theyre sellouts

Resident Evil was Sony's baby from day one, no one had the balls to release it. The Best Resident Evil game was part two. It was the closest thing to a George Romero movie!!! Resident Evil without zombies is like a Ferrari without wheels!!

RE5 + PS2 = best game ever.



we all know 2008 means late 2009, but im sure it will be worth the wait

I wouldn't say that. There's a big difference in quality from company to company. Capcom is a big one, so this is something they'll have to pull off. Now whether characters have block polygon hair on Everybodys golf 586 and Tony Hawk 99 is another story.

It's funny cause your comparing titles that have a massive time gap, wait till a title has been released a year after the PS3 and then compare it to GOW. Surely that would make it fair, if GOW was a Xbox release and then you compared it to resistance and GOW was graphically better than i'd hand it to you, but no, sorry

>"It's funny cause your comparing titles that have a massive time gap"



...for multiplatform titles developed for both consoles (i.e. not ports), there's little difference between the two consoles, with the 360 looking and performing better in many cases (Gamespot, 1Up and others have done comparisons).



Also, it mustn't be forgotten that the PS3 was delayed by 6-9 months, since it was originally due to launch in the spring. Just look at the games released on the 360 6-9 months after launch. 6-9 months can make a big difference.



Therefore we can't pretend this delay hasn't had a beneficial effect on PS3 launch games, and so the comparison isn't as simple as comparing launch games either.



After E3 2005, and for over a year afterwards, many gamers were insisting that the PS3 was twice as powerful as the 360, but the current games prove that idea to be wrong, since even if you took everything into account, there's no way several multiplatform games will look and run better on the 360 if this was true. The PS3 is slightly more powerful overall, but not enough to make a big difference.



Still, there's a lot more to come from each console, and so the best graphics will come mostly from exclusive games built from the ground up on each console.

i got a 360 for resident evil 5 and no its delayed!!!

owell i still got gow and halo 3 to play in the mean time.

this has to be said straigth forward.



Gamespot was sponsored by MSN to advertize for microsoft....that site..[is completely Biased towards microsoft].



it never posts good ps3 news....it always give ps3 games terrible scores....even NBA2K7...which was superior than the xbox360 version was given a lower score....same for full auto 2..which is far better than the 360 version yet was given 5.7..!!



the same goes for 1UP...completly biased...they didnt even REVIEW NBA2K7 for the ps3.



Finally....for Gears of war..i,l make it short.



to propely understan how long this game was in development.....then you have to understand that this games Uses the UnrealEngine 3 [i believe most of you already know].



it means that the games technical prowess comes from the engine......NOW...that engine has been in developmet...pay attention....before the xbox360 was even announced...waaaay before the ps3.



what EPIC did...is simply tune the already years in devlopment engine for the 360....thus actual development for GOW can be said to be more than 4 years...



even with that...the game is reported to have considerable slowdown in multi-player gaming...[even though its only 8 players]...which suggests that the game is pushing the 360 greatly



there may be room for improvment....but i dont think they can go too much further.



in the end...its important to say that the UE3 is OPENGL based.....meaning that it will work [Better on the ps3 than the 360]...since it has an nvidia GPU....and nvidia is known to have superior performance in opengl...



well..that all....wish i can talk more but...

"Gamespot was sponsored by MSN to advertize for microsoft....that site..[is completely Biased towards microsoft]."



Which is why Gamespot were one of the few to go so crazy over the PS3 during E3 2005 that they believed the Killzone trailer was realtime (because a Sony rep told them).



Gamespot are not biased towards one console. A year ago, it was the opposite, with XBox fanboys claiming GS were bias towards Sony, because of all the reports and previews. This changed after E3 2006 when the benefit of the doubt many gave towards the PS3 evaporated into the harsh reality.



"the same goes for 1UP...completly biased...they didnt even REVIEW NBA2K7 for the ps3"



Whenever a website doesn't say the things gamers want to read, they immediately cry out 'BIAS'. Pathetic.

"in the end...its important to say that the UE3 is OPENGL based.....meaning that it will work [Better on the ps3 than the 360]...since it has an nvidia GPU....and nvidia is known to have superior performance in opengl..."



lmao, unreal engine hasnt been opengl based since unreal 1, it has opengl codepaths, but also 3dfx codepaths back in the day, now unreal engine is optimized for directx ( ut2k3 is soo poor in opengl), unreal engine and the source engine are both engine that run best on directx, you are probably mistaken with the quake/doom3 engine, which is opengl based ( prey uses it).



i dont really care that much about the delay for re5, cause it will be an outstanding game, even more so at 60fps, but it would be cool if they would up res RE4 a bit and release that for next gen as well, so we have some "next" gen RE to play in 2007 at least, meh, they dont even have to up res it xD