PS3's power will be untapped for years, says Dave Perry |
Ó
Former Shiny boss David Perry describes Sony's next gen PS3 console as "the best piece of hardware, without question," but believes that it will take videogame developers years before they can hope to tap the console's full powers. In an exclusive interview with GamesIndustry.biz at GDC 07, Perry said that he hasn't seen a single game so far that shows him what the PS3 is truly capable of.
"I haven't seen anything even close to what the machine's capable of doing," he claimed. "So that's the sad part for Sony - I feel really bad for them that somebody hasn't really stepped up to show us the hardware all singing, all dancing."
Perry attributed this under-utilization to a common cycle in the console market. Perry used the PS2 title God of War as an example of a game that finally tapped a console's power after it had been out on the market for a few years. "The point is," said Perry, "you're not going to get to see the PlayStation 3 for probably a couple of years, and then you're going to go, 'Wow, that's incredible.'"
Perry also lays blame on the door of the hardware designers themselves. "This is how sad the industry is right now," he said. "If Sony thought of a way that their architecture designers could somehow add even more power for less money, but made programming a misery - actually made you just want to kill yourself - they would do it."
What Perry sees as a solution is adding more input from top developers into the design of a console system. Perry claims that this move would help to "focus on what's important" rather than building in secondary features at the cost of affordability and game functionality.
Via Games Industry
47 Jumps PSP homebrew - PSP live TV v0.3
44 Jumps PSP homebrew - PSP Live TV v0.4
22 Jumps PSP homebrew - QMixer v1.0
18 Jumps Buy two, get one free at Best Buy
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
"This is how sad the industry is right now," he said. "If Sony thought of a way that their architecture designers could somehow add even more power for less money, but made programming a misery - actually made you just want to kill yourself - they would do it."
Doesn't he mean, "this is how sad sony is right now?"
Developers aren't having nearly as many complaints developing for Microsoft. I guess sony never had to worry about making a console easy to develop for in the past. Shouldn't have underestimated the competition, sony.
All he said about the untapped power etc could just as well apply to any console or even indeed the latest PCs.
IBM is stepping in to help developers unlock CELL's potential isn't it?
That's true!
Remember when the ps2 came out and they were babling on and on about the emotion engine and how it would make hair and clothing move realistically? Well none of the promises came true then so im not holding my breath now. If you compare the gamecube version of resident evil side by side with the ps2 version you will notice how crappy the ps2 version is...i mean even nintendo had better graphics last time.... and for a machine that has nothing going for it other than supposed better graphics the games look pretty *****ty. Motorstorm sucks resistance is average and the rest are forgetable at best. hopefully ps3 will get some great games...or they can not release anything like the psp and spend more time on firmware upgrades than getting great exclusive games for the system.
at least go play the games before you diss them, and don't say you have, nobody believes your stupid little lies. Why can't you just go away, go play in the xbox forums?? seriously, you just lie, and get on everyones nerves.
nobody complains about developing for the xbox because it's a cheap POS. maybe if they make one with any sort of future, people will have to try harder. Oh, and who is making any great games for the xbox? Gears is crap, halo is weak. Is that all you have? lame fps games? Get a life! So you comment on nobody producing a great game for the ps3 yet, but nobody has or will produce a GREAT game for the 360. You know, something that I might actually go waste the money on?
Share the ***** you are smoking guys... Everyone needs to hallucinate sometimes.
Is it just me or are you people being too critical. First off, RESISTANCE IS NOT AVERAGE!!! Resistance is one of themost fun experiences I have had in a long time. You can put that game on and before you know it hours have passed. Sure it does not have GEars of War's graphics (though the environments in Resistance is better). But people are extremely ignorant. Gears is BASICALLY JUST GRAPHICS. I like the game and have had fun with it but come on lets be serious. Its a half azz multi player and a single player that is over in a few hours. TALK ABOUT REPETITIVE.
And yes gamecube did have better graphics than PS2. Thats because it came out a year later (PS3 vs 360 anyone?).
Stop being so critical. Why cant everyone be like me and just own all 3. That was you can TRULY be objective. If you ONLY have a 360 then you will favor it, and the same goes for people who only have a PS3. Buy em all then judge.
TheSh0wstopper
Sony has sold over 200 million PS1/PS2 consoles. There hasn't been competition until just recently. The PS3 is ahead of it's time, now Microsoft is playing catch up. I wonder if we will see a cell machine from them?
Motorstorm sucks??? I wonder if you are refering to the japanese version of the game. It scored very high here in the states. The critics claim it looks and plays better for the U.S. release which comes out today by the way. So maybe you should play the finished product before you judge. Or maybe you just don't like off road games with spectacular crashes and HD visuals and road rash gameplay!!!
For this same reason, the Saturn was a pain to develop for, thus started the decline for them.
Ps2 was a hard to develop for but it had followers so they dealt with it, but it was a first step in the wrong direction for sony.
Ps3 is taking the same route again but now developers are starting to say, why bother, this is overly complicated for no apparent reason other than sony really doesnt know how to build a well conceived system.
Its like saying, hey lets throw a rocket on this car to make it go faster, instead of actually thinking about the crazyness the idea is.
Ah well, in a lot of ways I hope they die the painfull death their arrogance deserves. And that makes me mad that I have to feel that way.
The cell is just hype. It isn't the next step up in technology. Why do you think only sony uses the cell? Why don't any computer manufacturers have any interest in it? It has inferior general purpose computing power compared to a good dual or triple core processor. The cell may have it's uses, but computers and game systems work better with more than one TRUE core.
...is clearly a 360 fanboy, but your post with your 360 attacks makes you no better, whoever you may be. :|
If you find people like MCS annoying, then you should respond with facts instead of behaving worse than the person you're complaining about.
If you want to argue, at leat bring something relevant to the plate. Everything Mr.Common sence says is true, yet said a little biased, but still quite fact worthy. On the other hand, you post is full of fantard flames, huge generalizations , etc. And if anyone is smoking something, look in the mirror. With all the stupid things Sonys has done, and you still standby blindly, whos the one seeing things?
why are the 360 fanboys here in huge numbers..??....and why are they angry...??
you only see one or two sony fanboys in the 360 blog....but it seems that the 360 fanboys invest their entire time in the ps3 section
this indicates one conclusion,some one feels "inferior" about their purchase,and they are trying to express their poisons in here
another conclusion that some microsoft employees and markeeters are making these posts regularly,thus they are doing there "job"
i suggest that those people be ignored....there is no opinion been stated here,its just bashing and bashing was never an opinion
i agree 100% Madlax
does anybody actually think that SONY as a company would die or just the PS3? I'm no fanboy, but saying that SONY will die over and over is really getting annoying. You gotta remember, SONY makes more than just video game products. If anyone is going to bash the PS3, at least refer to SCE(Sony Computer Entertainment) not the entire SONY corporation. At least that would show you know something.
sticky it
i dont care about gay wars..................i just truly know the ps3 is more powerful..........
i am looking forward to the next GRAND THEFT AUTO that comes out after 4
when it will be a ps3 exclusive again
right now the gta4 game is gonna be puzzy'd up to fit on the 9 gigs a dvd can hold and it will be held back to the inferior 360 graphics..........
when they truly tap the ps3's power and then let rockstar loose with 54 gig's of possibility's
then that will be a truly great game,
imagine... not a city' but a world fully destructible,am azing graphics, with 500 differnt cars and you never run into the same pedestrian twice..thousands of songs , only possible on PS3
if the games do look any better than gears of war... then they will hav to sacrifice disc space , where they could have put more levels, vehicles, characters,,
and dont start with ,ohh there not gonna use all that space....cause resistance was going to take 22 gig's to make , but they converted the movies to keep it at 16 gig'z...........already almost twice the 360 disk capacity
im also looking very forward to the next midnight club , i absolutly love dub edition remix
i really hope there working on it .. and partner up again with dub
i love making things im proud of showing off online
why wouldnt they... its a million seller
if 360 didnt have gears of war , right now it'd be nothing ......and since sony got a guy pissed saying the ps3 is the only truly next gen system,.....
i dont see people from that camp making a ps3 exclusive
kinda gay'' well at least they'll show off that the ps3 is capable of those graphics when unreal tournament comes out
maby it might put the 360 version to shame
i could imagine gears of war trying to run fast would f-up the frame rate on the 360
Even if sales are terrible, do you really think Sony would just stop supporting this thing that they made out to be such a huge thing? Sony has a lot of money. Even if the units do not move, PS3 will be around for however long they want it to. Plus, I would not imagine sales really going down from here, considering actual Sony games are on the horizon. We will see if PS3 can even catch up, but I really doubt it will disappear until a PS4 or whatever comes out.
PS3 Suxbig time
too many naive gamers.
"not a city' but a world fully destructible,am azing graphics, with 500 differnt cars and you never run into the same pedestrian twice..thousands of songs , only possible on PS3"
it needs more than blu-ray to make that a reality. so dvd is not holding gta4 back, that's the excuse stupid ps3 fanboys make to try to explain the lack of difference between the consoles.
what you're asking for would also need more ram to store everything during gameplay (loading from hdd is not good enough), and both 360 and ps3 have only 512MB (half of that for graphics), not 1GB or more!
and how long do you think it will take developers to create the game you suggest? the reality is, even if devs have all power and storage needed to create your massive game, they probably don't have the time or the money to create it. unless you want gta4 in 2010 that is?
so get real.
whens gta coming out???
iunno i played motorstorm demo.. its kinda cool i guess, but definitely not worth the price of a ps3 game... the tilt steering is fun, really hard tho
lets hope they "unlock" the ps3 soon enough to save it
instead of just repeating same style games with better graphics... once 2 or 3 really good games for ps3 comes out, sales will boost for sure, just get 1 or 2 really good online games out and it'll be a console seller
hows the playstation network stability compared to xbox live
if they're similar why would anyone pay for xbox live
Everyone relax. We are all entitled to an oppinion. You never need argue if you know yourself. I know myself and I know that my oppinions are right because I believe it and because I know myself. My oppinion is that 360 is a big bag of w*nk.
Yeah, no computer manufacturers have any interest in it. THEN WHAT THE ***** IS IBM? Of course it's the next step up in technology, that's why it's running faster than your *****ty 'box. Considering the processor has been out for 3 months, I'd be kinda freaked if it wasn't just used by Sony. Oh, and btw, the Cell is actually BETTER at general purpose computing, since the EIGHT cores are insanely good at math (computers use math to do *****; I bet your head was too far up your ass to know that). If the Xbox360 is so great then PLAY IT instead of spouting nonsense on a PS3 news site.
*sarcasam on*
Yes, but according to mr common sense IBM must be some sort of fruit stand company, because they don't appear to qualify as a computer manufacturer.
*sarcasm off*
No, I don't think Mr. Common sense has said anything that's true (unless he stuck something about him being a asshat somewhere in there that I didn't catch among his other nonsense drivel.). Any 'facts' he states are either pulled from speculative research BEFORE the PS3 came out and have since been disproven, or he pulled it out of his ass. He's a sullen moron because since he finished Xbox360's one token good game (GoW), he's discovered that the Xbox360 sucks ass and has to fill in the time that he no longer uses for the xbox 360.
You are the dumbass...
"Math is used for sh*t" - That's a brilliant observation there.
However, if you actually knew anything, you would know that the SPU's handle absolutely no branching code, which is what general purpose Cores handle.
It's a fact, PS3 has less general purpose computing power then even a 2 core cpu, read some technical articles and quite THINKING you know what you are talking about.
You WILL NOT see cell in any desktop PC's, I can guarentee you that....it's only true application is in Servers and science applications...
Find an IBM desktop that uses cell...
It's only use will be in scientific applications, which are far from general purpose.
If you weren't such a smartass you would know he meant places like Dell and such...why can you not buy a cell powered desktop ? Because it would cost way too much and perform worse then it's equivalently clocked 2 core Intel CPU...
Sony always does this with their consoles, makes something advanced(more than the other consoles at least) and then their product wins in the end because it's just as good as the other ones are new because of its library, its just their technique, and Microsoft probably has realized this, but decides not to do the same thing as to prevent failure. As for the Cell Processor, it's not being used by computer manufacturers because windows doesn't support it Lol...go figure...those bastards.
Anyhow, he's right about it being untapped, Xbox360 is reaching its full potential as we argue.
My sega dreamcast never reached it's potential . . .
or
...he said the Ps2 reached its potential weren't you listening?
or Yes, it could apply to the "NEW consoles" or even the latest PCS, kthxihateyoutoo .
LOLLOLOLOLOL
Yeah!!! LEts compare the WORST PORT from Gamecube->PS2, IT WAS A PORT!!!! Meaning that it was made for the gamecube, then crapily put on the Ps2 and it took a graphic cut because Ps2 is DIFFERENT.
I doubt you've even played the Ps3 :)
Sry Crow, you are no better. Man you fantards need to get a life.
Or maybe, PS3 fantards need to realize that just becasue your not a sheep, doesnt mean your a fanboy. Every person that posts anything negative about Sony, is labeled as a 360 fanboy. Just becasue im very disapointed with Sony, doesnt mean im a fanboy, it means im an objective consumer. I love my PSP, and my SXRD. But right now the PS3 seems very lack luster, with no real reason to buy. Every promise they made, diidnt come true. They have been called out on the CGI lies. Just becasue you maybe a fanboy, dont generalize everyone. There are more people cashing the PS3 than the 360, because of all of Sonys bad press. There not fanboys, and ffs, none of us work for microsoft. The only thing clear here is that these negative posts are really affecting you. which IMHO is very sad madlax. So again, just becaue i dont swallow everything sony tells me, and praise the all mighty Cell; donot generalize me, and others as a fanboy. Im a gamer, i have almost every system (Including gems like the Turbo Graphics 16 etc) and i see no reason to prase the PS3...YET!! And im not spending $600 on a console that may very well not turn out as hoped.
Im mean, ist everyone in aww of this post. These are fanboy comments from like 6 months ago. The cell hasnt proved anything yet, and restitance was 22 gigs becasue of uncompressed audio, movies, and the game is on multiple locations on the disk to increase load times. And GTA4 has allready been anounced on 360, it my be a timed sony exclusive again, but i doubt it. Developers want to make money, not please silly fantards.
And my opineon is your another useless fantard. To say the 360 is crap is just brand loyalty. To say the PS3 is crap, is also just brand loyalty. To say the PS3 got off to a rocky start, is fact. To say 360 is leading right now is also fact. But you know what, neither you or i has a cystal ball. Both systems show promise, one is in a better place right now, but its still very early in the life span of these consoles. Just like its still early in the hddvd vs blueray wars, heck they havent really began.
Opinions are a funny thing. I genuinely agree with what you're saying. I do normally dish the common sense when it comes to this stupid rivalry crap but I get sick and tired of the numbskulls that spread this s*it so I thought if you can't beat them, join them. I do think it's too early to tell which format will win the next Gen console wars but I will say this:
I have played alot of 360 games and completed some of them, I have also kicked some ass on some of the Live games (Gears and Rainbow) but - I have never really been that excited about the Xbox360 console (I'd have bought my own if I had) and as far my needs are concerned I am looking for convergence in true pure HD and in my opinion this can only be achieved through PS3. But this my opinion and I am not trying to push this on anyone especially the Xbox fanboys. I hope you can respect that. It's a shame that we cannot express ourselves on a PS3 news forum without having our opinions bashed or tarnished by utter crap and untrue speculative bol*@cks (e.g. mister common sense).
i never go into the xbox forums to complain, i do own a 360 tho, but bought it second hand while i wait for the ps3 to come out here. i am greatly disapointed in my 360 experience and hope my ps3 one will be better.
Lol. Had you actually READ what I had posted instead of being in a rush to spout your nonsense, you would have realized that my "brilliant observation" was made in sarcasam. But, since humor is obviously useless on the ignorant, I appologize for trying. Two things: 1) You don't see the cell in a pc because it's so new. It's the same reason you don't see hydrogen-fueled cars on the road; they exist, but they've very new. 2) The current Cell processor can reach 6Ghz non-overclocked, which is faster than any non-overclocked dual core on the market. Oh, can you please provide links to these technical articles, so it doesn't seem like you've suspiciously made them up? Thanks. :-D
I'm sorry that I didn't magically infer that "computer manufacturers" meant Dell and whatever other vague companies. Maybe if you're more specific next time, you won't have to spend time correcting "smartasses" like me. (I do tend to be a "smartass", because it's better than being a "dumbass", like you. :-D) Anyway, it's funny that you bring up scientific applications.
: Bleeding edge power, capable of processing multiple complex tasks simultaniously, accurate physics, realistic AI, large renditions of complicated realtime 3D CGI graphics, fast processing, extensive networking capabilities, with the ability to be built upon to easily support purposes not yet devised. Hmm...sounds eeriely similar to the purpose of a gaming console, doesn't it?
Fantard? Lol...wow, you're really reaching low, aren't you?
To quote you: "Every person that posts anything negative about Sony, is labeled as a 360 fanboy. Just becasue im very disapointed with Sony, doesnt mean im a fanboy, it means im an objective consumer." Switch the words "Sony" and "360", consider me an "objective consumer", and stop being a hypocrite.
I agree. I've been *****ing a bit too much lately, but what you said really makes sense. I'll keep that in mind. :)