Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
65nm CELL now in production for the PS3 |
Listed in: PS3 Tags: playstation 3 updates, Sony, Toshiba
Ó
Yep, that's right. This 6 GHz, 65nm computer CMOS SOI processor is now under production, as Sony said it would do by 2007. PS3 fans, your moment has arrived: Sony began the mass production of the 65 nm CELL processor, although European customers should know that it is uncertain whether the new CELL chip will be slapped on their PS3s for the launch. Maybe it's for a newer PS3 model...But like it was said before, the chip is cheaper to produce than the 90 nm version inside all PS3's out now. And it's relatively cooler. Does this mean it will be cheaper? Probably not, seeing Sony's PS3 sales since launch. But hey, as long as it's cooler. Oh and the CELL isn't just for the PS3. It will be inserted in a few more Sony and Toshiba products as well.
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|












Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
What they meant, was that the 65nm processor will be in production for the PS3, AND the benefits are below:
> Smaller processor (no advantage over current PS3 Cell processors)
>Cooler processor
>Cheaper for Sony to manufacture
>Closer to a price drop!!!
So this all pretty much means the current PS3 owners:
> Have the hotter version of the Cell (though not overheating)
>Have a bigger processor (but not better in any way)
>Were more expensive for Sony
Don't worry just look at it as a cooler processor.
Reply
Reply
Reply
But yes, it still uses the old 90 nm design with regards to SPEs so the PS3 version will have 7 SPEs available to it (8 SPEs with 1 disabled by Sony).
I'll be checking for more insight.
Reply
performance gains in an fashion are moot, devs must code for the lowest common denominator. so higher speeds anywhere won't be used. remember the psp is underclocked, so that wouldn't be a first for sony either.
Reply
Reply
qj is silly. I dunno what to believe.
but I know one thing, I'll be selling my ps3 to get the colder one when that comes out.
If it really does run markedly cooler, they could probably reduce the size of the ps3 considerably.
Reply
6 GHZ would be a new chip, as PS3's cell is only 3GHZ.....so expect it in a beefed up media PS3, or not even in PS3's, but university research supercomputers etc....
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This will Mean that By Next Christmas 2007,the PS3 will be Cost-Reduced Enough to Increase the Value of the PS3 Package by a [100$] or even[150$]
Basicly...With this Level of Cost-Reduction Speed,Sony can add [a game,another Controler,Hi-Def cable] to the Current PS3 package in the coming [Christmas] Or Even more [Maybe Slash 50$ from the 600$ but thats Unlikely...Increasing the Package Value is the Way to Go]
This Wont Hurt Current PS3 Ownerz....The PS3 rarely Overheats Unlike the 360,Which Freezes Frequently
Reply
Reply
My making the chip smaller, it uses less power and produces less heat.
No performance gain/loss at all. As long as it performs at the same statistics as the 90nm processor.
Using the 65nm makes it so that less voltage is needed for the same desired effect. Less voltage even with the same amount of amps = less watt usage, and therefore less power = less heat.
Reply
This definitely means a reduction in costs, the 360 is moving to the 65nm process also this year also. I agree that a price cut is unlikely, because Sony still has a large loss margin to pull back on the PS3. Maybe if targets start falling behind they'll be forced to.
Reply
Reply
How is this incredible speed? Cell didn't debut with the PS3, it was available LONG before the launch of Sony's console, and we all knew it was moving to 65nm soon anyway (or were you living under a rock at the time?).
As for your last statement, it just shows what a dumb fanboy you are.
Reply
the PS3 is quieter, doesn't overheat (though it does get warm), and has only frozen on me once, last week, while playing the Motorstorm demo.
i'd like to get a 360, but i just can't trust it right now. so far, the PS3 has proven to be the more well built machine. at $500/$600, Sony knew they couldn't play around with making the console sturdy.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Also Microsoft is About to Screw its Current Followers with a new 360 that has a 65nm Processor,HDMI and 120gb HDD...the Ultimate Blow to the Current Outdated 360 owners
They are Denying it....But it will Happn,So you see....with a PS3,your Problems are far less than the poor Others
Reply
My roommate bought a 360 and so that's why I opted for the PS3.
His 360 only crashed a couple of times. I think he was downloading something online a lot of those times too. I mean, shoot, my Wii crashes too. It happens
Anyways, I was curious to see if his 360 was overheating, after I played a good 2 hours of DOA, and I found out that it wasn't very warm at all. He does, however have a Nyko intercooler that hasn't crapped out on him yet, but in the end, I'd have to say, the 360's held up well.
I'm not going to deny that there were quite a few documented cases of defective 360's. That's MS's bad.
But for the most part, if you got a good 360, then it's going to be good for a long time coming.
Yea it's loud as hell, but system life and operation is key to me.
That sucks about the 65nm processor, HDMI, 120gb, "super premium" 360 that people seem to be talking about.
If that's true, then I can't really feel bad about me having a warmer running cell chip.
Reply
Reply
figboy, go to gamestop or walmart and check out the ps3 on display. chances are.... it froze.
Reply
Reply
Reply
If you understand what im saying, post here and tell me if im right or wrong.
Reply
Reply
Reply
- ISSCC white sheets indicate that the current prototype for STI's little PowerPC puppy runs at 6 GHz (256 GFLOPS) at a dual rail of 1.3V. The current CELL model in the PS3 runs at 3.2 GHz (205 GFLOPS) at a single rail of 1.3V. That same model can run at 2 GHz at a single rail of 0.9V.
"No performance gain/loss at all. As long as it performs at the same statistics as the 90nm processor."
" Haha everyone is getting so worked up over nothing, it will hardly run any cooler and is EXACTLY the same speed, it's only being changed because it's cheaper for Sony to produce on 65nm."
" from what I've heard, this won't affect the performance at all."
- Ahem. If you're any smarter, you'd specifically state that "you think that Sony will not use the advancements that come implicitly with the proposed 65 nm design, using only the current die map of the 90 nm model to not disappoint 90 nm model owners." Lower core processing current ALWAYS means processors run cooler. Any PC geek will slap that right back into your face. 512 KiB caches over an accelerated SPE network means multi-tasking, multimedia performance, as was demonstrated by the late 90s InsteadMedia GX "PC-in-a-chip" prototype by Cyrix. No improved performance? Review Virginia Tech's G5 Supercomputer, read the details of concurrent, parallel processing, and get back here.
"How is this incredible speed? Cell didn't debut with the PS3, it was available LONG before the launch of Sony's console, and we all knew it was moving to 65nm soon anyway (or were you living under a rock at the time?)."
- This IS true. The roadmap for the CELL BE has long been highlighted by STI (most especially IBM) and the 65 nm design was sure to come the moment Intel and AMD both announced their 65 nm die prototypes.
"Don't listen to QJ
The 6Ghz version of the Cell will not be in the PS3, Sony wouldn't do that to their fans..."
- I don't see what warranted this call. We explicitly announced "it is uncertain whether the new CELL chip will be slapped on their PS3s for the launch." What part of this statement is unintelligible? The use of the 65 nm CELL in the PS3 is not confirmed, at least not to our knowledge.
With a lower rail, the 65 nm CELL would probably equal the 90 nm version in performance, if you're comparing the Hertz ratings, just as the 90 nm version can achieve lower speeds. This will affect bandwidth and overall performance, but the 65 nm will still outperform the 90 nm even at the same Hertz level.
STI did not, and will not, claim to produce a 6 GHz monster as a 3.2 GHz just to satisfy a console gripe. The 65 nm IS better and it warrants the money and time put to researching the die map. Intel is coming out with a 40 nm, 80-core processor design, so the CELL may follow suit soon.
Reply
Reply
Secondly, the XBox 360 runs HOTTER and LOUDER than the PS3 and dies MORE OFTEN.
Thirdly, Microsoft rushed their console much more than Sony did theirs.
Fourth, "existant" is spelled "existent".
Reply