Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Activision looking into Vietnam War music; CoD 7 set in Vietnam? |
Listed in: PS3, Xbox 360, PC Gaming Tags: Activision, Africa, Official Xbox Magazine, Treyarch, UK
Ó
No, not necessarily. Rather, they made some heavy mention on top tunes from the Vietnam War era, as well as Cuba, Africa, and Soviet Union. That's quite a track list, I must say. Also, it appears that Treyarch will be developing once again, since Word at War senior producer Noah Heller is involved once more.
Well he did say that they will be "showing the final battles of the Pacific and the European Theater and that lets us put a close to the war," last year in an interview with UK's Official Xbox Magazine.
If that really is the case, then prepare yourself for some hippie, groovy 60's music. Here, Help yourselves with The Beatles for a quick trip down memory lane. This was at number 6 on September 20, 1965 in the charts.
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|













Comments
Reply
im down with it, as long as it didnt fail like WaW
Reply
Since WW2 was raped by countless video game portrayals in the 2000s alone, a good Vietnam game wouldn't hurt. Looking forward to how ruthless the game will be. They already had random gratuitous gibs in WaW, so they'll def. need more for a Vietnam setting.
Those traps were brutal.
Reply
nothing to do with fanboys and everything to do with learning from the past.
anyway who the hell cares about the Vietnam war? it had no real meaning.
Reply
Perfect logic. Learning from the past must mean I'll like the game.
As for the last sentence...Go say that to a veteran's face. It'd be some sort of miracle if you actually came back from the talk.
Reply
2, If I said that to a veteran's face and he attacked me, just means hes emotionally affected (and fair enough, but its not my fault the soldiers went to war) BUT doesnt make what I said incorrect.
Reply
Lmfao what do you think world at war is? the point is they even managed to ***** up a cod4 mod
Reply
Reply
Reply
I guess I can look at it this way,.....Zombie Viets anyone?
Modern Warfare > Anything that is NOT Modern Warfare.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
That's what they were liked for.
Modern warfare should have been a new series, seperate from the call of duty line. And Seeing as modern warfare 2 no longer has call of duty in the title, why would they be working on a call of duty 7, when it would be call of duty 6.
CoD:5 improved on CoD:4, and made it better (in my opinion) by putting it back in the world war era.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
It wasn't our war to begin with, but it's a great war to be portrayed in CoD's engine. They have a lot of potential.
I can also call 4 an expansion pack to 3. See what I did there? CoD3 was FAR from subpar.
Reply
Reply
It's like saying GTA: Vice City is GTA IV.....
Reply
modern warfare (seperate from cod but taking off of the cod4 mw line) and probably every other cod game made (that is not some sort of off shoot) so there could potentially even be a world at war 2.
i think they need to do some more dessert battles with the cod4 engine like the gulf war. with like nerve gas manufacturing facilities. though sky scrappers and urban warfare is good enough.
but pertaining to the Vietnam era. at least there will be some m15 m16 usage there. and in my opinion the vegetation is where things go interesting in 4 with concealing opposing forces. so this could be a very exciting installment to the series.
this of course if not botched.
Reply
Reply
I ve never heard or read (barring you) anyone say waw is better or as good as than 4 and/or tryarch dosnt spoil every cod game. soooo logiclly 4 must be alot more popular than waw
which I suppose is true.
you can call 4 an expation to 3 but as the first two are infinty ward (both better than 3) by your logic (see what I did there :P) then.. well Im sure you see
Reply
Although you do have a point, CoD2 was really, really good.
Reply
Anyway, WaW was a terrible game. On paper it could have been great, it took everything from CoD4 and improved it, engine wise, added things people wanted and took nothing away. They just screwed it up when they went back to WWII and then added Tanks (enough said). Since the games are only getting better engine wise. Modern Warfare 2 will be the next real step forward in the series and this game will probably MWF2 but in Vietnam with...tanks...
Reply