Microsoft's Neil Thompson says educational games will cause game industry to lose money |
Remember those news bits about the Wii and DS being used as educational tools in classrooms around the world? What about those educational games like Brain Training and the like? Those sound like great ways to make the non-gaming masses more open to video games, right? Well, Microsoft's Neil Thompson thinks otherwise.
It's not that Thompson is against combining education and entertainment. He just thinks it's a bad idea. Speaking at the recent Games 3.0 event, Thompson emphasized that instead of trying to combine the two, developers should concentrate on stuff that will sell, "because it costs too much money to get that wrong":
We're in the business of creating fun entertainment and the moment we try to pretend we're in the business of education we've crossed the line and it's dangerous for us as a company and as an industry.
Yeah, it all boils down to money, which is a bit understandable since we are in a financial crisis right now and hey, gaming is big business. Like analyst Colin Sebastian said, core gamers haven't been affected yet by the economic crunch, but casual and mass market gamers have gotten a bit tight with their money. Parents have also been shown to still be wary of so-called educational games. Still, didn't Nintendo's Brain Training titles sell like a gazillion copies?
Nintendo has done some great work in producing products that are both fun and educational, Brain Training is one example, but I think for us to quote this as an industry and say let's start producing edutainment type products – we'll lose a lot of money. I don't think it's ever been done in a clever and good way because you lose the focus of it being fun and involving.
Thompson does acknowledge, however, that games can be used in education, but finding ways to combine the two isn't the job of game developers:
Educators and government should understand what great education is in order to look at the products we produce and ask can they be used in different scenarios that can benefit children in their educational process?
Related articles:
- Analyst: economic crisis bad for small studios, console life cycles might extend
- Adults dismiss educational video games too quickly?
Via Games Industry
The QJ.net Network |
 |
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
Comments [refresh]
FERST POEST
HAH FIRST WOO Lol lul lulz lolz
Omg first lol
Ahhhhhhhhh Second
Wats wrong with my name ppl?????
A company = money bags. Duh... they want money and that is all they mostly care about. I hate it when they release something new every year.
Just look at frogger
If they want people to buy these types of games, then put it on a online arcade buy for the console.
I like some gamming companies that care about the people and create kick ass games.
The company that would spooge millions of dollars to divide by zero.
I'm sure they're to smart for education.
it's not because I learn a thing or two at school from a nintendo ds that I'll stop playing videogames, this guy is strange. Does he really thinks we see educationnal videogames and videogames as one? lol.
You're looking at it from the wrong perspective.
He's not "complaining" about buyers. The point is... a GAME developer should focus on what they're good at... and that is making games.
If you want to make it educational, then you need teachers, parents and professors to come up with what needs to be taught, then think about how they can make it fun.
I mean, these people went to school and got degrees in TEACHING, so who better to make an educational game?
die in a fire
The fact that you would say something like that proves you are MUCH more immature than someone who posts 'First'. First of all, how does Aceboogz's post bother you?
First of all, he didn't just say "First." He made himself look like a complete idiot with all his phony excitement and whatnot. I'm sure it bothered you as well. People like that simply don't deserve to live. It is scientific fact!
ohno, its the machosofts loyal neil thompson!!!1!!1!oneone!
he must be punched... in the face... FASTERRRRRRRR!!
Its true, why should a game developer need to incorporate teaching and education into a game? If he does we then have school bodies deciding what is acceptable and not acceptable for use in the classroom.
Let the education authorities look first at the games and see if there is anything they feel would be a benefit and then ask a developer to work with it.
it bothered me a little, but I don't think I'd take his life away for it. I mean sheesh and this is why we live in such a corrupted world now, man its so much violence