Blu-ray: Messiah of the PS3?

Posted Feb 4, 2007 at 4:46AM by QJ Staff Listed in: PS3 Tags: Dreamcast, eBay, Microsoft, PS2, Sony
Ó


Flashback to a few months after the feared Y2K bug. With a less-than-admirable launch list, the PS2 had to rely on the strength of the brand name to drive sales. It wasn't until the months leading to the holiday season of 2001 when a blockbuster list of games (Metal Gear Solid 2, Dynasty Warriors 3, Final Fantasy X, GTA 3, Devil May Cry, etc.) had the PS2 dominating.

Some have argued that what really kept the PS2 afloat (aside from the hype) during the first few months of its release - a time when the console was plagued by production shortages and eBay overpricing - was that the PS2 was a decent and affordable DVD player. There were even reports that at the time, Akihabara was filled with PS2s that are displaying DVD movies. Some have argued that this was surprising since they claim that Akihabara - the Japanese tech town - used to be solely videogame-centric.

DVD - Image 1


Some Dreamcast fans even go as far as to say that if the Dreamcast, the console that came out a year early, only had DVD support instead if the GD-Rom, then maybe (we think that's a big maybe) the Dreamcast would've lasted a few months past March 2001.

Flash-forward to 2007.
The PS3 is facing heavy criticism. Pundits are screaming lower than expected sales, shipping problems, high prices, bad PR, and an underwhelming launch list.

Defenders of the console are screaming that the big black console is built and engineered for a bright tomorrow, that prices will go down in time, that the high price is an investment worth making, and that just like the PS2, the games will come.

Defenders of Sony's big black console are also saying that the PS3 has Blu-ray. They're saying that Blu-ray is the future, and that it will help support the PS3 until the promised franchises and the awaited titles arrive. The sentiment is that Blu-ray will help the PS3 much the same way DVD helped the PS2.

Blu-ray to the rescue?
Well, the situation now isn't exactly similar to the situation right after the Y2K bug. The Blu-ray's got competition. Microsoft is pushing the HD-DVD format for their console that came out a year early, the Xbox 360. Some High-def connoisseurs are saying that the quality of Blu-ray HD movies isn't all that good compared to HD-DVD. The HD-DVD camp is even saying that the contrast and the colors and the detail is better on HD-DVD.

If in the next few months, the Blu-ray format does become the dominant format for HD movies, will that help convince folks that their US$ 600 purchase is justified? After all, most Blu-ray players now are closer to US$ 900, thus making US$ 600 a decent price for a Blu-ray player that's also a game system. Will that somehow give people reason to purchase PS3s while they wait for a second coming of that legendary 2001 Holiday game list? Sony zealots are hopeful.

What about hybrids? - Image 1


So how's the battlefield?
A quick look at the list of upcoming HD-DVD and Blu-ray releases seem to indicate that Blu-ray has a big lead when it comes to the number of movies that are going to be available on its platform.

Upcoming HD-DVD releases
Upcoming Blu-Ray releases
February 06, 2007
Failure to Launch (Paramount)
Hollywoodland (Universal)

February 13, 2007

The Departed (Warner)

February 20, 2007

Babel (Paramount)

February 27, 2007

Bullitt (Warner)
The Getaway (1972) (Warner)
Nine Inch Nails Live: Beside You in Time (Interscope)

March 27, 2007

Happy Feet (Warner)
National Geographic: Relentless Enemies (Warner)

April 10, 2007

Payback: Straight Up - The Director's Cut (Paramount)

April 24, 2007

Planet Earth: The Complete Collection (BBC)
February 06, 2007
American Psycho (Lionsgate)
Failure to Launch (Paramount)
First Blood (Lionsgate)
Reservoir Dogs (Lionsgate)
Running With Scissors (Sony)
The Tailor of Panama (Sony)

February 13, 2007
Broken Arrow (Fox)
Chain Reaction (Fox)
The Departed (Warner)
Entrapment (Fox)
Ladder 49 (Buena Vista)
Marie Antoinette (Sony)
The Marine (Fox)
Phone Booth (Fox)
Planet of the Apes (Fox)
Reign of Fire (Buena Vista)
The Sentinel (Fox)
The Usual Suspects (Fox)

February 20, 2007
Babel (Paramount)
The Prestige (Buena Vista)
Vertical Limit (Sony)

February 27, 2007
Bullitt (Warner)
The Getaway (1972) (Warner)
Nine Inch Nails Live: Beside You in Time (Interscope)
Stranger Than Fiction (Sony)

March 13, 2007
Casino Royale (Sony)
Commando (Fox)
Dances with Wolves (MGM)
Dodgeball (Fox)
Hoosiers (MGM)
Ice Age (Fox)
Layer Cake (Sony)
Mr. & Mrs. Smith (Fox)
The Thomas Crown Affair (1999) (MGM)

March 20, 2007
Big Fish (Sony)
Chicken Little (Buena Vista)
Finding Neverland (Buena Vista)

March 27, 2007
Happy Feet (Warner)
National Geographic: Relentless Enemies (Warner)

April 03, 2007
Dude, Where's My Car? (MGM)
The Fly (1986) (Fox)
G.I. Jane (Buena Vista)
Hannibal (MGM)
King Arthur Director's Cut (Buena Vista)
Me, Myself & Irene (Fox)
The Silence of the Lambs (MGM)
Tristan & Isolde (Fox)

April 10, 2007
Payback: Straight Up - The Director's Cut (Paramount)

April 17, 2007
Turistas (Fox)

April 24, 2007
Planet Earth: The Complete Collection (BBC)

June 08, 2007
Con Air (Buena Vista)
Crimson Tide (Buena Vista)
The Rock (Buena Vista)


Of course, the titles listed above are only for the confirmed movie releases. Moreover, released titles don't really indicate if the format is selling well or not. So how are format sales shaping up?

Well, it seems that recently, there's a lot of good news for Blu-ray folks. There have been reports that Blu-ray discs are outselling HD-DVDs by over 2:1. In fact, the Nielsen VideoScan results for the week ending January 7 reveal that for every 47.14 HD DVD movies sold, 100 Blu-Ray movies are sold. And there's a lot of speculation that the gap will get bigger.

Fox has even said in a press release that their internal research (we're a bit iffy about this since it's "internal") indicates that the growing sales gap would see Blu-ray outselling HD DVD by a 3.5-to-1 ratio by the end of March this year.

Movies and Sony - Image 1


Speaking of March, does it seem a bit too convenient that the PS3 will be launched in Europe this March, and that Sony's "Spiderman 3" movie will be released soon after? Is this starting to sound like a PS3 fanboy's wet dream?

Wait, we might be getting ahead of ourselves.
Despite us pointing out these things, we have to be fair and consider that Blu-ray may still end up a non-factor when it comes to the console war. That, and we still have to consider the opposition.

The people behind HD-DVD does point out that because HD-DVD is an option for Xbox 360 users, those on the HD-DVD side will have a higher "attachment" rate. They said this in a CES press release:

With the knowledge that every Xbox 360 HD DVD player sold is purchased by someone who wants to watch high definition movies, studios supporting HD DVD see significant value in the player, as a great way to bring "The Look and Sound of Perfect" to gamers while helping ensure strong movie attach rates for each and every player sold.


Competing - Image 1


There's also Microsoft's planned IPTV, and Bill Gate's drive to move content away from discs and have users just download the movies that they want. Here's what Bill had to say during an interview:

For us it's not the physical format. Understand that this is the last physical format there will ever be. Everything's going to be streamed directly or on a hard disk. So, in this way, it's even unclear how much this one counts.


Even if Bill himself isn't unsure about how much "this one counts," Xbox 360 HD DVD player sales still look pretty good.

It's still up to Sony.
Sony's big black box has been facing "hate" since even way before it was launched. You'd think that it'll all lighten up after launch but no, the PS3 is facing a lot of criticisms right now. The latest EGM cover even shows a tomato-splattered PS3.

Despite things looking good for the Blu-ray format, it still doesn't automatically translate to a brighter future for the PS3. Not that we'd like to decry the PS3, we just want to see Sony do things right. We have a PS3 here in the office ourselves, and we, like all of you PS3 fans out there, don't want to end up with a dead console.

A high end audio visual system... - Image 1


As much as we'd like to be happy about how things look promising for Blu-ray, Sony still has to exert a lot of effort to make Blu-ray matter for their PS3.

Sony has to make good on their promise that games for the PS3 will come. Sony has to work on that PlayStation Network of theirs. Sony still has to communicate to users that US$ 600 equates to a decent Blu-ray player. Sony has to communicate that Blu-ray movies are starting to sell and are starting to proliferate. Sony just basically needs to communicate.

Given their recent PR attempts involving bad rap and their PSP, this blogger is worried.

 
 
 

Comments [refresh]

by Mr. Common Sense - 2007-02-03 19:14
» not over

BR may be what gets Sony through these tough times. I have no doubt that it will soon be named winner of the format war. HD-DVD just doesn't have the support.



$500 plus a pretty good BR player is a good deal. And with HDTV sales picking up (and Sony HDTVs at that) the console war is far from over.



MS better start looking over their shoulder.

by Devise - 2007-02-03 19:18
» ...

DVD supported 100% of TV sets. Blu-Ray supports only HD TV sets, which is at about 10 to 15% at most. Also HD-DVD is delaying the success of Blu-Ray which isn't helping the PS3 cause. It adds confusion to the customer base, and a lot of people seem to be happy to wait. The step up from DVD to Blu-Ray is not big enough for the average person. Only earlier adopters and gadget geeks are buying into it. The main selling point for VHS to DVD was the fact that DVD doesn't degrade in quality and doesn't require rewinding (remember those days?). The ability to copy DVD titles has also become a popular feature, and many people just wont upgrade until there is a decent HD copying solution.



The PS3 will definitely help Blu-Ray, but as was with seen with UMD, gamers lose interest in movies fairly quickly wears off and the focus moves back to spending money on more important things, like games.

by Devise - 2007-02-03 19:22
» HD DVD list

January 30, 2007



* Beerfest (Warner)

* Half Baked (Universal)

* The Wicker Man (2006) (Warner)



February 06, 2007



* Failure to Launch (Paramount)

* Hollywoodland (Universal)



February 13, 2007



* The Departed (Warner)



February 20, 2007



* Babel (Paramount)



February 27, 2007



* Bullitt (Warner)

* Digital Video Essentials (DVD International)

* The Getaway (1972) (Warner)

* Nine Inch Nails Live: Beside You in Time (Interscope)



March 06, 2007



* The Good Shepherd (Universal)



March 27, 2007



* Happy Feet (Warner)

* March of the Penguins (Warner)

* National Geographic: Relentless Enemies (Warner)

* School for Scoundrels (Genius)



April 10, 2007



* Payback: Straight Up - The Director's Cut (Paramount)



April 17, 2007



* The Game (Universal)

* The Jerk (Universal)



April 24, 2007



* Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Universal)

* The Nutty Professor (1996) (Universal)

* Planet Earth: The Complete Collection (BBC)



Release Dates Postponed

The following titles were originally given release dates but have since been postponed with no new dates announced. Watch this space for the latest street date updates as soon as they are made official.



* Alexander Revisited: The Final Cut (Warner)

* Galaxina (BCI)

* Golgo 13 (BCI)

* That's the Way of the World (BCI)



Release Dates Pending

The following titles are planned for release in the HD DVD format (as indicated by press release or previous public statements made by the distributor), but release dates have not been announced:



* 2001: A Space Odyssey (Warner)

* The 40 Year-Old Virgin (Universal)

* Above the Law (Warner)

* American PIe (Universal)

* American Pie (Unrated) (Universal)

* American Pie Presents: A Naked Mile (Universal)

* Angels in America (HBO)

* Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery (New Line)

* The Aviator (Universal)

* Awake (Weinstein)

* Band of Brothers (HBO)

* Battlestar Galactica: The Complete First Season (Universal)

* Bikini Destinations (Magnolia)

* The Black Dahlia (Universal)

* Blade (New Line)

* Blade Runner (Warner)

* Blood Diamond (Warner)

* The Blues Brothers (Universal)

* The Bourne Identity (Universal)

* Braveheart (Paramount)

* Breaking and Entering (Weinstein)

* Bubble (Magnolia)

* Catwoman (Warner)

* Children of Men (Universal)

* A Clockwork Orange (Warner)

* Coach Carter (Paramount)

* Conan the Barbarian (Universal)

* Contact (Warner)

* Dante's Peak (Universal)

* Dark City (New Line)

* Dawn of the Dead (2003) (Universal)

* Deadwood: Season One (HBO)

* Decameron (Weinstein)

* The Dirty Harry Collection (Warner)

* Elizabethtown (Warner)

* Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room (Magnolia)

* Eraser (Warner)

* Executive Decision (Warner)

* Eyes Wide Shut (Warner)

* Final Destination (New Line)

* Flags of Our Fathers (Paramount)

* Forrest Gump (Paramount)

* Friday (New Line)

* Friends: Season One (Warner)

* From the Earth to the Moon (HBO)

* Ghost (Paramount)

* Gothika (Warner)

* Grease (Paramount)

* The Green Mile (Warner)

* Grind House (Weinstein)

* Hard to Kill (Warner)

* Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (Warner)

* Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Warner)

* Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (Warner)

* Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone (Warner)

* HDScape: Antarctica Dreaming (DVD International)

* HDScape: Fireplace - Visions of Tranquility (DVD International)

* HDScape: HD DVD Sampler (DVD International)

* HDScape: HDWindow - Hawaii (DVD International)

* HDScape: HDWindow - The Great Southwest (DVD International)

* HDScape: Serenity - Southern Seas (DVD International)

* HDScape: Stargaze II (DVD International)

* HDScape: Visions of the Sea (DVD In

by Devise - 2007-02-03 19:24
» ...

* HDScape: Visions of the Sea (DVD International)

* Idlewind (Universal)

* Inside Man (Universal)

* Killshot (Weinstein)

* Last Legion (Weinstein)

* The Lemon Drop Kid (Universal)

* The Libertine (Weinstein)

* The Maltese Falcon (Warner)

* The Mask (New Line)

* The Matrix Revolutions (Warner)

* The Matrix Reloaded (Warner)

* The Matrix (Warner)

* Maverick (Warner)

* Mrs. Henderson Presents (Weinstein)

* The Music Man (Warner)

* Mystic River (Warner)

* Next of Kin (Warner)

* North by Northwest (Warner)

* Ocean's Eleven (Warner)

* Ocean's Twelve (Warner)

* Passenger 57 (Warner)

* The Player (New Line)

* Pride + Prejudic3 (Universal)

* Psycho (1960) (Universal)

* Red Planet (Warner)

* The Return (Universal)

* Rush Hour (New Line)

* Save the Last Dance (Paramount)

* Scarface (1983) (Universal)

* School for Scoundrels (Weinstein)

* School of Rock (Paramount)

* Scoop (Universal)

* Se7en (Universal)

* Shaun of the Dead (Universal)

* The Shining (1980) (Warner)

* Shuttle Discovery's Historic Mission (Magnolia)

* Sin City 2 (Weinstein)

* Smokin' Aces (Universal)

* Soldier (Weinstein)

* Son of Paleface (Paramount)

* Spawn (New Line)

* Spongebob Squarepants: The Movie (Paramount)

* Star Trek: First Contact (Paramount)

* Star Trek: The Original Series (Paramount)

* TransAmerica (Weinstein)

* Twister (Weinstein)

* U.S. Marshals (Warner)

* The Ultimate Star Trek Collection (Paramount)

* Vanilla Sky (Paramount)

* Vengeance of the Zombies (BCI)

* The War Within (Magnolia)

* We Are Marshall (Warner)

* Wild Wild West (Warner)

* Young Hannibal (Weinstein)

by aron - 2007-02-03 19:33
» !!!!!!!!!!!!

bullitt is coming out on the 27th. that is one of the greatest car chase movies of the sixties. with my favorite car, the highland green 1968 ford mustang gt. but now on blu ray. makes me want to buy a ps3 a little more quicker.

by Extinction - 2007-02-03 22:38
» Um...

64% of Japan, 15% of the US and 10% of Europe own HDTVs

by Spooks - 2007-02-03 22:43
» WTF?

Blu-ray supports all TV sets. I've watched Blu-ray on a pathetically small 480i TV, just to see the difference between 480i and 1080i.

by raidendx - 2007-02-03 22:50
» Mpeg-4 Rules!!!

Being able to play PS1, PS2, PS3 games, and Blu-ray movies is well worth 600+ dollars. I already have 14 Blu-ray movies. The latest movie was I own is Open Season(first Mpeg-4 movie on Blu-ray). Wow that movie was sooo clear. You could check the reviews here: http://www.dvdfile.com/index.php?opt...898&Ite mid=3 That movie wasn't Finding Nemo, but it shows what Blu-ray could do. The next mpeg-4 movie is Casino Royale...Sold! Can't wait for more mpeg-4 movies. I also bought 2 games(Ridge Racer and Resistance), have not had the time to play those games much. Just enjoying my PS3 Blu-ray feature. I knowing better PS3 game titles will eventually come and soon games that will be 50Gigs. I'm in no hurry especially when PS2 games is still around and games like God of War 2 is coming soon.



I was going to buy a Xbox 360, but Microsoft made the HD-DVD an add-on. The games is always gonna be on a dvd format. The HD-DVD is movies only ,and no HD-DVD games? Hell No! Now what's with the Xbox 360's hard drive? Ninety dollars for a 20 gigs HDD, so how much for 100-200 gigs upgrade? Why is it sooo expensive?! Good thing there is a cheaper way to upgrade the HDD by using an adapter, but then you void your warranty. Let's just say Blu-ray wins...are you guys gonna buy a Blu-ray add-on, too? Microsoft charges 200-400 dollars for their new Windows Vista and when you call the customer service you get the pleasure of talking to people from India? Hey! I thought Microsoft came from USA, then why these fools taking jobs away from the american public? ***** Bill Gate!



Let's go to the Wii...IT'S A TOY!!! They have wires on the controller that connects to make a nun-chuck?. There is another stupid wire that is the IR that goes on top of you TV. The IR is on the outside? Yuk! No HD games? I would love to see Zelda on HD. I'll wait for the next Nintendo console. Damn old school farts!

by Tas - 2007-02-03 22:51
» Actually Devise

Blu-ray supports any TV set, just like the dvd, but the point is on standard definition there is no difference in quality. I think that is what you meant?

Comparison to UMD is pointless, because UMD didnt deliver better quality and was definitely not meant to be in the living room. The target audience was totally different.



A list of movies that might come in the future to the HD-DVD is pointless as there certainly is a similar one for blu-ray movies. They also have a lot of movies listed. I know Duke Nukem Forever is coming, but when?

Having 7 out of 8 studios behind you makes your selection of movies much much larger and that is the difference of those released movies lists of HD-DVD and blu-ray.

by HarryPopaya - 2007-02-03 23:13
» Blu ray seems more supported

it does. even at my local navy exchange they have i think 6 blu ray players on display and 3 Sony BRAVIAs on display and no HD-DVD players for display or for sale as a matter of fact. and the navy exchange sony blu ray player is 200 bucks off regular price. they also have a phillips and samsung player and i think a panasonic one too.

by Devise - 2007-02-04 00:04
» ...

Yes, 480p is supported on standard TVs but why would a person buy a Blu-Ray player for a standard TV for $600?



I bought up UMD as an example of gamers supporting a movie format. It won't work, Blu-Ray needs to appeal to non gamers as well.



Yes Blu-Ray currently has support for 7 out 8 major studios but not exclusively.



I think the player that first hits an affordable price point for the regular joe will probably win. HD DVD players are cheap now and cheap to produce, but with Blu-Ray in mass production because of the PS3 it's difficult to tell which player will get there first.



I know one thing though ... Blu-Ray is not the messiah of the PS3. People bought the PS2 because it was a gaming machine.

by Oracle - 2007-02-04 00:07
» HD has total, BR is growing

Compare:



http://hddvd.highdefdigest.com/releasedates.html

http://bluray.highdefdigest.com/releasedates.html



HD isn't dead, but BR is growing and, right now, have surpasses HD sales.

If current projections hold, and studios keep a steady flux of new releases,BR will have surpassed Total discs sales(counting 2006 sales) in mid february.

by mohaas05 - 2007-02-04 03:34
» awesome

good job. i agree with you 100%

by WeApOn - 2007-02-04 05:56
» Devise omfg

" Blu-Ray needs to appeal to non gamers as well."



God, You're such a moron.

by ***** BD rom - 2007-02-04 06:09
» ***** BD ROM

guess what? they can all go to hell

im sticking with dvd. Yes the BR and HDDVD is clear, but who the hell needs to see all of that detail? i dunno bout you guys, but dvd is quite enough for me for a while. AND I AM NOT A CHEAP BASTARD BECAUSE I OWN A PS3 AND A WII, IM JUST SAYING THAT I DIDNT BUY A PS# BECASUE OF BLURAY BECAUSE I DONT SUPPORT ANY OF IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

by Dj Natas - 2007-02-04 07:18
» The war was over from day 1

because most major companies supported the Blue Ray format from the beginning! Once you got Disney and Fox in your corner that spelled the end for HD DVD. Universal is jumping on board too, they just ended the dumb contract with M$. Like every other PS3 owner I went and bought some Blue Rays, and all I gotta say is wow!

by Peter - 2007-02-04 10:19
» But who cares?

There is a big difference here - when DVD came out, people were really interested in it. The same in NOT true of the HD disc formats - sure, there will always be the early adopter types that are into it, but it has far less mass-market appeal than DVD did - especially as you need to buy a new TV for it to make any sense.



And most important of all, the vast majority of the public *do not care* about picture quality - they think that SD looks OK, even when adjusted as badly as most peoples TVs are..

by act 2 - 2007-02-04 12:28
» BD

its BD not BR, the d is for disc, Blu-ray is one word

by anon - 2007-02-04 13:57
» BD FTW!

BD won along time ago i just wish the dumb hd-dvd people would quit and start coming over because to tell the truth when i go to the store there are alot more hd-dvd movies id like to own then BD ones but there is no way in hell id own an hd-dvd player

by CHris - 2007-02-04 14:57
» HD DVD

Im Sorry but BD has more movies but Hd DVD has the movies that i will actually like to see in HD.. Also all HD DVD movies come wit ac1 compression and Dolby True HD.. Also some HD DVD are dvd combos, I wont have to but the same movie to see it on my regular dvd player..Its to early to say who would win this war.. But as time goes more people will want HD DVD over Blu ray.. It just need time.. and people at my local stores like best buy perfer hd dvd or blu ray..

by mick - 2007-02-04 18:54
» you reckon

but hd-dvd have porn...theres the winner

by True - 2007-02-04 21:12
» HDTV is still just a expensive toy

Wow now the big point all the HD-TV Blu Ray supporters forget to mention -



HDTV is great IF you want to play games or watch expensive films in more detail BUT there is one HUGE tradeoff and that being normal Terrestrial, Freeview and satellite programs look TERRIBLE on these TVs the picture is blocky and the whites are either to high or to low and the closer you get the worst it looks,this will not change for years at least not untill HD is broadcast as the standard.



So what you really have in effect is a large overpriced PC type monitor that shows HD films and games and is also capable of showing normal TV BADLY.

by mark - 2007-02-04 21:26
» LOL Blu Ray may have space But look at the PS3 Ram problems

The Blu Ray this the blu Ray that ! yer right well it looks like this could be the trade off though -



http://ps3.qj.net/Bethesda-PS3-technical-limitations/pg/49/aid/81701

by Yukoiichi-san - 2007-02-04 22:48
» PS3 v. Xbox 360

I've seen a PS3 it is a lot of good graphics than Xbox360 so PS3 still the best console.

by Real Mr. Common Sense - 2007-02-05 00:32
» Quit using my name again dumbf*ck

You PS3 fans are so pathetic. Forcing the few 2 million PS3 owners to buy blu ray is not considered support. Get a life you pathetic loser and

by Real Mr. Common Sense - 2007-02-05 00:50
» How low do you get?

Use the credibility of the original Mr. Common Sense to push your sony propoganda is low. Using his name repetedly to insult him or try to make it seem like he now favors $ony and their next soon to fail media format is even lower.

$500 for any movie player is not a good deal to me. Besides if you have an XBOX 360 it's only $200 more and you get a real game console with the best games and online. HD-DVD has plenty support (including porn), you just don't see new releases announced 8 months in advance. $ony promotes their products with lies, hype, and exxagerations. It's just sad that many consumers are so stupid it seems to work to some extent.

Sony needs to look over their shoulder, because well they're losing horribly. A PS3 fan will lie, exxagerate, use others' names in any desperate attempt to prevent the inevitable: PS3 will have no

None of these announced movies are even any good. More reason to wait.

I finally registered to prevent others from acting like their work for $ony's hype machine is from an XBOX fan. From now on I will be Mister Common Sense since a scumbag already registered my name.

by sicf - 2007-02-05 00:50
» The good graphics!! where?.

And would you like to tell us the PS3 games that you played and also explain how you concluded that they have better graphics than Gears of War etc.

by Real Mr. Common Sense - 2007-02-05 00:53
» typical comparison based on hype

The PS3 hasn't delivered anything but lies.

Just because you're used to PS2 and $ony has you brainwashed into always supporting their company, the graphics are truly pathetic compared to the XBOX 360.

by Slice - 2007-02-05 02:07
» (south Africa) typical comparison based on hype

If you say all Sony fans are brainwashed, then can't we say the same for all MS fans.

by Dr Doom - 2007-02-05 02:35
» Porn is not the decider

Porn doesnt choose the winner.



Like everything in porn, they oversize things :)

by Mister Common Sense - 2007-02-05 03:37
» raidendx is a sony propoganda puppet

You bought 14 blu ray movies? Then you have only 2 PS3 games? What will you do if blu ray fails?

If you did your research, you would realize blu ray does not improve the games. Combined with the other main PS3 limitations: 1/5 the memory bandwith, unchangable memory usage between CPU and GPU, and the difficulty of cell programing combine to make the PS3 inferior for gaming.

You have time to watch 14 blu ray movies but not play the 2 games you own? I guess they just aren't that good.

by Mister Common Sense - 2007-02-05 03:40
» I am not brainwashed

because the XBOX 360 has something the PS3 does not, RESULTS! The PS3 just has promises so far, and sony over the years has made promises that have been less than reliable.

FACT: any side by side graphics comparisons favor the XBOX 360.

by Touhid - 2007-02-05 05:23
» Totally Wrong Direction

PS2, XBOX, XBOX360 and PS3 all are gaming consoles. We are talking about these becoz we like to play on those. We are not buying for Movies! Sony's PS2 was so popular for huge games lineup. thats why, i bought PS2 insteed of Xbox. MS now very keen about releasing games and rapidly Xbox360 games are releasing. But Sony producing PS3 low, focusing only movies and forgeting their main objective, Games!! . Its realy harsh. one of my friend visited to USA last December to buy a PS3 and returns with Xbox360. The reason is that there are no good games but X360 does. Its not a time to say who will be the winner BD or HD-DVD. But one thing makes HD-DVD in good position. IF anybody(talking about gamers who got X360) interested to watch HD Movies, just buy HD-DVD , X360's addons. Now, s/he can use it on their PC also. Also, Dual Layer DVD of X360 can now cover all their games. after say 18 month, Big games may release for X360. then they can use it (that time may be HD-DVD costs $99-$150). U see people now don't need high capacity DVD. After U got a HDTV, then u can consider. but my personal opinion is, still DL DVDs got potentials and BD or HD-DVD got to be work out hard, but not using our favorites gaming consoles. One thing for sure, DVD price will be key factor. Imagine, HD-DVD/ BD player selling same price. but HD-DVD costs $10 and BD DVD costs $18. which one u pick?? take ur time and wait 6month to 1 year to take wise decision.

by Feylin - 2007-02-05 06:13
» How can you even compare...

How can you even compare the Xbox 360 (which has been out for a year) to PS3 (which has been out for a few months). In the one year span that the 360 has for game development they have reached a high point in the understanding of the workings of the 360. The PS3 on the other hand hasn't been out for a long time, thus it's full potential has yet to be tapped into. Compare Gears of War to a PS3 game in 1 years time, then it'll be even.

by Doctor Common Sense - 2007-02-05 06:41
» Please

"the graphics are truly pathetic compared to the XBOX 360."



If you say so. But I played Fight Night 3 and one of the Basketball games on my 46" Samsung 1080p LCD on both PS3 and Xbox 360 and there was no question who was better. It was PS3 hands down. Better refresh rate, better blacks, better contrast. That doesn't make 360 a bad system. In fact, they both do many things well. But 360 has a year's headstart. In addition, they also have a very lucrative and monopoly operating system division, that allows their game hardware division to run in the red so they can undercut the price of their competition. If you think that the xbox 360 actually costs less to make than PS3, you need to do your homework



"The PS3 hasn't delivered anything but lies."



(rolls eyes) You haters are all alike. Grow up. Don't buy one then. You'd think that with all the great games and graphics at a low price you boast about you wouldn't have time to waste on the opposing systems forums telling people how bad it is. I know I won't once Oblivion, Saint's Row, and Assassin's Creed come out. Switch to decaf, man. You sound like a jilted girlfriend. All I know is that my PS3 cost about 0. And I will GET 0 worth of enjoyment out of it. With the free online Resistance multiplayer with 720p and surround sound is enough on its own. Beautiful.



As for BD, I would comment this. Blu-ray is recognizable to the anerage Joe Punchclock consumer as a new format, whereas HD is not. That is why it is now and will be more successful, regardless of who has the better specs. In addition, only 15% of people have TVs that can take advantage of it anyway. As for porn, they aren't going to decide anything. Porn was critical in the VHS vs Beta war because there was nowhere else to watch live action unless you wanted to go to a seedy movie theatre. Its role is going to be minimal, and remember it was only one studio that weighed in with HD-DVD. A big studio, but I think that they will quietly adopt Blu-ray also in the coming months, especially when some of their competition does. Because of what I said above, BD's not just going to go away. Over a million people have blu-Ray disc players now. That's a huge built in market for what we're talking about. Enough to keep BD afloat for awhile.



Doc

by Mister Common Sense - 2007-02-05 06:43
» The nazis were winning in the beginning of WW2, but we all know how that turned out

With disney and fox supporting blu ray, that gives me more of a reason to not get it! Check out a site (or Devise's comment above) and you'll realize there's a great selection of HD-DVD movies, and if you go to most stores the selection is about equal for each format.

I prefer regular DVD for now, upconverted with my XBOX 360 to 1080p.

by Doctor Common Sense - 2007-02-05 06:46
» heh....

"All I know is that my PS3 cost about 0. And I will GET 0 worth of enjoyment out of it. "



Weird. Maybe it was the dollar sign I put in front of it.



Six hundred dollars, will get six hundred dollars of enjoyment out of it.



Anyway, regardless of which system you have, its a great time to be a gamer.

by Mystery - 2007-02-05 08:50
» So sad...

That is so sad... The Revolution is a toy? Grow up. Well, if it is a toy, then the PS3 + Xbox 360 are also toys.

What's wrong with wires to the two controllers? Are you going to flame them to death for that little thing? How many things in your home isn't wired? Anyhow, give it time and a wireless nunchuck will arrive. Besides, remember that it isn't cordless because it would bump up the price and not everyone wants to pay that.



As for PS3 and the like... I don't see why I should get a BD player when the format war isn't over. I don't even have an HD TV... And from what I know, the whole BD format isn't finalized (plus many players lacking features), so getting one now is a waste when new movies come out. And remember how poor the PS2's DVD playback was? I think I'll wait until there is one standard or get a high-quality stand alone machine.



And I don't really care for the "advanced functionality" of the PS3, seeing as I have a computer that can do everything the PS3 can - and better too. Gaming is the only thing that interests me - and therefore I get a gaming console - not a multimedia console.

by Mister Common Sense - 2007-02-05 10:14
» so the imposter is a doctor now?

I'm not sure what cables you used for your comparison or if both were running at 1080p, but I read the Gamespot article comparing the cross platform games and the screenshot did definately look better on the 360, and the writers agreed. It mostly had to do with the lighting.

Yes, sony has lied quite a few times. I guess you could also call them empty promises. Probably the biggest one is "only the PS3 is capable of 1080p native resolution" (in 2005 it was actually supposed to have 2 HDMI outputs each outputting a 1080p image.) Then there is the lie that blu ray improves gaming, and the lies regarding launch date and numbers. There have been more lower profile promises they failed to meet, but I can't remember them all. They have said some truthful promises, like the PSN is still free. My point is, they should never announce something unless they can make it happen. I'm sure some people have waited for the PS3 based on some of these lies and exaggerations and that's a poor way to do business.



I'm not getting into the blu ray vs hd-dvd debate too much, it's just too new to say either will come out on top. I do know more movies I would like to see are on HD-DVD than blu ray.

by Replying to Devise... - 2007-02-05 10:17
» PS2 just for games...

I think I bought mine for both a DVD and Game player from what I remember. Same with this PS3. Perhaps you should keep your comments personal(as in use "I" and not "Everyone")

by raidendx - 2007-02-05 12:46
» well i got to go to work...got a life you know

Before HD movie format came out I would buy DVD movies 2-4 times a month. Now ever since PS3 was released...it allowed me to experience Blu-ray movies for the first time. You better believe it that i'm going buy more Blu-ray movies. What the hell are you guys talking about the price difference in HD-DVD and Blu-ray movies? 19-29 dollars is what i pay for my Blu-ray movies. HD is the future for gaming and movies. If Xbox360 actually had the HD-DVD as a feature in the system and not as an add-on then I would have bought one already. There is also is a power plug for the HD-DVD add-on, too? I like my systems to be all-in-one type.



I'm used to wireless now...no mess no fuss. I used to remember the old days when we would wrap the cord around the controller. That's probably why Nintendo change their name from Nintendo Revolution to Wii. There isn't anything Revolutionary with those corded Wii remote with the nun-chuck and the corded IR which goes on top of your TV. Even if you buy their gamepad it's also has a cord...man the fun just don't stop, huh. The Wii games looks like crap.

by Amish.Gramish - 2007-02-06 16:05
» Talledega Nights and Flying Daggers

I have Talledega Nights and The House of Flying Daggers on Blu-Ray, and I watched them on my PS3 on my SD TV, and I think they look even better than DVDs, especially ones that aren't anamorphic widescreen.

by Amish.Gramish - 2007-02-06 16:09
» Especially

Especially Excite Truck, that game has sub PS2, and even Sub PSP (if you would make the PSP have 480 instead of 272) graphics.

Excite Truck is a really, really boring and crappy game, though the only people I know that think it's fun are the Nintendo fanboys that are my friends. (I can't find anyone else that thinks it's fun, except for the mehs...)

by fgtsda - 2007-02-07 14:13
» fa

the 360 plays hd games thats what they are just not movies.

by 645765 Hacker - 2007-02-07 18:49
» Whoever doesnt support the PS3 console is just wrong

The conclusion comes to this; who has seen all the bugs microsoft sofware has just look at windows, their games are buggy as hell except for halo, if you guys havent checked some xbox 360 consoles were overheating for poor manufacturing and design, it didnt come with a hd dvd player you had to buy it separately, multiplayer gaming is not free and plus the cost of your internet service in which sony has free multiplayer gaming and the only cost is the internet service, xbox 360 is not nearly close to the graphics the PS3 has I do admit their good but not as good, the PS3 has so many features in which the xbox 360 doesnt have again, bluray seems in the lead now and it also seems like its going to stay that way for a long time since all you see is bluray players on the market and no one can tell me that Sony hasnt had a good line of electronics unless you didnt own any sony product. So what system seems like te best choice?

by PS3Rider - 2007-02-08 09:28
» To Devise

Clearly your wrong, as if people just bought the PS2 for games we would have a completely different future now, as the dreamcast may not have failed due to its lack of DVD compared to the PS2

by cac - 2007-02-09 17:27
» Re: How low do you get?

"$ony and their next soon to fail media format is even lower.

$500 for any movie player is not a good deal to me. Besides if you have an XBOX 360 it's only $200 more and you get a real game console with the best games and online."

Now if THAT isn't a fanboy statement, i don't know what is...



"It's just sad that many consumers are so stupid it seems to work to some extent."

Since when does it make someone stupid to prefer a certain console over another? It doesn't. Your just forcing your idiotic, bias, fanboy-ish opinion onto to other people.

$500 for a movie player is not a good deal to you? Maybe to some people, it is. For me (and most other people), I wouldn't buy the PS3 for just the movie player, but for its HD graphics in games and media center capabilities.



If you decide to make another post, maybe you should consider the opinions of others, and if you disagree with something posted, present logical reasons and facts as to why you do not agree. Not stupid replies like "Quit using my name again dumbf*ck" It makes you look like a 10 year-old.

by Hello - 2007-02-11 04:35
» @ Mr Common Sense

Yeah, and you're a pathetic little xbox fanboy. The 360 hasn't been proven to have better graphics whatsoever. I don't know how you could even say that.

by Matt - 2007-02-12 08:50
» W!!!

the 360 lacks HD audio so next time you try to claim that 360 is better choice keep in mind that you're getting a crippled HD DVD player. Audio is half of the experience and if you think otherwise lets cut off one ear and stuff some cotton in the other and see if its "just as good"

by Matt - 2007-02-12 08:52
» Do you like MP3's?

or do you prefer CD's? do you prefer compressed crap? or clean audio? Seems to me you're the type to walk around with an ipod and ipod headphones(whic h are one of the worst headphones ever) and call that quality music.

by Matt - 2007-02-12 08:57
» Fact or opinion..

See when it comes down to it, its all opinion of fact not fact at all! THEREFORE you're wasting our time saying somethings a fact because most PS3 supporters will say that PS3 games have had less development time in comparison to 360 games. Look at UT3 which looks better than GoW, yet was first developed for PS3. The gun models in GoW are so horrible its scary. On GS the assult rifle has no defined edges just a faded out one. That's oldschool graphics. Im not saying that PS3 is better im just pointing out that GoW isnt all that...

by Vecha - 2007-02-12 14:35
» look at ps1/2

if you are too young to remember ps1/2 had major issues. Sony was enev sued. and lost.



is ms perfect? no. is sony? no.



so stop being a godamn faboy!

by Sony Fan all the way - 2007-02-18 09:14
» x-box sucks

the only reason x-box360 is doin good is because of Halo, plus the only reason yall dont like ps3 is because yall just cant afford it, im not the richest kid, but i own a ps3, i only have need for speed carbon, and some movies,well i got it cuz its cool but i just got to say that blue-ray is better that hd-dvd, To by an X-BOX and an hd-dvd ad on is already $600 dollars why nopt get a ps3 for the same price

by x';",)` - 2007-02-19 09:34
» 80000002

80000002

by 80000002 - 2007-02-19 09:37
» x';",)`

80000002

by 80000002 - 2007-02-19 09:39
» 80000002

x';",)`

by 80000002 - 2007-02-19 09:40
» 80000002

80000002

by 80000002 - 2007-02-19 09:41
» 80000002

80000002

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!