EA takes out whip: getting banned in forums gets you banned in games

Posted Oct 30, 2008 at 11:13AM by QJ Staff Listed in: PS3, MMORPG, Xbox 360 Tags: Command & Conquer, Electronic Arts, SOE
Ó


Command and Conquer - Image 1


It's banhammer time! In order to streamline their accounts system, it looks like Electronic Arts is also resorting to some strict measures along the way.

With the Master EA Accounts, users get to log on to EA games with the use of just one account name. It's this same Master account that is now going to be used in EA-monitored forums as well. Makes sense, right? Lots of publishers make use of universal accounts these days. Just one example of many is the SOE ID system.

Unfortunately, not everything is right as rain for EA gamers who decide to get rowdy, as Shacknews points out. Upon explaining the new Command & Conquer forum rules, forum admin eaapoc said that getting banned in the forums now gets you banned also in the game. Oh, not just a game, but effectively all other EA games (which require your Master Account) too.

It's actually going to be a bit nastier for those who get banned.


Your forum account will be directly tied to your Master EA Account, so if we ban you on the forums, you would be banned from the game as well since the login process is the same. And you'd actually be banned from your other EA games as well since its all tied to your account. So if you have SPORE and Red Alert 3 and you get yourself banned on our forums or in-game, well, your SPORE account would be banned to. It's all one in the same, so I strongly reccommend people play nice and act mature.


All in all, we expect people to come on here and abide by our ToS. We hate banning people, it makes our lives a lot tougher, but its what we have to do.




Related articles:


 
 
 

Comments

by Nevers - 2008-10-30 12:06:51
Wow

Haven't bought an EA game in years... doesn't look like that drought will end anytime soon.
by Silver-Tiger - 2008-10-30 12:49:02
....

hmm.. this is a complicated thing... On the one hand, they are completely right, i don't want to play with premature *ssholes who talk sh*t all the time like "f*ck your mom, ****!" and so on. BUT, on the other hand, If somebody paid 60 bucks or more for a game, he has the right to play that game online. If there is a way to reactivate accounts or if they are able to temporary ban somebody then I think it's completely ok to do so.
by StingBlah - 2008-10-30 13:45:23
soon people will have like

10 IDs
by c74gta4smash - 2008-10-30 14:14:13
!

LMFAO!!!!!
by sonofken - 2008-10-30 14:18:37
what?

i think that this will not be a good thing for EA, they are already pretty much in everybodys 'who gives a ***** if the game looks good, it's EA' book! they definatlety are in mine after the *****storm that was battle field bc on the ps3, can anyone say 'mic's crashing the system?'
by MADMAN-_-zZ - 2008-10-30 14:44:45
.....

well there is a good EA game and I swear it's the only good one ive played in like.... forever, and that is Dead Space, but I guess the moral to this story is, don't talk on the official EA forums, easy as that, don't talk on the forums and no risk of getting banned!
by Apeaggedon - 2008-10-30 15:39:09
EXACTLY BRO.

thats wut i was thinking .. just dont talk ***** around their own forums,just talk crap everywere else exccept there and you wont get banned,its that simple.. or just do your trash talking over the game wen your playing online... no one even parely [;ays there own games eccept for dead space and the 20th "sam ol *****" madden games. i dont even think anyone really likes them at all to be honest.
by bradz7 - 2008-10-30 20:54:42
EA=EPIC FAIL

Well i hate ea with a passion! i refuse to "buy' their games anyway. i will however continue to d/l their games and play on my modded 360. ea is the sole reason for modding my 360. i buy every other game except the ones that have anything to do with ea. with the way they treat their customers i'd be surprised if ea survive. they really are cr@p! cr@p company is cr@p
by damonous - 2008-10-31 09:33:52
Refers to the PC, no?

I think the big problem here is that this article is referring to the PC product. For the Consoles, there is also a concern related to the point I'm about to bring-up, but it's largely related to downloaded content only.... What happens when at some future point, logins are REQUIRED to play an installed PC game (for security/authentication/bootleg-prohibition). We've all seen the fangs of things like Steam. --I'm saying, for a moment forget even about not being able to play online: what about being required to login to a Master Account just to install a game and then the subsequent running of that game only being 'authorized' by the Master Account? --No more LOCAL play, either. :-O ...Which is actually a valid REAL concern with downloadable content on 360 and PS3: since your right to use content is related to your XBL or PSN ID.... if that ID were to be unusable due to a permanent ban .......no more downloaded games on- OR offline.

Add New Comment




You must be logged in to post comments




Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!