Rumor: PS3 To Have Different Systems Too? |
Ó

He also said the $ 299 version might not have the Blu-ray Video playback function, but the $ 599 version will. But still, both versions are capable of playing Blu-ray games. Now imagine a PS3 that can't play Blu-ray videos... the only word I can find is "Lame".
Ken Kutaragi's words are still in my head even now: "You can buy the PS3 by working overtime for a few days." I wonder if Japanese people are getting THAT well paid, or was he just referring to the $ 299 version?
We cross our fingers about this rumor.
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
Best prices available for:
Price Range:
$49.00 - $80.00
$49.00 - $80.00
at 15 Stores
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - March
User Favorites - March
Categories
Archives
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006





Comments
Well, I don't really care anymore, I am going to get one no matter what. I will get the premium of course and hope that my pre-order is met.
Reply
Reply
SWEET, if that's true, $299 is the price it's going to launch at...:D
and think about the number of launch titles Gamestop will have to place inside the order if they wanted to make a $599 Bundle:D
Reply
Reply
Reply
Blu-ray video is not worth $300... I just don't want it...
The only reason I want blu-ray, is because Sony wont have to face those looming Disc Size problems (if there even are any)... Personally, if the PS3 will be $300 for Blu-Ray games only, I'm buying the $300 model, NO QUESTIONS ASKED...
Reply
This can be a Example, of a Hacked next generation FIRMWARE for PS3... Imagine a firmware with All Cheats included for all games (and automatic UPDATE by Internet TOO!...)
Reply
There are no immediate disc capacity issues that make their use necessary (http://www.gamesfirst.com/index.php?id=1132).
Why would game publishers want to pay the premium necessary to put their games on Blu-Ray when they would easily fit on a smaller, cheaper media like DVD.
Gotta give kudos to Sony for the nice smoke and mirrors job they are doing marketing it (Blu-Ray) though.
Reply
Reply
You honestly think they're just going to tell this info to some random employee at EBgames? Gimme a break...
Reply
Reply
Reply
This is just another nasty rumor from some idiot Xbox360 fanboy...
Reply
WHatever store said this is just bull****ting. Sony cant release two versions of the console because that would be like manufacturing a PS3, make one that has all the features and one that disables features. Its not practical.
the xbox core and premium accually had removeable hard drives that defined it being cheaper. Anyone who believes that sony would make such a stupid move is an idiot.
Disk space is an issue for true HD games. If any console wants true HD content they will need a mssive amount of space. Most movies on DVD9 arent putting out 1080 because they cant, space wont allow it.
games can be the same, PC games have had compress all their files and still use 4gb of space. But PCs are much faster and better at handling compressed files. Most of the recent PC games have broken the dvd9 barrier when you decompress all the files. And they are designed for resolution of 1600x1200.
Consoles dont have t
Reply
Reply
Reply
These blogs that post info they heard from a local employee are just dumb. I worked at gamestop for two years, so I know that these "news" posts are just pointless when the source is "some employee at GS or EB".
Reply
after all, they aren't as stupid as MS
Reply
This isn't even worth posting here
Reply
And Sony already stated they will out MS MS. They have shown the PS3 in silver, white, and black. As well as stated they will be different. So, it does not suprise me one bit.
Reply
that does not make sense
anyways, i think it might be like the PSP
where you have the value pack and standard
Reply
I think half of it really could be true, like I read here. A normal PS3 and a PS3 with all kind of **** bundled too it.
No blu-ray video playback on one system and playback on the other is very weird for 300 dollars. Especially if blu-ray games are to be read by both systems. The technology would be in there, but only not enabled. I guess there would be cheaper ways to enable it.
Also it wouldn't be a great move to win the race between blu-ray and hd-dvd, making a blu-ray video player more expensive then it could be. Especially 300 dollars...
Reply
Reply
Not likely that third parties (Sony might, but I think even that is debatable) will be putting out games on Blu-ray within the first couple of years of the system's release. Extra storage is not necessary at this point and is not worth the premium they would have to pay (and charge) for the media.
Reply
Still, sounds fake.
Reply
Reply
Reply
i swear thats total BS coming from an "EBgames Employee"
as for this "I wonder if Japanese people are getting THAT well paid, or was he just referring to the $ 299 version?"
as far as i know you can probably earn a few thousand yen in one night by working part-time at a construction site
Reply
You wonder if the japanese have the money, they definitly do, their pay rate is alot higher then in america. If the PS3 cost 500 bucks, it will sell out just as fast if not faster then the PS2. If it cost more then 500 then it will still sellout. people who arent willing to pay the premium for the PS3 will be shoved aside for people who are.
Reply
WHatever store said this is just bull****ting. Sony cant release two versions of the console because that would be like manufacturing a PS3, make one that has all the features and one that disables features. Its not practical.
the xbox core and premium accually had removeable hard drives that defined it being cheaper. Anyone who believes that sony would make such a stupid move is an idiot.
Disk space is an issue for true HD games. If any console wants true HD content they will need a mssive amount of space. Most movies on DVD9 arent putting out 1080 because they cant, space wont allow it.
games can be the same, PC games have had compress all their files and still use 4gb of space. But PCs are much faster and better at handling compressed files. Most of the recent PC games have broken the dvd9 barrier when you decompress all the files. And they are designed for resolution of 1600x1200.
Consoles dont have t
Reply
They have no EBGames in holland?!?!
I gotta move back there!
Anyways, this ish bullsh*t, It costs them money to do it.
And obviously a core and premium would be like one HDD and one not, and maybe some controllers..
Hell, if Sony's online aint free than maybe a subscription.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
My conclusion is quite logical, since a 80gb 2.5' HDD retails about $150, an HDMI cable for around $50, etc... I know you can get these cheaper but I am listing them at average retail prices.
So basically the core systems will be a standalone version PS3 with no PS3Net service (separate monthly access fee), no HDD, and comes with standard component or a/v cables vs. pricy hdmi.
Reply
Reply
Its cheaper and more efficient to manufacture one model. One default model. if you manufacture 2 models then you have to design the process to create two types of the PS3 which cost more.
Also DVR is cheap. The PS3 will already have everything a DVR needs except software. So DVR functions is just a matter of installing DVR software. Cheap way to add DVR, will cost them next to nothing to add that feature. Hard Drive are not as expensive as you think, even 2.5 laptop drive. Sony can buy directly from manufactures and if you checked the price of laptop drives, they arent so overly expensive.
A PS3 wouldnt bea PS2 without a blue-ray drive, they already said the PS3 will come with a Blue-ray drive. Why would they make a model with no Blue-ray drive?
Online Service will probably cost a monthly fee. But if Sony is gonna be smart about it, they need to offer it for free for a few months to get the bugs worked out and off
Reply
Reply
Reply
That's the dumbest statement ever.
I mean, he's an idiot and it shows.
If cheaper PS3 has Cell (decoding), RSX (processing) and Blu-ray (content), then how could it not play movies?
What an idiot.
It won't have Blu-ray drive, but it will play Blu-ray games? Oh yeah, I forgot that my DVD Player also recognizes Blu-ray discs.
It's SONY, it's not Microsoft. They want to deliver quality, and they will, whether you can afford it or not.
Can this site go any lower? You guys start to post TOTAL GARBAGE, and kids around here, without brains probably, are eating every little straw of info.
And about games not taking up the BD disc: yeah they don't on X360, because they look like crap and use current-gen technology, next-gen games will take up much more space, just like Epic said.
Reply
"Rumor: PS3 To Have Different Systems Too?"
Wow...will you look at that. It says the word "rumor" any idiot who reads it and takes it as the truth...well too bad for them.
"And about games not taking up the BD disc: yeah they don't on X360, because they look like crap and use current-gen technology, next-gen games will take up much more space, just like Epic said."
Ok..now i know what is wrong...
you are a blind fanboy...and anything negative said about the ps3...you get pist off?..right? So you make an attack on the 360, which has no cgi pre-rendered games, and gears of war looks as good as MGS...so don't use that as an excuse.
Reply
Ok..now i know what is wrong...
you are a blind fanboy...and anything negative said about the ps3...you get pist off?..right? So you make an attack on the 360, which has no cgi pre-rendered games, and gears of war looks as good as MGS...so don't use that as an excuse.
ok i am a ps3 fan boy just to get that off my chest but im not stupid
yes gears of war looks as good as MGS but all that aside
do you now how long the game is? thats all i want to know :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
It has about as much credibility as a radom post on a message board
Reply
Reply
yes gears of war looks as good as MGS but all that aside
do you now how long the game is? thats all i want to know :)"
I didn't call any fanboys stupid. But saying the Ps3 is better then the 360 because of "MGS" is blind fanboyism.
I don't know how long Gears Of War is...but I also do not know how long MGS4 is either.
Reply
you awnswered that question well but who bout this one
Madden 06 cut out almost every thing Xcept just the raw game (one big thing they cut out is Super Star)
but they cut out somuch because of small storage on DVDs
no if a game like madden isnt even full then how do you posably think Gears of war can even be a decent lenght game when the graphics look far beter then madden
now on the other hand there is no evedenice that show ps3 games can fit on BD Xecpt that the are more then 5x the size of DVD so i think with much confidence that MGS will be 2 to 4 times as long
Reply
I could be wrong that it will be enough.
And I understand that BR makes it seem more sensable to think the game will be longer...But...Launch games are known to not be the best and not show the full potential of a system.
I will be getting two systems...and if the ps3 comes out to be better...I'll most likely buy more games from Sony and anything on the ps3...
But...I am not totally shuting off the 360 from my mind just because of the belief that the DVD will not be enough.
Hopefully they can master space over content.
But then again...if one is better then the other...remember we are the victors as the consumer, we can go out and choose one over the other and just buy games for the better system...
But I really believe it will be very close in terms of power and graphics.
But...we'll have to see...
sorry I'm such a fence sitter...XD
Reply
Reply
perhaps the premium is the one that includes the DVR, LOCATION FREE, and after seeing the psp support only mp4, maybe the premium will use diff firmware that allows for the playback of video approved by sony (bluray)
there is alot of technology that is being put into the media centre aspect of the ps3, so it is totally possible that they will release another ps3 designed specifially for games, to be cheaper than the media centre one ^_~
Reply
Reply
perhaps the premium is the one that includes the DVR, LOCATION FREE, and after seeing the psp support only mp4, maybe the premium will use diff firmware that allows for the playback of video approved by sony (bluray)
there is alot of technology that is being put into the media centre aspect of the ps3, so it is totally possible that they will release another ps3 designed specifially for games, to be cheaper than the media centre one ^_~
Sony has been noted to say they wouldn't have different systems. I can understand your form of thinking...but chances are slim...especially this info coming from a "stupid kid" who works at EB games.
Reply
And Epic said: "Next-gen games WILL need AT LEAST 20 GB of FREE DISC SPACE" - it's not my fanboyism, it's Epic.
I didn't use MGS as an argument, but if you want to argue with me on this one, then go ahead, because I already showed that you don't know much about technical side of graphics.
One thing that is important (and if you're not blind, and if you're PC is fast enough to run hi-def trailer, you should easily notice) - GeoW really can't compare graphically to MGS4. Just to say, GeoW character models are built out of 10-15k polygons (triangles), Snake's hairs alone, in MGS4 are built out of 60k polygons (you can see individual hair, and they are physics driven, so they move realistically).
Facial animation - if you watched trailers, you would notice, that in GeoW main character is
Reply
Reply
If you asked me...I'm feeling a little uneasy as to how it will play.
But if it's great..no low frame rate drops..then great I'll get it.
if not...I'm sure a better ps3 game will show up.
BUT...seeing as this isn't even on topic.
What I was saying to you...Is you flipped...when on the site it even states, "RUMOR" I too beleive this is bull****.
But I won't act like a baby and scream, "WHAT THE **** IS WRONG WITH THIS SITE"
I mean c'mon. Its just a rumor. And they thought it'd be interesting you know what is in the rumor bin...even if it sounds utter bs.
Reply
Why are they posting crap like this? It doesn't make any sense.
And sorry, but MGS4 demo didn't have any framedrops, GeoW was like 15 fps all the time, but not MGS4. There's a part of the trailer, in which Kojima changes effects and such, and it states the framerate in the numbers, it was like 40-60 fps all the time.
I was also talking about animation, Snake and everything in MGS4 is life-like, due to muscle structure, and real-time animation, in GeoW it all looks just like in a current-gen game, only that it's more sketchy.
And facial animation - in MGS4 - it's all life-like, in GeoW, there are prescripted maps, that are added to main model, it looks lame and CAN'T really compare to MGS4.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
there have been issues about ps3 not including a hard drive. i think they should do exactly what they done with the psp.
the ps3 should came standard with a small hard drive (maybe 2gb), basically enough for all those online stuff and that. just like the psp comes with 32 mb. but the ps3 is a multimedia station, for videos and music, so they should have the option to buy larger hard drives.
this is good because not everybody will be using the psp for videos and music, just like some people just use psp to play games.
Reply
Reply