Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

Individual Cells not as Reliable Because of Complexity

Posted Jul 13, 2006 at 8:39AM EST by QJ Staff

Listed in: PS3 Tags: IBM, playstation 3 updates, Processor, Sony, Toshiba
Ó

CellAs we have all undoubtedly heard, the Cell Processor, made by Toshiba, Sony and IBM, was designed to be one of the most potent processing systems available to the public today. Unfortunately, life in the real world is revealing that the complex design of the Cell Processor may be too complex to allow for the efficient operation of its entire complement of 8 cells per core.

IBM admits that it accepts chips that have only four out of 8 cells working, blaming the discrepancy on the size and complexity of the chips design. According to IBM VP of Semiconductor and Technology Services Tom Reeves, "with a chip like the Cell Processor you're lucky to get 10 to 20%" (working). Reeves goes on to say that, "the PS3 requires 7 of the 8 processors to be working," and that, "Sony will be using Cell Processors whether they have all cores functioning or not."

Obviously, at this point Sony is hitched to the fate of the Cell Processor no matter what happens. After Sony's substantial investment of time, money and resources into the processor, changing strategy now would move the project further down the road of disaster. All of this talk about the Cell Processor having various levels of functionality leads to obvious questions about quality control. What if I get one that only has 10% of its capacity functional will I notice a difference?

Should I have to pay the same amount of money for a lesser machine? Another potential pitfall for the processor is the fact that if one cell does happen to "blow out" (cease to function) prematurely, the machine must be sent in for an under warranty repair. If your machine is no longer under warranty then you are apparently out of luck. For those of you out there who have been reading all of this on the verge of tears, about to lose faith in the PS3 take heart!

As far as "blow outs" are concerned, Reeves claims that any problematic cells will be removed during the testing process and it is unlikely that a bad one would make it past QA and into public circulation. Sony apparently will be producing PS3's with different Cell Processors, but remember, the PS3 only needs 7 cells working to function, so essentially those with 8 working processors will simply have an unnecessary or spare cell that will not be used.

Reeves says that there is no difference in speed between a PS3 operating with 7 cells and one using 8 and while he maintains that it is unlikely that there will be any performance differences, only time will tell if there is actually any difference in overall performance. The miles of minutiae, complications and skepticism surrounding Sony's path to a successful PS3 release are a stirring testament to the difficulties they are facing and I feel, firm validation of the PS3's price point.

Via DailyTech



40% of voters think this story ROCKS!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (4) This story SUCKS!! (6)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# my cellGuest 2006-07-13 10:11
my cell is going to blow up!!!!!



and its funny how its only 3 months from its release and they only got 4 out of 8 cells working!!!!!! and in order to meet their 2 million unit shipping expectatoins, theyre going to have to start making them at least by late august.

Reply
 

 
# wtfGuest 2006-07-13 10:26
you people a this web site take a four page article and print one freaking paragraph. If you read the whole thing, 7 out of the 8 cores on the processor are used at all times, the 8th core is a back up core. How many times does SONY have to tell the public that!!! The article was printed two years ago, when the cell was still being developed!!!!!!

Reply
 

 
# Chip yields for cell...Guest 2006-07-13 10:33
processors used in PS3 are at around 40%. This includes processors with 7 or 8 working SPEs (PS3 was built to only use seven in order to increase yields). So no, it's not the end of the world. This is VERY old information spun to look like PS3 is going to fail...for like the 12th time. Just for comparison purposes, AMD 64 processors have a yield rate of 40%, which is standard. Everything's perfectly fine. :)

Reply
 

 
# Higher percentage than that suitable for ps3Guest 2006-07-13 10:41
I read the following comment from one editor of the website "Techspot"



"Reeves' figure is likely to centre on the top-grade chips, (8-working cells) so the number of suitably operational PS3-oriented parts coming off the production line is likely to be higher - and will continue to rise, in all probability, as more wafers are completed and the Cell partners continue to refine the process."



http://www.techspot.com/news/22207-yield-rate-on-cell-processors-20-or-less.html



Original article at: http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA6350202.html?industryid=21365



That same article was btw used by this blog earlier this week regarding backwards compability

Reply
 

 
# OldGuest 2006-07-13 10:42
This article is old and has been posted on this site months and months ago....

Reply
 

 
# oh jeezGuest 2006-07-13 10:59
no one take any mind of this, this site is just to create some news and hype and more crap really. ps3 will work fine.

Reply
 

 
# Rubbish!!!Guest 2006-07-13 11:11
A lot of folks are scared §hitless of the PS3's potential.

Reply
 

 
# MisleadingBlueDude6 2006-07-13 11:28
That's very misleading to print old news like this as if it's something that's been figured out yesterday, especially when dealing with a topic that can change greatly in a matter of days. Misrepresentati on...Very irresponsible of this website.

Reply
 

 
# BYE BYEHawk 2006-07-13 11:40
Yep, I agree with you BlueDude6.



I think I will not be reading this site any time soon. I will find other sites that actually keep up with news and are not Hell Bent to print EVERYTHING negative about the product.



There maybe some good but read those carefully, they seem to put in a little jab here or there.



Well, best of luck all. I'm off to read real up to date news from other sites that don't bash with each article.



let alone most of the comment leavers....

Reply
 

 
# ..omgGuest 2006-07-13 11:43
#2 if your right and this is a 2yr old articel...tht is just *****ed up, in know qj can be behind on some news..but 2yr od news...thts just stupid...when i was reading it, it didnt seem to fit...it tlks about a 10-20% yeild...wtf...there have been announcements that its up to around 50-60% - and even tht was a few months ago. and also what stood out is the mood of the article, its very negative...it puts sony in a bad position...and i supose it did whenever this article was writen...but if this news was new...then there would no way ps3 would launch in nov. 06, it would be pushed back to atleast spring 07, if not summer - there would riots and killings lol

Reply
 

 
# This isn't oldGuest 2006-07-13 11:44
It was posted by DailyTech TODAY! From an interview THIS WEEK! If that's your definition of old, than you're far to young to be sharing your opinion.

Reply
 

 
# i have a questionGuest 2006-07-13 11:48
where's the link to the article this post was referencing? i'd like to read the full article. what the hell's Daily Tech? usually the posts on this site have the link at the bottom. not so with this one.

Reply
 

 
# would youGuest 2006-07-13 11:50
#9 would you rather have all the topics go like this:



yeah for ps3, it will rock your socks.



woot! ps3 is great.



I cant believe sony is making the ps3!



the ps3 is the best console ever!!





that would get boring and wouldnt be news. what good news have you heard from the ps3 lately? my point exactly if there is no good news to post then your just going to see bad news.

Reply
 

 
# new newsGuest 2006-07-13 11:52
http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=3295





thats the link confirming this is new news. so all you little sony fanboys can go back and wish this was old news but that still doesnt help that the cell is getting 10% yeild rates with only 4 cores able to run a month before they have to start mass producing them.

Reply
 

 
# Figboy...Guest 2006-07-13 11:56
Sorry, the Via link was accidentally ommitted at first and was added just a couple of minutes before your comment.



And to #2 - you've got alot of gall to accuse us of not reading the original article and leaving out information, when that very information IS IN THIS POST! (2nd paragraph) Why don't YOU read before you go on a commenting rampage? Thanks.

Reply
 

 
# no worriesGuest 2006-07-13 12:25
i just went to the site the old fashioned way (i typed it in).



anyway, once the writer called the PS3 a "toy" i lost all respect for what was otherwise a relatively interesting article. there are also misleading things in the article, and the comment section under the article was very informative to those that may misinterpret what the people at IBM were trying to say. i have no worries that the PS3 will be a kickass console. and even in it's early stage in life, it's cranking out visuals on par with the 360 (ie, Heavenly Sword), so i can't wait to see what it'll be capable of in a year or two.



all this negative press is getting real tiring though, and i'm tempted to stop looking to the internet for my gaming news period, as, honestly, there's way too much opinion across the net, and very little objective journalism.

Reply
 

 
# so, what's the truth?comedy 2006-07-13 12:56
i would assume the head of ibm would know the yields for cell... but we were told ages ago that the yield for cell was up high. so what's actually true? i would assume this is reliable and it's certainly recent, but it can't have gone down!



they aim to have 2 million units at launch, 4 million by the end of december, and 6 million by end of march 07... so either yields are going to not get in the way of that, or we'll see xbox360 launch numbers all over again!

argh! i couldn't stand to see sony fail as bad as microsoft... also, if wii really comes out 1 month before ps3 isn't it going to be a bit annoying to have to pay 450 quid for a new games console only a month after you've paid 200 quid for a new games console?



i'm still going to try to get one, who cares about chip yields? i don't, i know ibm are a good lot, and sony are my friends too...

Reply
 

 
# wow...Vecha 2006-07-13 14:01
"sony are my friends too"



You think sony wants you as a friend?



Nintendo...Microsoft...and Sony...just want your money...lol



a good lot my ass.



Money greedy bastards is more like it.

Reply
 

 
# to comedyGuest 2006-07-13 14:05
the answer is simple: i don't plan on buying a Wii. from the N64 to the GC era, Nintendo consoles just haven't had more than a handfull of games that piqued my interest (basically Super Smash Bros, Zelda, and Metroid; i never owned an N64). and from what i've seen of the Wii, there isn't much more than Zelda and Smash Bros that i'm eager to play (at least until Lucasarts releases some sort of lightsaber battle game).



for the PS3, there are a handful of games that i'm really looking forward to playing (some playing *again*): Untold Legends, Warhawk, Resistance: Fall of Man, Heavenly Sword, Brothers in Arms, Mercenaries 2, Assassin's Creed, MGS4, FFXIII to name but a few. there's more than enough coming out this year and next to keep me happy. and as i've mentioned in another thread, 40 million gamers started their gaming with the PS1 (the SNES had sold 60 million units, the PS1 100 million, so Sony grew the market by 40 million people). judging by the sales of the GC, Nintendo support from the gamers have fallen off drastically since the SNES' heyday (the GC sold 25 million units).



the point i'm trying to make, is that hardcore Sony fans will be the first to gobble up PS3's this November, regardless of price. if you aren't a hardcore Sony fan, you won't be getting a PS3 this year. and even if you are, it's going to be a battle trying to snag one by years end. most of the fans will have to wait until 2007. and judging by the 25 million X Boxes sold compared to the 100 million and counting PS2s sold, Sony fans would more likely spit on the 360 than purchase one as a "substitute" for their PS3. they'll wait. maybe not patiently, but they'll wait. i plan on getting a 360, but not until more than five games that pique my interest come out for the console (so far, there's Lost Planet, Mass Effect, and Crackdown. two more games that i can't buy for my kickass PC, and i'll be sold).

Reply
 

 
# to VechaGuest 2006-07-13 14:11
sure Vecha, we all know that those companies want your money, but it's bad business to deliver a *****ty product to the masses. word of mouth over something bad spreads much faster and farther than positive word of mouth (take all the ridiculously negative PS3 "news" all over the net for an example).



also, unless we know exactly what yields and their percentages mean truly, it's a waste of energy to get worked up (whether positive or negative) about it. i find the article rather encouraging in a way, as it shows that the Cell is a beast. and when on form, it's going to deliver some amazing content (tell me you guys didn't think the videos for Afrika were actually nature videos. and that's just a start). another point of interest is that apparently all the demos for PS3 at E3 this year were running off of the *Cell*, not the RSX. the Cell was rendering each of those games. we don't even know what the RSX can do yet. i find that pretty impressive, really.

Reply
 

 
# 4 cores working? xbox360 only has 3Guest 2006-07-13 14:55
Well even if it still only has 4 cores working, its still > than xbox360's old 3 core shazzum.

Reply
 

 
# to 21Guest 2006-07-13 15:13
having 4 cores working doesnt make it better than a 3 core design. even with all 7 cores working, ibm says(not in this article) that there is no substantial gain in processing power compared with 3 cores of the 360. so not having that much of a lead and then going down to about half that... means it sucks. does a car with 1 wheel missing run as fast as a motorcycle? no. even though it has more wheels it needs them all to work as it should.

Reply
 

 
# HmnnFin 2006-07-13 19:40
This is pretty bad news if you take it bluntly, but I just don't think Sony would risk launching their PS3 when their is a high risk of cores blowing out in which they spend too much having to fix them under warranty or maybe even suffer some sort of class action suit from the millions that would be enraged that they spent 600 bucks for faulty merchandise. If Sony launches the PS3 as scheduled I would assume they have fixed alot of the present problems for it to be sellable. Anyways, I'm waiting on getting it later and by that time they'll be using smaller Cell chips which should help.

Reply
 

 
# How much did M$ pays to put bad news about PS3Guest 2006-07-13 20:46
All i hear is bad news all the time about PS3 from most of the web sites and some are old news. I ll Buy PS# no Matter what .. screw Bill gate and his crappy 360

Reply
 

 
# #24Guest 2006-07-14 00:48
"How much did M$ pays to put bad news about PS3"



In this case, nothing. There's a big world out there, where people are able to discuss the PS3 (good and bad) without the help of MS. :|

Reply
 

 
# Hmm...SteveTao 2006-07-14 01:32
Cell yeild is Sony's problem. Why do all you people are so concern about it? If the yeilds are low, Sony will produce more. No matter what, in the end, you'll get a working PS3. So really, all stuff are really none of your business. In the end, Sony will ship only working PS3 anyway.

Reply
 

 
# :| not againKnowLedge 2006-07-14 07:31
Yet another article that takes words out of context :| .



Read the interview.



SONY and IBM took that fact into account from the very start.



Reeves was talking about logic redunancy :|, idiots.



He was explaining why they are producing 8 core Cells, not 7 cores. And they do it to prevent systems from crashing, so you WON'T have to sent the machine for repair.



Here's the link to the interview:



http://www.reed-electronics.com/electronicnews/article/CA6350202.html?industryid=21365





With people like Ernest G. ps3.qj.net is flopping constantly, and went from being a reliable news source to just another rumor posting site. Congratulations , keep up the weak work.

Reply
 

 
# Yes, we know.Guest 2006-07-14 16:06
This isn't exactly "new" news, however it's definitely aimed at downplaying the PS3. And you know what? I've been seeing that everywhere. It seriously seems like most people are trying to justify NOT purchasing the PS3, and a lot of consumers are excited for the Wii and its low price point.



And Figboy is a ridiculous fanboy who should have his right to speak revoked.



Either way, we'll see how all the consoles do when they launch. I'm still thinking that Japan is going to go crazy over the Wii, and the PS3 will be in second over there. It's hard to say with America, though.



~Dac

Reply
 

 
# #28MGSROCKS1 2006-07-14 16:57
Please explain how Figboy is a fanboy. From what I read, he is saying that he is planning to buy a 360 too, but so far he has 5 games that won't also come out on a PC. He's looking forward to buying one, but he needs more reasons to buy a 360, and not turn to his PS2 instead. Perhaps you're the fanboy?

Reply
 

 
# #20 - Figboy, where did you get that idea from?Yaz 2006-07-14 19:41
"another point of interest is that apparently all the demos for PS3 at E3 this year were running off of the *Cell*, not the RSX. the Cell was rendering each of those games. we don't even know what the RSX can do yet. i find that pretty impressive, really."



What are you talking about? :) The ONLY demo we've seen running on just the Cell processor was the landscape demo show during Sony E3 conference LAST year. Everything else we see for the PS3 is running off PS3 hardware at various stages of developement, using both the CPU and GPU.



Kaz Harai said during the Sony conference this year, that final devkits were already being shipped and that some of the PS3 games on the show floor are running on those final devkits. Therefore everything you saw during the conference was running on final hardware, and NO games or demos were running without the use of the RSX.



Where on earth did you get the idea that the RSX was not being used in PS3 games and demos?

Reply
 

 
# HmmmGuest 2006-07-16 10:01
I swear the qj.net forums are full of children. That's all I want to say.

Reply
 

 
# stfu fanboysGuest 2006-07-16 14:21
If you look at the source of this article it was written today, so stfu about it being old, yes it is old news that the cells been having problems, but the statistics are new. You can really tell that your a fanboy,when you disagree with anything that is said against your precious console. Then when a rumor pops up thats good about ps3 its automatically true.

Reply
 

 
# Yield...Guest 2006-07-17 12:19
Dont worry... Sony will be using the low-yield processors for thier LCD flatpanels 'n' stuff.



The've been telling us for a while that they plan to embed 'cells' in most of thier future products.

(And get them all integrated!)



And what will be sitting in the middle... :D

7-8 core's of PS3 delight.



(Go look at IBM's cell pages on the web, they speak of the connectivity potencial there...)

Reply
 

 
# It's okGuest 2006-08-07 10:01
It's not a problem at all for sony. They only pay for the working CELLs for the ps3. They also want 2-4 core CELLs for other technology like TVs, so will be able to pick them up from IBM at a bargin price.

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword