FLAMEBAIT: Xbotz come here to flame the PS3 fanboys because the xbox 360 has better graphicz because it has more of teh ramz, lol PS3 sux!



Ok its a long title, but yea.. they are softer. Move along?

PS3 has 256 ram for the games and 256 for the OS... I'm pretty sure they just failed at utilizing it correctly when Guerrilla can make a game like KZ2 be 720p and 1080i native.



Imo, the visuals are lackluster on both versions anyway, but oh well.

Especially considering these idiots made out that the PS3 was such a better platform to develope for leading up to the release of this game. The volumetric smoke clouds in KillZone2 are to die for. Ah well maybe they'll release a patch for the PS3 version still doesn't explain the disparity between what they said in development and what the finished product looks like.

I normaly can branded an xbot by the way but KZ2 changed the playing field.

I know longer think the PS3 is incapable of bettering the 360 I just think Sony have got some serious axes to grind with their departments who put together their development software.

It just seems to be way too hard for developers to multiplatform effectively.

SONY MAKE IT EASIER FOR DEVS AND YOUR PRODUCT WILL SMASH THE COMPETITION!

Well neither 360 or PS3 is going to smash the wii, but yeah the wii is in a different league of their own (a better selling more profitable one).

Doesn't look good on either console.

this is not a valid statement because it is coming from spokesperson, he doesn't know *****. u can fix the texture issue by changing the color range to full. the man doesn't have a clue of what he is talking about. EVERYONE knows that the 360 and the ps3 have the same amount RAM (512MB)

now you know how xbots felt last gen with the ps2 and gc...

and you can really tell the difference too, antialiasing filters take up alot of vram on the nvidia and ati chips i guess this is it too simply not enough ram, and thats sad...

Yeah, it doesn't have the graphics of KZ2, but I don't think every game should. I like a little variety in the look of games. My gf is playing the PS3 version right now and having fun. That's what matters.



And a quick message to Bill Murray-I have five words for you and your friends-



CADDYSHACK GOLF-THE VIDEO GAME

The 360 and the PS3 may have the same amount, 512MB, but that's just the number. the structure of the RAM is what's different and most important. The 360 has 512MB of UNIFIED RAM. The PS3 has 512 of TOTAL RAM. Where on the 360 the GPU and CPU share from the same pool of RAM, on the PS3 GPU has 256MB for itself and the CPU has 256MB to itself. They cannot crossover. So if PS3 version of the game would run better with 300MB of RAM, well there just SOL and MUST find a way around it. Were as on the 360, the developer can just use the 300MB from the single 512MB pool and give the CPU the remaining 215MB. Both structure choices have advantages and disadvantages.

not your post i could really give a rats ass lol no offence



but Caddyshack the videogame would rock!!! i can imagine a mini game where u have to kill the gopher

I was playing the PS3 version yesterday, it looked fine to me. I have both consoles, but usually opt for the PS3 version. Might have changed my mind if I'd known about the difference. Ah well, ignorance is bliss :)

the gpu RAM and the CPU RAM CAN crossover on the ps3

Uncharted looks better than many 360 games, and most PS3 3rd person games. Few other developers have made 3rd person games look as good as Uncharted on the ps3. If they spent more time programming natively instead of converting the 360 textures (as is what appears to have been done by what they said, in spite of them saying it was developed independently), they could achieve the same graphics on both systems. Uncharted is cleverer, and streams the textures to the uber fast memory, whereas Ghost Busters is dumb and uses the old fashioned "load everything at once into memory and don't make use of the system's bandwidth, resulting in blurry textures" method

Then how come every other PS3 game runs great and the graphics are amazing? It is because Terminal Reality sucks.

All they have to do to fix the blurring problem is stop using Quincunx AA. Quincunx aa gives you the effect of 4X FSAA at the performance cost of 2X FSAA....however it is notorious for blurring texutres. They should just patch it to use 2X FSAA...there might be more jaggies, but at least everything will not be so blurry.



What is the point of it being 720p when it has the visual fidelity of a standard definition game...

PS3 has very large BW for XDR to GDDR3 memory transfer and this can be done via DMA. Being able to store data on XDR is an advantage because the CELL can work on procedural textures with greater performance.



The reduced RAM that the developers were talking about is the XMB which reserves a certain amount of memory for itself, more than the 360 OS menu.



Having said all that clearly the developers made little attempt to find ways of optimising the engine as it's pretty poor for both consoles and texture heavy, where the ps3's strength lies in vertex heavy level designs.

they bull*****ted it. they worked on the 360 version only and at the last minute ported it. the ps3 can do alot better than this. even other multiplatform games look better than this (bionic commando, cod4)



this game looks like a first gen ps3 game, with the same first gen ps3 game problems (multiplats anyways) where the textures looked horrible and there was a lack of proper lighting. its simply lazy devs. they didn't want to properly optimize it.