Every Warhawk rumor extend extra: this time, "32" |
Ó
However the debate over those rumors that Incognito Inc. will launch Warhawk as multiplayer-only with the PlayStation Network and Store turns out, it probably won't end until definite PRs from Sony or Incognito step up to bat. Until then, the rumors will likely continue to fly and hit the fan like... Like this one from the Rumor Reporter blog, whose reliability is too hard to gauge on this one, without some supporting data. Still...The first claim is that Warhawk will hit the Store this fall, "easily a year earlier than expected." Second claim is that Sony will continue to remain "tight-lipped" about Warhawk until their library of Network-only titles beefs up (that way, it doesn't stick out. Then again, after TGS, and after its use as a SIXAXIS demo, it's still gonna stick out anyway, if only for its media profile). Third claim of note is that players should look to 32-player dogfights.
And our take on this is... really, 32-player dogfights? ... Man, we're still going to miss the single-player experience (you are looking at a writer who plays Ace Combat for the story as much as the pwnage), but... 32-player dogfights? On its own, it's admittedly not a perfect replacement for missing out on single-player (unless there are features that we still haven't heard of). Still, some of us can perhaps fill that void in our hearts with mass aerial slaughter, perhaps.
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
they make 32 player dogfights seem like a bad thing. Is it good or bad? because i guess i would be happy with that!
Nothing to worry about there. I really like single-player experiences, too, but even I agree that online multiplayer was something Ace Combat sorely lacked.
32!!! that's the opposite of 23!
Fu ck you QJ~!
it is a pretty good number for a dogfight, but knowing that RFoM got 40 players online, WarHawk must try a bit harder
64 perhaps? What's the world record for the largest dogfight in military history, anyway?
Im sorry, but anyone who isnt a bit miffed with Sony at this point is nothing but a fantard. How many games have to have features removed, promises broken, before you realize developers are doing this to try and possibly gain a little money from there investments, and are not willing to put more into it to finish them. The ship is sinking and developers are just trying to milk it before it sinks.
does 32 player dogfights mean 32 player online or 32 planes per map? 32 people sounds nice, but if half are on the ground, and half are in planes, its a little less sick
the idea that it more than likely won't be a full-fledged game does kinda suck, but 32 planes fighting in the sky still sounds like a helluva lot of fun for a DL'd multiplayer. regardless as to how this game turns out, I'll probably get it either way. I own one of the Ace Combat games for the PS2, so I know the fun that can be had during dogfights. the motion SIXAXIS capabilities should make it sweet.