I got it wrong, before the jump I thought the real life picture was GTHD, and vice versa.



amazing......

These have to be fake.



If you look at every 'screenshot' thats meant to be of GT:HD you'll see that the wheels are completely stationary. No motion blur on the 'spokes' of the wheels. Secondly, when was this car in GT:HD? I can't remember seeing it in the car selection screens or anywhere. Thirdly, what the hell, there are screen shots that are complete copies of real life photos. Clearly these could only be created and not made simply from being in a single tracked demo that is GT:HD.



Now i love Gran Tourismo and all. And i'm a vivid GT Fan and can't wait for the 5th installment. But sheesh. This is just BS. Honestly.

This is not fake, this car only appeared in a Special Edition of GT:HD that they released in a certain event, now they will release it to the public in a near future upgrade of GT:HD, but for now they are giving us the video of it a replay using the that same car. This is not a Fake at all.

Ok, in GT:HD, when watching a replay you can pause it, making the car stop, and there is no motion blur, so then they take the picture.

not with 360

I gave this news to you and said if you do post this up, please give credit where necessary. Obviously you have not done so :(

A screen capture at 60 FPS is prolly allot better than the camera they used for the picture. That explains the spokes of the weels

wasnt this video supposed to be on Playstation Network by now? Why cant I find it?



Or was it only released in a certain region?

well im impressed with this its just too real and its not even the GT:5 so imagen the GT:5 how would it look like and if a game is exclusive to one console then its much better on it because you know a ll the specfition on it and dont need to worry about what other console has if GT goes multiplatform then it wont be this good.

that ist not ingame.

its render replay

the game version looks better than real life lol

Come on, GTA 5 still wont have car damage because the car companies wont let them. This game will be another marketing strategy for car companies out there. Forza 2 will be better because its running 64fps and has car damages. I dont care about 600+ cars. Most of the cars are junk anyway. A minivan in a Racing game? Give me a break. Im better off with having 300 cars in Forza 2. Atleast we would have some downloadable content like cars and tracks.

how about its better than the camera that took the real picture!

you need glasses in real life and the game compensates for a lack of them!

sometimes it's better just to not say anything...(like in these circumstances)...GT HD looks stunningly awesome and nobody can argue this.

Motion blur in next gen games do really exist and are different from the prev-gen motion blurs.



If we look at gears of war, turn around with the camera very fast and you will see a good motion blur. Now when you look at call of duty 2 for xbox 360, the framerate is really high, but you won't see any motion blurs. This makes it really fake. It gives me the feeling that i'm playing an arcarde game. Well that's my feeling.



Back to the motion blur part. If you look at the demo(trailer) of Project Offset, they can freeze the game, move with the camera, but still the motion blur of the game is there(they freezed the motion blur as well)... wauw...



Well what they do is saving the speed(vector) of every vertex* in every object(correct me if i'm wrong) using a pixel shading technique to make a motionblur in the same direction of every vector from every vertex.



With this technique you can freeze motion blurs etc. If you look at the long trailer of Little Big planet, in the end when they are on the skateboard. You see a really good motion blur diagonal of the objects that pass by. And what i saw was a really big motion blur mistake! The wheels of the skateboard did had a motion blur. But it didn't look right, if you look at it again you will see what i mean. Why it went wrong, because a vector just points to somewhere, some direction, the motion blur wil be made that direction nothing more. Well with wheels you don't have vectors, but (i don't know how to say it in english) rotating "vectors", because of the wheel that rotates. Now if they could use that, and use a motion blur technique that makes a motion blur in the good rotate direction then it would be nice, but that is a lot more work. So what they did with gran turismo where they have the same problem, they took away the motion blur of the wheels. Thats it. So:



1.Look at the demo of Project Offset

2.Then the demo trailer of LittleBigPlanet

3.Think Think, or read my stuff again ^

4.Make the conclusion that motion blur do exist, its always fake but that doesn't matter, that it's different from previous consoles, and that its currently not usefull on rotation objects ;)



Greets Mic2000



michielkrol.nl

And you know this how? Did you actually do the rendering yourself? What proof do you have to back up that claim? Have you even played the demo to know what it looks like IRL? No, I forgot, you can't afford a PS3 which is why you must find every excuse to try and make you feel better. Good luck.

The cars do get dirty, granted not to the extent of a rally game, but if you use the car wash there is a noticeable difference to the gleam, maybe those x-pox fan-boy glasses you wear have clouded your vision.

GT HD to me has without a doubt the best graphics for a car games. However all the screenshots are taken from the replay. When racing in actual drive mode the graphics don’t look as photo realistic. What’s the point on having so much detail on graphics during the replay when most people just skip the replay.

ok then.. why dont you tell us how forza 2 will be better than GTHD too... you are as laim as Mr common sense is....

brains rape.

These are just screenshots of a game that's already out. GTHD. Download it yourself and have a look



GT5 will most definitely look better than this

the replay is only what someone did, its no different then the gameplay. the game cant render its own cgi. thats something the developers have to do before the game is playable. so what ever you see in a replay IS the actual gameplay. it might be because you are driving and things seem to blur as you go faster

I don't even see how that would be possible, Taz(in terms of screenshots).

while the cars themselves are stunning. things like the spectators, road, grass, background can still be improved.



I think they'll still manage to improve the cars too, at least with possible damage, and other physics.



I'd like if if they introduce rain.



Animation in general will get better, at the moment things in motion still look artificial, things like dirt and stones kicked up by tyres correctly modelled would be nice

GT is the best looking car game, if you disagree you are a x-bot or an idiot (same thing). So all you x-bots get out of the PS3 updates and go back to where you came from. Just because you don't have a PS3 you feel like you need to come over to these forums to people who own the system and talk sh1t about it?



The GT demo was amazing. Remember that GT is a racing simulator and is made to be like the real thing. And for those people who say GT is sh1t because it has no damage, do you really want to be on the last lap of a 200 lap endurance race and hit a wall at 300kp/h, get the car all CRUNCHED up and blown to pieces and have the car respawn? WTF? or even a pop up on the window say you were last to finish the race because you crashed...



Minor damage in GT is perfect, I repeat it's a racing simulator, if you want damage go play burnout of somthing. GT is a completely different game OK?



I can't wait for this game, been a GT fan since GT 1 on the first Playstation. BUT! I would like GT to have an online play option and fix the crowd of people



The only reason x-bots even bother coming to a PS3 forum is because:



a) They are jelous of the PS3, so they talk sh1t.

b) They want a PS3 but cant afford it, so they talk sh1t.

c) They have nothing to do because their x-box has over heated and died, so they talk sh1t.

d) They are lonely nerds that want attention, so they talk sh1t.



F uck off x-bots, just f uck off!!!

Forza 2 runs at 64FPS per second thats twice the amount of Motostorm, its not out yet so dont make out you know anything about it until you get the boxed retail version

The big difference between Forza 2 and GT is the usual PS3 problem its not coming out for bloody ages whereas FORZA 2 is out in about 3 weeks, Forza 2 has been tweaked to the limit and it is going to be hard to beat.



It will be interesting to see if they can actually get GT running at 64FPS as Forza 2 can, they couldnt do it with Motostorm.



The way you are trying to make out this looks so good is just stupid, they are replay shots ALL racing games look a hell of a lot better in replay shots its that simple, and of course you cant play a driving game without rumble so you had better get saving up for those pads that you are going to be forced to buy IF they include rumble in GT

Clearly an xbox 360 fanboy...

i see some people saying that these pics are fake and that makes me know they dont have a ps3. all these pics are real and these sick real to life graphics are what ps3 has to offer. PS3 IS THE FUTURE AND THE FUTURE IS PS3

compare images of forza and gt hd forza is not even close to real life only one more game is near to real life touch and its crysis all xbots know that xbox360 cannot support these types of games and by the way 64 fps will not give the game real life time graphics ps3 can play 64 fps but its not about that its about the power of rsx chip which gives reallifetime graphics and in pc u have completely upgrade to play crysis u need nextgen pc which i cannot afford

youre right i got em mixed up 2

shut up would you! go play the damn game please!! if you play it..you'll soon realise the graphics of actually gameplay and replays are exactly the same! idiot.

fuc fucity fuc fuc fuc fuc

You know there's something wrong with your argument when all you can stick to is HDR.. Is this supposed to be some kind of technical marvel? Even PS2 did it, and it did it with flying colors, I should add. But yea, GT does have HDR, but it doesn't overkill it like many many many games do these days.