But they aren't on any other system, are they Mr. Development tool kit?

sounds like they are very stupid to first of all a good game takes time to make in case if you havent noticed. "unlock the puzzle for Ps3 and they also said not enough time so that means dcm4 is crap. basiclly a rush job and that's ashame because I WAS looking forward to this game.

apparently someone does not get jokes **coughAoxomamo xoAcough** And i've noticed that u always start flame wars even though knon posed a valid question... u r one sad, little man...

What an ugly motherf.u.c.k.er.

It really doesn't bother me that this game went multiplatform.

What does is the crap that developers say rather than just come out with the truth.

Is saying MS payed us a sizable amount to port this game over to their system that hard?

It's business, that's how business works and at the end of the day that's what it's all about, making the money.

So why do idiots like this guy come out and try to insult people's intelligence by saying things like,

"As game makers we want as many people to have the chance to play our games as possible."

Yet as noted above, neither Dead Rising or Lost Planet (which is going to PC) are coming to the PS3. Very contradictory to his statement where he tries to sound as if he's looking out for all the gamers.

If that was the case, these two titles would go to every platform regardless of the install base so that gamers of all systems could enjoy them.

As far as his other statement,

"We still haven’t had enough time working with the [PS3] to really explore and exploit the machine to its fullest potential."

Well unless you put out more than 1 game out on the system, things ain't going to get any easier.

It's an evolving process where the more you do it the better you get, not where you put out one title and instantly push the system to it's limits. Inafune of all people should know that. He needs to take a page from Team Ninja and just STFU and make a good game.

It's simple really, Inafune and by extension, Capcom, don't want to lose face.

So rather than tell you,

"Yeah MS paid us a pretty penny to keep the games 360 exclusive."

They come out and make statements like the crap above and come off sounding like a two faced lying son of a Mc'F*ckfart.

Dead Rising and Lost Planet came out too early for it to be worth their while porting these games to the PS3.



If they are working on sequels, then it's possible that THESE games would make it to the PS3. Isn't that a better option? Wouldn't you prefer sequels to Dead Rising and Lost Planet on the PS3 instead?



So come on, enough of the "Microsoft paid them" rubbish. :)

ok.. first off, xbox live is more developed than PSN, thus its obviously going to be better and have a larger user base. I agree with you on that note. I don't agree with you thinking that most people on xbox live can't afford to buy the PS3 essecially after the price drop. I mean, most people that are on xbox live most likely bought the Pro verson rather than the core or the elite. The Pro version costs $399 while the PS3 now costs $499. considering each game costs like $60 bucks, youre assumption is that people can only afford to buy the xbox 360 and two games. Otherwise, if they could afford to buy a third game, the could spend the same amount of money on a PS3 and one game. This doesnt include the amount of extra money spent on Xbox peripherals, and also the people that are paying $50 a month on xbox live gold. People can afford this game.



secondly, 10 yr olds are not indicative of the common gamer. Although you may hear immature kids online that don't have the tact to watch what they say, the average console game player is ~30 yrs old and thus these kids are the minority of the group. (this comment isn't against your argument, but its something to take into account for everyone reading)



Lastly, Gears of War has nothing to do with whether or not a game developer is going to release games multiplatform. Its merely an example of a game that has sold well and is a top game on a console. It was not made by Capcom, thus it it is not relevant to the topic of this artical. This artical isn't about whether game developers in general are going to stay console exclusive, but why one decided to switch to multiplatform game developing. Personally i don't think his reasoning is BS. Even though there is no indication that dead rising and lost planet will be ported to PS3, if capcom was working on their development game engine with those games, whose to say it wont be ported in the future. Capcom is definatly making a smart move going multiplatform because it basically means that they are not limiting themselves to one particular fan base. I personally see more ports coming from the 360 to the PS3 and vice verse from Capcom in the future

They want more money yet most PS3 owners loved Resident Evil. So why not put dead rising on PS3 at least. They would make way more money then the 2 million people that had 360s last summer coz a million people had broken ones. Nobody wants Lost Planet though. The game was terrible and the PC one that came out later has the same bugs and needs a huge rig to play. Don't want.

I agreed 100%

"They would make way more money then the 2 million people that had 360s last summer coz a million people had broken ones."



No they didn't, not even close!

there is a larger user base on the 360 system num nuts

@AoxomamoxoA



PS3 ISN'T POWERFUL ENOUGH???



GET A LIFE



XBOT MUTHA F##@A