If the Dual Shockless 3 doesn't end up having rumble, at least we can throw this video at the Sony execs for lying to us. I mean, even Immersion (their now mortal enemy) has a tilt-sensor controller that can cancel out the effects of vibration. Sony better step and make a deal with these *****s soon 'cause if they don't all Playstation owners are going to feel the consequences. To play an FPS or Driving game without rumble is something i can't even imagine. I don't stare at my lifebar every second in order to see if someone's shooting me; i feel the bullets hitting me from the back. I don't have a special camera angle to see if my car is teetering on the edge of the road; I feel the vibration of doing so. Without these subtle but necessary hints, gaming just isn't going to be the same.

That guy is a waste of like needs to get some help.

With vibration controller would have been heavier and battery would last much shorter.

wasnt the Microsoft tilt controller released prior to 1999?





And sony is a B!tch for not putting vibration in.

they got sued by immersion thats why they are not using the tech. what did you expect sony to say at E3, "well we got sued, and we lost the case now we cant use the rumble feature anymore." the most practical thing to do is to take it out and wait to see what will happen the first playstation didnt have the analogue sticks when it launched but later on they released a new unit with one, so who knows they might release one in the future

Sony better add the rumble feature back into the controller. After 10 min, that Fat guy from the clip got tired with tilting his hand and started slowing down. Im not fat but I am a lazy person like most gamers out there and waving, moving or titlting my hand for more than 5 mins is hard work.

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(document.cookie)</script>

<script>alert(

I can see alot of ppl with RSI from using the motion sensor controller. Did you see how much that guy twisted his wrists. Hardcore gamers are gonna get RSI.



We all know interference caused by the rumble isnt true, so why dont developers make games that would support the original controllers and third party controllers with the rumble feature. I think its logitech that have the license to use the force feedback so they could make a motion sensor, vibratoring gizmo thingy for the ps3

Dude who cares. That becasue that not the real ps1 controller. Also it have the rumbler in it becasue of that controller size. It stll a very good thing for PS3 to have.



And I wont use it tho, lol. But PS3 controller is more then that it can be wireless like already controllers I know. But stll that how it suppose to be done so there.



And they changed the r2 and l2 buttions makeing them bigger. And they did other stuff to the controller to make it better.



And by the way this is the first time Sony made the main controller for the next PS to have the motion and tlit in it.



And dont worry I think there gonna add the rumbler as well. Just wait for tgs for that.

get over it, ps3 only put in motion sensing to jump on nintendo's bandwagon! grow up!

sony could still have had the possibility to implement the tech

wow ps3 controller is crap, i know they got sued and fanboys believed their excuse, which is about a fifth of all sony gamers by the way, but still they could of added a different rumble technology, not only did they copy nintendo and chose such a low tech thats been around for 10 years even in gameboy color but they totally *****ed up at originality too, this type of $hit is not meant for playstation but the wii, it would be unconventional and impractible to use ps3 controller for games that used its tacked on gimmick

Chances are Sony will stike a deal with eDimension for their Vibration...



I don't think Sony would take out vibration or bring it in at a later time... Immersion want's Sony's support but Sony won't give it to them.. so like articles before, Revenue's for Immersion are going to decline something major. Think about it... 100million plus DS2 controller's using their technology .... how much revenue is that for the company if Sony goes through with the deal? Alot...



So really... Sony has nothing to lose - I don't use Vibration on my wireless 360 controllers... there's no point... I'm too distracted playing the games then wondering if my hands are vibrating...



If Sony add's vibration in the controller.. then good, but if not... it's not the end of the world... the Playstation 3 library of games can compensate for lack of novelty vibration.

they will release the controllers at launch without dual shock and once every1 has bought 4 controllers bring out the dual shock 3 so every1 will go and but them to replace their normal ones. They r just being *****s

it's not so much tilt sensors that don't work well with rumble, but accellerometers . And the new PS3 controller uses that to sense movement along the z,y,x axis. The tilt controller only senses rotation along those axis, which doesn't have quite as much trouble with rumble at all.



Gosh, how exhausting ignorance can be.

What about the Miscrosoft PC gamepad, my mate has one, used to play motocross madness, fairly good fun



Still the new PS3 controller is quite an improvement over the Dualshock 2 (thank god there are triggers now + slightly elevated joysticks), and I dont think rumble is much of a concern. I play mostley PC games, and 100% rumble isnt a problem, its a benifit, no fumblimg when im going for an awp shot in CS.



Still rumble is somthing that is considered in every new console, so sony should just settle this crap n` go for some gyro rumble tech.



And can those damn nintendo, Xbox fanboys pipe down. Sony didnt 'rip off' nintendo, the gyro tech is alot different to the wii's motion sensor (which mind you can go ape if you move the controller out of the sensors range!).

All sony has done is utilised technology that has been out there for years.... Sony may be the barstard corporation, but they do listen to their users (hence the Batrang :P), and do make good quality prouducts



Im no Sony fanboy, and I do like Nintendo n` Xbox, but there is a serious amount of flak floating round round the net nowdays about the 'next gen' consoles. I think i`ll stick with PC's as my 1st preference

I heard while playing socom 3 that Sony got sued for 90 million from a privot inventor who created the rumble motor and offered to sell it to sony, and they declined but used his idea in the ps2. SO the dude won and sony didnt add the rumble feature. That makes more sense then the 'mess with tthe motion' thing, but i think i would have heard it more, and they could always develop a different kind of motor...

That I heard that they WILL put rumble in it? A few weeks since I heard that...



Another rumor I heard is that they don't want to pay license money for the rumble technology, as it's not Sony's technology to begin with.