Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
PSP "scam" sites? Dark_Alex homebrew sold? And how to avoid scams |
Listed in: Homebrew Applications, Opinions & Analysis Tags: eBay, psp homebrews, PSP3D, Sony
Ó
pj1115 over at PSP3D made a list of top sites to avoid online. We'll cover those before discussing the sale of free homebrew on eBay.- Dark-Alex.com. We talked about this before.
- UnlimitedPSPmovies. This download site says you'll get unlimited movie downloads if you pay US$ 34.95. According to pj1115, "these files are probably illegal" and are "illegal torrent downloads with no seeds." The site also asks you to turn off your firewall (kids, this is something you shouldn't do). pj1115 is concerned about spyware - we're concerned about identity theft and nasty viruses; if you have no firewall, anybody can take all your important info.
- FeedmyPSP and PSPwizard123. Same thing as above: you pay a fee and get free movies, cheats, music, games... But pj1115 points out that the "Hacker safe" and "100% secure" labels are pixelated and are not hyperlinked to any real certificate or agency.
- UnlimitedPSPGames. From the same people who brought you unlimited PSP movies for only US$ 34.95. They offer P2P, and tell you not to download anything illegal from them.
One sold "53 old and new homebrew applications" for nearly 40 US dollars. As for the other one, pj1115 says "this person is selling the Dark_AleX 2.71 generic downgrader for £5" and this defeats "the purpose of free software and indirectly abuse Dark_AleX" (£ 5 is about 10 US dollars).
There's also a part that looks like the seller claims to be the coder: "THE ENTIRE FILE WAS CREATED AND WRITTEN BY ME SO THEREFORE I HAVE RESELL RIGHTS." I think the "file" the seller is talking about is his "guide" on downgrading, but if pj1115 and others think he's claiming the homebrew is his, then it's a bit ambiguous. Even if the guide on how to download was written by the eBay seller, there's still that sticky issue of the homebrew. Is it the seller's homebrew? Or is it Dark_Alex's? We make no judgments until we hear the full story.
So what the hell does this mean?
Legal mess. If homebrew programs are "freeware", then parts of the software (or all of it) are proprietary ("are somebody's property"). The software is "free" or "available without charge" for redistribution (i.e., letting your neighbor have a copy). Even if the homebrew developers let you distribute the source code "for free" - that's still only making it open source. It isn't clear if it's OK to sell the hard work of others without crediting them or giving them a cut. Besides, what does Sony have to say about that? Can people sell applications for Sony's PSP even though these applications don't have a license from Sony?
The developer's proprietary or "ownership" rights. Whatever the case, arguably, the maker of something has proprietary privileges over that something. At least philosophically, ethically, and by common practice (any lawyers out there wanting to throw in some free advice on whether homebrew developers have any legal say about their software?). Basically, if the maker of a thing says "I want this distributed for free," things will get ugly when the thing is sold - and where the developer doesn't even get credit for it.
Conditions and credit. As far as we know, many homebrew developers have made CONDITIONS about the redistribution of their hard work: "you are free to redistribute this AS LONG AS CREDIT GOES WHERE IT IS DUE." That's just good manners. We feel for Dark_Alex (who mentioned being fed up and plans to quit the scene) - there are sites that really do such nasty things: bad manners and stealing credit and identity theft. Bad manners will get your website flamed by the righteous burning justice of a very angry PSP homebrew community. We protect our own, right?
Truly free software. To make things more complicated, some homebrew is "free software". This means the maker doesn't really care if you sell it and make money out of it. The maker is just throwing the code out there and hoping that people will benefit. We mustn't get confused between "freeware" and "free software (with conditions)" and "free software."
The "real" issue. Only one half of the issue is the SELLER who earns money from stuff he or she didn't make - some of us are OK with that kind of "capitalism," and some of us are not. But there's another bigger issue here: people are paying for software that the homebrew developers said should be free.
False advertising. Seller beware. If you misrepresent what you're selling (you claim something or you lead somebody to believe something about your product that really isn't true), you can be hauled to court. Many times people are sold free software while the seller NEVER tells the person "this software is free; it's not written by me." It would be nice if the seller says "you're not paying for the software, you're paying for the PSP and the charger - by the way, here are the websites of the developers..."
But what if...? For example, you make a compilation of Dark_Alex's and other people's homebrew and sell it with your PSP. Well, you went through the effort of downloading them, you burned the CD, you even wrote your own instruction manual and included a FAQ for PSP newbies, and you're throwing in other gadgets and accessories and a charger or two along with your PSP. Are you reselling "your" PSP with "extras like homebrew"? Or are you reselling the hardwork of homebrew developers who intended their work to be distributed for free?
Tough questions.
We're just scared. Because it's stuff like this that can destroy a community if we don't think about things right.
Finally, if you're the kind of person who wants to pay for your software, then you should send a donation to hardworking homebrew developers and independents. There are also free software movements that need support.
Finally, pj1115's advice is good stuff and you should heed them (we'll summarize them here - this article has been too long already):
If it promises easy, legal downloads, be aware. If it has testimonials, read carefully and look for any regularities that might indicate a common author. Check the disclaimer; if it mentions P2P, leave. If it promises unlimited content, at high speeds, with a one-off or regular membership price, walk away.
Look for a security certificate logo that is clear, and links to an authentic certificate from a reputable organization. NEVER obey a site when it tells you to disable your security software, this is a commonly used trick! Use a site advisory product. I suggest downloading "McAfee site advisor."
| This story sucks? This story rocks! |
|
|












Comments
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
I feel sorry for DAX, as he is prob 1 of the best things 2 happen to PSP, but he is being plagued by these ghey boys tryin to rip him off... they are just jealous
Reply
Reply
After a month of talking with e-bay we got the guy banned and we managed to make the news in a few places and since then no GTA mods have gone for sale that were not made as freeware.
And it dosn't suprize me that people are putting stuff up on ebay for the PSP. the owners just need to fight for it to be taken down. just show proof that it's freeware and you made it and it can be taken down.
and the pricks that do this should be shot. jerks trying to make money off of other peoples hard work.
Reply
This article itself seems a little rightous. Sony does NOT support homebrew at all, hence making it illegal. Now these people are on selling this illegal software, your arguement is a little hypocritical, you believe homebrew should be allowed but not the reselling of it.
A similar example of this is mod chips. The person selling/installing the mod chip is not the creator just the installer. So they are being paid for the service and the chip. These people on ebay are being paid for the service they are providing.
I'm a supporter of the homebrew community, but much of the popular software is used for playing isos and the such. Please anyone the claims otherwise is just wrong.
I agree with this article I dislike the practice of selling the software but I totaly agree about them selling the service. This article has made generalisations about the sales on ebay, which is again not right.
I realise I have made generalisations to but unlike this website I don't think my opinion should be pushed onto other a hence is just a comment
Reply
i've always thought that one sounds dodgy... because umd's have never been available for download legally!!
perhaps qj.net should check who they allow to advertise here, and its not an excuse to say that the adverts are supplied via a third party is it??
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Whether it's illegal or legal to sell free software on the web or not, these people need to be fought.
And to anyone who would like to call me a 'N00B', I'd like to point out that I'm advising people who are liable to fall for these rip-off's. Do you think I have NO experience when it comes to the web? A sad 13-year-old who believes he is superior because he's too good to help people out cam go home and play with your toys, if he's going to try and show people down.
Sorry about the bit where I said the author claimed to have written the software. I'll update my post with the alternative information.
Reply
This article has made me loose alot of respect for this site.
Regardless if the adverts are supplied by third party, it's the pot calling the kettle black.
Reply
This site on the other hand DOES support illegal homebrew no doubting that. Look at the Mario homebrew, that characters and artwork are trademarks. Hence they are supporting the copying of trademarks, this is illegal.
A good example of the trademark issue is the Simpsons. I remember a few years ago (mid 90's) that Fox tried to stop everybody on the internet using pictures of the Simpsons. But what Fox came to realise it that it was free advertisement and as long as these sites were NOT profitting from it then no harm done.
Typically this site is nothing more than supporting homebrew/isos they just don't say it.
If you want proof have a look at the number of jumps on the software that allows firmware/isos to be emulated or played.
This site seems to think if no one says anything it will not be true, but is obviously is.
Reply
Reply
Come on beat them at there own game.
The people buying off ebay obviously have no knowledge of THIS site otherwise they wouldn't be stupid enough to pay for it.
In my opinion these ebay people are opening up the psp community, and like other forms of piracy are actually doing a the homebrew community a service FREE ADVERTISING.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Before this site gets flamed because of people misunderstand our article because of your comments, let me correct them.
#1 We never self-righteously said that Sony supports homebrew. As I wrote above: \"Besides, what does Sony have to say about that? Can people sell applications for Sony\'s PSP even though these applications don\'t have a license from Sony?\"
#2 About our \"generalizations \" - well anything a person says is at least partly a generalization. Even the phrase \"many of things that people say are, in fact, generalizations \" is a generalization. It would be a sorry day (on at least one side of the world - at least in this world, unless you believe in another), if we have to make room for every exception (well, not really have to, unless of course....... Hehehe. It is awkward - careful use of generalizations is a blogger\'s best friend! Haha.
Notice that we avoid a generalization FOR the eBay sales and we also avoid a blanket generalization AGAINST eBay sales. In fact, the article was quite long because we considered different possibilities and at least reported the different nuances of \"free.\"
Thank you for your feedback - but you understand that this is a touchy subject and I don\'t want QJ to be dismissed offhandedly as \"just another website that pushes opinions onto others.\" We don\'t present both sides of a debate EQUALLY (they don\'t get the same number of paragraphs) but we do present both sides FAIRLY and JUSTLY. We, of all sites, know that being unfair is bad manners - and it will get us flamed. :) Once again, thank you for your comment (feedback is always welcome and you always have the right to disagree - I just had to comment on your response because, as I said, I do not want other readers to misinterpret what we had tried to present in a manner fair and open). :)
Reply
Reply
And thank you for your tips on keeping safe on the internet - those should be taught at schools as real-life survival skills! People often hear news reports about the dangers of going blindly through the net, but still some people do such stupid things as turning off firewall! :)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Also, I have another point to make: just because the blind person can not see the sun does not mean the blind person has no right to talk about the sun. Well, just because we have the occasional random ad for sites that demand payment for downloads (which has yet to be confirmed by the way), that does not invalidate what this article is about - nor is it a reflection of the opinions and reputation of our bloggers and editors. :)
Finally, thanks for your feedback - I have told my editor about it - we always appreciate it. So sorry for this text wall, but I felt that I had to say something about your comments before wild theories and ideas run rampant. :)
Reply
This article does NOT represent both sides equally (you admit that) but how can an article be FAIR or JUSTLY when you write it towards one opinion.
It's a shame that you are unable to take onboard what I'm saying rather then flaming me.
I'll point out that this article is ONLY reaching those that are already in the KNOW. So it's falling on deaf ears.
As far as I'm concerned these people are doing the community a service. Depends on your view on it.
Thanks for replying nice to see you think that you think I could make a difference. The fact is I'm being MORE honest than you and rather than correct your mistakes you prefer to flame.
Reply
Reply
Noone is saying you choose the ads, simple I'm sure you have google configured with a number of words, just go back in and exclude words. I don't think you have the pwoer to control the internet but you do have the power to control what content you deliver.
I don't have to prove these links exist, cause simple fact is they do. Trying to avoid it is stupid.
The only theories that are running rampant in my mind is your ignorance, funny you guys say you have no control over the ads, so why should ebay be any different. You want to hold ebay to a higher standard then yourself. If you want to change anything in this world, set an example.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Fu/cking Ghay a$$ liking butt holes
Reply
Homebrew:Origin al Apps,games and stuff (mostly crap)created by 1 or more designers that produce them as "Freeware" for not apparent reason.While this creations remain as original content they are legal.
Emulated games and apps:Also piracy since emulators are for running games that have "RIGHTS" on them that specify the use of them also they have clear that their reproduccion is ilegal.
Reply
Reply
ok its the *****in internet. if made a picture from paint and send it to all over the internet. they will send it through ebay.
WTF ***** THIS *****. THIS MAKING DARK ALEX NOT WANT TO DO ANYTHING FOR OUR PSPS EVER AGAIN.
***** YOU QJ AND ***** YOU PS2NFO AND ALL THOSE ***** SUCKING SOME OF A *****ES!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
"You may not (i) rent, lease or sublicense the Application, (ii) modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile or disassemble the Application, (iii) attempt to create the source code from the object code for the Application, or (iv) download game content for any purpose other than game play.
You may, however, transfer all your rights to use the Application to another person provided that you transfer the original product unmodified and in its entirety. The terms of this User Agreement shall apply to transferred Applications."
So, you see technically some homebrew is illegal.
As far as QJ not posting illegal content that's a bunch of BS because I seem to recall QJ frontpaging such things as DAX, harleyg, and others' custom firmwares, those would fall under 'modify, adapt, translate, reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble' and that would include Devhook Firmware emulation, and you are breaking that EULA term everytime you and I dump anything from our firmware, flash anything, run unsigned homebrew programs, use PBPUnpacker and the like... Would you like me to go on, or have I made my point?
Personally, I think that the hacking scene is wonderful and so should Sony (It's a free way to find flaws in your code and it's security).
Reply
Might wanna do some research before becoming a vigilante.
Reply
Reply
First, it mentioned a site pretending to be Dark_Alex - no big issue there - we all agree that is bad and we all feel bad for Dark_Alex.
Second, it mentioned three sites that took your money in exchange for that pj1115 said were unseeded torrents. We blogged about this because it was interesting and helpful to know - some newbies out there might benefit, and some of the long-time gamers might also want to read out it. The only issue there is those sites can pop up in our Google ads because PSP is a key word. Because of this incidental thing, some people argue that we lose credibility and no longer have the right to report possible scams. I argue that any QJ blogger still has the right to blog about the truth - like I said, even a blind man has a right to blog about the sun.
The third issue is PEOPLE who sell what should be free (not eBay or sites that allow the selling of free stuff). What things did we say about the selling of homebrew? Here it is: the article said that is bad if the software is freeware, confusing because of Sony rights, OK if the software is free software, an issue because of sellers can be sued for misrepresenting products, and confusing because sometimes the software is part of a package or compilation so then it is no longer clear if that is black or white.
We were not out to attack eBay. Neither did we expect that ads would become the big issue when I wrote this blog entry. I thought we would have a lively discussion about software rights. Oh well. :)
Finally, I have reported your complaints and criticisms to my editor. :) As a blogger, I can try to clarify your understanding of what I have blogged, but your criticisms will not go unheard. :)
Reply
Reply
However, it is dumb to buy it. I mean, it's free.
Reply
Reply
I'd bet that there are many unlicensed and illegally obtained SDK's out there that are also being used in these "not-so-original" creations.
Reply
Im sure they got a hefty hosting bill
and many people who dont run a LARGE site such as QJ have no clue as to what a task it can be.
and look at all the BS they put up with!!!
and here comes someone trying to talk down
"what was wrriten at QJ"
Im tired of you all complaining all the dame time about qj this and qj that.
I say your lucky QJ is even here to help
bring all this info, {weather ligit, or whatever)
They can post their oppions,
and ofcorse the story was written by 1 person,
their for it will lean to one side.
I do agree they should look at their keywords and try to get them ads off. But again thats on QJ and not any of you.
Reply