Game Informer reveals July cover story: Fallout 3 |
Ó
If you're an avid fan of the franchise back when Interplay still had its clutches on Fallout, you've probably gone stripping your clothes off screaming "OMG, it's coming I tell you!" as soon as you heard this news (probably even before we published this story). Fallout 3, now in the hands of RPG experts Bethesda, will get unveiled in Game Informer's July issue, together with Harmonix answer to Activision's riff-busting title: Rock Band. The computer role-playing game gets a new, darker face in the post apocalyptic era, and Game Informer hopes to blow "the lid off of the most anticipated returns of a franchise."
No longer limited to the PC, Fallout 3 will also be gracing the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 by 2008. Will the game be just as ground-breaking as the first two in its ancestry? Or will Bethesda totally reinvent the series? We'll find that out for you, as news and developments arise.
Via Game Informer
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
12 Jumps Sonic speeding into LBP
Best prices available for:
Price Range:
$15.00 - $85.00
$15.00 - $85.00
at 7 Stores
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - March
User Favorites - March
Categories
Archives
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments
Reply
Reply
Play the originals, and DONT BUY FALLOUT 3. At least inform yourselves of how the first two games were about and how they played.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Fallout 1 and 2 were ***** 2D games so i hope they turn it into Oblivion with Guns!!!
Reply
r35 - yes, turning one series into a clone of another game series is exactly what we want. When I goto the game store, all I want is 50 different games that all have different titles but are all the same game.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Bethesda has a proven background and wouldn't trust any other game developer with this license. I've played both Fallout 1 and 2, I think rumor is Bethesda is using the Oblivion 3d engine, that's it. It will still be a 3rd person view. So please give me legit proof that this will be "Oblivion with guns"? Actually, never mind, I guess thats a rhetorical question you obviously don't know what your talking about and I'm waisting my time arguing it. Just know that you are a moron, no one likes you, go home, stop posting ***** you can't back up. Thanks.
Reply
Yes, Bethesda does some things well. They're graphically interesting, unconventional, they make really, really *BIG* games, and the content of things you can actually *do* in the game is both broad and deep.
A "deep and compelling story"? Nope, they don't have a lot of that. A sense of humor? again, a miss. And, I don't know, the games themselves...after a while I always lose my sense of purpose, or even interest. Not because their aren't interesting things to *do*, but because I start to not care about the goals the game sets, or the goals I set myself. That's the fault of the games, because all those "interesting things to do" after a while become repetitive, even bland, because they fail to compel me.
They *should* compel me-they have the capacity *to* compel me, but they don't, they fail, and that's Bethesda's fault.
Maybe Bethesda will do a good job, I'm not sure, but my uncertainty about them being able to make Fallout 3 is based on the past history of the games this company has actually made, compared to the Fallout series.
I think it's possible for them to do it, I think they have the necessary elements, in greater or lesser proportion, to add up to a good Fallout game. The question is whether or not they have the vision and drive to create a newer and better Fallout that incorporates the things Bethesda does best, while remaining true to the thing that made Fallout special, rather than forcing Fallout to conform to the Bethesda ways of doing things, and in the process making something that lies to you when it says it's 'Fallout 3'.
If people are interested in Bethesda "blowing the top off" of the Fallout series, that's fine-and hopefully, in a few years, you'll start to want *real* games, with interest beyond what your eyes see and your hands do.
Personally, when something is labled "Fallout", that's what I want, just like when I open a box of Cheerios, I expect Cheerios, not frosted corn flakes in the shape of little smiley faces, and colorful marshmallow O's.
The reason the Fallout series was always great is how it grabbed your mind. Hopefully, Bethesda can manage that, but it'll be somewhat of a stretch for them.
Reply
Reply