Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Pachter sticks to his prediction, expects GTA V in 2010 |
Listed in: Xbox 360, PS3, PC Gaming Tags: Michael Pachter, Piper Jaffray, playstation 3 updates, PlayStation Network, Take-Two Interactive
Ó
Michael Pachter's back on the prediction path. This time, he's thrown in his hat into the "When will Rockstar release Grand Theft Auto V?" guessing game once again, reiterating his earlier estimate that we'll see a new GTA in 2010.
Pachter's prediction is actually earlier than the release period estimated by Anthony Gikas of Piper Jaffray last week. According to the Wedbush Morgan analyst, they still expect a GTA game to be released in calendar 2010, but "it is not clear that the game will be released before the end of Take-TwoÂ’s fiscal year ending October 31."
Take-Two Interactive's Strauss Zelnick, on the other hand, said earlier this year that 2010 will be "a year that won't have a multiplatform release of a new GTA."
Related articles:
- Analyst: Take-Two to be more profitable because of 2011 GTA V expectation
- Take-Two says no to GTA V in 2010
Via VG247
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|
Comments
gat3
gta3 vice city
gta3 san andreas
gta4 is set in liberty as is gta3 so why not
gta4 vice city
gta4 san andreas
Reply
Reply
Reply
I mean, I can see them doing it but its getting boring. we need new locations outside of America.
R* have covered the American cities worth doing. any others are just the same thing with different paint.
anyhow
"Take-Two Interactive's Strauss Zelnick, on the other hand, said earlier this year that 2010 will be "a year that won't have a multiplatform release of a new GTA.""
Only those two gta iv expantion packs for ps3 then?
Reply
... because salt is sour and Pachter always hits a sour note.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
.. multiplatform being the key word?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply