Shock horror, this came from Major Nelsons Podcast. #1 M$ Ass Gobbler in the world.

This game was built from the ground up on PS3 and ported to the 360. Of course it'll have multiplayer.

Wow ur worst than Mr.Common Sense It was delayed because of the ps3,yet it's a ps3 port? lol wow that was a funny joke.As a matter of fact,the 360 version may actually look better just like most multiplatform games do.

It wasn't delayed because the directly because of the PS3. It was delayed directly because of MGS4. Get it.



BTW, I never saw anyone claim that the 386DX (MS) was better than the 386 SX (PS3)...nor did anyone care. The thing that will separate the two system is the services they offer. Nothing more.

I hope u do know most multi-platform games have the XBOX 360 as their lead console,hence the reason why the 360 version usually looks better the ps3 version because they are ports usually.Also,making the ps3 lead console most likely will

never happen since the 360 version almost always outsell the ps3 counter part.The ps3 would look better if it was the lead console,which it is not so tough luck.

That would be like saying DMC4 will look better and sell better on the 360. Well i got news for you, it was started on the PS3 first, wow a multiplatform title started on the PS3 and ported to the 360. Thats right learn facts before spewing garbage out.



Also FYI the DMC4 on the PS3 is out selling the 360 version by 5-1 in Japan and Pal regions. And lets wait for the U.S, its not going to look pretty.



So stop talking $hit.

Yeah that'll be the first time they've ever done that /sarcasm.



It was MS's lies in the first place that convinced me PS3 was more powerful. They'd have no reason to lie if PS3 was indeed inferior.



This is the article:

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html



It's filled with lies. Like MS's claim of "The memory system bandwidth in Xbox 360 exceeds the PS3's by five times."

That only applies to 10 megabytes of it! The rest is faster on PS3.



"Cell's claimed advantage is on streaming floating point work which is done on its seven DSP processors."



SPUs/SPEs are not DSPs and are praised in almost every developer interview I've read.



"The Xbox 360's CPU has more general purpose processing power because it has three general purpose cores, and Cell has just one."



Actually due to the lie about SPEs/SPUs, their performance counts towards general purpose computing power and Cell kicks 360s ass.



"The Xbox 360 GPU has more processing power than the PS3's."



Then why is nVidia claiming PS3s GPU is more powerful than 360 in it's entirety?



In conclusion, EVERY advantage MS claimed was a fabrication. If 360 was indeed superior, MS wouldn't have to lie like that.

not every game is s 360 exclusive they also comes out on the PS3 with almost same quality, YES barely noticeable difference.

and i thank rockstar for not gimping the ps3 version, and yes those downloadable contents are absurd, i myself also hate paid ps3 dlc, they should have included it in the game in the first place or should be free. fy to microsoft for sucking more money from clueless xbox 360 bots.

don't

This article was during E3 2005 in response to Sony's claims that the PS3 was twice as powerful as the 360 (remember 2 TFLOPs vs 1 TFLOP?).



"That only applies to 10 megabytes of it! The rest is faster on PS3."



It's not as simple as that. The faster embedded memory does give the 360 certain advantages over the PS3's GPU in certain areas, however it's not as clear cut as mentioned in that article because overall, the performance of the two GPUs are similar (with the 360's having the edge).



It's interesting that you accept this article isn't to be trusted as it's based upon MS's analysis of both consoles, and yet you seem willing to believe the PS3's GPU is more powerful just because NVidia says so. :| The facts are, devs _working_ on both consoles says this simply isn't true! Some say the GPUs are equal, others gives the 360's GPU the slight edge, none say RSX is more powerful.



"Actually due to the lie about SPEs/SPUs, their performance counts towards general purpose computing power and Cell kicks 360s ass."



No. The general purpose power of the 7 SPEs are negligible compared to the PPE and the 3 cores of the 360's CPU. The SPE's strengths are purely in their arithmetic performance. Hence to refer to devs again, all working on both consoles accepts the 360's CPU has more general computing performance compared to Cell (by about a factor of 2), whereas Cell has more arithmetic performance (again by about a factor of 2). Since ALL games are a mixture of general and arithmetic processing, the CPUs balance out overall, with the CPU of either console capable of outperforming the other depending on the game and how it uses the CPUs.



Sony focused on floating-point performance at E3 2005 to make Cell seem twice as powerful as Xenon overall (the 360's CPU), but this is as much a lie as anything MS have said. They also used the TFLOPS comparison to make BOTH the CPU and GPU of the PS3 seem twice as powerful as those of the 360, which again is untrue, and therefore also a 'lie'.



Hence it's no use pointing the finger at MS whilst ignoring Sony's claims. They are both going to make out that their console is superior. That's to be expected.



Instead, listen to the devs who are working on BOTH consoles for the facts, don't listen to Sony, MS, NVidia, ATI etc.



For example, Criterion are a Sony-leading multiformat developer, so you'd expect them to be as unbiased as possible but perhaps lean towards the PS3 slightly. And yet in podcast 15 where they compare both consoles, they come to the conclusion that both console are equal in terms of power!



http://www.criteriongames.com/podcast/