Sony: We're not antisocial, we have Singstar |
Ó
With the success of games like Activision's Guitar Hero, MTV's Rock Band (Xbox 360, PS2, PS3, Wii) and Nintendo's Wii Sports, all of which rely heavily on the social aspect of the play, there appears to be growing demand for social games in the industry.
During the London Games Festival, Jaimie MacDonald, Vice President of Sony Computer Entertainment Worldwide Studios, was asked to respond to criticisms that Sony is falling behind on these social centric games.
I wouldn't say we fell behind. SingStar (PS2) and Buzz (PS2) and EyeToy (PS2) are still hugely successful. I personally am really pleased to see the success of Wii Sports and Wii Play and Guitar Hero and Rock Band in a sense that it's expanding the market for everybody and it's expanding the appeal of video games.
Because they tend toward a more narrow niche market, the success of the SingStar, Buzz and Eye Toy is somewhat debatable when measured against giants like Guitar Hero. However, MacDonald also cited the recently released LittleBigPlanet and the upcoming PlayStation Home as their contenders for the mainstream social gaming market.
Even if Sony is behind the social gaming scene (despite their insistence to the contrary) they won't be for long. MacDonald said on the subject:
I think we're incredibly well positioned (to take advantage of social gaming) in the sense that we kind of, it would be a bit arrogant of me to say we invented, but we were an early pioneer certainly and we continue to be very successful in that space.
Related Articles:
- PlayStation Home v1.0 hitting closed beta, invites available from Qore next month
- No worries: Sony still on target despite forecast slash
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
19 Jumps Sonic speeding into LBP
Best prices available for:
Price Range:
$25.00 - $25.00
$25.00 - $25.00
at 1 Stores
Price Range:
$48.00 - $74.00
$48.00 - $74.00
at 8 Stores
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - March
User Favorites - March
Categories
Archives
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments
perhaps Jim part of a dieing breed of gamer, and in face people with my views on online gaming are now a minority, And if that is true then so be it, I can understand the apeal and importance of online gaming to others.
some players even go as far as to exclusively play online titles,
I feel online gaming on the broad scale, hasn't fully matured, Sure we have some decent online game's like world of warcraft, and halo 3, Cod 4 and so on, and these games really do have great online modes.
Games that make really great use of online capabilities are honestly few and far between, And more often then not when choosing a quality title for any given console, ones best bet would be a single play offline experience.
has anyone else ever noticed this?
it seems bioshock didn't have a multiplayer mode because 2k, at the time, wanted to focus on making the single player experience as great as they possibly could,
im my opinion it paid off.
there is something to be said about the single player offline experience, im not social redundant, or anti social, but the media and electronic developers are really pressing this social theme too far,
instant messages and in game email, the question is really. not did we need it. the question is, why the hell would be want jason and jacob and tammy and jill to all know when im online emailing me while im trying to get my bioshock on?!
really?
do people really want that?
i mean i'm not socialy impared, but the honest to god point is, not everyone damned happy skippy feels like being social all the time,
sometimes they just want to curl up with a book, all by themselves and not be bother, or a videogame,,
but no, sony and microsot and nintendo all want to strap a lcd screen onto my forhead so they can text me while I ***** !!
I mean Damn,,,,
I don't suppose anyone these days can remember how great it was to just have a really great offline game with no interuptions, emails,updates, or people annoying them while they are trying to play a game..
like i said, im part of a dieing breed.
Reply
I find it I cant play online games unless a friend plays with me, except for Socom and hopefully LBP.
But I think that ingame messages was needed because there was many a time were someone sent me a message, and I had to quit playing just to read it and repsond.
If you dont wanna be bothered while playing, and your playing offline anyway, just log off your account, no point being signed in if your not playing online. +)
Reply
Reply