EA talks Army of Two region lock, points to lag issues |
Ó
Electronic Arts knew better not to stay mum on the confirmed Xbox 360 multiplayer region-lock of their latest gem Army of Two. Seeing how easily their co-op third-person shooter topped the charts in such a short time, EA can't stay under a bunker for very long - especially now that its Playstation 3 version is also region-locked as well.
Army of Two lead designer Reid Schneider attributed the root of the region-lock on the game's deterministic (peer-to-peer) networking approach for both Playstation 3 and Xbox 360. Schneider elaborates:
Army of Two uses a deterministic (peer to peer) approach for networking
versus a traditional client-server approach. We do this so we can have
all the synchronized animation gameplay that exist in the game.
This solution is solid for our game but also exposes us to risk in terms of lag, if we're not careful. In a peer to peer connection the person with the worst connection brings down the whole group to his/her worst connection level.
While not generally a problem for COOP (since most people play co-op with friends) when playing in Versus mode 3 people can be highly adversely affected by one player with a bad connection. We use the region lock to minimize the likelihood of this occurring.
EA's other major consideration lies with territorial differences. Asian versions have restrictions when it comes to shooting down bodies. Since EA will not remove this feature for North American and European users, parity issues will emerge resulting in the eventual failure of the multiplayer session.
We understand how EA wants to safeguard Army of Two's gameplay quality with the region-lock and some gamers are all for it. But it's always better when options are put into place instead of total restrictions. More updates here at QJ.NET as they arrive.
Buy: [ Army of Two (PlayStation 3) ]
Buy: [ Army of Two (Xbox 360) ]
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006

Comments [refresh]
You'd think the largest gaming conglomerate in the world could afford to host the largest dedicated server network in the world to support their games.
But wait! That would cost money! Asshats
EA FU
They can just not unify the network; in resistance we at firs couldn't play with japan/the brits, but they changed it.
no way
i was going on holidays to america and this would have been the only game i wouldve wanted
i dont like EA, take for example fifa theyre taking the piss out of it now