NeoFlash Summer Coding Competition '07 entry: PSP Tower Defense

Posted Aug 19, 2007 at 6:01PM by QJ Staff Listed in: Homebrew Games Tags: TacticalPenguin
Ó


PSP Tower Defense screen - Image 1Another entry to the ongoing NeoFlash Summer Coding Competition 2007 just came in, titled PSP Tower Defense by TacticalPenguin. Like you would've guessed, it's a PSP version of the favorite desktop game complete with a level maker and other nifty features.

Unlike most tower defense games, TacticalPenguin has gone through all the trouble to allow players to customize their own challenge. Here are some gameplay factoids you'd want to know:
  • creeps walk along the path trying to get to the other side
  • they have a bar above them showing how much health they have left
  • turrets can be built, sold (for half back), and upgraded to do more damage per shot
  • info about the current wave is displayed at the bottom of the screen
  • information about the turret the cursor is over and the turret type to build is displayed at the side of the screen
  • the range of turrets is displayed by a circle around them
  • money is used to buy turrets and upgrades for them
  • when a creep gets through a life is lost; when all lives are lost the game is over
  • everything can be customized to one's likings
The game itself is quite intuitive, though checking out the Readme file can do wonders. You may actually find something more interesting, and learn other sweet stuff you can do with the game.

Download: PSP Tower Defense

 
 
 

Comments

by - 2007-08-19 18:31:27
W00t!

w00t first!
by - 2007-08-19 18:57:50
Oh my god...

Ass ugly compared to Danzel's version. Why do people waste their time?
by - 2007-08-19 19:33:05
Where's the TD game you made?

Oh. You didn't make one. Shut the ***** up please. Also, this one has a level maker; danzel's doesn't. Why do people waste their time criticizing the hard work of others?
by - 2007-08-19 19:53:16
LAmer

What have you ever done? Get over your self kid.
by - 2007-08-19 20:59:44
......................

going by the logic you both displayed, no gamer can ever say ANY game sucks at all. Do you criticize game magazines for giving games 3 out of 10s?? You dont need to be a developer to be a critic. grow up and quit with the "you never made anything so you cant say anything" comments.
by - 2007-08-19 21:17:06
You're missing our point

A game that really sucks really sucks, but people shouldn't go around and before looking at the details of something just go off and say it sucks; game magazines actually play the game and get a look at it before saying it sucks.
by - 2007-08-20 08:35:56
f

but this one actually has a score counter *gasp*
by - 2007-08-20 08:51:09
wtf?

...
by - 2007-08-20 09:30:16
woot woot

nice but it dont work properly on my psp wish it would p.s. i just got a sony go cam yay
by - 2007-08-20 18:37:06
weed

weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed weed
by - 2007-08-24 08:53:59
You completely switched

I agree with you that people should check the details. However, your initial comment in no way indicated that that is what you thought. You merely said. You didn't make one, so don't say anything. Your opinion on your initial and second comment are two totally different arguments.

Add New Comment




You must be logged in to post comments




Add QJ.NET
Add to My Yahoo!
Google Reader Subscribe with Bloglines
Add  to your Kinja digest Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Pluck RSS reader Add 'www.qj.net' to Newsburst from CNET News.com
Subscribe with SearchFox RSS del.icio.us www.qj.net
Add to Technorati Favorite! Add to My AOL
furl! it Stumble for Treehugger!