Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.

Cancel and Return to page

Sam Fisher vs. Sam Fisher: Splinter Cell PS3-360 comparison shots

Posted Apr 10, 2007 at 4:40PM EST by QJ Staff

Listed in: Xbox 360, PS3 Tags: playstation 3 updates, Sam Fisher, Ubisoft

Sorry to stir things up a bit, but everyone and their pink prancing hippo probably already know that PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 side-by-side comparisons are a fact of life these days. Previously, we've had graphical comparisons of Armored Core, Elder Scrolls, and Virtua Tennis, and some time before that, comparisons of Tiger Woods and Tony Hawk.

Today, Sam Fisher's getting the same treatment, but this time around, as seen in pictures (instead of vids). From The Back Buffer (Blogspot), we got comparison shots of the PS3- and 360-versions of Splinter Cell: Double Agent. Quite aptly so, we just might finally see the true meaning of his being a "double agent."

Now, now. Before you guys go at each other's throats, here's a very intelligent comment by Anonymous we found on the Blogspot post, saying that he/she won't decide on either an Xbox 360 or PS3 purchase based on these screenshots because of the following:

are those screenshots captured directly from the system or from physical digital camera?
are those screenshots from the same display output?
I may question the game developer's capabilities of getting the most from both systems.
I will decide my purchase based on screenshots from Gran Turismo for Xbox360 and PS3.

Opinions are opinions; everyone's entitled with their own. And as always, the main difference between both consoles is the lighting. Now, to make things fun, we'll make you guess which side of these shots are running on which platform. If you want to cheat just highlight the following censor bars: Xbox 360, right-hand side; PS3, left-hand side.

This story sucks? This story rocks!

Vote Now!

(0)

(0)

the ps3's SPDA looks pretty disapointing as compared to the 360's, look at the detail on the flag of the guys shirt sleeve, and look at the texture and detail in the finger nails and the ways sams face seems to shine with sweat and his hair stubble stands out , even the walls in the background seem to have more fine detail on the 360 than on the ps3

I will say that I have SPDA on the 360 and know how it looks in 720p, but after seeing how it looks on a ps3 im really really disapointed, it looks as though they didnt really try, sad...at this point I wouldnt take a ps3 if people were giving them away for free

# interesting — Guest 2007-04-10 18:06

the 360 looks better for floor textures but I can't really comment on anything else

# yeah — Guest 2007-04-10 18:15

it seems like they weren't trying on the PS3 version

# classic — ContrAss 2007-04-10 18:27

example of a poor port. Too bad that it looks like junk on the PS3.

# well — Guest 2007-04-10 18:28

if so then ps3 really sucks and im gonna cry cause i love sony.

But i dont trust the sourse.....

1st i havent seen bill gates in game yet....

2nd The First shot from the left might be taken from PC version using low detail setting..and no one will know hehe.

3rd - Photoshop FTW!

so ***** off xbox fanboys

# can't believe it... — Guest 2007-04-10 18:30

until its proved that these are really shots from ps3-version and not from xbox or pc with low settings. the diference ist too extreme, most of pixel shader effects seem to be removed and theres no HDR-Rendering, and why these comparison-shots are low-res?

# ... — Guest 2007-04-10 18:34

Looks like a poor port for the PS3. Except for the night vision, everything looks worse. This could be one of the worst PS3 ports yet.

# . — Guest 2007-04-10 18:42

yea... i was kind of disappointed myself of what ubisoft has done with splinter cell double agent port

now... i'm not really a fan of the series but i was actually planning to get this one to actually experience what SC is all about(haven't played the prev. titles either... and yes i know it's a stealth game) in good HD glory :)

i thought if bethesda could port oblivion at such quality to the PS3 then why not ubisoft.... but i guess i wrong

and i simply just have to say this... that pic of sam holding that guy looks so much like a PS2 screenshot

# ps3 — SuperVegeta 2007-04-10 18:43

i thought the ps3's looked way better than the 360's. PS3's shading is more subtle. 360's is just bam, straight at you as it changes shadows. this is especially evident in image 13. I just think the ps3's SPU's can do stuff like mist and shadow better cause it can have an SPU specifically for those things like they do with rain in Formula 1 racing

# WRONG!! — Guest 2007-04-10 18:47

you gays... sorry, guys

WWTF?? what kinda crack are you guys smoking? The right IS THE PS3, not 360. It has the hallmarks of PS3, the light only PS3 does that. Check ALL other comparisons Xbox 360 can never achieve the type of light of PS3.

They say right left in mirror image because behind the screen the Xbox is right and PS3 is left.

I can't believe Y' ALL got it wrong.

# Damn Sony Fanboys — Guest 2007-04-10 19:16

Chill Out,

It's obvious that Microsoft > Sony.

Damn little Japanese Sony Fanboys,

America > YOU

# yeah — Guest 2007-04-10 19:17

oblivion did seem to be the best port, and the shading in oblivion for the 360 was dark and hard to see but in the PS3 it was lighter and better. And yeah it does look like a PS2 screenshot but remember that they both run on the RSX processor. Not to bring down the PS3 though cuz i love it and i have a 360 too but until i've seen the game on my PS3 then i will decide

# You Idiot PS3master — Guest 2007-04-10 19:19

i have played Double Agent for the 360 in HD and I CAN TELL YOU that it looks nothing like the pics on the LEFT, THE 360 version is on the right.

# what is this garbage? — Guest 2007-04-10 19:34

I have splinter cell on the ps3 and does not look anything like the comparsion pics they have up there rite now. I don't know what they are trying to pull, but that comparsion is NOT true.

# Xbox 360 is *****ty — Guest 2007-04-10 19:43

***** yeah PS3 for the win! Xbox 360 is a piece of ***** console!

# afl — Guest 2007-04-10 19:49

lol you obviously dont have the 360 version because then youd know the 360 is on the LEFT and ps3 is on the RIGHT just like the article states. you sony fans will make up anything just to make people think your console doesn't suck. jeeze...

# yeehaw — Mdubz 2007-04-10 19:53

HARR HARR, BEER N' FREEDOM FRIES!1 YEEHAW!

# huh — Quixand 2007-04-10 19:54

why do we need to argue about these pics... i guess we all know that this isn't really reliable... left-right right-left... it doesn't matter... it not's going to look like that (the left pic) for either the 360 and the PS3... we all know both are better than that... as LiquidZ3ro said we can only decide when we actually see it on the consoles... i'm not going to believe these pics... never have (with previous comparisons) and never will.

i've only had my PS3 for three weeks (just launched here in Sydney) and i've already bought 7 games since getting it (Resistance, Motorstorm, Ridge Racer, F1, Marvel Ultimate, VIrtua Tennis, and NHL2k7... i'll be getting NBA2K7 this thurday plus a couple of downloads like GT HD Concept, Tekken DR, and even that Rub a Dub)... and i've got my PS3 connected thru HDMI to my Bravia... and none of them games are like this... they all look magnificent... no way I'm going to believe that THAT pic up there will be what a game would look like on a PS3.

# WTF ??? — Guest 2007-04-10 19:57

"I will decide my purchase based on screenshots from Gran Turismo for Xbox360 and PS3"

WTF ?? For your information there will be no Gran Turismo for Xbox360 Gino D.

As far goes for Splinter Cell I'll wait for Gametrailers video comparison and there will be one sooner or later .

# From IGN — VgSlag 2007-04-10 20:52

From IGN:

Double Agent's gameplay relies on deep blacks and the lighting on PS3 came off as less dynamic in many areas.

It's a trade off. When Sam first drops into the water on 360 it's difficult to get your bearings and figure out the correct direction to swim.

However on PS3 you'll switch to night vision less often because there seems to be plenty of ambient light even in the "dark" areas.

The PS3 versions is lacking some small details present on 360. For example when we first enter Sam's prison cell there is a chessboard on the ground and some scattered belongings next to his bed. These aren't included on PS3.

There are also a few less background characters in the prison and different fire effects.

http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/778/778471p1.html

# what!? — Guest 2007-04-10 21:06

either ubisoft sucks or this is not the real ps3 version!

# poo — Guest 2007-04-10 21:34

that looks more like wii vs xbox30/ps3

# I own SWPDA on PS3, and it sucks — Guest 2007-04-10 22:05

Although the PS3 version doesn't look as bad on an HDTV as in the shots above, it is indeed a very bad port. Compared to other games like Resistance FOM and the frame rate is very choppy dropping under 10fps at times :/ The PS3 doesn't deserve such junk. Just stay away from that game (not from the PS3 ;), or get it on a 360.

# cool — Guest 2007-04-10 22:24

The PS3 shots are better than the 360!

# Pointless — Guest 2007-04-10 22:28

Kinda a pointless arguement, the 360 has a damn site more dev time where coding is concerned, give the PS3 18 months and you'll have a more worthwhile comparison. Personally I don't care as I own both ;)

# . — Guest 2007-04-10 22:30

QJ say PS3 is on the left side - 360 on the right...that isnt tru for all of the images. whereever the lighter image is..thats PS3.

i have the ps3 version, and when underwater it is NOT so dark that you cant see anything. that underwater pic with the bubbles has the PS3 to the right, where you can actually see what you're doing. i have heard from reviews that the 360's version is very dark, and even the darkness of underwater was commented on.

like i said, whereever the lighter image is, thats a ps3 screenshot

# . — Guest 2007-04-10 22:33

'360 is on the LEFT and ps3 is on the RIGHT' that isnt actually true. these screen are mixed up. for the first row - the PS3 is on left, 360 on the right; and for the rest PS3 is on the right and 360 on the left.

# . — Guest 2007-04-10 22:35

although the framerate is rather bad...i have heard the 360 version also has a bad framerate and that its worse in places, and theres even tearing of the screen in places.

# 360 — Guest 2007-04-10 22:49

i had this on ps3 and my friend has this on 360 and i agree it looks better on 360 and i blame it on when it was ported over, for some reason game play on the PS3 isn't smooth but rather choppy, the 3d camera seems to lag and when i finished the game it sucked anyway so i returned it, but yea id say who ever ported it from 360 to ps3 just didn't do it the way right way to run well on a PS3.

# Truly — Guest 2007-04-10 23:34

I`m sick of that comparison,not only for that game but for the rest.On every page there`s f*****g comparison. It`s not that I hate that but that is to much I`m sick of that stuff!

# Love the fanboys — Guest 2007-04-10 23:41

You have to love when people hit out with ohh F**K XBOX and XBOX is the SH*T console, if xbox is the ***** console can u please elaborate on that one because since i've had mines its shelled out great games, great online multiplayer an everything else

# From the IGN review... — Shatterdome 2007-04-10 23:46

"Graphically, the game looks good, but falls short of the detailed display Sam saw on Xbox 360 last year."

So, once again, 360 come out on top....

# For all the naysayers... — Shatterdome 2007-04-10 23:48

From IGN review...

"Graphically, the game looks good, but falls short of the detailed display Sam saw on Xbox 360 last year."

So, once again, 360 come out on top....

# i hate this — Guest 2007-04-10 23:53

this is a game that is on last generation platforms and sony i guess hasn't concentrated so much on them. all of the games on all platforms look crap on the ps3 because they weren't specifically ment for the ps3 so they look crap. just wait until the ps3 exclusive games come out.

# ... — Guest 2007-04-10 23:54

pro-g.co.uk weren't so friendly about the PS3 shortfalls.

"So, everything is very much as it is in the Xbox 360 release, but in terms of presentation this PlayStation 3 version is severely under par. Whereas the Xbox 360 game often dazzled with impressive lighting and a solid frame rate, the PS3 game chugs frequently and seems to be missing much of the subtle lighting that impressed so much last year. What's more, numerous sound effect glitches crop up throughout and cutscenes fail to run smoothly. It's all rather sloppy and lessens the experience substantially."

http://www.pro-g.co.uk/ps3/tom_clancys_splinter_cell_4_/review-2.html

# damn stupid kids — Guest 2007-04-11 00:02

America is a continent, not a country! Don't you fuc*s ever learn?!

# They're never trying with PS3 games — Guest 2007-04-11 00:26

Or maybe they were trying very hard?

# Wow, biggest difference I've seen so far — Guest 2007-04-11 00:28

Just look at that first pic, with the NPC being held hostage, 360 looks a thousand times better than the PS3 shot. And once again, lighting is superior on the 360 version, it's brighter where it should be brighter and darker where it should be darker.

Either developers are getting lazier or the Cell really is just that hard to code for, and methinks it's the former

# . — Guest 2007-04-11 00:29

Yes the console with more games that are always better is a peice of **** console. Whatever you need to tell yourself to make you feel better about your $600 purchase.

# . — Guest 2007-04-11 00:32

Yes, there are quite a few bad ports on the PS3 for some reason. So many bad ports it's hardly a coincidence.

# ok im going to have to say this — gtauk 2007-04-11 00:50

the ps3 version looks *****ing *****, that looks like a ps1 game

now, i love the ps3 but this is just appaulling

# by far — xche78x 2007-04-11 00:53

this is the most stupid of all of the comparisons.

inaccurate in every way. these screenshots does not represent either of the systems gfx/display capabilities.

# Some serious denial here PS3 fans! 360 is better! — Guest 2007-04-11 00:59

I have IGN insider access, I've download the high res movie comparison, and in every way, the 360 version is much better than the PS3 version (as yes, those screens ARE from the PS3 version).

Give whatever reasons you want, but the framerate is better on the 360, the colours are richer, the contrast is better, and the detail is higher. :|

# ^^^Who said it was a system comparison? — Guest 2007-04-11 01:14

This is a comparison of Splinter Cell ON THE 360 and PS3, no-one said its a comparison of the 360 and the PS3 consoles.

And how is it inaccurate? That IS how the game looks on both systems, and if you had IGN insider access, you could download the head-to-head movie these screenshots are taken from and see it for yourself.

http://uk.insider.ign.com/articles/778/778471p1.html

# have you seen oblivion? — hush404 2007-04-11 01:39

It's obvious that the PS3 has much more power behind it for textures. It looks like ubisoft just got lazy... or these screens really don't show off the true game.

# Which system is really better — Guest 2007-04-11 01:56

Fact is that when you port from 360 to PS3 you often have to cut geometry and reduce textures to fit within the limited asset memory of the ps3. Yes the PS3 has more cels, yes the ps3 is supposedly the more powerful system. But there are things about the PS3 that make it limited in comparison to the 360. PS3 is a system with 1 core that has many cells clocked in at 2.8ghz for the core overall. 360 is a multi-core system clocked in at 3.2ghz per core. PS3 has split memory divided in two 256MB chunks (this is what limits the amount of textures and geometry) 360 has 512 to use for whatever a dev wants. PS3 has a dedicated shader architecture(la st gen tech) where as the 360 has unified shaders(next gen tech, just being implemented on the latest gfx cards). Overall the PS3 has a better design for a processing data and chrunching numbers, but the 360 has a better design for being a game machine.

# But it also has to be said — Guest 2007-04-11 02:04

PS3 is tough to code for where as the 360 is much easier. devs can spend more time working on making a game look nice on the 360 during production. On the PS3 they have to spend more time coding workarounds to get the effects and game working on the PS3. There are often more bugs on ps3 version that have to be fixed as well. more coding to do a simple task means higher chance there will be issues later on. When pressured by publishers to release by a specific date the 360 version are almost always going to look bertter due to there being more time to make it look prettier. Publishers will often tell devs to cut corners to meet deadlines. I suspect a combination of the above points may be the case for this one. Besides it is still early in the PS3s life and the 360 still hasn't hit its peak. In 2 years lets see which system seems to have the better games.

# wow — Guest 2007-04-11 04:10

this is just ridiculous. the 360 looks amazing... except for the night vision which looks way better on the ps3. could be a few things; crappy/lazy port, not in hd, cell is just to alien to get used to. i am hoping for the sake of my future game library that it's just another one of ubi's crappy ports.

# WTF — Guest 2007-04-11 04:54

Have you seen the third pic... a part of his foot is missing!! That can't be real or ubisoft is the worst company making posts ever!

# IGN says... — Shatterdome 2007-04-11 05:17

that there are parts of the game with snow falling, and it stops falling in only one of the upper corners of the screen....as well as lots of collision detection bugs (which seems to be present in alot of PS3 games)...

It's probably that the engine for Splinter Cell just is not made for cell....however Unreal engine 3 was probably alot better adapted for it....

# ha — Guest 2007-04-11 05:44

exclusive games? what like heavenly sword? that game looks worst than SCDA . I own a 360 but i do want a ps3 but sony won't give me any games that make the system worth my 600 bones

# Yes I've seen Oblivion. It looks the SAME except.. — Guest 2007-04-11 07:16

... the shaders the programmers developed to improve the transition from background to foreground textures improves the graphics in this area, and the draw distance is slightly further too.

This has NOTHING to do with power, this is due to extra developement time, and the devs has said this a number of times when asked!

# nuh uh! — Guest 2007-04-11 07:52

Yeah it's the XBOX 360 holding back the quality of these multiplatform games! There just isn't enough storage on a DVD9. lol

fanboy + retard + fantard

# haha — Guest 2007-04-11 07:54

PS3 got pwned

# HaHa — Guest 2007-04-11 07:57

Xbox 360 are so much better that i feeel like puking.

PS3 Sucks

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHA

# ????????? — Guest 2007-04-11 08:21

LOOK at the night vision pictures and you can see that on that one the ps3 has better texture! The problem is that the xbox360 version has better lighting! the ps3 version looks too dark! and the xbox has great lighting!

# ^^^Not very smart are you! — Guest 2007-04-11 08:22

How could the 360 be holding back the quality when the 360 version is the superior version? And this is true for many multi-format games. The PS3 should at least match the 360, but for many games, this is not the case.

Last gen, the XBox was usually the best version for multi-format games. The GC and PS2 were less powerful, but that didn't hold it back because the XBox was capable of better textures, more polygons and better framerates.

Right from the beginning devs and gamers said there's not much difference between the 360 and PS3 in terms of power, and so far this is being shown to be true in multi-format games. If anything, the extra (and more flexible) available memory on the 360 and slightly more powerful GPU seems to be making the difference.

# Damn stupid trolls — Guest 2007-04-11 08:23

Since you want to be a technical douche,

America is not a continent either.

North America + continent

South America + continent

Go to http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q+United%20States

"Also called America"

# lol — Guest 2007-04-11 08:30

I'm gonna say ubisoft sucks.

All the Tom Clancy games look like garbage in my opinion

# You really need to see the IGN movie. — Guest 2007-04-11 08:32

The PS3 version appears to have better textures on the night vision pictures because of the way night vision is being implemented. With night vision off, the difference is as seen in that first picture at the start of this topic.

# I didn't notice any — Guest 2007-04-11 08:36

I rented it last weekend for the 360, and I didn't notice any framerate problems atall.

You gotta realize that the 360 is running 720p not 1080p. The 360 has better framerates in basicly all the multiplatform games.

Although, since the 360 got patched for 1080p a few of the newer games are developed in 1080p. (i.e. Armored Core 4)

# People, relax! — Guest 2007-04-11 09:13

What i want to say is this. I only own a 360 and i have SPDA for it, and it looks incredible. I dont have a ps3, nor have I seen the ps3 version actually running on a tv screen. With that said, IF these ps3 screenshots are accurate, its a very bad port. Key word here is "PORT", just because this game looks bad on the ps3, it doesnt mean the ps3 sucks and is incapable of great graphics. Look at Oblivion, it looked better on ps3, but this game looks better on 360.

The point im trying to make is, both systems are powerful, both have their pro's and con's. Games like this dont prove one console is better than the other.

# I rented both PS3 and 360 versions — Guest 2007-04-11 09:30

And the PS3 one appears to be worse unfortunately

# IGN says the 360 version looks better — Guest 2007-04-11 09:37

but I guess you all are the professionals.

IGN.com

# ***KING LAZY A$$ PORTS !!!!!!!!!!!!! — Guest 2007-04-11 10:34

No wonder Rainbow six keeps getting delayed BECAUSE THEY FRICKEN SUCK AT PORTING!!!!

# splinter cell — alcest 2007-04-11 10:58

The only thing they get from this, is lower salability for PS3, THATS ALL :)

# hmm — Guest 2007-04-11 11:13

Well if u think about it the night vision is awesome and ponely have to use it alot in this game so ps3 pwns the 360 in night vision and on 360 its so damn bright u dont evn need it and splinter cell is mostly about hiding in the dark therefore they win in ther own way but id buy ps3 one..

# This site is starting to suck — Guest 2007-04-11 11:17

What there talking about is the detail on sam not the environments so get over it, and we know ign is basically a 360 site

# All the reviews — Guest 2007-04-11 11:39

say the 360 version is better in almost everyway possible! And we can see it's better in this comparison. The only reason I could see for anyone buying the PS3 version is because they only have a PS3 and not a 360.

# w3tw1lly — Guest 2007-04-11 12:40

omg the 360 rocked the ps3... ps3 = muddy textures and poor lighting

# why night vision look like crap on 360 — Guest 2007-04-11 12:56

i think the reason the night vision look worse on 360..is because the developers saw how we did not like the night vision mode in 360,so they made it look better for the ps3 port......(the night vision was intentionally made to look bad in the 360 for REALISM,,butt people didnt like it including me,,so in the port they fixed it)

# wtf — Guest 2007-04-11 12:56

Wow this has to be a joke the PS3 shots are just awful.

lol i love how some people are miss reading the article and saying the 360 is on the left and PS3 is on the right.

# Dont trust sites as: — Guest 2007-04-11 13:06

Gamespot.com and ign.com because they r both makor 360 fanboy sites

# ummm... — Vecha 2007-04-11 13:10

you are going to cry because you LOVE sony?

YOU need to shut up fanboy!

why the hell would you cry over a *****ing company?

# No, that's not what they meant... — Shatterdome 2007-04-11 13:47

IGN UK goes into more depth...

"So, everything is very much as it is in the Xbox 360 release, but in terms of presentation this PlayStation 3 version is severely under par. Whereas the Xbox 360 game often dazzled with impressive lighting and a solid frame rate, the PS3 game chugs frequently and seems to be missing much of the subtle lighting that impressed so much last year. What's more, numerous sound effect glitches crop up throughout and cutscenes fail to run smoothly. It's all rather sloppy and lessens the experience substantially."

Or you can just look at the pictures and it's quite obvious....don't worry, your POS console make a good blu-ray player !! awesome...

# There is no comparison — Jobo50 2007-04-11 13:50

they both looks good, this is more a battle of the *****y fanboys! STFU and just enjoy what you have *****es!

# Actually... — Shatterdome 2007-04-11 13:50

The reason the 360 nightvision looks "worse" is that they are using more shader effects to obscure the screen.....PS3 doesn't have as many pixel shaders as 360l, so they were not able to distort the screen as much...

For some reason people think brighter/clearer is better....but really, it's not, and is usually inidictive of a lesser system using fewer effects...

# THen... — Shatterdome 2007-04-11 13:53

Just look at the screens and see for yourself...

Really the first one with the hostage sums it all up....360 just powns in lighting, textures and even facial animations....which PS3 has none of....

The guy on PS3 really doesn't look too bothered by the fact he is about to get his neck broken...maybe he figures Sams arm will clip through his neck due to shoddy collision detection, and he'll be alright....

haha

# It's hard to do that... — Shatterdome 2007-04-11 14:12

when the company that was touting the worlds most powerful gaming console, with "twice the power" of any other console and has the most expensive console....is getting beaten technically over and over by it's competitor...

Really now, if some kid kept bragging that he could jump a fence in one leap, and that you couldn't do it even with help....and then when he went to jump it, tripped up and fell flat on his face, while you soared over it easly.....wouldn't you feel the need to point fingers and say "I told you so" ?

# wtf... — Guest 2007-04-11 14:29

are you sure this isnt PS2 vs. Xbox 360?

# heheh — Guest 2007-04-11 14:54

whatever helps you sleep at night...hallmarks..that made me laugh

# KHHAHAHAHh — Guest 2007-04-11 14:56

ur dumbass got pwned not a donkey

# Wow what an idiot — Guest 2007-04-11 15:22

You really are a PS3 fantard aren't you? How is the 360 version holding back anything when 1. It came out first and 2. Looks better than the PS3 version, which came out half a year later

# this means — Guest 2007-04-11 16:38

this means nothing ps3 is still an awesome machine, splinter cell 5 is going to be a 360 exclusive I have heard though.

# Wow... — Guest 2007-04-11 18:35

This games looks like something a walrus would regurgitate. Seriously i own a PS3 and have not played this game but man i'm going to have to rent it now to find out if these shot are true to word. If it is indeed true, then this has GOT to be the worst port EVER. The first shot looks like something you would expect off a PS2 readily giving me the impression this was made by someone who did not give a damn. Even if you are an Xbox fan you have to admit the PS3 is more than capable of making something that looks better than these atrocious shots. I'll be renting this over the weekend and if the shots prove right then i may just take a hot steamy dump in the case and return it as it may just be what the developers were going for.

# Ah, the good old classic — Guest 2007-04-11 19:54

"and we know ign is basically a 360 site"

If a website doesn't show unconditional love to your console of choice, then it must be run by fanboys. *rolleyes*

Splinter Cell looks better on the 360, get over it!

# ^^^ Hmmm — Guest 2007-04-11 19:58

The character was changed in his post, I think he wrote fanboy plus retard equals fantard, hence the name.

So looking back, I think he's being sarcastic. :)

# fact — Guest 2007-04-11 21:48

well now we know why they are making splintercell 5 exclusive for the 360.

ps3 really has mediocre graphics.

# Waste of bandwidth — Guest 2007-04-12 07:12

I have a PS3 and I know Xbox360 graphics aren't that bad. This is just plain lame comparison. Also, if the developers aren't using the full potential (ie: reusing old bitmaps) of each system (which I suspece they aren't), it's just foolish to compare.

# Tearing — Guest 2007-04-14 04:56

Tearing is actually caused by lack of synchronization between the graphics card and the display- it's not the game or the system's fault.

# ps3 — Guest 2007-04-22 09:47

i have the ps3 and double agent and none of these photos look anything like the real picture.

# STFU — Guest 2007-04-25 07:09

hey buddy shut the ***** up because i have SPDA on PS3 and it looks nothing like that on it. it looks better then the 360 because me and my friend both hooked up our systems he has 360 and we did a side by side on my 1080p 50inch tv in a split screen view and my PS3 looked way better obviously this is ps2 becasue ive played it on ps2 and thats how it looks. So before you go just posting ***** like that why dont you own both systems and do a little test for yourself because until you do SHUT UP. these are obviously done by microsoft to make ps3 look bad. its not fooling me.

# hahaha — Guest 2007-04-25 16:16

im sorry but this is funny seeing how mad people can get over games. in how many months not even years will this matter to you. sorry but they're both games and both are better at different things. But i do agree that ps3 graphics aren't anywhere near that bad and i have a 360.

but seriously just relax

Refresh comments list

Add comment

JComments

QUICK JUMP DAILY DIGEST

Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:

Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.

So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!

Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!

HOT FLASH GAMES

QJ.NET Categories
• Apple • E3 • Featured Articles • Gadgets • Games for Windows • iPad • iPhone • MMORPG • Mobile • News • Nintendo 3DS • Nintendo DS • Opinions & Analysis	• Photography • PlayStation 3 • PoV • PS Vita • PSP • Rumors • Science • Site News • Tabula Rasa • Wii • Wii U • World of Warcraft • Xbox 360

Sitemap

Newest Downloads

05/10/2013 - 05/18/2013

PSP Homebrew: Cosmos Lunar v1.01	05/17/2013
PSP Homebrew: Xonergy	05/16/2013
PSP Homebrew: Cube Runner Advanced v1.2	05/16/2013
PSP Homebrew: Wagic 0.19.0	05/15/2013
IrisManager 2.41: New Payload, Updated Discless	05/15/2013
PSP / PS3MInis Bite v1.5: Homebrew Support	05/14/2013
This Tool Makes Playing PSP Games on PS3 EZ!	05/12/2013
Iris Manager v2.40 Has Some Cool New Features	05/11/2013
PUAD GUI v1.5 PUP Unpacker/Decryptor makes PUP Files Easy to Handle	05/10/2013
Get Your NOR Dumps Validated by BWE v1.24!	05/10/2013
Estwald Updates Fan Control Utility to v1.6	05/10/2013
BWE NOR Validator v1.24	05/09/2013
PSP Homebrew: Soldiers of Future Gets a New Beta With Major Improvements	05/08/2013
Crazy Stuff Mod 1.0 for Multicraft	05/08/2013
PSN PKG Decryptor and Extractor 1.71 Is Stable, Fixes Bugs	05/07/2013

Most Comments this Month
As Promised A Metro Last L..	(41)
VP Biden Says Taxing Viole..	(13)
Iwata is Tired of People B..	(12)
Giving Away 10 Age of Wush..	(11)
Sound Off: Would You Play..	(11)
EA Gets Exclusive Rights T..	(10)
PoV: Nintendo Has Changed..	(10)
Say Hello to the Xbox....I..	(9)
No Metal Gear Solid 4 or L..	(8)
It’s Official: Dead Spac..	(8)
Sega Sued Over Colonial Ma..	(7)
Pachter: PS4 Buzz Has Died..	(7)
Could Smartphone Apps Help..	(7)
First GameStick Consoles R..	(7)
Why Won’t Wii U See Fros..	(7)
Manhunt is Headed to the P..	(7)
QJ How To: What is SSH and..	(7)
Nintendo Acknowledges Wii..	(6)
Study: Companies are Overe..	(6)
The Next Mass Effect Just..	(6)
Games are Full of Easter E..	(6)
EA Announces That Online P..	(6)
Insomniac CEO Gives Wii U..	(6)
PS4 Will NOT Mandate an In..	(6)
Ken Levine Has Some Intere..	(6)

Top Jumps this Month
PSP Homebrew: Camxps..	(97)
WiFiHack Now Availab..	(49)
PSP homebrew - LameC..	(45)
PSP GBA v1.2: Gamebo..	(32)
Wii homebrew - WAD M..	(29)
Custom Firmware PRO-..	(28)
PSP Comics Reader v2..	(26)
Speed Gamers Are Pla..	(24)
Brian Lara Internati..	(24)
PPSSPP: A Windows an..	(19)
Naruto Shippuden: Ul..	(19)
Choco's Black Ops 2..	(14)
PSP Fans Unite! Toda..	(14)
PSP homebrew - Mario..	(13)
Download full Sid Me..	(13)
PSP Homebrew - PSPDi..	(12)
QJ Shootout: PSP Vs...	(12)
Saints Row IV - Meet..	(12)
The World Is In Trou..	(11)
Treyarch Responds to..	(11)
Minecraft PC Hits 8..	(11)
Nintendo Explains it..	(11)
New GTA V Trailers A..	(10)
Games are Full of Ea..	(10)
PlayStation Eye driv..	(10)

Quick Jump Daily Digest

Sam Fisher vs. Sam Fisher: Splinter Cell PS3-360 comparison shots

Related Stories:

Comments

Add comment

Newest Downloads