Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Sony hammers the final nail on the coffin of backwards compatibility rumors |
Listed in: PS3 Tags: PS1, PS2, Sony
There have been a lot of rumors and hopefuls talking about PS3s with backwards compatibility for some time now. There was this one rumor that there would be some kind of emulation in an update that would enable PS3s to run PS2 games. The Koalition got a chance to get a few words from Sony, and they got the final nail on that rumor's coffin.
Here's the email sent in by Sony to The Koalition:
Thanks for your email,
When we removed backwards compatibility from PS3, we said that it would not be coming back as our priority was to make great next generation games. I am not sure where you are getting your information from, but at no point did we say that there would be some sort of emulation being brought to PS3. At no point has this strategy changed and therefore I can tell you that there are no plans to bring back backwards compatibility to PS3. I think you will agree that the list of 1st party exclusive games for PS3 is growing quickly and the quality of them is great. Games such as LittleBigPlanet, Motorstorm Pacific Rift, Resistance 2, GT5: Prologue and the up-coming Killzone 2 show that we are very serious about bring exciting, innovative and fun games to PS3.
Many thanks
Well now, they were certainly direct to the point about that. Ouch though. One of the things I love about the PS2 is its backwards compatibility, which means I still get to play my old PS1 games. Re-played my old Suikoden I and II, in fact. Oh well. So if I still want to play PS2 games, I guess I'll take goooood care of my PS2 then.
Read these too:
- Rumor of PS2 emulator for PlayStation 3 returns
- Sony UK boss explains 40GB PS3's lack of backwards compatibility
- Revival of 80GB PS3 backwards compatible model confirmed by Sony
Via The Koalition
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|













Comments
Reply
And playing old games that already exist gets in the way of programming new games?
Reply
Anyway it gets a little repetive when they always name their exclusives. I've been hearing the same list for the past year.
Reply
I just hope they don't set up a PS2 emulation thing on PSN where we gotta pay like $50 to play our old games.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
like E3 06 or 07
Reply
Reply
There still might be some sort of PS2 emulation patch made available later but meh.
Reply
Of course i could always try to play my old games as backups on my PS3 only if i can find a work around for the swap magic because i couldn't find one that would work on my Japanese PS3. :'(
Reply
Reply
Alot easier than it sound.
However if ps2 emulation gets back in line ill probably camp outside best buy for a month.
WHY SONY WHY???!!?!?!!???!
Reply
That's partly true. It's also true that Sony did this to punish non-early-adopters.
Reply
Reply
First there's the cost savings of not putting emotion chip in the PS3 which were released to everywhere after the US release.
Second they scrapped the Emulation which they told everyone they would have (which the guy's letter is BS about btw). Which means they can fire the dev team working on the software emulation to make PS2 games work on the PS3.
Because they had to reduce the price on the console so much because of the expense of the bluray drive they're hemoraging money badly on each sale of the PS3. This means they absolutely need people to buy PS3 games and lots of them (which included in the cost of each PS3 game is money to pay back the loss they made on the PS3 console sale). If someone bought a PS3 and only played PS2 games on it that would be an absolute disaster for them.
Still at the end of the day it's nasty to the consumer, and they will loose business because of it. I know a couple of exPS fans who went 360 because they couldn't play their PS2 RPGs on the the PS3, so they were like well I might as well buy a 360, with square getting more and more on board the 360.
I wouldn't be suprised if they did what you say in the last sentence there, MS do that with their xbox1 games (the difference being if you already own the xbox1 game for sale on XBlive you can play it for free of course).
Reply
Reply
Reply
I thought the original 60 gig one actually had a chip on board that was the first batch released in the USA. Then there was a second batch still 60 gig that was released to the rest of the world that did it by emulation. Then we've got these new POS that are 40 gig but no BC at all?
Reply
Reply
Recently I got a DS for some games and THEN learned that it's only BC with GBA games (and not GB/GBC) and that made me very sad.... it's to the point now that... you pretty much NEED to do BC to keep people happy.
Reply
Hmm... I don't really think they would lose money if people bought a PS3 just for PS2 games cause wouldn't they need to buy the PS2 games too? But i guess it would extremely devastating if they did make the emulator for the PS3 and someone cracked it so PS2 games can be ripped and then played directly without the need for a legit CD.
And remember, the good games like FF13 (soon to be), Resistance 2, white knight (maybe), etc. are not PS2 titles so they would have to buy the PS3 disc anyways. If they make games only for the PS3, then everyone will need to switch to the PS3, so kinda no loss there right?
And god let some gifted hacker out there create an emulator for us... software please? Dont wanna pay for a chip again.
Reply
The 40 gb models don't have neither of the chips.
So, in order for all models to include PS2 BC in the future the PS2 GPU has to be emulated aswell.
Reply
Reply
Reply
A stupid consumer is what runs the economy though.
No one would start a business if you actually thought about what you were buying...
Personally I bought the 60GB when it first came out,
and installed a 320GB HDD in it.
I also enjoy the card reader ^^
Reply
due to the production costs, they had to remove features, to be able to drop the price, so sony goes hmm.. *yanks out b/c, card readers, etc.*, BUT they are still making ps2 games, so they keep selling ps2's to make up for the little to no profit made on the ps3's, sony is quite brilliant, despite the fact that everyone whines about it
Reply
Reply
removing ps2 backwards compatiblity is the most stupid thing sony did with their ps3. and lots more stupid decisions put them in last place.
Reply
I don't think Sony punished us early adopters with the PS3. While I'm not fond of being a beta tester (for example, my retail purchase of the Socom Beta which brings more game through download than on the BD, or Home) I think the early adopters goit the better end of the deal. The only bad part was that we had to wait a year for a good game. LOL
Reply
I remember Summer 2007 when the first 80gb model was released. The 60gb model was reduced to $499. I bet everyone who didn't get one because they were waiting for another price drop is kicking themselves in the @ss. Sure I paid full launch price for my 60gb, but at least I have the one most PS3 owners are salivating over.
Reply
i wonder whether the same thing would happen to ps2 if its bios was re-flashable.
i guess it brings one more reason for people who try to make homebrew for ps3 - to make sure they can run their ps2 games. i wonder if it could work properly (at satisfactory framerate) on ps3 linux.
btw, ps2 users are not quite satisfied with level of ps1 emulation offered on ps2, so there is a alternate homebrew ps1 emulator for ps2 in development.
Reply
$ony are loosing the console war and they remove backwards compatibility.... They really have no intrest in winning it dont they.
The big mistakes from $ony are;
No backwards compatibility,
High Price and not interested in dropping it,
removing features (Memory card slots),
removing USB slots,
releasing Home in its way uncompleted state,
Stupidly high price for repairs. ($315AUD) (A new arcade Xbox360 costs $250AUD)
I now really regret getting the PS3 as its a total rippoff.
I have 2 360's already so when this PS3 dies for a 2nd time its the bin for it and ebay for all the games and accessories.
Reply
Reply
Reply
When it arrived I was shocked, 00AUD and missing ps1 chip. I decided to wait, later it lost the ps2 ability as well.
Forgive me if some of this information is incorrect as I never owned one.
I always told my friends how crap I thought the 360's were and how I'd get a PS3 when it can play everything again and dual shock came out.
I still think the 360 is crap but hearing this information I don't think I want a PS3 anymore, I think I might just buy another Blu-ray player and get me a Wii or something.
I would of gladly spent my money with Sony had they only done the right thing by a long standing ex-customer.
Reply
Not that I care that much about ps2 compatibility, especially since I have an older unit that still has it, but I nevertheless completely regret buying a ps3 over an xbox 360. But even I can recognize, from a business point of view, how seriously they are shooting themselves in the foot with this.
Frankly there are no must-have sony exclusives. They don't care about making the customer happy. They don't care about making the big developers happy. They don't care about making the indie developers happy. It's a system that appeals to no one.
Reply
Reply
Also, it would be stupid for sony to have ps2 compatibility. Its library is so immense and good that many will never buy $60 ps3 games when they can buy cheap $10 ps2 games which sony barely makes any profit from. They want to promote the ps3, so might as well not be its own competitor.
Reply
Reply
Reply
sold the ps3 for blu-ray to win.
I cared about Ps2 compatability, because I didn't have my own Ps2, so I bought the 60gb when it came out. I regret buying an Xbox360 because I have to pay for online... and I don't, so my Xbox360 sits around a lot.
In reality, I don't think there are any exclusives that I need. the only games I've enjoyed lately are MGS4, Resistance 2 and Soul Calibur IV.
UT3 was the biggest letdown on the PS3 for me.
I like the system because I can put all my movies on it, music, photos... and play games (online for free) when I'm bored ---- not for 14 hours a day on xbox live.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Remember the GTA games on PSP? They said LCS wouldn't hit the PS2, it did. Then, unbelievably they said the same thing about VCS. It also went to the PS2.
We have no good reason to believe this, and every reason not to
Reply