ATV Music: Beatles video game will have tremendous implications |
Ó
After the announcement that they will be working on a title featuring the Beatles, MTV and Harmonix have signed themselves into a considerably lucrative deal. The game is being targeted for release during the 2009 holidays, and will be in "an interactive video format."
"The game is in development," said Apple Corps CEO Jeff Jones. Apple Corps is the rights holder of the Beatles' music. "We don't want to talk about how it will turn out a year from now. We're in the process of creating the game."
It makes one wonder about how the music will be put in the game. Like some sacred relic, the Beatles' music was never remastered and was left untouched, making it unavailable through digital retail like iTunes. It seems that this game will be going where no digital retailer has gone before.
"Maybe the fact that this deal is done will offer an impetus to Apple and EMI," said Martin Bandier, CEO of Sony/ATV Music Publishing. "We signed a deal that would be considered very rich by the videogame company but fair for the artists. It will have online implications that will be enormous."
As early as now, I'm wondering how the game will come out. How much it'll cost is a different story altogether. I guess we'll just have to play by ear for now.
Related articles:
Contact Us:
The QJ.net Network |
|
| Site | Feed |
| QJ.NET | RSS |
| Nintendo DS | RSS |
| PlayStation 3 | RSS |
| PSP Updates | RSS |
| Wii | RSS |
| Xbox 360 | RSS |
| MMORPG | RSS |
| Personal Computer Games | RSS |
| iPhone - iPod Touch | RSS |
| QJ.NET Forums | RSS |
User Favorites - December
User Favorites - December
Categories
Archives
Accessories
Add-ons
Applications
Artwork
Batteries
Cheats
Deals
Emulators
Events
Featured Articles
Firmware
Flash Applications
Flash games
Game Demos
Games
Hacks & Exploits
Homebrew Applications
Homebrew Demos
Homebrew Development
Homebrew Emulators
Homebrew Games
Homebrew Themes
How-To
Humor
Imports
Interviews
Magazines
Mods
MY QJ
News
Off Topic
On Shelves This Week
Opinions & Analysis
Podcasts
Previews
PSP Go
PSP Minis
PSP Slim & Lite
QJ How-To Series
QuickJump QuickGuide
QuickJump QuickPeek
Reviews
Rumors
Scans
Screenshots
Site News
Titles
UMD Movies
Videos
Weekend Warrior
Wi-Fi
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005

Comments [refresh]
"Like some sacred relic, the Beatles' music was never remastered and was left untouched, making it unavailable through digital retail like iTunes"
Why not? For many the music from the Beatles regardless of taste, reshaped the music world. The original Beatles music should be kept untarnished, which is what has been done. A digital copy used for a game is no problem as the original is and remains in tact. The statement "remastered" is BS. Should we remaster/repaint Van Gogh, Picasso or Rembrandt? Digital representation or Photo prints of an original are fine but the original..............it's fine as it is.
I agree that the Beatles' music ought to be treated with such respect, and it's good the way it is. In many ways, it is "sacred."
Unfortunately, leaving them as they are would restrict availability. Perhaps due to expensive rights, digital retailers did not invest into it, making the music less available than it could have been.
This partially falls into your music-painting metaphor: if it wasn't for the photos, then how will the rest of the world see the masterpieces?
Of course, music isn't the same thing, but wouldn't you agree that spreading through more channels (like paintings "spreading" as photos) would make it easier for everyone to appreciate something?
Yes I would agree. My point is simply that the Beatles as such do not need remastering. The quality of the recordings is quite masterful and especially the production work of Alan Parsons at Abbey Road. That the music be used for other purposes is fine but I would disagree with the trend of "remastering" I do not think that the original source is to be improved upon.
Artists that have covered a Beatles song have often done it very well and added a new dimension to it and in this way a game as such could well do the same. I feel that the choice to limit the original source recordings and keep them as they are was a good choice. I myself have the Original White Album and have heard at a friends house the song Blackbird as an MP3. (no comment as I would be flamed for being elitist & snobbish)