It's MHFU against enemies that will be cake walks from what those videos portray...sounds fun...if you enjoy easy games like Phantasy Star Portable and the like.

I'm passing on this.

I dont think people wanna see whoever is playing this getting their ass kicked, rather they would actually like to see the game so its probably on easy. I for one think this game looks sick

"...look, it's MONSTER HUNTER with new models and textures!!"



"wooow are you serious, did they really change the textures this time??"



"Yes, you can be sure about that one"



"OH FU****ING GREAT, I'M BUYING IT."

++'s

*gun/sword weapons, that's interesting

*monsters look kinda orginal



--'s

*There is limited or no weapon classes

* Big mistake of making characters run around with weapons in there hand all the time.



*

SWEET

I love it!



I just hope that the game play retains that solid feel that MHF Series has. While I think the Phantasy Star was cool, i hated the 'light' and repetitive feeling it has. MHF feels 'epic' in battle. Not just epic music either, when you swing your weapon, you can feel the weight of the sword. I need this game to retain that feeling. This leaves the player with a feeling of accomplishment after slaying said beasts.

"2. Wow, you can actually dodge unlike MHFU... +P"



If you cant do it in MHFU, I daresay it isn't a problem with the game. Ahem

Monster hunter has the most CLUNKY control and response I've ever seen, it is literally repelling the moment you get into actual gameplay. The menus are god awful and unintuitive... It seriously has the feel of a cheap game a 'casual' gamer buys that keeps getting repackaged and pumped out to milk it. Visually, the graphics are great, yes, for psp, but the gameplay, I don't mind grinding, but the combat is slow and boring, and just feels like it might as well have been a turn based rpg. The point of NOT being a turn based RPG is to have fast and strategic combat (i.e., God of War, Devil May Cry). To me Monter Hunter is like taking the sims, giving it a medieval fantasy theme, taking away the customization, aspirations, and etc, and social interaction, and turning it into one task: kill stuff, take the stuff they drop, give it to somebody. Even that wouldn't be ANY problem, if the combat system felt more SOLID and not clunky like a broken clock. end rant. I am ready to deny the MH fanboys attempts to deny all I've just said. =|.



On a much more relevant note, this game looks promising. Just hope the gameplay and controls are more fluent.

I really find the new graphical style VERY appealing, but it just gets old.

It feels like the devs are resting on their laurels.

and you and your team are sent out to get rid of them before they cause more harm to the city. The weapon has a "God Eater" mode where it either does more damage than usual or is the finisher.

Just a few things that need said...



Dont blame the controls because you suck at a game. The controls are fine, as are the menus and the camera control. You either dont know how to use them, or personally dislike them, but what you call "clunky" is actually "balanced". Pros and cons to multiple different classes and types of weapons. As for "casual game" Lmfao, get real man.



I don't see where you would ever put games like GOW or Devil may Cry in the same catagory as MH. They are completely different in purpose, execution, gameplay, visual style, ect. They are not the same kind of game.



You're right - the game is largely repackaged, but each time it is improved and added to. If you are a fan, you appreciate it, if you already dislike it, you'll say that its BS. That said, do I see your point on it.



Lastly, if this will be a good representation of the final product God Eater will be, it looks absolutely horrible. "Clunky" MH combat mechanics, mixed 50/50 with repackaged Dissidia style combat mechanics. The current product looks pretty bad and completely unoriginal so far, to say the least.