GTA4 bags Game of the Year award at Spike VGA 2008

Posted Dec 14, 2008 at 10:37PM by Karl B. Listed in: Magazines, News Tags: Niko Bellic, Spike TV
Ó


After everything was said and done, Grand Theft Auto 4 (PS3, Xbox 360) walked away with the Game of the Year award at this year's Spike TV Video Game Awards, winning out over Fallout 3, Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, and Gears of War 2.

The Rockstar title also took the award for Best Action/Adventure Game. Michael Hollick, who voiced GTA4 protagonist Nico Bellic, also snagged the Best Performance by a Human Male award.

Here's a rundown of the big winners during the event:
  • VGA 2008 - Image 1Game of the Year: Grand Theft Auto IV
  • Studio of the Year: Media Molecule
  • Best Shooter: Gears of War 2
  • Best RPG: Fallout 3
  • Best Individual Sports Game: Shaun White Snowboarding
  • Best Handheld Game: Professor Layton and the Curious Village
  • Best Graphics: Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
  • Best Game Based on a Movie or TV Show: LEGO Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures
  • Best Music Game: Rock Band 2
  • Best Driving Game: Burnout Paradise
  • Best Action Game: Grand Theft Auto IV
  • Best Soundtrack: Rock Band 2
  • Best Xbox 360 Game: Gears of War 2
  • Best Wii Game: Boom Blox
  • Best PS3 Game: Little Big Planet
  • Best PC Game: Left 4 Dead
  • Best Original Score: Rock Band 2
  • Best Multiplayer Game: Left 4 Dead
  • Best Independent game:World of Goo
  • Best Fighting Game: Soul Calibur IV
  • Best Male Voice: Michael Hollick as Niko Bellic in Grand Theft Auto IV
  • Best Female Voice: Debi Mae West as Meryl Silverburgh in Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots
  • Big Name in the Game Male: Kiefer Sutherland in Call of Duty: World at War
  • Big Name in the Game Female: Jenny McCarthy in Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3



Related articles:


Via 1Up

 
 
 

Comments [refresh]

by kasmo7 - 2008-12-14 18:19
» haha

im playing gta4 now!

by xploren - 2008-12-14 18:38
» What?

GTAIV was the GOTY? I disagree with that choice. It was a good gamer, but a big disappointment.

by DNAgent - 2008-12-14 18:58
» Oh

So that's what Rockstar did with that $50 million that Microsoft paid for mediocre DLC.

by roddollente - 2008-12-14 19:07
» eeewww

Americans really have no taste. what's so great about GTA anyways? from Mafia, to mexican/blacks, to a southern drug company, and now to a russian mafia. wtf are those? so gangsta it's so stupid. putting in alot of cussing, drugs, and sex doesn't make it a great game. period. gta4 is like gta3 with upgraded graphics. we all know mgs4 should have won. it's a shame that hideo kojima was there and he didn't even get to go up the stage.

by PT-X - 2008-12-14 19:45
» Ummm

I disagree aswell...GTA is not the best of year game..this year..

I prefer MGS 4...good story good gameplay and they should make movie of it!



For Wii I would say Super smash brawl

for PS3 yeah LBP is ok

Xbox I agree to

by teh not so 1337 g@m3r - 2008-12-14 20:33
» What?

GTA4 did not deserve it.

by sycoblast - 2008-12-14 21:00
» i agree

GTA 4 was a good game but not the game of the year



i would have given it to either

MGS4

or

GeOW2

by spicyhamster - 2008-12-14 21:02
» mgs4 got ripped off

it deserves way more awards than it got. gta4 better than mgs4? you've got to be kidding. it's clear that it was a compromise. they should've given goty to mgs4, but didn't because they were afraid that the 360 fanboys would have cried too much. gta is multi-platform, so no one wins, but unfortunately, the better game lost.

by ___ - 2008-12-14 21:02
» um you dum*****

Japanese people and euro*****s also made it happen. Get your head out of your @ss.

Another thing GTA IS NOT FOR EVERYONE! It has immense success and the sales prove it . Not only that but true fans of the series like it, LIKE ME! In fact I think you have the worst taste for not liking it . I bet you like COD4 and think Home was gay like you also ? MGS4 was the shiznit but Hideo has gotten plenty of awards for his accomplishments .



BTW GTA ROX FTW! C.J and Niko would bust a cap in y'alls asses for talking smack.

by HIDEO KOJIMA - 2008-12-14 21:18
» !

I agree with your disagree, but I would like to point out that it is your fault for hyping yourself up for GTA4.

by HIDEO KOJIMA - 2008-12-14 21:50
» !

I'm sure if there was a "Best Game Finale/Ending" or "Best Boss Fight", MGS4 would've won those.

by roddollente - 2008-12-14 23:00
» LOL fanboyism much?

last time i checked, Japan, the homeland of video games, don't buy western $hit. let me ask you: who made Mario, Zelda, Final Fantasy, Gran Turismo, Metal Gear, Dragon Quest, Tactics Ogre, Streetfighter, Tekken, F-Zero, Chrono Cross, Resident Evil, Silent Hill, Sonic the Hedgehog, tetris, Secret of Mana, Gradius, Ninja Gaiden, Devil May Cry, etc.?



and you're telling me japan buys GTA4? are you serious? i just don't buy these types of games catered to whoever likes them. the games above didn't need sex, drugs, or cussing to be awesome. and yet GTA tries so hard to be gangsta with all the guns and stupid accents. that's why US devs can hardly crack the Japanese sales, cause playing games like these is like watching Hell's Kitchen. tries so hard to be 'in da hood' or whatever they want it to be. action with the homies or something. so gangsta it's so stupid. i liked the original GTA 3. it was a nice upgrade from the bird's eye view. but recycling the same game over and over isn't worth Game of the Year.

by RJ - 2008-12-14 23:14
» -

Your first hurdle is that the game was made by Rockstar North, without you looking too much like a fool I'll let you google them and you can find out where they're located yourself.

But heres a clue: Rockstar Leeds, the people who make the PSP games, are based in Leeds.



Oh and I don't like GTAIV much. Everything else in the series I do like but not IV. It was awkwardly too much of a departure from the originals, yet it wasn't different enough. The same old story structure, same old events but with a god awful physics engine powering everything and them horrible looking, Doom 3 style shadows (it's either in a shadow or not, nothing inbetween and the shadow smoothing was fugly).

by Aces In The Palm - 2008-12-15 00:20
» agreed

gta4 should of been as freedom orientated as san andreas IMO

there was so much you couldnt do in gta4 that made san andreas great

by failtorespond - 2008-12-15 01:02
» ..

"Times Online reported that Grand Theft Auto IV recorded 609000 copies in first- day sales, in the UK."



Definately not just the USA that bought the game, pal. I'm sue if MGS released multi-platform it would have helped it's chances, even though the game WOULD be ugly on a 360.

by Fujin - 2008-12-15 02:16
» Crap

Yea, well it seems like this award show was about 99% hollywood and 1% video games... So that being said, these awards are just as meaningful as the Special Olympics medals... Everyone's a winner!

by ConXept - 2008-12-15 02:28
» Wtf?

This list is all skewed, come on your telling me mgs4 beat out farcry 2 in graphics. That BS, FC2 whas pretty much photo realistic. MGS 4 just looked nice, but its solid graphics, and optimization were nothing compared to FC2. Mgs 4 was the better game though. If we throw pc gaming, FC2 def won in graphics, and Crysis Warhead also killed, but its optimization was nowhere near fc2.





Also, in my personal opinion, Gta4 was the best Gta I've played. Quality over quantity, get that in your mind people.



Yeah San Andreas had a lot of *****, but how much did you actually enjoy doing. Come on San Andreas was so boring in some of its areas I can't believe you prefer it over San Andreas.

by ConXept - 2008-12-15 02:32
» Whoops

I meant gta 4 in that last word

by RexNox - 2008-12-15 02:55
» GTA4...

high def game using the same medium as GTA3...and you wonder why you can't do as much as before?



GTA4 is not a GOTY, though. It probably would be with all the expansions in place...which is probably why they obviously paid for that...accolade.

by Cactuar Knight - 2008-12-15 03:26
» .

GTA IV doesnt Deserve GOTY.

It was a good game,I'll give it that much, but the series is getting stale now. I didnt even beat the whole game because I got bored around halfway through.

If anything, Gears Of War 2 [although it was just released] or MGS4 deserve the spot - They are far better games.

And best Male voice should've gone to David Hayter, hands down.He was amazing in MGS4.

by ___ - 2008-12-15 03:33
» To roddollente

Now in case you haven't noticed or don't know Capcom (a very well known Japanese publisher) and is the current publisher of the Gta4, and because of them the game was a success . Proof?



http://www.joystiq.com/2008/11/05/gtaiv-hijacks-top-spot-in-japan-sales-chart/



http://kotaku.com/gaming/media-create/gta-san-andreas-*****-slaps-japan-sales-charts-233338.php





Like I said get your head out of your @ss, the game DOES deserve game of the year and allot of people agree. THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ANYWAYS HA HA! GTA like I said is not for everyone. OK? Get it trough your fat head buddy. If you don't like it then leave it alone and let the whole world enjoy it . I just don't get why you would hate on the Xbox and PS3 game (gta) when they are the best IMO well at least compared to Wiifit UGH!*pukes*, and all those games you listed are basically for the *****wii.

Seems like you need to stick with the Wii and you'll be happy or else you'll turn old and bitter but by the time you read this it'll be too late though +[



The point....



"Dumb motherf*@#+rs are always hating on successful $hit . "

-Katt Williams







http://ps3.qj.net/NPD-Top-5-best-selling-games-in-2008-so-far-for-PS3-Xbox-360-Wii/pg/49/aid/124278



http://www.qj.net/Japan-Grand-Theft-Auto-IV-beats-LittleBigPlanet/pg/49/aid/125915



http://ps3.qj.net/Grand-Theft-Auto-4-sales-slow-down-still-on-top-in-UK/pg/49/aid/120293



http://ps3.qj.net/It-s-official-Grand-Theft-Auto-4-now-Guinness-World-Record-holder/pg/49/aid/120046



http://ps3.qj.net/Chart-Track-UK-Software-Sales-Grand-Theft-Auto-4-still-on-top/pg/49/aid/120003



http://ps3.qj.net/Chart-Track-UK-GTA-4-sells-926-000-copies-in-first-week-takes-first-place/pg/49/aid/119607



http://ps3.qj.net/Grand-Theft-Auto-4-first-day-sales-breaks-sales-record-in-U-K-/pg/49/aid/119217



Grand Theft Auto IV Tops in Japan

http://ps3.ign.com/articles/928/928013p1.html



http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2008/11/05/grand-theft-auto-iv-is-number-1-in-japan/



WHEN YOU MAKE A GAME BETTER THAN GTA4 THEN YOU CAN TALK SMACK SHlT IT EVEN KICKED POKEMON PLATINUM'S @SS MAN ! DUDE C'MON GET A CLUE!

by ConXept - 2008-12-15 03:40
» yeah but,

Yeah but have you heard Michael Hollick in real life. The man sounds nothing like Niko, I think the voice actor award was rightfully given.



But you are right GOW2 and MSG4 were better games than gta4. Unfortunately you have to own both systems to enjoy both of them.



If I didn't have video games in my life I think I'd be rich.

by Cactuar Knight - 2008-12-15 03:48
» .

GTA IV doesnt Deserve GOTY.

It was a good game,I'll give it that much, but the series is getting stale now. I didnt even beat the whole game because I got bored around halfway through.

If anything, Gears Of War 2 [although it was just released] or MGS4 deserve the spot - They are far better games.

And best Male voice should've gone to David Hayter, hands down.He was amazing in MGS4.

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 03:51
» the future is cell

gta 4 sucked and was a success because of a lot of people being a sheep. i knew gta 4 would suck since it was going multiplatform. i cant believe you idiots would think an open world game like gta 4 could be good with a lot of content cut out due to disc space being 8gbs on xbox. i cant wait for ff13, lol, i knew that gta 4 would suck from the videos but because a lot of hype was behind gta 4, you flipping idiots ate it up and bought the crap and now are complaining when the game gets goty. blame yourself cause the sales were great. anyway, i have a ll the systems but i dont buy multiplatform games cause that means the game will not be the best game it could have been due to disc limitation on a dvd9 disc.



i cant wait for killzone 2 which is an awesome game cause ive seen it and played it. its the best looking game ive ever seen and played. go and hype killzone 2 cause its awesome and i know alot of haters wont hype killzone 2 because they are jealous that they dont have a ps3 or cause their system of choice doesnt have a game that matches up to killzone on a technological aspect. i have an xbox 360 also and its my 6th one, i have gears 2 also which lags alot in campaign but i would rate it a 7 out of 10. xbl/psn-dylantalon. and g.o.w 3 trailer was awesome.

by Cactuar Knight - 2008-12-15 03:55
» lol

Wow I replied to you and instead the webpage decided to repost my old comment...wierd.

Anyways you're right, I think the only way to enjoy both games is to own both systems.

Thank god I have a well-paying job to allow me to own and support both :)



and thanks to your post, I am now wondering exactly how much richer I would be if I didnt buy games.....hmmm.....

by BIH - 2008-12-15 04:12
» No it isnt you dumbass Sony Fanboy....Congrats to Rockstar they deserved to Win!

Go crawl back into Sonys arse.



First off all GTAs have been multi-platform, because a game is mulit platform doesnt mean its going to suck for example COD4 was awsome and that was multi platfrom you moron.

Second Disc space has nothing to do with how good a game is going to be, you think all games use the 20 or so Gigs on a blu-ray disc? NO

that's why you ended up paying double for your system!



Seems most PS3 owners are pissed because MGS one of the few PS3 exclusives worth buying ah well.





You clearly don't have a 360 just a pissed of PS3 owner needing to grab 360s neck to justify you buying the console, quite sad to be honest.



Congrats to GTA totally deserved it!

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 04:26
» dylantalon@aol.com

my xbox live gamertag is "Dylantalon" add me. am i able to send pics on nxe?i'm not sure but ill check into it. is my email address, this is the internet so go there and you'll see pics of my 71 hdtv and 51in hdtv with my name on it in my room along side all of my system which range from nes, snes and so on up to having 3 broken 360s in my room and a ps3.



im not a fanboy, check pics if you like, this is the computer you are on so its not hard. gta 4 sucked cause they cut a lot of content out of the game, call of duty is a fps where they cut a lot of content also and you can tell by the flipping campaign which you can finish in 5 hours but the online is good. gta 4 is not relying on its multiplayer side, its relying on its story side and the graphics were horrible and the gameplay was horrible also and the reason is cause of disc space.



my point is, gta 4 is good to some people but gta san andreas was a way longer game and a better game than the newest gta game, why is that, it is cause of disc space and content. in gta, you pick up your cousin and the game is over. in san andreas it was a much longer game. san andreas was done on a dual layer dvd9 disc which was fine for last gen games cause they used less space on a disc.



killzone 2 is the best looking game, those are facts, not my opinion and if you think im wrong, you are a fanboy.

by Diablith - 2008-12-15 04:27
» Corrections...

To roddollente-



Okay the first problem with what you said was, "Japan, the homeland of video games", Japan is not the homeland of video games. The home console was started here in the US and released by Atari (Atari 2600). Japan BECAME a video game hub, that much is true, but it is not the homeland.



Second problem: Tetris was made in Russia by Alexey Pajitnov.



You'd be surprised what the Japanese actually like these days.

by BIH - 2008-12-15 04:50
» again....

I couldn't careless what TV you have or console, posting your email address on here smart move :)



You're so misinformed i wasn't eve going to bother.



They didn't cut anything from COD4 the single player campaign was short because IW chose to make it short nothing to do with limitations.



Graphics where horrible?

Are you right in the head?



San Andreas was not on a Dual Layer DVD! They used a normal 4.7Gb disc again where you are misinformed. Sigh, why is everyone comparing it to San Andreas. Its the start of GTA games to come like GTA 3 was, where every game got better and better and it finished at SA.





Killzone 2 has nothing to do with this topic, its not even out yet! And how does me not agreeing to that make me a fanboy?



Please read up a little more, might make you look less stupid.

by yykakashi - 2008-12-15 04:55
» ooooh man too many to read

anyways gta4 deserved GOTY



most whom are disappointed with gta4 expected it to be a cookie cutter of San Andreas except in Liberty City



now about that action game award i can see how anyone would be mad about that



but the hate for the goty is just some fan boy jealousy because their game of choice didn't win

by ___ - 2008-12-15 05:54
» dylantalon's jokes

"blame yourself cause the sales were great."



"graphics were horrible and the gameplay was horrible also and the reason is cause of disc space. "



Graphics and disk space doesn't apply to this game . You never played the game like you said yet you seem pretty sure it looks HORRIBLE?

You must be looking at your reflection on the TV.



"i cant wait for killzone 2 which is an awesome game cause ive seen it and played it"







"or cause their system of choice doesnt have a game that matches up to killzone on a technological aspect."







"my point is, gta 4 is good to some people but gta san andreas was a way longer game and a better game than the newest gta game, why is that, it is cause of disc space and content. in gta, "



Again with the disk space. Get over it you moron!

When GTA4 was being created (back when san andreas was released) Blu ray did not Exist and GTA4 was originally planned to fit in a Double layer DVD regardless of the PS3's superior space.

If you didn't know that then you need to read more adding more crap to the game may slow it down even more . This game runs at about 12fps.







"haters wont hype killzone 2 because they are jealous that they dont have a ps3"









"gta 4 sucked and was a success because of a lot of people being a sheep."







"i knew that gta 4 would suck from the videos"





"killzone 2 is the best looking game, those are facts, not my opinion"



"you flipping idiots ate it up and bought the crap and now are complaining when the game gets goty. "



Umm no I'm not I'm glad it did . Point proven.

by anhero - 2008-12-15 07:05
» dissappointed...

I for one feel very disappointed by the results starting with the GOTY which should have been MGS4 (by a slight margin over Fallout 3 the 360 version, and Littlebigplanet ). Best shooter should have been COD4. Best graphics either crysis 2, far cry 2, or flight simulator X (its really relative). Best handheld game FF for the DS. Best PC game: Comand and Conquer 3. Really dissappointed...

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 07:16
» xbox 360 uses dvd9, ps3 uses blu ray

gta 4 sucked, and thats that. to all you idiots that are trying decipher my posts, youre a loser. anyway, as i said, , i have 2 big screen hdtvs in my room cause i'm a big gamer that wants to see everything clearly im doing in my games. i have gta 4 and if you want to add my xbl/psn-dylantalon, you can check my history and see that i have gta 4 and finished it.



anyway, i will stand by what i said previously so all the jealous fools can hear me, gta 4 sucked and could have been better and was suppose to have a lot more content in the game. anyway, if you dont believe that then you are a fool. if you played the previous gta games and played gta 4, you will realise that this game had less content that was in san andreas and i know they are 2 different games but why is the next gen version so short and lacking?



anyway, you people above me that badmouthed me cause you are all jealous, have a nice day. remember, you all had to hail me up.

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 07:20
» oi

gta 4 was lacking content because of the dvd9 discs that xbox uses. the game had terrible graphics and terrible frame rate and glitches because of the dvd9 disc constraint. ps3 is the fture and the future is ps3.



which shooter that is released or going to be released have the best graphics??

by Orlyeh - 2008-12-15 07:48
» shooter with best graphics

that would by Crysis

by ___ - 2008-12-15 08:05
» Are you serious?

"you people above me that badmouthed me cause you are all jealous"



Dude WTF?!?!



*sigh*



First..

You have one of the biggest egos man! Seriously, I mean who the horses @ss is going to be jealous of you showing off your POS?



Second..

Pics could be copied from other forums as far as we know.



Third..

Judging by your grammar you cannot be older than 8 if you are, oh boy.



Fourth..

US JEALOUS!?! ?BUAHAHAHAH!!

OMG HAHAHAH! WE LIKE THE GAME AND

THE ONLY ONE JEALOUS HERE IS YOU ! STOP HATING ON R* BlTCH @SS SHlT FACE! ...

...............................................................



No fifth..

by ___ - 2008-12-15 08:24
» lol Orlyeh true dat +)

Crysis was a grafixwhore lol.

I was using a 9700 gt at the time all futile at max settings lmao.



@dylantalon

Again with the disk space. Get over it you moron!

When GTA4 was being created (back when san andreas was released) Blu ray did not Exist and GTA4 was originally planned to fit in a Double layer DVD regardless of the PS3's superior space.

If you didn't know that then you need to read more adding more crap to the game may slow it down even more . This game runs at about 12fps.

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 08:36
» oi

a lot of devs knew about blu ray and the cell chip broadband that would be in the ps3 before 2005. again, just like forza 2 sucking and being inferior to gt 5, just like gears of war 2 being inferior to uncharted and killzone 2 in the graphics department because of disc constraints. dvd9 isnt enough for gears 2 and thats why it was compressed . you idiots will never understand.



my point is this, every game thats on the xbox 360 could have been better if it were a ps3 exclusive because the ps3 could make use of the blu ray disc and add more content and better graphics and textures which takes up more space. again, ps3 is superior to the xbox 360. crysis looks good but good luck trying to run that game at 100percent.



which console game thats a shooter that is out or soon to be released have the best graphics? lol. anyway, crysis animations are rubbish along with the rag doll physics imo.

by Orlyeh - 2008-12-15 09:12
» protip

there are no games which don't make use of compression in one form or another



even metal gear solid 4 used it



you asked me which shooter looks best and I answered, it's not my fault if you have to keep changing your questions to make up for your lack of ability

by narutosaiyan - 2008-12-15 09:15
» tisk tisk

lol my prediction was right... they would never grow the balls to give da award to the game that actually deserves it cuz its on ps3

by ___ - 2008-12-15 09:37
» LMAO you are really dumb aren't you?

" dvd9 isnt enough for gears 2 and thats why it was compressed . you idiots will never understand."



DISK SPACE AND COMPRESSION WILL NEVER DETERMINE THE QUALITY OF THE GAME ! IT'S ALL UP TO THE DEVELOPER . IF XBOX WANTED THEY COULD DO DOUBLE DVD . YES THEY STILL DO THAT BUT SEEING HOW YOU'RE AN IDIOT. I DOUBT YOU'LL GET IT THROUGH YOUR FAT HEAD!

THE ONLY THING THAT GETS AFFECTED IF ANYTHING IS IN THE SOUND AND VIDEO CRITERIA . IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GAMEPLAY !



AGAIN ! GRAFIX/COMPRESSION HAS NOTHING TO WITH HOW WELL THE GAME IS GOING TO DO WITH THE MARKET. THERE'S ALSO A LIMIT ON HOW HIGH THE RESOLUTION OF THE TEXTURES CAN BE . THE HIGHER RESOLUTION THEY ARE THE LOWER THE FRAME RATE IS GOING TO BE YOU STUPID *****N *****! IN OTHER WORDS YOU CAN STORE IT IN THE BLURAY BUT YOU CAN'T READ IT FAST ENOUGH THAT'S WHY PS3 HAS MANDATORY HDD INSTALLS TO HELP WITH THE READING . THE SMALLER LASER DIODE READS AND TRANSFERS AT A LOWER SPEED THAN REGULAR DVDS .







LET ME TELL YOU THAT IF YOU CHOOSE A GAME JUST FOR IT'S GRAFIX,...YOU DESERVED TO GET SODOMIZED BY SHAQ'S SIZE 24'. IN FACT I HOPE IT HAPPENS TO YOU . FACT!!

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 10:37
» cell

compressed data isnt as good as uncompressed data. compressed sound isnt as good as uncompressed sound. now that ive said that, answer this for me, why is uncharted drakes fortune a more beautiful game than gears of war 2 that came out recently? uncharted was released in 2007 and both games are exclusives titles that should show what the systems are capable of.why does gears 2 have so many glitches and slowdowns in the campaign? why can the ps3 do 60fps in 1080p natively?but the xbox 360 cant. why is the xbox using hdmi 1.2 and theps3 uses the newer hdmi 1.3 which is better? when will xbox 360 have a game that will get game of the year again?cause we all know its going to be killzone 2,heavy rain, god of war 3 or some ps3 exclusive.



whatever the xbox can do, the ps3 can do way better, im not a fanboy but a realist. i have all systems and when i say all, i mean all. xbl/psn-dylantalon . i love when people hate cause they are jealous . killzone 2 destroys all xbox 360 games next year in terms of graphics and quality and ive played it.

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 10:43
» cell broadband engine

i meant to ask ' when will the xbox 360 have an exclusive game again that will get best graphics of the year'? anyway, every year until the next consoles are out, ps3 will win that title.

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 11:02
» hd dvd is dead

most people here dont own both next gen systems which are the nes wii and ps3. the xbox 360 is rubbish, it has a failure rate of 33%.my xbl/psn-dylantalon and ive been an xbox gamer since 2001 until now. fanboys get upset when you bring up facts that their system of choice breaks 33% of the times and is limited to 8gbs of space on 1 dvd9 disc. i dont care what haters say about me on the net,i dont make any money from sony or microsoft. where are the online games on the xbox 360 that has 60 people in one room without any lag?why does gears 2 lag so much online?



why cant people admit that ps3 is better than xbox 360 in every way? is it because they only own a dead box 180?

by trigger - 2008-12-15 12:10
» GTA4 goty?

well, it's really hard to define what makes a goty, but i suppose it fits the bill.



besides. i'm looking at the VGA winners, and damn, i suppose you can say the judges did their jobs well.



at least VGA's winning list is not as poorly constructed as the one from Time Magazine. hehehe. man, what do they know about videogames anyways? leave the "GOTY" listing to the gamers. hehehe. i appreciate Time for their magazine and news and features and all. but please. not for videogames.

by Eclipze_ - 2008-12-15 12:11
» I'm one who dissagrees with the choice..

"Dumb motherf*@#+rs are always hating on successful $hit . "



No ones hating on anything, I think its just people notice that there was better $hit that should have won. Game of the Year shouldn't be about sales or popularity alone, it should really be about the best game. Now I think Gears 2 or Mgs4 should have won. Graphics wise GTAIV is beat by lots of games, Story wise GTAIV is beat by lots of games, gameplay wise GTAIV is beat by lots of games. Two of those games being Mgs4 and Gears 2. People really do notice that GTAIV isn't good enough to reach Mgs4 or Gears 2 quality, thats the only reason why their complaining.



Just to note I helped out GTAIV sales because I bought the game as well. Do I think that its better than the other games that I mentioned? Not even close. GTAIV is just a universal game that lots of people buy because it has the Gran theft auto name and its free roam.

by dyIantaIon - 2008-12-15 12:30
» xbox rulz

PS3 sux.



GTAIV is teh best!!

by dyIantaIon - 2008-12-15 12:32
» cell

compressed data isnt as good as uncompressed data. compressed sound isnt as good as uncompressed sound. now that ive said that, answer this for me, why is uncharted drakes fortune a more beautiful game than gears of war 2 that came out recently? uncharted was released in 2007 and both games are exclusives titles that should show what the systems are capable of.why does gears 2 have so many glitches and slowdowns in the campaign? why can the ps3 do 60fps in 1080p natively?but the xbox 360 cant. why is the xbox using hdmi 1.2 and theps3 uses the newer hdmi 1.3 which is better? when will xbox 360 have a game that will get game of the year again?cause we all know its going to be killzone 2,heavy rain, god of war 3 or some ps3 exclusive.



whatever the xbox can do, the ps3 can do way better, im not a fanboy but a realist. i have all systems and when i say all, i mean all. xbl/psn-dylantalon . i love when people hate cause they are jealous . killzone 2 destroys all xbox 360 games next year in terms of graphics and quality and ive played it.

by roddollente - 2008-12-15 12:45
» To ___

dumba$$. it's not about sales. like what the guy said above me, it's about quality. there are alot of games better than gta4. if sales equals game of the year, then can you justify Assassin's Creed being a repetitive game with $h!tty gameplay? i don't care what numbers you throw me at. we all know GTA4 is a bestseller, but it's not that good of a game. even though i'm an mgs4 fan, i'd rather have Gears of War 2 bag this than GTA 4. what a stupid reply. you even posted links. irrelevant as hell. it's clear your head can't comprehend the meaning of Game of the Year. it's not about sales, you dumba$$.





*facepalm*

by dylantalon - 2008-12-15 12:47
» oi

xbox is rubbish . it fails 33% of the time.

by roddollente - 2008-12-15 12:49
» To ___

i posted the reply to another psot. didn't know ignorance is contagious. i better stay away from you. haha.



dumba$$. it\'s not about sales. like what the guy said above me, it\'s about quality. there are alot of games better than gta4. if sales equals game of the year, then can you justify Assassin\'s Creed being a repetitive game with $h!tty gameplay? i don\'t care what numbers you throw me at. we all know GTA4 is a bestseller, but it\'s not that good of a game. even though i\'m an mgs4 fan, i\'d rather have Gears of War 2 bag this than GTA 4. what a stupid reply. you even posted links. irrelevant as hell. it\'s clear your head can\'t comprehend the meaning of Game of the Year. it\'s not about sales, you dumba$$. *facepalm*

by StingBlah - 2008-12-15 12:54
» anhero, i agree on everything except

mgs4 was DEFINITELY best graphics of the year.



and gta4 gets SOOO repetitive! I couldn't even make it through the half-way mark! Its the samet hing over and over again. Get call, drive car, go kill.

by StingBlah - 2008-12-15 12:56
» have you played MGS4?

Its graphics were revolutionary! Far Cry 2 graphics were good, but it wasn't as varied and rich as MGS4. It was the same thing again and again in FC2--brown rocks, plains, trees. For all we know they could've repeated huge sections of the map and the player would never know...

by haru3173 - 2008-12-15 13:37
» oi

If GTA IV was not released for the xbox 360 and only a PS3 exclusive, I bet GTA IV will not be GOTY. If a game were to be released multi-platform, people are gonna buy the 360 version rather than ps3's.

by xploren - 2008-12-15 13:48
» I actually didn't.

I wasn't hyped up for the game, actually. I was busy paying attention to other games. If I wasn't hyped up and I was disappointed, you know how big it was.

by dyIantaIon - 2008-12-15 14:03
» meh

i eat poop for breakfast

by kupomogli - 2008-12-15 17:54
» I think GTA4 deserved it

I disliked every GTA game up to GTA4 because of all the flaws within them.



GTA4 on the other hand fixed every flaw within every other game. The shooting system is great, regardless of whether you're using lock-on or not. The best is that if you're using lock-on, the enemy still has to be in your line of sight, so it's not like you can just lock-on and then it'll lock-on to the nearest enemy or a random person running 5 miles down the street "BEHIND" you.



GTA4 also had a really amazing driving system, as the system turned VERY realistic and made driving through the cities different than games like the original GTA games, the Driver games, etc. It also put most racing games to shame since it not only has realistic driving, but also car damage is factored in along with some nice checkpoint races.



The storyline and missions were also really good. If people want to attempt to say it's the same thing, yet praise Metal Gear Solid 4, then how about we just list how Metal Gear Solid 4 is the exact same as every game in the series aside from the fact that they upgraded the shooting system as well(MGS4 easily has the best shooting system.) Hey look. Let's go through MGS4 which is just like going through MGS1, 2, 3, and Portable Ops. Game of the year!!.



How about the fact that some other people said that GTA4 is repetitive you just drive places then shoot people, drive other places, shoot people, etc. Oh wait a minute. Let's look at MGS4. Infact, let's look at every MGS released. Go to the next area, wait for a minute in each intersection so you have enough time to run across or crawl across without being seen etc.



Some people need to stop being hypocrites.

by kupomogli - 2008-12-15 18:02
» Btw.

I like both the PS3 and 360 the same. Alot of people should stop trying to do some console wars bs because it's retarded.



The PS3 has great games the 360 doesn't have. Uncharted and Little Big Planet.



The 360 has great games the PS3 doesn't have. Dead Rising, Gears of War, and Halo 3.

by Fujin - 2008-12-16 02:02
» Your right!

You actually make a lot of sense there dylantaion you bring up some pretty good points.

by beastlie23 - 2008-12-16 06:31
» gta 4

over rated bilge

by narutosaiyan - 2008-12-16 10:10
» wow

couldnt put it betr myself

by Specht - 2008-12-16 16:23
» RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGED

I loved GTA IV to death so I agree it deserves a nomination, though Fallout 3 and MGS4 are far superior in my opinion. Hell, I would've agreed with LittleBigPlanet 'cause it's one of the few games without a number in the title...

by Specht - 2008-12-16 17:02
» roflmao

"Why do you care so much about what other people think about a console if you don't care about what they say about you?" is what I would say if I were trying to be rational, but since rationality just doesn't work with 'people like you' (I hear they don't like to be called the "F-word"... you know what I mean), I'll have to resort to something you could understand.



Mah xbox360 is liek, waaaaaaaaay moer powerfull tahn ur Piece-of-S*** 3. Teh cell be is liek, totally underpowered since its jsut a singlecore proccessor taht distributes cacluatons to teh SPEs to maek stuff faster-liek. Teh triple-core proccessor in teh 360 runs simulateos threads at 3.2GHz aech which maeks it wel-siuted for handleng compression over teh Cell BE which would haev 2 maek teh SPU stop waht it's doin an start decompressing teh data in a free SPE liek a bottleneck. Of course, msot developers culd find ways aruond tihs liek pre-installing teh data on teh harddrive so teh tiem to raed the BD is cut uot of teh tiem it taeks to uncompress teh data. An' explain how Fallout 3 looks bettr on teh 360 tehn PS3...



In all seriousness though, if you could get anything out of that last paragraph it does make sense. The 360 and PS3 are almost equal in processing capability. It's just the way each system works. I find the perfect example for explaining this to a n00b is the Fibonacci algorithm. There are 2 basic ways to implement an algorithm to find a number in the Fibonacci sequence, recursively and iteratively. In this case, the recursive function, when called, will end up doing the same calculations over and over again and eventually will give an answer. While, the iterative function will give the answer in the time it takes to go through each needed calculation since it only goes through each one exactly once which saves on time and memory. Anyway, what I'm trying to get across here is the fact there is no "best" anything. In most cases, recursive functions are MUCH faster than iteration, though in this case, the iterative function is exponentially faster.



Now, when you take that over to the PS3/360 "war" replace the fibonacci problem with online functionality, the recursive function with PS3, and the iterative function with 360. Online functionality on the 360 has worked from the beginning extremely efficiently while it's not as great on the processing side(however small the difference really is). And Sony has taken a long time to get their online functions fully established (if you can call Home really established yet) and it's still having problems with the stuff they overlooked. For example, after resetting the default system settings by holding the power button for 7 seconds(that is just the video/audio settings, not the HDD), my trophies were permanently disabled and Burnout Paradise is completely unplayable on my account. I can make a new account, though the original gamesave isn't shareable. Since the gamerscore has been a part of Xbox Live since the launch of the 360, I'll never expect anything like that to happen on my Gamertag.



Ya, and Wii has all the consoles beat in the Homebrew scene...



LAWL, I just realized I'm typing this in an article about GTA4 getting the GOTY award.

by Specht - 2008-12-16 17:10
» oh yeah...

The Cell BE doesn't determine how good a game looks, it determines how well it runs...

by Specht - 2008-12-16 17:24
» ugh

Explain the difference between HDMI 1.2 and 1.3 other than "it's better" and I might actually give a crap about what you say. Emphasis on the "might".

by Aces In The Palm - 2008-12-18 01:00
» @rexnox

to your comment about gta4 being on same medium

this may be true for xbox but my copy is on blu-ray, so i see no excuse for the loss of freedom

the xbox version could of been multidisc with an install

there is no excuse why gta4 could of had as much freedom as gta3:san andreas

by ahnp - 2008-12-19 07:34
» porting

now the reason it was an ordinary dvd dl was because of the xbox 360, the pc version is over 12 gig and they ported it from the 360 to ps3, hench the origional onnline problems, its good for the multiplayer but after awhile even that gets boring, call of duty waw should of done better, mgs deffinetely won graphics because the emense amount of space they had to work with, but it doesnt deserve game of the year as good as it is, ive seen films shorter than the ending movie, and thats just the ending movie, they went way over the top with cut scenes although the references to earlier games were quite commical but the best graphics was purely for the cut scenes, left 4 dead is way over hyped, zombie mode on cod is far better and you can battle each other, not to mention you get to royally screw berlin in it, no offence but 80,000 germans to 2.5 million russians, thats just quality

by ahnp - 2008-12-19 07:41
» europeans fault

what are you chatting about, ive never played an online game that wasnt filled with under aged americans, it is the americans who put it out as to be so popular not the japanese or europeans, we all put in for lbp as limited as it is, its something different which gta4 isnt, its the americans who are the ones obsessed with gang warfare and the mafia, else it would be somewhere else, which funnily enough only 1 time in the series has it been out of america and it did *****, and its interesting how its the americans who mimmick it and go around believing its real so they go kill people based on the game, this is where jack tompson(*****) was right for once, you believe anything you see and make it a reality and the parents couldnt give 2 *****s if their 12 year old kids play these games and wonder y, y did he go on a massacre

by ahnp - 2008-12-19 07:57
» in your dreams

forza might be better than gt5 but reality check douche it aint

by ahnp - 2008-12-19 08:08
» not that im saying its a bad game

it just lacks in content, yeh ok they can dlc for it but most people in the europe brought it for the multiplayer, and according to your figures 609000 sold, it sold 6 million copies, so where is the remaining 5391000 copies sold, not in japan, or australia, but as other people have said its about quality not sales figures, and it is lacking in quality because of the 8.1gig xbox restriction, but even still its all gang warfare, drugs, sex, which funnily enough every other gta was about, other than gta london but thats proberbly y it sucked so much, you can go with you figures to go oh were not the ones buying majority but you were, http://gamer.blorge.com/2008/05/07/gta-4-sells-6-million-copies-in-first-week-will-ps3-xbox-360-sales-spike/ and i can say being from the uk i got it for the multiplayer which was ment to be so high and mighty, ive seen network games with better multiplayer, i dont think it deserves goty especially since they keep mucking everyone about with the surposed dlc 'coming' but their is alot more games more deserving of the award, ive had gta twice, mainly caus of the multiplayer problems and i still havent completed it because it is boring after the 10000 person you kill, wow look at me in my car running people over, carmageddon was much better for that and anyone who is willing to say that gta4 is the goty is a underage kid, sorry but if you were older you would know if the game library, even fable 2 was better

by ahnp - 2008-12-19 08:12
» its about the cutscenes

and ive noticed lots of issues with graphics of fc2, if they game come fully patched before it was released then maybe it would be different but it still hasn't been updated, you get floor tiling, cliff tiling and you get graphic glitches in certain areas on the hugh map which i must give it credit for that, lots to do but repetitive going back and forward guard post after guard post, got so bored i got myself stuck between a tree and the inside of a cliff

by RJ - 2008-12-22 12:57
» -

MGS4 graphics were revolutionary?!



Pwhahwahaa awahaw. In this revolution of yours, are barrels hexagons and wheels with only 10 sides? No. No really, no. Everything was washed out and the only detail was in the characters faces.



It wasn't revolutionary.

by Rickey123 - 2008-12-23 02:37
» how is

the best multiplayer game not LBP or Cod4?

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!