Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayer

Posted Oct 1, 2010 at 9:25AM EST by Karl B.

Listed in: PS3, Xbox 360, PC Gaming Tags: EA, Electronic Arts, Medal of Honor
Ó

 

moh

 

 

 

The upcoming Medal of Honor reboot has been hit by a lot of flak over the decision to include the Taliban as a playable faction in the game's multiplayer component. EA stuck to their guns for a long time regarding the issue, but it seems the pressure has finally gotten to them.

 

On the game's official website, executive producer Greg Goodrich has announced that the Taliban are now longer part of Medal of Honor's multiplayer mode. Their virtual counterparts have now been renamed "Opposing Force" following comments from "friends and families of fallen soldiers who have expressed concern."

 

"We are making this change for the men and women serving in the military and for the families of those who have paid the ultimate sacrifice - this franchise will never willfully disrespect, intentionally or otherwise, your memory and service," wrote Goodrich.

 

The whole Taliban debacle has led not only to criticism from government officials around the world but to the banning of the game from being sold on all US Military base worldwide.

 

 

 

Via [MedalofHonor.com]



18.2% of voters think this story ROCKS!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (6) This story SUCKS!! (27)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
+1 # RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerKarl B. 2010-10-01 10:39
And then a few days after launch somebody will release a patch that changes the name back to the original.

Reply
 

 
# RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerPS3 Owner1 2010-10-01 11:01
It's a game not reality.

But the same can be said about South Park's 201 it was completely censored and I hope it'll be released uncensored on the Blu-ray / DVD editions.

Reply
 

 
+2 # RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayersymbyosis 2010-10-01 11:21
I wouldn't care. its as real as you make it. this reminds me of the black community getting mad at resident evil taking place in africa and having black zombies, what the hell is there in africa besides a dominant black population?...so what else is there in the middle east that are our ENEMIES, just the taliban, so the americans that are "offended" need to just accept it...so how else are we gonna fight against the taliban? buggy MoH mods for pc?

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerjoostin 2010-10-01 13:07
ummm

Taliban, Mujahadeen, Hezbollah, Iran's Republican Guard, Al Queda, etc etc.

The list goes on. USA pretty much made enemies with every terrorist group in the Middle East.

Reply
 

 
+1 # YeahUltimaXX 2010-10-01 21:18
Uhm, except, Iran's Republican Guard was a military group, not a terrorist organisation. HUGE difference. It's like arguing the Nazis were terrorists. Sure, they were dicks, but they weren't terrorists.

Reply
 

 
# +1JOshISPoser 2010-10-02 00:26
simply for that last sentence :P

Reply
 

 
# RE: Yeahjoostin 2010-10-02 09:41
Actually, by using any means to incite fear is the act of terrorism. Just because the Nazi's didn't Hijack planes, doesn't mean they aren't terrorists. Iran's Guard actually supplies weapons to the Taliban, thus being on the list of terrorist groups.

If you want to get technical, USA is the home of the most terrorist acts in Human History. Take a bite off of that one. Just read about Raegan/Nixon/Bush I & II, Kennedy, Clinton, etc. Best example would be Reagan-Nicaragua campaign. It is known around the world, except in the USA of course, that most American administrations have used their power to influence micro wars around the world to increase USA support back home or to boost profits on a certain commodity..hmm oil. They sent Black Op teams to kill off Democratically elected leaders in South America because they were giving the people power via Socialism. Of course the USA believes Socialism to be equal to Facism or Communism, but really the whole world uses a form of Socialism. Mdeicaid is a form of Socialism, Old Age Security is a form as well. Every industiralized nation has free health care for every citizen except for the good ol USofA. Just a campaign of misinformation in that great nation.

Reply
 

 
# ErmUltimaXX 2010-10-02 16:33
Except Nazis didn't use FEAR to propell their fucked up ideals. They used HATE to do that for them; they turned the entire nation against minority groups to unite the majority and conquer nations. Terrorism is about disrupting civilian life to produce a sense of fear, which destabilizes governments. There's a HUGE difference.

I'm fully aware of the examples you gave, by the way, and thanks for the (redundant) history lesson but that doesn't change the fact that the Nazis weren't terrorists, and the IPG weren't either. You say they were supplying the Taliban; maybe they were, maybe they weren't, but you can't be a terrorist through association, and even then I think you're forgetting the Taliban aren't terrorists either.

They are nationalists with a moral-code from the prehistoric era, and we invaded because they apparently had no qualms with Al Qaeda proliferating on Afghani territory when they were in power. We invade to stop Al Qaeda from gaining too much power, and now they hate the fact we're there protecting our own countries and they're attacking us in an effort to get us off "their soil".

It's messy, and it's ugly, but it ISN'T terrorism for god's sake.

Reply
 

 
+1 # ...papajag 2010-10-01 13:22
People actually have a reason to hate this because they have had their families died recently due to the war. We can say it's cool because we never personally experienced the damage(although recession...).

Can't say the same for Resident Evil racism thing though. I think that was just BS.

Reply
 

 
+1 # pshhh biased much?jessse 2010-10-01 19:49
its the same shit, your probably not black so you don't care, i honestly wouldn't care if it was Mexicans(which is what i am) but i also don't care for the taliban in this game

those soldiers made the conscious decision to join the army knowing full well of the benefits and risks, the people getting mad (including the friends and families dead U.S. soldiers) are just racist hypocrites

these soldiers need to stop being glorified as hero's and shit, they are mindless zombies who sold their souls to be nothing more then a tool of the government, in hopes of surviving so that they get benefits from the government (which screws you in the end)

i am totally against violence and killing, but shit at least the taliban are fighting for something they believe in, what the fuck are U.S. soldiers fighting for in Iraq? material things?

it's unfair to only protect the feelings of one group of people, and disregard the others, members of taliban also have families and friends, if they take the taliban out of multiplayer, they need to take them completely out of the game, and put american soldiers as enemies as well as the "hero's"

don't get me wrong, im not a fan of terrorism or the taliban, but i'm also not a fuckin hypocrite

Reply
 

 
# MaybeUltimaXX 2010-10-01 21:28
So wait... so there are people expecting the media to respect casualties of war to avoid hurting the feelings of widows and mothers who've lost their kids to the war and what not, cool, but apparently they have no qualms about policement being killed left right and center in the GTA games, or any game that lets you kill innocents for that matter.

I've yet to see ONE statement made by a grieving friend/relative of a war casualty that wasn't self centred. I don't mean that in a demeaning way, and they have the right to be upset, because it obviously opens up wounds for them, but what makes the grief of the parents of dead soldiers any more legitimate from the grief expressed by relatives of men and women who died at the hand of mobsters? Of good police officers being shot by hooligans? Since when does sticking patriotic sentiment behind an argument automatically lend it complete validity?

At least EA wasn't trying to glorify the Taliban. Can't say the same for Mafia II.

Don't get me wrong, I love all of these games and am perfectly for freedom of speech, and I think people can decide what to play and watch for themselves yada yada yada... But I'm just sick of hearing the same bullshit arguments being made against MoH repeatedly, because these same people didn't even CARE about this until it became relevant to them.

I can respect people who argue against the glorification of violence and whatnot as a whole in the media having a problem with this, because that's morality based on principal, even if I don't actually agree with it, but all cases made against the series so far are just haphazard comments being pulled out of donkey arses at the last second because being politically correct, even when it conflicts with freedom of expression, just seems the thing to do.

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayervideo gamers 2010-10-01 11:29
its a game, people need to get a grip of reality. ANYONE who was offended is probably mentally challenged and shouldnt be playing video games anyway. Its rated M for a reason genius...

EA has lost my respect even more now...

Reply
 

 
-1 # who careaWhocares 2010-10-01 11:42
Americans are so stupid.. When you ask them what country to attack next they will tell you: Russia, France, Saudi Arabia, China...
Damm i hate arrogant people who think they are the only people in this world.

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: who careajacobian91 2010-10-01 13:26
What you said made absolutely no sense whatsoever.

Reply
 

 
-2 # ...papajag 2010-10-01 13:26
Quoting Whocares:
Damm i hate arrogant people who think they are the only people in this world.

This is where you're wrong. The problem with the American government(my government) is that we get involved with other people's problems to much. I say fuck the other countries, let people starve to death, let people kill themselves and just focus on our own problems. This whole guardian-of-the world shit costing the U.S. money.

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: ...symbal 2010-10-01 13:51
How many nuclear bombs you think would have been just flung around the world by communist/dictatorship countries if the richer countries didn't intervene? The USA would have been obliterated 40 times over by now if they didn't.

Reply
 

 
-1 # @symbalpapajag 2010-10-01 14:32
True...but I doubt anyone in this world would ever attack the U.S. with nukes. Retaliation will be payed 10x over.

Reply
 

 
# RE: @symbalsymbal 2010-10-01 15:33
Thing is though if the world wasn't governed like it is and USA etc. just stayed out of things there's no-one to really have the power to get their noses into everyone's business, so what you'd get is countries getting too powerfull and the world would end up like the 17th century with countries being invaded and building empires, then it's game over USA. The fact is the world does need governing or problems will just massively escalate.

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: ...Rowaa 2010-10-02 18:22
How many nuclear bombs in the world were used AT ALL? And now the punch-line question: who used them?

Reply
 

 
# RE: ...UltimaXX 2010-10-01 21:35
Quote:
This whole guardian-of-the world shit costing the U.S. money.

That's a pretty common misconception. There are a few key principals behind economical growth; production, trade and consumption. War provides a reason for billions of dollars to be poured into researching new technologies. It provides jobs across all spectrums. It produces goods, it allows the sale and use of these goods, and whenever we convenientyly happen to "help out" a country with massive oil reserves... We just take the opportunity to sneak in a few clauses during the construction of "their" new government that allows us pretty unreasonable access to their supply of oil.

Sure, war costs a lot of money. But ultimately, it makes so much more.

Reply
 

 
# RE: ...Azariel_z 2010-10-02 05:55
Quoting papajag:
[quote name="Whocares"] This whole guardian-of-the world shit costing the U.S. money.


Do you lvie udner a rock? Thre is no "guardian of the world", or "guardian of peace"...blablabla...Is all about money and economic interests.. Keep the oil coming, and don't let them grow on the market, keep the things and politics on check so they can continue cutting the benefits, and writing the rules.
It's divide and conquer logic, and the peace and protect the innocent are just for the weak of mind that let corrupt media 's finger down their throat..
Welcome to the real world.

Reply
 

 
# RE: who careaJOshISPoser 2010-10-02 00:28
arrogant or ignorant?
Why would we (americans, cause i'm american) choose to attack France? I could see maybe those other countries...it'd be stupid to attack them especially Saudi Arabia.

Reply
 

 
# while we're at it...Datnizzle 2010-10-01 11:47
Can we take Nazi's out of Wolfenstien, stop all games about Veitnam, and take American's out of every war game. How many people around the world have lost loved ones to our military. This is stupid.

Reply
 

 
# Lost my MoneyRowan 2010-10-01 11:59
i was going to go buy this so i could play as the taliban and kill americans id do it on americas army but then i get kicked of for killing americans... realeas 2 versions of the game one with and one without just for all the wingers out there, its band from us militry base cause they dont like the fact that you can play as taliban nothing more

Reply
 

 
# Dumb just plain dumb!SnowSerpent 2010-10-01 13:56
:-| EA your sad!. :-| Stand up for our right's as well! "Stop banning or censoring video games!.The game is 17 + up right? Then why are you taking out opposing terrorist's?.Next thing you will do is change the game's name completely oh boy... :o The Taliban and Al qaeda are our enemies EA! So why can't they be in a video game that was endorsed by the Special Force's?..So stupid!

Reply
 

 
-2 # RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerGangsta457 2010-10-01 15:06
why are families bitching if theyre not even gonna play the game?

Reply
 

 
# .Ph0lly 2010-10-01 17:24
Pussies, EA always backs down. I don't really care what they are called because it doesn't matter but if they keep backing down people will keep complaining and EA will keep taking it up the ass. Good thing COD will be out soon after :D

Reply
 

 
# RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerSaddam H. 2010-10-01 17:30
Taliban are cool 8)

Reply
 

 
# RE: TardedFhqwghads 2010-10-01 17:46
Why is everybody bitching? My grandpa almost got killed by nazis and many americans did, yet they're still featured in some of the biggest games around.

In CoD:WaW you can play as (and kill) Japanese people, last time I checked Japan was still a real country but they didn't pull it from the game.

Either it's all okay or none of it is. People are so stupid sometimes I get sick to my stomach. Realize that this, just like any other 'realism' war game has REAL enemies, and REAL allies.

They aren't glorifying the Taliban by making it a playable option in their cheesy, shitty reboot of a once good game.

Grow some balls or common sense, until then GTFO EA.

Reply
 

 
# RE: EA pulls Taliban from Medal of Honor multiplayerjosiah wooldridge 2010-10-01 17:50
does anybody realize that EA has only RENAMED the Taliban to something else and have not completely replaced them. So the Taliban are still in the game they are just called something else.

Reply
 

 
# America leave all the other countries aloneRowan 2010-10-01 19:13
America go home leave all the other countries alone seen that move the hurt locker none of the events would ever happen if America left them alone and didn't invade there country every five minutes America step in and tries to take control you want world peace then stop the Americans

Reply
 

 
# hablinxRED 2010-10-01 22:10
It wouldn't be so offensive if people weren't so sensitive.

Reply
 

 
# MoHTommy Vercetti 2010-10-02 00:40
I agree +1

Reply
 

 
# I want reality my godson is a USMC.he doesn't cry about it..iTz_CuRtAiNz_4u_BaBy 2010-10-02 01:06
:DHmm I bet all the ppl who reported been offended,were pay off & encourage by none other than ACTIVISION...

Reply
 

 
+1 # UUmmmtherealpsndonutdude 2010-10-02 11:14
These ignorant idiots who complained completely forgot that you can still kill Americans in the game... In my opinion that should have been taken out if anything. According to you Americans, killing other = Good. Killing Americans = Bad. Now killing Americans in this game = good. But killing them as the Taliban = bad? Huh it doesn't make any sense.

Reply
 

 
# .Billy Mays 2010-10-02 19:43
I bet 75% of the people complaining about having the Taliban as the playable opposing force in multiplayer has never played a video game, and wouldn't even notice the release of this game if it wasn't for the Taliban issue. What about the Nazis? You play as a Nazi in CoD and MoH games.

Reply
 

 
# pfftPlaztek98 2010-10-02 23:54
guess instead of paying for it (seeing how i reserved it and payed for it already) ill jus get my money back and just rent it

lets all forget about all those millions lost to world war 2
nazis weren't as bad as taliban i suppose

Reply
 

 
# Video gamesDCX6000 2010-10-08 18:21
My father was a ninja. I wish they'd stop making ninja video games about ninja getting killed. (*tear*)

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword