Virtua Tennis 3: The PS3-360 graphics comparison |
Ó
Like our previous coverage of the Elder Scrolls IV graphical comparison, this quick video also takes a look at the similarities and differences between the two consoles using similar moments of play. In this case, you'll be watching two players taking their rackets to the court in a friendly game of tennis, complete with comparisons of the character models as they wipe the sweat off their foreheads.
Who do you think edges out the other graphics-wise? We're still undecided ourselves. Take a look and let us know if you think the PS3 or XBox 360 wins out this time.
Buy: [Virtua Tennis (PS3)]
Buy: [Virtua Tennis (360)]
36 Jumps PSP homebrew - MHUSPEED v3
25 Jumps Sony helping fix Bayonetta for PS3?
22 Jumps PSP homebrew - MacroFire v3.0.12
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
Hard to say if it's due to HDR or just plain overall darker. As far as everything else goes, it seems to be identical...however I don't think this game looks that great in the first place....damn PS3 holding back games...
I cant tell the difference. In motion i imagine unless one has a frame rate issue you wouldnt notice a difference.
Looks the exactly same thing to me, however, the Xbox360 seems to have more realistic shadows and all, but thats about it.
First off I just want to say I own both a x360 and PS3 so im not out to slam one or the other. But from this video it look like the PS3 version doesnt do a lot of close-ups where as the 360 goes all out. It looks to me that the PS3 is trying to cover up bad textures and framerate. But just like every other 360 to PS3 comparison I have to say that the contrast and overall light looks slightly better on the PS3. In the end, the visual display doesnt matter, I'm buying the 360 version because I have a lot more friends on xbox live than I do on PSNetwork. Don't get me wrong, I do still love my PS3!!!! When it comes to multi-platform games with online, i will probably always buy the 360 version, I am not impressed with PSNetwork at all, resistance has way too much lag for me, I dont ever get lag on XBL. It's just that, right now, xbox live provides a much better online experience. I really hope sony pulls through with PSN. I keep looking at my shiny new PS3 and I get excited thinking about whats to come, but then again I also love my 360. I guess I'm just a gamer at heart, not some silly fanboy who throws all his eggs in one basket.
Amazingly close considering each version was developed by a different studio. Sumo developed the 360 version and AM2 developed the PS3 version.
I think I like this game. The demo grew on me and the mini games look really fun.
Unfortunately for PS3 owners no online game play, ouch. What's up with that?
I couldn't tell much of a difference.
My dsl service is not that fast and I get no lag so far on PS3 games.
Well the only difference I can see is that the 360 version is a little darker.
Honestly i don't know how you came to that conclusion from the video. I'm pretty sure the PS3 version is identical. It's a very short video and it only displays about 4 second of proper comparative video at the start with the match intro.
360's is darker........ don;t forget the ps3's only been out for a couple of months......ps3 rocks
Development started at the same time, so what's your point?
the ps3 version is brighter than the 360
and whoever doesnt notive tha then bloody hell
Looks pretty much identical, minus the darker lighting in the 360 version. The PS3 version had more defined shadows, but that is not to say it's better or more realistic, but it just seemed to from this video.
Oh Oh! The PS3 uses all caps in "EXHIBITION MATCH" while the 360 doesn't. I think that's the hugest thing.
For me it's not the graphics thats the big issue. If you want to go on line there is only one option and that's the 360 is the only one. Lord knows why the PS3 doesn't do this, but hey I got both so the 360 gets my vote
ps3 YOU CAN SEE THE FACES A LOT MORE CLEARLY AND BETTER HAIR TEXTURES
Let me give you a point. How about development started a year ago for the 360 and just for a few months on the ps3 (not talking about VT3...in general). Hows that for a point?. Now what is your point?
^
Lol. Just ... lol.
Actually development started simultaneously on both platforms in April 2006. Haven't you heard of dev kits?
To see the real graphical differences you have to stop looking at the characters and start looking at the detales off the the sides and in the stands. you can clearly see the ps3 version has a chrisper image, with more detale.
There seems to be more compression squares on Xbox360....How the hell are you guys gonna compare anything on a youtube video???
Plus this game is a DVD game! It's like getting a CD-ROM game for a PS2. I would expect this game on a Xbox360 but not for a PS3. I'm not buying this game, and I'm not buying Virtua Fighter 5(also another DVD game).
Is amusing to see people got to little details to be able to discern wich one is better, the real question is is $200.00 bucks better? I don't think so. For me both version looks identical, but the PS3 version lost some points because the lack of online play in a game that is going to be a blast to play online. I'm going with the 360 version in this one.
Another PS3 game that looks slighty better than the 360 version, yawn.
No online gameplay for the PS3, there is all the difference I need to see.
You mean a DVD9 Dual layer game right(8.9 gig) DVDs are NOT all One size get that in your head..
Lets get some real facts here, what QJ should do is get some top quality video of both systems running the game(without saying which one is from which version) and then let everybody vote for say One week on which version looks better, at the end of that week QJ could then say which version was running which video and look at the results I bet it would be 50 50.....
Exactly the same, and the 360 version monitor was adjusted far to low on brightness or contrast a stupid point to miss when comparing Two systems.
I wouldnt buy this for the PS3 (if I had one) due to there being no online which is a massive difference unless it only costs half the price of the 360 version.
My PS3 lags quite badly at times especially on Resistance, but my old xbox1 runs fine with Halo.I suppose thats the difference One I pay for and One I dont.
Its darker because their monitor settings are set that way its NOTHING to do with the consoles, sighhhhhhhhhhh
its the PS3 that has better quality. Yes, their both equal in game play, but look beyond and when they touch their forehead, the PS3s actualy touch as the X360s dont, and the croud in X360 are not as vive as in PS3
PS3 wins!
It's just plain stupid to compare the two using compressed video.
Other than the different brightness settings, I couldn't tell a single difference in graphical quality between the two. It's very hard to tell fine details apart when two HD video feeds are recorded into such a small video resolution (320x240?). All of the detail that you have is going to get lost. It's like taking a 10 Megapixel camera and comparing it to a 7 Megapixel camera by taking the images from each and scaling them both to a 1 Megapixel image. Of course, your results are going to look virtually identical. A little common sense, please...
ytryr
You are a tool, the monitor has absolutely NOTHING to do with the darkness. They capture the video BEFORE it goes to the monitor! Amazing....
^Repost from above^
ytut
You are a tool, the monitor has absolutely NOTHING to do with the darkness. They capture the video BEFORE it goes to the monitor! Amazing....
I already know Dumb Ass!!!! Here you go, you poor kid.
Virtua Tennis for Xbox360 is 4.88GB on DVD9
Virtua Tennis for PS3 is 4.23GB
Virtua Fighter 5 for PS3 3.85GB
Not sure if those PS3 were on DVD or Blu-ray, but I don't give a crap, why do you care????
Equal in gameplay ? NO, No online means far LESS gameplay and shorter lifespan for the PS3 and graphics wise they are identical other than they have set the 360 lighting slightly lower for their own reasons.
none
And YET when YOU play the game, you are ABLE to adjust the lighting and contrast yoruSELF.. yso your point is moot... The 360 version would be grightened on anyones monitor...
Becase he is a victim of marketing... what a dumbass.
For someone whos not bothered why did you type this then Dumbass!!! ?
-------------------------------
Plus this game is a DVD game! It's like getting a CD-ROM game for a PS2. I would expect this game on a Xbox360 but not for a PS3. I'm not buying this game, and I'm not buying Virtua Fighter 5(also another DVD game).
-------------------------------
Why would you think that its acceptable for the 360 which is DVD9 ?.
What you really mean is Its got No online for the PS3 just like the the other One you listed Virtual Fighter 5, again no PS3 online, so you dont want them, isnt it......
PS3's doesn't have online on alot of games because Sony doesn't host the servers for their "free" online. The game makers have to host and maintain their servers (similar to PC games). Microsoft hosts servers for X360 games, that's why every one is online (everyone that it makes sense to be) and that's why we pay for it.
You can spell dumb ass both ways you idiot, but it still comes out the same that your still a Dumbass!!! LOLZ!
You can spell dumb ass both ways you idiot, but it still comes out the same that you're still a Dumbass!!! LOLZ!
There you go, I want to make sure that you know i'm typing about you.
I got the game an its sweet. Regardless of what system you have, go out and get the freaking game! I got a PS3 and I juts bought it, its 39.99!!!
Naw, these games are good for renting or iso loaders(if it exist). I'm more into real Blu-ray games like Motorstorm and Resistance that actually will take advantage of a Blu-ray disc.
I say the ps3 one looks a lot better.
(smh) no online play for ps3....cmon now, im not a big fan of this game (tennis in general) but i would have at least rented it to play some online......that sux
and the graphics pretty much look identical to me, it just seems like the ps3 version seems a little bit brighter
Same. The look the exact same. I love all the fanboys praising their own systems.
These 2 games have been out for both platform now and have been review by many online reviewers.
I've reda most of the reviews and basically the 360 version is the better out of the 2 ......this is because of the superior online facility for the 360.
Graphically, they're both the same!!
I'm sure if this was a problem then it would have been mentioned by now.
common sense people.....you can't compare graphics through this crappy youtube video!
Ps3 is lighter and the easy way you can tell which is better by looking at he hair
At one point it shows them walking away showing there side faces and there hair.
xbox360 has high detail but it looks too much like all one peice on the back and 0.9% plastic
ps3 Also has high detail but if you look close you can almost c each individual strand of hair and the back also has strands so it doesnt look like one peice.
And you cant just look at the vid once and say "o they both look the same" or "o i cant tell" you have to observe it MULTIPLE times to tell the difference even if it is on a low resolutuin
What you guys need to see if this game on a 360 running on a HDTV and on a PS3 running on a HDTV right infront of you so you can see it first hand instead of some crappy compressed video from GameTrailers.
"Ps3 is lighter and the easy way you can tell which is better by looking at he hair"
Don't be silly. If you have to go to such lengths to spot a difference and, even then, only see it after multiple viewings, then there's not enough to say one is better than the other. They ARE the same.
Yes, her hair looks slightly sharper in the PS3 version, but how much of that is that due to the brightness levels in the video? How much is due to the encoding? How representative is this when the rest looks the same? Are there specific times when certain little details look better on the 360 version?
Whatever it is, these versions are obviously VERY close to eachother, so it's nonsense to declare a winner from a video with less detail than the game itself.
Who cares about gameplay anyway, as long as a game takes advantage of Blu-ray, then that's all that really matters. *rolleyes*
im sure most of you 360 fanboys just want to think the 360 looks just that bit better or they are the same but i think the ps3 wins on this one anyway no online for ps3 is a bummer so i would go for the 360 version because of online... if i had a 360 that is oh and if i liked tennis games...
WOW you just don't get what he said do you? No wonder you are a MS fanboy....adjusting the brightness still doesn't take away from the fact that is is not as clean/clear. Go to GameTrailers and watch the HD version of it.the PS3 flows better, sharper, crisper, shadows more realistic and the background isn't blurred as on the 360.
But this is all a moot point since when real games that use the power of the PS3 are made by DEV's then a true comparison can be made. But that is the problem most DEV's only care about how much money is to be made and not the final product....
From what i've seen alot of people keep saying that they both are Identical, and that Graphics this, motion this, DVD that.
Man right of the top, you can tell that hte Ps3 has more detail and Work than that of the 360, If you look at the people on the back, you can tell they have no Shadow on the 360 version, while on the ps3 they do, and the model rig' and poly's are higher than that of the 360, also if you notice the croud, theres more in the ps3 version than the 360. The Textures of the Net, is also sharper and less blurry than the 360, shall i keep going? Motion is almost as equalp, I havent payed much attencion to it really. But come one, you guys are just talking and crap, but really didnt say what i've said, go watch the HD video in Gametrailers and STFU =)!
the ps3 will win in a long term of time, not right now, but it will win
I have yet to experience any lag on Resistance or any other ps3 game online. They are solid as hell and I definitely can't say that about games on xbox live. Im not trying to hate on xbox live because it is a good online system but my over all experience with actual online gameplay is better on my ps3.
Thats weird because I have really bad lag on the PS3 as well mainly on Resistance but I have NO lag on my 360, different for everyone it seems ?.
Wrong Microsoft do NOT host the servers on the 360 (I wish they did)
Looks like tyuty owned you on this one.
LOL thats true, as long as its on Blu Ray we should all buy it right? no matter how bad it is and what is missing.
They are just the same, but the sad thing is you are reacting to this news, the more hits this post gets the better it is for someone, its just rubbish and you should ignore it.
I'm sure this won't matter to most people, because what percentage of people have a TV that can show the full resolution, but I believe the PS3 version is running at 1080p. Anyone know what resolution the 360 version runs at?
the ps3 version is looking war better. The light is better and the colors are more vivid. The xbox360 version is looking like a beta test without the fianl colors...
*kuch*ignorant* kuch*
Did anyone thougt about the fact that it's the game and not the console? Let's say this game looks better/more realistic on the ps3. Maybe that's because the creators of the game found it easer to work with the ps3 sdk than microsofts 360 sdk and therefore were able to get a little bit more out of the game.
I've tested Blazing Angels on both consoles and I must say the game looks and runs so much better on the xbox360. Does that make the console superior to the ps3? I don't think so...
Even if you think the graphical quality of the game defines whether its a better console or not, isn't it far to early to judge. They yet have to get the most out of it.
wtf are you talking about...both versions are online...
I've had no lag on PS3 so far but had quite a bit of lag on Rainbow6 and GOW on the 360.
Did anyone ever stop to think that whenever a game like this is developed (for multiple game systems) it will be written for the lowest common denominator?
Whether it's the 360 or the PS3, it doesn't matter, they won't take advantage of either systems' special features because it's a lot more difficult. The developer will use textures, models, animation, and other details that BOTH systems will be able to display.
That's the problem with these ports. Too many systems to release on, and it would take too much time to rewrite for each system. Unfortunately, the PS3 ends up getting the shaft on this because it's CPU has the ability to do a lot of things that other ones cannot (or cannot do in realtime.) Because it's special, in many of these multi-system games we just won't see anything special.
And forget about the Wii - if a game is released on the Wii, PS3, and 360, don't expect cutting edge graphics. No offense to any Wii fans, but it's really just an overclocked GameCube with a new controller. For some games, good graphics don't matter. But for others, the better the better.
I can't tell any difference due to the quality of the GT video. The Elder Scrolls video showed a better comparision. The PS3 won that hands down. Just look at ruin pop in on the Xblows 270.
Hey "M$hater", you do know that the 360 received a graphics update patch that now looks just like the PS3 version or better. So STFU
They book look the same but the PS3 is a little brighter, which means nothing. If you want something washed out, okay, fine. Notice the PS3 sky looks worse than the 360's (the clouds can actually be seen in the 360 version and the sky is actually blue). Also, 360 has rumble and online. So quit your yappin' Sony fanboys. I own both PS3 and 360 and I'm going for the 360 one.
Actually MS host all the P2P hosting except for EA which demanded that they use their own crappy laggy servers.
these comparisons are always here and there.
no matter which version is better it always comes down to sales, and even if 50 percent of total 360 users buy this game and all of the ps3 users buy this, the ps3 is still short due pretty much small market compared to 360. the ps3-360 battle will really start when bought consoles have almost the same number of user base. by next year both maybe near the 15 to 20 million userbase, by then we can see whose dominating and who's flopping.
I have worked on both the PS3 and 360 versions. 360 has slightly better textures / filtering but framerate is slightly more unstable.
360 version developed by SUMO Interactive
PS3 version developed by SEGA AM3
Both are 100% playable though, so enjoy ;)
cause_of_chaos
"wtf are you talking about...both versions are online..."
The PS3 version does not support online play.
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id+160542
(Change the plus character to equals in that link to make it work. Not sure why this happens on QJ)
"The only slight downer about VT3 is what we're not getting - there's no online play. For reasons known only to Sega and Sony and the tea lady who eavesdropped in on the meeting, the online play featured in the Xbox 360 version is missing in PS3 Virtua Tennis 3...."
"Unfortunately, the PS3 ends up getting the shaft on this because it's CPU has the ability to do a lot of things that other ones cannot"
That's really just an excuse. Yes it's true that in most cases, multi-platform games do not push consoles as much as games written for a console from the ground up, however, multi-platform games in previous gens DID show differences between consoles depending on their power. Hence last gen, the XBox version of such games tended to be the best, with better textures, more polygons, better sound, better framerates etc.
The fact that the PS3 and 360 versions of many multi-platform games are so close as to being identical, only gives strength to the arguement that the 360 and PS3 are very similar in terms of power (as stated by devs working on both consoles).
Who cares which one is the best. Honestly, I'm flattered just by looking at Sharapova's ass. May the next generation be full of moments like these :)
for once we agree!
...all i can say is, the 360 version supports online play, the PS3 doesn't. Now choose.
PS3 + Vitua Tennis 3 = $740
XBox 360 + Vitura Tennis 3 = $440
Winner: XBox 360!
Now THAT'S a graphical comparison!
:)
good work... you made one of the most intelligent points we're ever likely to hear in the 360 - PS3 console war .... if only there were more out there who "got it".
First off I just want to say I own both a x360 and PS3 so im not out to slam one or the other. But from this video it look like the PS3 version doesnt do a lot of close-ups where as the 360 goes all out. It looks to me that the PS3 is trying to cover up bad textures and framerate. But just like every other 360 to PS3 comparison I have to say that the contrast and overall light looks slightly better on the PS3. In the end, the visual display doesnt matter, I'm buying the 360 version because I have a lot more friends on xbox live than I do on PSNetwork. Don't get me wrong, I do still love my PS3!!!! When it comes to multi-platform games with online, i will probably always buy the 360 version, I am not impressed with PSNetwork at all, resistance has way too much lag for me, I dont ever get lag on XBL. It's just that, right now, xbox live provides a much better online experience. I really hope sony pulls through with PSN. I keep looking at my shiny new PS3 and I get excited thinking about whats to come, but then again I also love my 360. I guess I'm just a gamer at heart, not some silly fanboy who throws all his eggs in one basket.
WTF U TALK ***** RESISTANCE HAS NO LAG AT ALL AND YES U DO GET LAG ON XBL BECAUSE I OWN A 360 AND U GET LAG IN RAINBOW SIX VEGAS,GEARS OF WAR, SAINTS ROW,GRAW 2, I CUD CONTINUE BUT WHERE DERS ONLINE DER WILL BE LAG IN SUM MATCHES SO DONT TALK ***** U R NOT UNBIASED
WHEN U R READING THIS DONT STOP OR SOMETHING BAD WILL HAPPEN! MY NAME IS SUMMER I AM 15 YEARS OLD i have BLONDE HAIR ,MANY SCARS no NOSE OR EARS.. I AM DEAD. IF U DONT COPY THIS JUST LIKE FROM THE RING, COPY N POST THIS ON 5 MORE SITES.. OR.. I WILL APPEAR ONE DARK QUIET NIGHT WHEN UR NOT ExPECTING IT BY YOUR BED WITH A NIFE AND KILL U. THIS IS NO JOKE SOMETHING GOOD WILL HAPPEN TO U IF YOU POST THIS ON 5 MORE PAGES. (THIS IS NOT FROM ME BUT I HAVE TO SEND IT CAUSE I FEEL SCARED OFF IT.. SO I DID WHAT IT SAID..YOU SHOULD TOO)