Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

Blu-ray vs HD-DVD: Porn Industry Will Be The Decider

Posted May 2, 2006 at 10:08PM EST by QJ Staff

Listed in: PS3, Xbox 360 Tags: playstation 3 updates, Sony
Ó

PS3While President George “the Decider” Bush makes his choices on national issues, it seems the outcome of Blu-Ray and HD-DVD's battle to replace DVDs lies in the lotioned hands of the porn industry. E! Entertainment Television already chose the Blu-ray Disc format because of heavy-breathing talks the porn industry is leaning towards it. “Several major players in the porn industry (are) going the Blu-ray route,” said the E!. “If you look at the VHS vs. Beta standards, you see the much higher-quality standard dying because of [the porn industry’s support of VHS]. The mass volume of tapes in the porn market at the time went out on VHS.”

According to analysts the porn industry has always been a leader and a “strong factor” when it comes to the use of new technology. Digital Playground, which claims to have produced the largest number of high definition “interactive films” in the industry over the past three years, is choosing Blu-ray Disc because of its greater capacity and because Sony chose the format for PS3 (hmmm do we smell porn on PS3?). Blue-ray has a 50GB capacity or nine-hours of hd content – which is a lot of porn. HD-DVD can only hold a maximum of 30GB.

Aside from Sony, Blu-ray is supported by Panasonic, LG Electronics, Philips Electronics, Disney and Fox. HD-DVD has companies like Toshiba, NEC and Warner Home Video on its side. Blu-ray Disc and HD-DVD are the new optical-disc formats that are set to put DVDs in the boneyard of has-been technologies.



This story sucks? This story rocks!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (0) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# HD-DVD Has no chance...Guest 2006-05-02 23:34
HD-DVD is false hope... honestly, why would industry fall for second best? Lesser capacity and lesser support.



Blu-Ray can now hold up to 200GB of data - this format wont need to be replaced for quite some time...Blu-Ray offers interactivity aswell as true HD support, not to mention a whole lot more support than HD-DVD and also being kick-started with the PS3... i highly doubt Blu-Ray can fail.



As a consumer, i much prefer blu-ray

Reply
 

 
# hd-dvd is betterEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 00:26
I cudnt disagree more, hd-dvd is the better by far. Blu ray technology is flawed on so many levels. Mainly read speed and the way in watch the lens shape is created. The error factor in manufacturing is way higher than hd-dvd. Meaning it costs one hell of a lot more. Blu ray can hold 200GB on a 2 layer double sides disk. Just like hd-dvd can do 120GB on the same type. The thing is you will never see one of those in your lifetime. Also the cost of a double layer dual sided blu ray would be about 10 times higher than the same in hd-dvd. And your missing 1 massive factor, windows vista does not I repeat does not! support blu ray. So all the new fancy data backups and hd-dvd writing support in vista wont work with those blu ray drives. I know which id rather have in my pc.

Reply
 

 
# editEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 00:56
Sorry I meant quad layer. Since a single blu ray is 25gb and a single hd dvd is 15gb.

Reply
 

 
# Number 2...Guest 2006-05-03 01:06
We're talking about porn here, not lasers and crap. Blu-Ray kicks HD-DVD's mommas ass so hard, when she sits down, she's 5 inches taller...

No doubt that Blu-Ray is the winner, already. OMG HD PRON! ON MEH P$3!!!!!!!!!! WHOAWA!!!!!!! I wanna grab them boobs mate, but ill probably kill my 60 inch sony sxrd lcd...DAMNET! ***** YOU BLU-RAY!!!!! ARGHHHHH! LMAO. ANyways, blu-ray rules, yo moma drules... and uhhh, YOUR A FOOL!

Reply
 

 
# Blu-ray Va Hd DVD and R KellyGuest 2006-05-03 02:04
I think the real choice is what format will i release my new Golden Showers and doody flowers video on.. this is very important to R Kelly as the Tint of my powerful stream has to be just right... seeing my doo doo in high Def will be great on blu ray since i can put all sorts of DRM all over it and each person that buys a blu ray movie can take out a second mortgage just to afford it..except for me because i'm rich *****!!!

Reply
 

 
# hd-dvd is NOT betterGuest 2006-05-03 02:15
Ok, for starters, if you think that just because Windows Vista won't support Blu-Ray (because they hate Sony, remember?) that it will fail? Windows Vista will not be the deciding factor on technologies. Half the stuff in the world that is used on computers RIGHT NOW is not support by Windows XP. It's all 3rd party support. You just don't notice it. Did you know that DVI isn't support by Windows XP? Your graphics card does, which is 3rd party not 1st. Ooo a real discussion. The cost? Hah! The cost of the actual discs is not even a 10% difference! And in some manufacturers, BR is cheaper. I would also like to point out that the BR has backwards compatibility with handling DVD on it as well. In fact, the discs are being produced right now (see engadget's news for more info). What does that mean? Buy the BR/DVD disc (say The Matrix) for $5 more than it currently is on DVD (not HD-DVD) right now, and it works on a DVD player, and whenever you have access/buy a BR player, it'll work on there too without a loss of any quality (of course, better quality). The reason why the BR read speed is slow right now is because it's new technology. HD-DVD is still based on older technology. Older technology can only take us so far. A digital blue ray burning provides us for much more, we just have to wait some more time for it to be cheaper (they already proved they can make it fast, very fast). Eventually BR speeds will completely outweigh HD-DVD in all aspects. Perhaps, for once, M$ will lose some money from a horrible product. I'm still surprised out of all the ridiculous lawsuits that have been imposed on M$, that they haven't been sued for 1st party support for HD-DVD and not BR, which would still be considered (by people who don't understand what that means and only see on the Windows box - HD-DVD support) forcing you to get HD-DVD over BR. All the little kiddies and computer illiterate adults will pick HD-DVD because M$ says so. Well frankly, I hope they get what they deserve and lose the money that they're wasting. While I will sit back and laugh at you.



P.S. First party support from M$ means there will be MANY more errors than 3rd party. I think we all know how long it takes M$ to produce a less than, bug-ridden product.



Research is a tool, and a free, power, tool if used correctly. Don't just take sides. I have my share of M$ hatred, which is clearly defined in my topic (which isn't the main reason HD-DVD was made, M$ just says they support it). But when I saw a demo of HD-DVD, I didn't mind it at all, it looked great. But after I had done my research, my opinion initiates that BR is way it should be done.



My two cents..



-James [Computer Developer]

Reply
 

 
# To dear JamesGuest 2006-05-03 02:43
NO matter how much u shout, unless u back them up with some researched articles or some ***** like that, no one will believe you. It is widely known that BR very expensive to make. So if you say pay $5 more for BR for true HD, I dont believe one bit of that garbage. BAck you your facts, man!



I dont have time right now but if you go over to ign.com, they have posted a few articles there pointing out that HD-DVD players also have Backwards compatibility. SO you can play your old DVDs in them players.





As far as I know, HD-DVD reads on blue-violet laser and BRD on blue laser. How come HD-DVD is an old format then? Give me one reason why you say it is based on old technology?



Little kiddies dont know jack about HD-DVD or BRD, why the eff would you even bring up that discussion? So according to you, we will soon be seeing little kiddies in blockbuster or Family video stores arguing with their mommies for Toy Story 3 on HD-DVD rather on BD-DVD that the store carries or because mommy is educated and wants little Johnny to watch the movie on BRD because it is better.... WOW!!!!!



Stamping Computer Developer next to your name wont make all your statements true. And i am not a fan on HD-DVD or BRD. Personally, I think BRD is better (and no, that doesnt mean I am wanting BRD to win the war) because of the increased storage capacity it provides. But by the time they even start taking full potential of either format dvds, Holographic technology will already be in the scene and i know many would prefer that. I would be happy with either for now knowing that in a few years (www.howstuffworks.com; search for hlographic discs) it will be replaced by Holographic discs anyways.



So please dont be like, "i have said it, mark my words in stone".

Reply
 

 
# Holographic discsEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 02:53
out of blu ray and hd-dvd, id prefer hd-dvd simply for the price and the fact that I dont trust sony where drives are concerned. Holographic discs now thats an interesting point, although my guess is this, they wont make it. Basically because yes they are insane i think they can fit 1.3TB on a disc, but by the time they are out lots of people will have bought into the new hd era with either blu ray or hd-dvd. And I have a feeling they wont be willing to change.

Reply
 

 
# Comp Developler, lmfaoDarkLegacy 2006-05-03 02:59
You would have to be around the Beta & VHS days to understand what happened there. VHS became the standard becuase the porn industry backed that up as well. It wasn't afactor of which format was better, it was the simple fact that it the both the cheaper alternative to Beta, & it put more money back into the pockets of the Porn Studios & the Directors. Something that HD-DVD does both in. HD-DVD is both Much lesser in value, easier to work with, & a much smaller investment in the long run in turn, saving Porn Studios/Directors & there staff alot more money in the long run. Converting to Blu Ray is a huge investment & only a few studios will want to take that risk. Mostly ones with alot of headroom to accept a lost in profit the first few years.



Also, the PC side of things plays a damn huge role. Blu Ray automatically loses if they are unable to gain suppoer through the PC Market. It's a simple logic, when it comes to a Window OS, just how many retailers ship there systems with it? Um, damn near all of em. So, if MS took a wise approach to someone like, eh lets say, Dell, Gateway, Compaq, etc & said to them "Here, Slap in this HD-DVD Drive into your system & Sell it", you think they'll deny an offer like that, no lol. This is also Microsoft were talking about here, the 5000+ patent organization that is damn well able to throw there weight around as they see fit. If they were to set it up as Windows Vista not supporting Blu Ray, a ton of sales are lost right off the bat. No, Apple based machines & ones that runs Linux OS's won't save em. Don't kid yourself. The Windows OS is in more homes where is the main factor of drive sales. Apples makes it sales more based on buisnesses that benefit from there machines. Graphic Designers, 3D Animators, etc. Then theres Linux OS lmao, I use a Distro myself but I can tell you thats not gonna decide a damn thing in this war XD. You must not forget that DVDForum backs the HD-DVD Format. If you don't know what that is, you should go check it out. May makeyou think you twice seeing how much support HD-DVD truly does have from alot of smaller studios & organizations. Even Sony is in on it =).



Sony has alot of studios backing it up, but Im I already know HD-DVD will get them in the long run. You can laugh at anyone all you want, coming from a Tech that has been in the field as long as I have, I've seen plenty of Sony's offerings. All Superior to the competition, all break through ideas, all failures. Blu Ray will become another beacon of how the "To much to soon" strategy doesn't not work in todays economy.Good luck with your Blu Ray Player. Or, the Bottlenecking PS3 console. The poor mans Blu Ray solution =).

Reply
 

 
# To HAGuest 2006-05-03 03:04
I don't think you know how to read at all. I wasn't refering to the BR player at ALL. The BR DISCS can have a layer of standard DVD on them, that works on regular DVD players.



Why did I mention little kids and familys? Of course they don't care whether they have blu-ray or HD-DVD. Did I even say that? NO! You don't read at all! I said they don't care what the crap it is. If their OS says it supports HD-DVD and doesn't say Blu-Ray, they're going to buy HD-DVD, EVEN THOUGH BR will have 3rd party support and work just as well as HD-DVD. HD-DVD uses a RED LASER. I stamped Computer Development next to my name to state the position I'm coming from. I'm not coming from some person playing a game (X360 HD-DVD support vs. PS3 BR), nor a person wanting HD support (movies). You're the person acting like a ******* assuming whatever you read is EXACTLY how it's meant. You interpretation of what people say isn't fact.



The holographic discs will be very nice, and yes the last documentation released on them was up to 1.3TB. They did mention that there is a test release candidate for Spring 2007 for them.



I'm not really excited for holographic discs until they're out. They have been talking about them for 20 years and it's been the same ever since, just higher storage capacity than what we have had, every year.



'So please dont be like, "i have said it, mark my words in stone".' Ya, you're definately acting like the ******* here. I stated how I came up with my opinion, you obviously don't care for research. You just like to argue.

Reply
 

 
# I think...hush404 2006-05-03 03:07
Blu-Ray is clearly the winner! It's got more space, more space=more porn... and the porn addicts rejoice, lol.

Reply
 

 
# James you are wrongEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 03:18
HD DVD uses a blue-violet 405 nm weraz DVD uses a red 650nm. The reason why blu ray contains more space is also its downfall. The laser is bent into a cone shap to achieve a 0.85 aperature size, hd dvd uses 0.65, dvd uses 0.6. The smaller aperature means that the lasers dot is much smaller and so can write more data per sector. So whats the problem then? its amazingly error prone, the reason why the protective cover for blu ray took so long was because if you scratched it the tiniest bit it would render the disk unreadable because the laser is focusing on such a small area.

Reply
 

 
# F uck both of themEcho_Evolution 2006-05-03 04:03
Make way for HVD(Holographic Versatile Disc)!!!

These babies can hold on a single layer 200+GB

This will be the true champion in the format wars!!!

Reply
 

 
# Correct me if im wrongDeletegmc 2006-05-03 05:12
I might be wrong on this but isnt most companys who manufacture a supporter of blu ray so does that not mean that a blu ray drive will come with their computers which will mean blu ray will be on most computers anyway

Reply
 

 
# MoronsGuest 2006-05-03 05:24
erm you guys are all dumb, how about you stop debating, get a life, and go with the flow... whether hd dvd fails or succeeds isnt down to your stupid debating, its down to the rest of the dumb 95% of people who dont read tech blogs. They will decide, not you, so shut your mouths you stupid a-holes, no offence, but you all suck big time. Think before you back up your favourite brand you stupid n00b fanb



Now i am going to contradict myself and be a hipocrit and predict that blu ray has bagged it baby, why? becoz i can, oh and im god, so there stupid n00bies.



Mogungo

Reply
 

 
# hmmmEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 05:50
you know you dont make a point when your being an idiot. People are actually debating here the pros and cons of both media types. Ive backed hd-dvd for its price and its stability, lots are backing blu ray for its more storage. For me I recon this people are just getting to the idea of dvds im talking about your common home here. So naturally when they get a HD tv they look on the shelf they see blu ray and hd-dvd. There gonna pick hd-dvd. The standard consumer will not know how much data is stored on the discs or which format is better but he will know what dvd is.

Reply
 

 
# come on people.. think hereGuest 2006-05-03 06:03
well the porn industry has already been producing hd dvds for the past year andmany people already own them, so it at least has a head start,., if it is in the hands of thepeople already why not just get the player, hd dvd will win i think just becuase it will be cheaper and has more use than just the ps3.



blu ray might be better but remember betamax was superior to vhs, but vhs won that fight

Reply
 

 
# Cheaper always winsGuest 2006-05-03 07:00
ALWAYS. VHS was cheaper and it won, porn had nothing to do with it. HD-dvd is cheaper, so it will win, normal people dont see both formats and say, wow 50 gigs vs 30 wow ill take the one thats more expensive then. They see $25 HD $45 BD, so they take what's cheaper. Thats the bottom line. And BD can have normal dvd's burned on them, for $25 more then a normal BD which is already 20 more then it should be. All this was debated on yahoo when the dual dvd BD was announced, also, the HD discs can do it too, and they still charge 25 more, and its that terrible Jennifer anniston movie.

Reply
 

 
# EzekielThorlord 2006-05-03 07:39
you are completely correct.

the problem with the disc isint the features. its the way its produced and manufactured.



a cut on the surface of the Blu-Ray disc will cause the cone to be offcenter and cause EVEN MORE BRE's than the PS2 had. HD-DvD went for on the other hand, a format a little more durable and even though its smaller, its still large enough for everything that would be Put on Blu-Ray.



its just a 20gb difference. the ONLY product that would actually take advantage of that 20gb extra storage is Season DvD's of TV shows. Movies, Games, Storage can all be done on HD-DvD perfectly with the same quality as BVD and at a cheeper cost.



BVD may have 20gb more space, but thats its ONLY advantage.

Reply
 

 
# .......Guest 2006-05-03 08:42
So far my best experience with porn and the media-type it's placed on, is the PSP. I can download it and just put it on the PSP, without the hassle of long conversion-time and having to use a TV and DVD-player. Of course i have to convert the media to psp format, but with SUPER that takes almost half the time than normal.

Reply
 

 
# hmmGuest 2006-05-03 09:22
I think sony will win this one. while hd-dvd is better right now, blu-ray is still in a prototype environment and will improve with time. whoever is saying that blu-ray players suck and the there are so many problems is a moron mainly because the technology is fairly new even though it has been under development for a while.

Reply
 

 
# another blu ray faultEzekiel_Xz 2006-05-03 09:26
you know why where on the subject a 1x blu ray drive would have horrible load times on games. The ps3 really needs a 2x if it wants barrable load times. But I dont think they can afford to put one in. At current hd-dvd manufacture cost I reckon a 2x hd-dvd would be cheaper than a 1x blu ray drive. Which is quite something lol. If they put a 1x in the ps3 it would have a read speed of 4mbs a seconds :S. To put that in perspective it would take nearly 4 hours to read a full dual sided 50gb blu ray disc.

Reply
 

 
# @22Guest 2006-05-03 10:18
If your right in saying that It takes 4hours to read a full Dual Sided 50gb blu ray disc then whats the problem? Its been said in the blog that they store up to 9hrs of Vid.



Who noes who will win??? We will have to wait and see but still makes me wonder why they didnt just have one format. Would of helped buisness because now one pretty much has to fail so that means big loss to whoever

Reply
 

 
# stop with the trivial specs.. and get realGuest 2006-05-03 10:21
STOP ARGUING ABOUT THE PROS AND CONS HERE



the consumers are th ones who will decide and the normal consumer, doesn't know the difference... they know cheaper and versatility. if they can use it, they will, -the pron industry has pretty much backed hd dvd for the past years and have been selling movies budled with hd dvds...



blue ray will end up being for ps3 only and a few people who buy the player.



my parents bought a betamax becuase it was the best! - but guess what... it didn't last long and the consumers went with VHS. it was cheaper, and easier. same with hd dvd



sorry blu-ray

Reply
 

 
# whoaGuest 2006-05-03 13:30
if it doesnt work on vista its gonna flop.

Reply
 

 
# good pointGuest 2006-05-03 13:34
is blu ray isn't compatible with vista then it will be a big flop... hd dvd all the way

Reply
 

 
# Let the professor Guide you guysTheProfessor 2006-05-03 15:27
Few Facts:



*First of there will be no such thing as a 1x (36Mbps) Blu-Ray drive because BDRom movies require 54mbs 2x = 72Mbps. All players in the market are 2x and above and support 1080P. Toshiba’s first players are only 1x that and they don’t support 1080P due to this same reason (now you know why they’re so cheap). HDDVD will not, I repeat will NOT, be faster.



* HD-DVD drives cost more than DVD drives and their disk also cost more, however they are cheaper than Blu-Ray simply because the Blu-ray technology needs even more advance equipment/technology to create disk and manufacture drives. Of course this will all even out in the following years and price will make very little difference. Just look at DVD vs CD prices, same deal.



* HDDVD’s Theoretical limit is only 60Gbs and they weren’t design to be multilayer so you won’t see much in that department anytime soon for now is 15gs =) single layer. Of course you have already heard that TDK is going to be shipping 200gbs disks soon.



* HD-DVD is only mildly better than a DVD and it will hit it’s limits very soon. This is one of the reasons why most Movie companies are not supporting it. Why even make the move from DVDs.



* Most early adopters are extremely knowledge about technology. They know all about Blu-Ray and HDDVD. Most will pick blue ray for its superiority and after the PS3 comes out and most users will buy Blu-Ray movies because that’s what they can play without having to pay for another player (they might buy the HDDVD version but then return it when they find out it doesn’t play on their PS3s).



* If few movies (it has less support) come out for it what makes you think people would get an HDDVD movie instead of a BRD movie? HD will have no effect because every movie/player will have in big letters HDTV!



* BD disk are very durable. The polymer coating it uses, called Durabis, was developed by TDK and is extremely resilient and fingerprint resistant. More durable than HDDVD? That’s right.



* They have the same security. Do you research before making wrong claims!



* Toshiba’s first drive was horribly rated. Blue ray drives (lots more drives out there than hddvd drives) are getting rave reviews



So people please do your homework and stop bashing our new wining format. It’s quite sad when people make up stuff just to make it seem like HDDVD has an advantage. Besides price which will balance out in the near future it really only has disadvantages. And oh year if a drive doesn’t come included in the system it might as well no come at all (360 with HDDVD Add-on no point really just a waste of marketing).

Reply
 

 
# Vista support doesnt matterTheProfessor 2006-05-03 15:31
The drives support the Operating system not the other way around. Why do you think linux has such bad support for hardware? Drivers are built by manufactures and applications use those drivers to communicate with the device.



So no, is not up to vista. Windows doesn't support every drive out there the drives support themselves. windows might include a driver by default for it but it is usually a crappy old version.

Reply
 

 
# to number 28Guest 2006-05-03 16:21
So people please do your homework and stop bashing our new wining format. It’s quite sad when people make up stuff just to make it seem like HDDVD has an advantage. Besides price which will balance out in the near future it really only has disadvantages. And oh year if a drive doesn’t come included in the system it might as well no come at all (360 with HDDVD Add-on no point really just a waste of marketing).

----------------------------------------------------------------------



well first blu-ray hasn't won anything and i don't support either however since i have a 360 and it will be MUCH ceaper for me to buy the hd-dvd add on rather than a new player, i'll go with that.



second, just because one is better DOESN"T mean it will be better to the consumers... how many times do we have to bring up betamaz and vhs.. betamax was far superior



third. you said that hd dvds will cost more.. of course they will for the first few years BUT the porn industry has been giving them out practically!

a mainstream porno costs roughly about 50 dollars (depending on actor or actress) and lately for the past year or so if you buy one of these they are doubled with hd-dvds for the same price!!!!!!



btw Pirates... is a hilarious porn, complete with CGI skeleton warriors! heheh



but yeah.. i have the feeling HD-dvd will win out, blue ray might win in the gaming category, but other than that it doesn' have much use. oh well.

Reply
 

 
# Cant compare this to betamax it is completely differentTheProfessor 2006-05-03 16:33
Betamax



- Completely pripriotory

- No from other manufuctures, again a strictly sony thing

- If Betamax would have won we would all have sony tabe recorders back in the day. Not really good for consumers.

- Very little movie studio support

- Expensive



Except for price it is Toshiba's HDDVD that more likely resembles Betamax.



Being better does help. We move to new formats because they are better. DVD to HDDVD is not much of an improvement. Blu Ray is. Is like moving from CDs to DVDs or better. cd 800mbs or so, DVDs 9 gbs Blue Ray 200gbs. Simply it has come time for us to move to a new format.

Reply
 

 
# meant to say proprietaryTheProfessor 2006-05-03 16:34
Sorry

Reply
 

 
# wrap that ***** up foolGuest 2006-05-03 16:37
blueray is going to dominate a big reason is because it will be in ps3.think about dvds and ps2

Reply
 

 
# lolGuest 2006-05-03 18:17
dvd did not gain support becuase of the ps2...



dvds were released in 1996



the ps2 was released in 2000

Reply
 

 
# ideaGuest 2006-05-03 18:20
rather than delving into another format war.



all companies should have done what they did during the 80's for CDs and come together to create a standard.

Reply
 

 
# BetamaxDeletegmc 2006-05-04 00:17
The big difference nowadays between the format wars are the price. Both systems right now are quite expensive and the early adopters will be the people who are well off and people who have money when the walk into a shop they will buy the best product because they can afford it and because its the best. Today quality is more important to people so the vhs vs betamax war cant really be compared to the upcoming format war.

Reply
 

 
# ps2Guest 2006-05-04 10:31
i start buying dvds because i found out my ps2 can play dvds withouth realising it till i got it lol.

Reply
 

 
# DVDs in JapanGuest 2006-05-05 04:04
dvd did not gain support becuase of the ps2...



dvds were released in 1996



the ps2 was released in 2000



by zanz





DVDs may have come out in 1996 but the uptake in Japan wasn't that great until the PS2 came out (they stuck with VCDs). The japanese demonstrations placed much more emphasis on the DVD capabilities of the PS2 than EU and US.



So for Japan at least, the PS2 did increase DVD support.

Reply
 

 
# Show Seasons will helpGuest 2006-05-07 18:28
the curent big thing Joe Smoe's are getting are there favorite shows on DVD. this will also help decide. considering when Joe goes to Best Buy and sees the 5 DVD set of Nip/Tuck or the 4 DVD set of Sopranos on one Blu-ray compared to probably two HD-DVD's.

curent america wants stuff in the smallest avalable packige, even if they have to pay more. where talking about the iPod generation here. look at how almost everyone has a $250 or more iPod/MP3 Player, compared to no one using portable CD players going for less then $50. just the number of discs/quantity alone will be a big facter in the curent "everything in one box" America.



i peronaly don't care. i will stick to DVD untill they don't make um anymore.

i don't see why Sony cant push Blu-ray, MS push HD-DVD and have Studios produce for both. like how CD's and Digital music Downloads are both produced by the record industry. the only thing causing this "war" are the studios. if they made media for both everyone would be happy.

plus, multi format would add competition to the market, instead of everyone using DVD there would be three formats. so not every movie would be the same price. unless they price fix AGAIN.

Reply
 

 
# Blue-Ray 400 GB CONFIRMEDGuest 2006-05-08 11:52
The Blue-Ray disc has a 400 gb vercion using 6 mini layers

Reply
 

 
# Come on peopleGuest 2006-05-09 14:17
Is anbody else here sick of people making these seemingly outrageous claims without backing them up with links or references. If you're going to say something like, the center of the blu ray disks will actually be a replica of jenna jamesons mouth and will blow you everytime you put it on your lap, please show us where you got this information from so we can believe you... oh and its not vercion its version... Do you honestly believe everything you read? This is exactly what m$ and $0000ny want you to be doing right now... spreading unsubstantiated rumors across the WWW. I have an idea that can end all of this pointless debating... lets just wait and see what happens. We can argue all we want but like its been said before this war will ultimately be decided by the average consumer. Let's face it, the Average American is too busy watching t.v . or shopping at w mart or eating some fast food to sit down and read some articles about the pros and cons of both blu ray and hd-dvd and make an informed and logical decision. Only time will tell who wins this stupid war

Reply
 

 
# HD Porn videoGuest 2006-06-23 02:08
Hey guys, what are you talking about? Who needs those dvd's and expencive HDV players? Personally I prefer to download HD porn videos from the internet! I think it's great solution ;)

check out my site www.hd-porn-video.com - i post there my favorite porn sites with hd videos.

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword