Hollywood Producer Arad lets slip first Uncharted movie details

Posted Oct 2, 2008 at 9:57PM by Mabie A. Listed in: PS3 Tags: David Cage, Hollywood, Naughty Dog, Quantic Dream
Ó


Camera-shy - Image 1Looks like Nathan Drake is off to a new adventure, this time bigger, shinier, Hollywood-er. That's right, the long-rumored Uncharted: Drake's Fortune movie adaptation has finally been confirmed through details revealed by Avi Arad.

In an interview with the Hollywood producer, first movie details unfolded, and it went something like this:

When it comes to the big screen adventure, Arad said the plan is to mix things up a little bit. In the game, the action moves were very quickly to the island, but the film will open things up a bid and add some depth before the island adventure.


Hmm... looks like we're gonna be treated to some character development and backstory, eh? Which would you like to see more: Nathan's insatiable curiosity for all shining and shimmering splendid in his family history or Sully's own (mis)adventures with all the different women he met on travel?

We'll keep you posted on more updates as they come. But hopefully, it won't be a realization of David Cage's "Uncharted is like porn" statement.



Related Uncharted: Drake's Fortune articles:


Via Kotaku

 
 
 

Comments [refresh]

by izkjon - 2008-10-02 21:30
» Nice

Are they going to shoot this in South America, on a tropical Island. The Cast are going to have a sweet time.

by FOURTHxSURVIVOR - 2008-10-03 05:50
» Cool, but I don't think they need to really add anything

Uncharted was great; and one of the things that made it so great was how accessible the story was - it flowed well, the characters and their individual traits were presented to the player in such a way that you couldn't help but really like them....but I'm sure whatever they add will (hopefully) be for the best.

by sycoblast - 2008-10-03 06:20
» well..

im sure the add on will just be some sex scene it wouldnt be hollywood without it

by damonous - 2008-10-03 08:31
» Isn't he with Marvel?

I thought Avi Arad was with Marvel. Does that mean that Marvel is now 'branching out' (maybe with their Iron Man movie profits) and becoming a more 'diversified' movie studio/financier?

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!