Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Tony Hawk does a PS3-360 comparison |
Listed in: PS3, Xbox 360 Tags: Activision, playstation 3 updates, Tiger Woods, Tony Hawk
Ó
Now, this is not to spawn yet another console war, but rather, this is to see whether there really are differences in the way the game was developed for both consoles. It's kinda funny though 'coz personally, I don't see much difference. The video quality is kinda crappy so it comes out pixelated, but seriously, if you don't pay attention to the lower left hand corner where it shows which console the clip is taken from, you probably won't notice the difference too. I mean there were no snappy "Ah! That's on PS3!" comments.
But hey, that's just me. So check out the vid yourself and let us know what you think.
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|











Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Naturally it won't fully show the potential of any console.
Reply
Reply
So this test is a failed comparison as some parts the game looks identical and then in others its just too blurry on the side by side comparisons.
Again, the games share the same data and therefore look identical. We need comparisons where the video isnt encoded and compressed.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Tbh, i dont care about the water wake. and im sure the 260 would do exactly the same if the player went up to the pillar. oh well.
both the titles are going to be near identical so who cares about some tiny details here and there
Reply
Reply
their developers, while potentially talented, are hindered by businessmen that care only about profit, and not game quality or pushing the envelope. as such, the budgets and schedules they allow for their games are very low and short, and we get the medicore-fest of crap that 95% of their titles aspire to be. their business model is set up to crank out licensed titles factory style, and reap untold fortunes because of the audience that just *HAS* to have that Spider-Man, X-Men, and Tony Hawk title (to name but a few).
now, if Konami, Square-Enix, Capcom, Epic, Ubisoft, Kojima Productions, etc, were to do multi-platform games, i'd be more inclined to care.
also, am i the only person that noticed the subliminal "marketing" for lack of a better term. the people playing the 360 version of the title were doing really well for about 90% of the video, whereas the clips chosen for the PS3 presentation, the people sucked for about 80% of the video, and they decided to include footage of someone clipping through a wall for the PS3 version. the subliminals come in, as, some people would view this and think the 360 version is better, simply because the people playing the 360 version were doing a better job with their skater than the PS3 version. it's subtle, but that's how people's minds work.
as it stands, since it's Activision we're talking about, *both* versions of the game will be 100% the same, bugs and glitches and all.
Reply
but this could be because of different T.V.s or something else im not a pro
and im not a ps3 fanboy either i have a xbox360
Reply
Reply
PS3 ftw btw.
Reply
So to compare them it's unfair. I admit that i can't see a difference...TV settings are not the same for both games.
Reply
Reply
And the bit on the Ps3, where the guys head disappears into the pillar, isnt a ps3 problem, thats a development problem from Activision
Reply
Reply
Reply
GOW = Kill.switch ripoff.
Reply
Reply
Seriously, when I get my ps3, Iam not gana care what anyone says, i'll be too busy watching Ricky Bobby, playing games and doing a whole lotta stuff.
Fanboys and girls. Go screw yourself and for the love of god. do something else with your life.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
"there is nothing worst than a blind person that doesn't want to see."
Reply
Reply
Stop looking for excuses or reasons. Those videos shows that there's little difference between the two versions, and colour difference is more down to how the videos were captured, not the consoles themselves.
In terms of power, there isn't much difference between the 360 and PS3, so we will continue to see examples like this throughtout this gen.
Reply
Reply
This is the same game on both systems. same models, textures, everything. What is different is the hardware, specifically, the video card.
What you are really seeing here is a comparison between ATI video (360) vs nVidia video (PS3). These videos are REALLY poor examples, and the differences are hard to see.
The truth in this comparison, is that nVidia graphics have a more gritty look, while ATI graphics tend to produce a smoother more polished image. I remember seeing a great side-by-side screenshot several months ago that really showed off this difference.
Overall, I have to award "graphics victory" to the 360, for the same reason I use an ATI videocard in my computer. It simply produces a better picture.
Like I said before, it is really hard to see in those videos, but I did see it. The anisotropic filtering and anti-aliasing is just a lot nicer looking on the 360 then PS3. The differences you see in lighting is also a quirk between the vastly different video hardware.
Reply
Go get the high res video if you havent already. Here is the link.
http://www.gametrailers.com/downloadnew.php?id=14934&type=wmv&f=
You want to skip ahead to 1:49 - 1:50 in the video. Both skaters are in a wooden half pipe. First, the PS3 skater will land, Pause the video here. Notice how the nails in the wood are only drawn a short distance ahead of the skater.
continue the video, and one second later, the 360 player will be in the same spot. Notice that the nails in the wood are drawn much farther into the distance then you saw on the PS3.
This is ATI's Anisotropic filtering vs nVidia's crappy anisotropic filtering.
Reply
Both games come from unknown sources. Component? VGA? HDMI? We dont know.
Your comparisons on how ATI and Nvidia do AF is funny, since you know absolutely nothing about it. Because if you did, you would know they are both the same.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Yeah, because its true. I cant tell the difference!
Reply
it doesn't really say anything about the ps3 hardware, just that neversoft didn't spend the time needed.
is it running at 1080p or 720p on ps3? if they are forcing 1080, that would explain a lot.
Reply
Reply
Reply
But as I said in the begining, I am wasting my breath here, I know most people who visit QJ would fail special ed class.
Reply
You guys make the choice Xbox 360 $299, Playstation 3 $499.
Reply
Which one is faster on paper? The PC
Which one is actually faster for computations? The Mac
Which one has all the good games? The PC
Don't make blanket statements. It's up to the devs.
Reply
plzzzzzzzzzzzzz z how often in ur life do u c something like hdr
Reply
About the trailer, there was a lighting difference in the ps3 version. Had more of a bloom effect.
And to thge guy on about the PS3 version gltiched, so does the 360 I went flying into the sky by simply jumping off a halfpipe and scored like some insane backflip.
At the end of the day, yes the PS3 graphics may be better but the gameplay is the same.
Reply
http://au.gamespot.com/xbox360/sports/tonyhawksproject8/review.html?mode+gsreview
And notice how the reviewer says "Those frame-rate problems hit the PlayStation 3 version of the game significantly harder than the Xbox 360." on the technically more powerful system.
Reply
Reply
HDR is a good thing, but we won't really see the benefit until the novelty wears off and developers start doing realistic HDR.
Reply