Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
More multiplayer and online features for Armored Core 4 revealed |
Listed in: PS3, Xbox 360 Tags: 505 Games, PlayStation Network
Ó
Perhaps one of the most inviting features of 505 Games' Armored Core 4 for the PlayStation 3 and the Xbox 360 is its online feature. This allows for players to battle each other over the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live. 505 Games has recently released information about the other features that will be added to the mecha-themed 360 and PS3 video game which makes Armored Core 4 the game to play when you're feeling uber competitive.
Xbox 360 gamers are promised to experience online and system link multiplayer action in games for up to 8 players. PS3 players, on the other hand, will be able to join in multiplayer online, with up to 8 people at a time. They will also be able to experience system link multiplayer through network cable, not to mention split-screen action for 2 players on the same PS3 unit.
Now, gather your teammates, friends, acquaintances, companies, enemies...whoever to join in the fun. Destroy! (Wait, that's something else entirely...)
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|













Comments
Reply
What's the point of this "news"?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You can't see how many people are online, you can't even view rooms you can only randomly join one. The fights only last about 20-30 seconds, everyone uses the same weapons and when the match is over it throws both of you out of the room making it impossible to find the same bloke again.
The offline game is pretty good. It's really short like all the other Armored Cores but the quality is definately there. Plus the voiceover bloke sounds like Matt Berry so what more do you want?
Reply
The game already has 8 player combat... it even says so on the box.... so what is thise new feature???
Reply
Reply
Reply