).

We're also excited about the fact that you play different people whose adventures are welded together to form one narrative (you'll play as several different soldiers, although it looks like the stars of the game are a US Marine and a British SAS soldier). This is the style of storytelling that did wonders in the first three CoD games, the style of storytelling that makes the story feel alive. And remember that Infinity Ward's storytellers have always crafted engaging characters with different and dynamic personalities.

And here I'll end with a personal observation. I particularly applaud the choice of setting up a fictional conflict as the setting of this game. While we all can admire the chutzpah and guts of developers who infuse their games with political commentary, I like the fact that CoD4 manages to be a game that casts a Middle Eastern dictator as one of the bad guy terrorists without dragging the conflict to Iraq. Not only does this free us from the constraints of having to play missions limited by real-world events, this also frees us from having to worry about a game getting ruined by overly-political hubris.



This story sucks? This story rocks!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (0) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# hmmGuest 2007-06-16 15:36
loved CoD3 but i wont like this if the gameplay is the same and it should be changed because i would like to see more modern millitary tactics rather then the run and gun tactics in CoD3, ie, rainbow 6 vegas gameplay system in a CoD4 modern war game would be awesome imo

Reply
 

 
# huhdumbdrinker 2007-06-16 16:27
you confused me son, and im ready for modern, i have reason that they will make a next ww2 cod, its not like its impossible, i've seen it done(haha - cod 1, 2 , 3 and look out for 4, i think)

Reply
 

 
# cod2 bf2Guest 2007-06-16 17:38
battlefield 2 goes "modern combat"



call of duty 4 goes "modern wareware"





gay

Reply
 

 
# waww!!!!Guest 2007-06-16 17:43
Vietnam? they skip vietnam.

I hope they make a vietnam game for next gen..

Reply
 

 
# wowGuest 2007-06-16 18:35
dont post here often, but this article is a pretty foolish one. it questions whether CoD is becoming derivative and that is what it already is. we have had 3 games nearly exactly the same, with the latest one being so tiresome to play through cos we have all done it countless times now. and the fact that they have a middle eastern enemy is a good thing? CoD is the trophy piece of how to create a cash cow franchise made purely for peoples wallets, theres nothing to ruin already

Reply
 

 
# About timeGuest 2007-06-16 19:51
I've had enough WWII games, all I wanted was a modern day shooter, that didn't go too futuristic.



If you want gameplay like R6 Vegas then play R6 Vegas...



I wouldn't care if the multi-player mechanics were the same, but I should think they would add to it.

Reply
 

 
# ...Guest 2007-06-16 23:37
The COD franchise was ruined from the 3rd one



i say bring it on - sick of playing the same old s**t

Reply
 

 
# .Guest 2007-06-17 00:30
as long as the gameplay stays the same it will stay gd

Reply
 

 
# lol this is textDragoon 2007-06-17 00:33
I, personally, prefer futuristic shooters. I'm a huge fan of BF2142 and I often play Dystopia (Dystopia-mod.com - HL2 Engine modification. Sooo awesome.) but I can always add another game to my list. I'd rather shoot particle weapons with lasers that do way more damage than a rifle that you must reload after every shot. Halo 2 is a perfect balance between this. You've got some futuristic weapons (more like alien*) and normal weapons (Re: Shotgun, SMG..).



Futuristic is the way to go, and they finally saw the profit in it. Besides, who doesn't like driving huge mechs around? (BF2142)

Reply
 

 
# BF2:MC came first :(Guest 2007-06-17 08:15
im glad they finally are making something other than a WWII game. i mean, how many germans and japs can you actually shoot with a single shot rifle or m1 garrand before saying to yourself "Damn man, i wish i had some terrorists to annihilate"? it's about time. i never played CoD3 because i knew it was the same old stuff... same war, same guns, same enemies, blah blah blah. but now that they are going modern we'll probably get some great guns, hopefully some sort of technology, and vehicles (planes, helicopters, jeeps, tanks, all the stuff from bF2 XD) what i want to know is if we get to play as terrorists in the game. if so, i cant wait to make bombs out of household items, torture prisoners, and shoot up some americans.

Reply
 

 
# not to mention the nastagia factorHohlraum 2007-06-17 11:28
WWW II was about stopping forced spread of communism throughout 3 continents. What exactly does modern warfare embody? Umm oil interests? Yeah that really makes me feel patriotic. Support our troops. Bring them the f**k home.

Reply
 

 
# ^above bull***** lolGuest 2007-06-18 04:42
Im gland there moving on from the WW it gets to repetive

Reply
 

 
# CoD 3Guest 2007-06-18 18:32
CoD 3 Ruined the franchise, maybe CoD 4 will bring it back. nuff siad.

Reply
 

 
# It's only logical.Guest 2007-07-11 05:15
The CoD franchise is probably one of my favorites to mess around with. You are aloud to use strategy or run and shoot. It's only logical that they move on from WWII. There are only so many campaigns that were present in the war and that they were able to use. I believe that even the makers saw that they game was getting somewhat repetitive. I am crushed that they left out the great Vietnam but I'm not going to lose any sleep over it. But from what I have seen in the trailers and interviews, this is only going to add to the great CoD style. The only thing that disturbs me is that it won't be out soon enough!

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword