Crysis vs. Real Life |
Ó
If there was any doubt that Crysis was at the absolute top of the graphics heap right now, I think these pics just killed the argument. Rumor has it the boys at Crytek are porting the engine over to the PS3 and Xbox 360 hardware, so maybe soon we'll get to see this more of this stunning engine.
So what say you guys? Real life pwned?
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
Add QJ.NET
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
thats soo sick. u can definetly tell which one is on the 360 the grass is way diffrent. the mountains are way closer too but still thats pretty amazing
I think it looks better than real life. JK. No, but this game engine is the closest that has come to photorealistic graphics. Those pictures speak for themselves. I do hope they make a game for xbox360 and PS3 with this engine. The only thing im afraid of is that i hope the game isnt just graphics, AI, and physics. Those are essential for a game but the game has to be fun and have a good story. Also does anyone know what hard ware specs you need in order to play this games?
i wonder what they could do with some hot chicks
They didnt say that these pics from xbox360 or PS3. These pics are from PC so hpw can you say you can tell which system this from when these pics where not taken from a consoles but the PC. Maybe you should try reading the article before making dumb ass comments.
*drools*
That's soo awesome. I do wish to see that on a PS3.
and lol on #3
I do so wonder..
I call shenanagins.
There is no aliasing on the bottom picture first of all. And second, if this is real-time(which I doubt), what is rendering it?
clearly there is aliasing on the poles of the gate. open your eyes.
But yeah who knows if its pre rendered or rendered in real time. Either way I bet that if any system these days tries to make a game with those sick ass graphics its going to run at like 1 fps.
LOL # 3... i wonder 2
this gaphics looks perfect . its near the reality , but the reality is a little bit better . with the next-next gen consoles like PLAYSTATION 4 + Xbox 3 it would be better than the reality ! ! !
This game is currently running at pretty good framerate considering that DirectX10 isn't out yet.
http://media.pc.ign.com/media/694/694190/vids_1.html
And it's all thanks to that nifty Cry Engine.
#1: Each indivual frame is like 300x300. ANYTHING can look great at that size, lol
#2: The grass and shadows in the second pic look really bad.
in the second pick the grass and shadows do look pretty bad. The shadows dont fade and feather as they should and the grass looks like its been sent 10000 volts through it. Also, there seems to be a lack of depth perception and ozone. But other than that it looks pretty damn good.
The crysis pictures look better than the real thing.
The grass is the best ever, maybe you should look at it in high resolution. And for those of you which arenĀ“t informed, its realtime !!!
http://incrysis.com/crysis/index.php?option=com_ponygallery&Itemid=99999999&func=detail&id=77
They look cleaner, not better. Certainly not more lifelike, heh.
Is anybody planning to make an actual game with this?
real life pwned its true,....its only gona get more pwned with time......but wtf is up w/ #15? "Certainlyh not lifelike, n nor better" wat a retard
The Crysis picture looks quite impressive, by the way the poster of #13 needs prescription lenses.
cant wait to play this game, pretty close to the real thing in about 1 to 2 years we will be seeing games prolly as real as possible
I think you two need glasses. How is this better than real life? You may have to lay off the LSD or put your glasses on.
Anyway. Just imagine if oblivion was running on this engine.
everything looks good, but the grass. it looks horible.
come on. its impossible for anything man-made to ever look 'more realistic' than nature. think about it. do you see what I mean? nothing's more realistic than reality.
but anyways, yeah, crysis looks amazing, with the exception of that awful grass. I'm looking forward to playing it on my friends comuter (there's no way my computer could ever run that :) )
1 and 15 you guys are the smartest people on this website
#1 its running on a pc
#15 "Is anybody planning to make an actual game with this?" are you retarded? Theres this game called Crysis, I dont know if you have heard of it though. You are an idiot.
Both of you are idiots!
but eye can be deceit very easy those days, specially if you far from the object. Something more interesting is people, faces, bodys, show me some people on crysis and the photo of the model from a not to far away perspective.
#12 i dont think you know what ozone is
Thats creepy!
Very impressive screen shots....
thats friggen sweat, only thing is the grass.
Crysis is a tech demo pretending to be a game.
Call me when someone's going to make an actual game with this engine.
those pictures are little old, cos grass are now much better. Check it out with latest shots like URL links some posts above.
better grass looking
http://incrysis.com/crysis/components/com_ponygallery/img_pictures/originals/0604202_20060420_1787102457.jpg
for lazy people.
#28 - Crysis is coming up PC game for 2007. lol you dumbass.
http://incrysis.com/crysis/components/com_ponygallery/img_pictures/originals/0604202_20060420_1787102457.jpg
Link fixed
It is funny how people come to gaming news sites and yet they are still so misinformed. PC will always be the pillar of graphics, physics, AI, etc. So far Crysis and its engine is PC only but maybe it will come to PC like Unreal Engine 3.
Just correcting my typo in the above post. Meant consoles instead of PC
crysis (an actual game, not a tech demo) is the name of a game being made by EA for pc's not 360/ps3, it uses the crytec engine. also the devs were the ppl that made far cry before EA bought it.
Those screens are way too small to pick the detail from the engine. PS2 screens at that size would look good
the only way i could tell the cg ones were fake was too look at the grass of the one with the shed. unbelievable
You could've said the same things after looking at the grand canyon stage of Gran Turismo 4 on the PS2 or the amalfi stage, the point is that if you're out, putting graphics for most of each and every detail of a fixed environment, you can simply remake it and the HD power of the next-gen consoles is enough to make you produce something like that. It is obvious that 'NOW' its been under consideration and was not before when GT4 gave most of the 50 environments upto almost true look of their real world counterparts, only because its time for next-gen and next-gen demands attention to get into stores.
The Grass looks awfull;P
With all these next-gen consoles, they've said that PC's will not surpass them for years to come, but already there are DX10 games such as this. ATi and nVidia are planning much faster graphics chips than what consoles have, and AMD and Intel are planning extremely fast CPU's. Imagine what 45nm CPU's could do.
Still, I have a PS2, PSP, and XBox, and I'm no PC Fanboy (sick of that word), and I think consoles have the advantage of being a closed platform, thus devs can squeeze performance from them. However DirectX 10 from what I've been reading will fix alot of these problems. It should be a great platform to work on, and there shouldnt be many, if any variances between DX10 based graphics hardware other than performance.
i wonder if they can accurately render my pole..
to the poster #3
Maybe they can finally make you a girlfriend.
If you showed the crysis pictures to regular people, they would think they are real! I was wondering if perhaps Crytek would license their engine like the Unreal Engine? They would make so much money and all of the problems of sucky graphics and rough character edges would be gone. It probably won't happen because they want to have the best looking games, and don't want their competitors have an advantage. Still, I hope the bring this game to Next-gen consoles. Imagine playing this game with surround system, and a 30 inch+ HD TV!
@42
Well imagine playing this game on a Logitech Z-5500 with a Creative X-Fi Fatal1ty, and a high DPI 1600x1200 resloution LCD monitor! There's far better in PCs if you want awesome audio quality and good display.
And yeah I agree, they should licenese the engine, it's simply outstanding. Gives UE3.0 a run for its money.
imagine playing this on a 67' Samsung 1080p DLP with like 7.1 surround sound speakers in a dark media room.
But, with all that size, only PS3 can get 1080p resolution, and that's 1920x1080. 720p is what most HDTV's can support, and that is 1280x720. Now most PC monitors support these resolutions quite easily, and they're smaller. When you blow these resolutions right up to 67inch, they appear much more blocky than a 20inch PC monitor, thus a PC monitor has a much greater DPI than a HDTV. For sound, any of Creatives latest sound cards can blow any console out of the water.. and then some, seriously. My Z-5500 may only be 5.1, but it's the most incredible sound system I've heard, it blows away our local cinema. If 5.1 isnt good enough for you (I think it's more than adequate) , you can also get 7.1 systems for PC's.
yeah i agree with everybody that the grass sucksss alotttt
but how can that be real time? thats like crazy! if thats real time im gonna go sit infront of my video game store until it comes out
and post number 3 made me laugh lolol
This is real time and running on a decent frame rate.
not perfect but many people actually find the colors in games alot nicer than real life
the thing i am worried about is gameplay and realism i don't want to withstand 1000 bullets i want to die if the ai gets a headshot on me and the same with them