Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

PSP homebrew - PSP Bible

Posted Mar 2, 2009 at 1:51PM EST by Glenn M.

Listed in: Homebrew Applications Tags: psp homebrews
Ó

The Holy Bible - Image 1 For the religious conservative sort, here's an app that you might find useful. It's PSP Bible and it basically lets you view and read the Bible and its contents on your PSP, making it a substitute for the holy book. Your handheld is definitely smaller and lighter than most Bibles, plus it's made of tougher stuff that won't tear and shrivel up as easily as Bible pages do.

Developer Kehon has finished the new testament so far, but the old hasn't been done yet, so it seems he's halfway there.


Download: PSP Bible



More PSP homebrew:


Via Kehon's Forums



100% of voters think this story ROCKS!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (2) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# niceReDx06 2009-03-02 17:01
i wonder if it only works online, most Bible apps usually require there to be used online.

Reply
 

 
# Finall!powercat 2009-03-02 17:16
Thank God for this software!

Now I can consult the Holy Book in all occasions to help me make the right choices and decisions!

Reply
 

 
# AmenFreePlay 2009-03-02 17:31
Ezekiel 23:20

Reply
 

 
# YES_YOUR_MOM_ 2009-03-02 17:36
Now I can take the words of my imaginary friend with me everywhere! I like the sound of PSPCrutch better.

Reply
 

 
# .NarooN 2009-03-02 17:53
You're funny and intelligent.

Reply
 

 
# ...Goregeist 2009-03-02 17:53
well If I can't use actual Bible pages for Rolling papers, I guess I can turn the UMD drive into a Rolling paper dispenser.

Reply
 

 
# hahahahaReDx06 2009-03-02 18:12
wow lol

Reply
 

 
# pretty funnyexot32 2009-03-03 07:42
its funny how comments on a Bible application for the PSP can get decent comments but when an application for the Qur'an is made people make the most racist comments... but i'm happy the Christians have the Bible to read on the go now... good job Kehon

Reply
 

 
# Yeah, sadJediKnightJace 2009-03-03 09:46
I know, its terrible how some people react to their fellow human beings (hmm, my apostrophe button appears to be stuck).



Just because I dont regard the Quran as holy scripture (Im Christian) doesnt mean I look down on those who do, or that I think the book is devoid of merit. In fact Id love to read the Quran some time; Ive heard it has some very good lessons in it.

Reply
 

 
# ...JediKnightJace 2009-03-03 09:48
The below comment was meant to be a reply to this one.

Reply
 

 
# Cool I guessbillylee8 2009-03-03 10:28
There's also "The Good BookR" and an HTML version of the King James Bible on gutenburg for OFW users.



Luke 19:27 FTW!!!

Reply
 

 
# ...iamshadow 2009-03-03 10:31
i cant believe how so many people make fun of the Bible!

its nothing to make fun of.



oh and _YOUR_MOM_ and Goregeist...you might wanna try reading it sometime.

Reply
 

 
# Yay!blackthorn 2009-03-03 10:54
Brainwashing propaganda on the go!



HAHAHAHAHAAHHAA !

Reply
 

 
# lolNavani 2009-03-03 12:45
Sarcasm?

Reply
 

 
# wowmocherz 2009-03-03 14:02
what a waste of talent

Reply
 

 
# LOLFreePlay 2009-03-03 14:15
"i cant believe how so many people make fun of the Bible!

its nothing to make fun of."



Ezekiel 23:20

Reply
 

 
# Wow.PinCushion 2009-03-03 16:30
Has organized "Christian" religion pissed off this many people? That's pretty amazing. Seems like a few years ago I would have seen a lot more angry comments towards the people making negative comments about the bible. My how times change.

Reply
 

 
# LOLPinCushion 2009-03-03 16:45
Ezekiel 23:20 is describing how disgusting the acts of Judah were in God's eyes. Its metaphorical. Worshipping other gods is like adultery to God. It is a pretty gnarly passage though. He basically called Judah and Israel nasty Ho Bags.

Reply
 

 
# nawMiclowgunman 2009-03-03 19:34
we just realized that most of the people making these comments would never do it face to face with a person. So we gave up trying to face morons with no respect for others in a medium with no accountability.

Reply
 

 
# satanvicious36 2009-03-03 19:57
FTW

eat that *****. anybody reading this is sinning right now. marked by the right hand and the forehead. be ready for nibiru and 2012

Reply
 

 
# AlsoFreePlay 2009-03-04 02:00
I'd take a look at how often God seems to be obsessed with foreskins.



Example:

1 Samuel 18:27



Wherefore David arose and went, he and his men, and slew of the Philistines two hundred men; and David brought their foreskins, and they gave them in full tale to the king, that he might be the king's son in law. And Saul gave him Michal his daughter to wife.



That's right... buying a wife with 200 foreskins.



The Bible really *is* something to make fun of.

Reply
 

 
# LOLFreePlay 2009-03-04 02:02
You might like to think that, little boy, but if you tried to convert me in person I'd likely spit on you.



I respect your RIGHT to believe, but your beliefs are loathsome.

Reply
 

 
# FreePlay, CmonPinCushion 2009-03-04 04:18
Do your research. That was king Saul and David. Where did god come into that? Saul thought surely that David would either be too scared, or die trying to kill 100 Philistines and get the foreskins. That account was preserved to show that David didn't take any crap off of anybody.

Reply
 

 
# LMAOPinCushion 2009-03-04 04:20
You're funny. . . .

Reply
 

 
# sheesh....florinzgtrst 2009-03-04 04:21
what a bunch of stupid comments. Bible this... Bible that...

Seek for your God or beliefs in solitude, read the Bible maybe, read the Quran, be the best you can... and appreciate the work Kehon put behind this little homebrew

Reply
 

 
# Well, being spit on is a lot better thanPinCushion 2009-03-04 04:24
having a gun pointed at you. Try going door to door and preaching in Texas. Its only a matter of time before someone points a gun at you lol. FreePlay, I have a totally innocent, not trying to convert you, question. What do you believe? I would just like to know because its interesting to hear ppl's beliefs. +)

Reply
 

 
# LOL!!!blackthorn 2009-03-04 11:02
ALLAH AKHBAR!!!!!!!!! !!!!!1111111111



Oh sry, wrong holy book!



next pls!

Reply
 

 
# I have done my research.FreePlay 2009-03-04 11:50
And this is a good story to use to debunk the concept of "God's word."



In 1 Samuel 18:27, the number is 200.

In 1 Samuel 18:25 and 2 Samuel 3:14, it's 100.



It depends on your translation, too. The NRSV says 100 in both places, but with a footnote stating that the Hebrew manuscripts say 200.



So much for the infallible word.

Reply
 

 
# Me?FreePlay 2009-03-04 11:52
I'm a recovering fundamentalist, evangelical, Biblical-literalist Christian who saw the light of reason and became an atheist.



I've *done* door-to-door preaching and praying.



Trust me, you don't know what evil a thing religion is until you, without it, face the spite and venom of people with it.

Reply
 

 
# Your right about the numbers.PinCushion 2009-03-04 15:39
The same type of footnote is in my copy of of the bible, however, what does it matter if he killed 100, or 200? The only thing they can do is use the oldest copy available, so that's what many newer translations have done.

Reply
 

 
# Well, dude,PinCushion 2009-03-04 15:43
I'm sorry some people think that because you don't believe what they do, that they have the right to treat you like crap. That is very clearly wrong. They should read the bible that they claim to follow. Not many "Christian" religions actually go door to door and preach, even though that was a clear commandment. Did you belong to any specific group? Sorry if that is too personal of a question.

Reply
 

 
# ...FreePlay 2009-03-04 16:33
... No.



The oldest Biblical manuscript we have is from around 300 AD, and even *that* is a copy of (if not a copy) an original.



The point is that it's inconsistent, and thus not infallible, and thus not God's word.



By the way, the oldest manuscripts say both 100 *and* 200, depending on which verse you're looking at. The newer translations *changed* it to make it match.

Reply
 

 
# Hmm.FreePlay 2009-03-04 16:42
"I'm sorry some people think that because you don't believe what they do, that they have the right to treat you like crap. That is very clearly wrong. They should read the bible that they claim to follow."



Which part? The part where it tells me that it's OK to buy slaves from the population of immigrants in my country? Or the part where it tells me that eating shrimp is equally as abominable as having sex with a dog?



The easiest way to keep believing the Bible is to never actually read it. Biblical teaching absolutely *does* promote the discrimination they practice. It's the soft, pick-and-choosy kind of Christianity that tells people their beliefs are OK even if the Bible says they're not. And when I was a Christian, that was the problem I ran into. Once I finally read the Bible all the way through, I found many things in it that I found morally objectionable. I questioned the idea that it was the word of some almighty, objective source of morality. Then I researched the history of the book, and learned how often it had been intentionally mistranslated; how the stories had been chopped up, spliced and rearranged; how pieces were added or removed; how entire books were left out even though they're referred to within the canon; et cetera.



What I once called the word of God is nothing more than a collection of rehashed, edited, revised stories voted upon by a council of religious leaders. The same council, by the way, that VOTED on the divinity of Jesus and the idea of the trinity. Before that, he was just another Jewish prophet. YHWH is just an inherited version of the Midianite god YHW, one of many tribal gods worshipped in the area where Moses supposedly ran into YHWH in the burning bush. The golden calf was the symbol of another Midianite deity, not some random idol the Israelites made for themselves.



Everything I'd been taught about the Bible - its authenticity, its inerrance, its unshakeable consistency, and that it had never changed - is just a lie that has been unthinkingly perpetuated for centuries among people who want to believe and who have been taught that it is virtuous to believe from early childhood.



As for the group I was a member of... I honestly don't remember the name of the church. It isn't important to me anymore.

Reply
 

 
# Were you referring toPinCushion 2009-03-05 14:10
the laws about slaves set out in the law of Moses, or to certain ones trying to use the bible as an excuse for stealing and enslaving people from Africa? Or did I totally miss what you meant, lol? Don't forget that the Mosaic law was abolished with the death of Jesus. It was only so strict to remind the people of their need for a savior. I suppose we go on about this all week, but its obviously pointless. I'm glad to see you have done your research. At least you educated yourself before making your decision. Good luck man.

Reply
 

 
# Just to clarify.PinCushion 2009-03-05 14:19
Were you referring to the council of nicaea? Because, by that point, in my opinion, Christianity had been so grossly perverted that it doesn't even matter what that bunch of yahoo's said. Especially about the trinity. OK, sorry, just wanted to say that. :)

Reply
 

 
# Reading ComprehensionPaladyn 2009-03-09 07:20
The Price was 100

David Paid 200



He was going above and beyond.



The translations that change it to make it match are incorrect.

Reply
 

 
# ...FreePlay 2009-03-11 10:33
"The translations that change it to make it match are incorrect."



Um, THAT'S PRECISELY WHAT I SAID.



And no, he wasn't "going above and beyond".



Reading comprehension again. 2 Samuel 3:14. He states that he fulfilled the dowry, nothing more.

Reply
 

 
# ...FreePlay 2009-03-11 10:45
"Don't forget that the Mosaic law was abolished with the death of Jesus."



I can only assume you really don't know what the Bible says, because that's a patently false statement.



Matthew 5:17-18 says:



"Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: *****I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil*****.



For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, *****one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled*****."



Jesus said quite precisely that the laws were *NOT* abolished.



And that's not even relevant. You're supposedly talking about the same god - a god that said slavery was okay. Oddly enough, the New Testament doesn't speak against slavery. In fact, it quite explicitly sanctions it: http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_bibl2.htm . Paul even tells slaves to obey their masters the same way they obey Christ in Ephesians 6:5-9.



And yes, the Bible was the primary source used for the *justification* of the enslavement of African people.





"Because, by that point, in my opinion, Christianity had been so grossly perverted that it doesn't even matter what that bunch of yahoo's said. Especially about the trinity."



The trinity WASN'T EVEN A CHRISTIAN CONCEPT *UNTIL* THEN. And it wasn't "a bunch of yahoo's", it was the LEADERS OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH. They DEFINED the Bible in its current structure, as a panicked response to someone ELSE who was already making his own version. They picked which books stayed and which went.



Read: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea



Also check out "The Lost Christianities" by Bert Ehrman. There were *older* Christian traditions that didn't survive. In fact, the Dead Sea Scrolls were hidden precisely so that they wouldn't be destroyed by the people whose doctrine won out.



Also check out the origin of your god: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ugarit#Ugaritic_religion



"While we know El to be the chief of the Canaanite pantheon, very little attention is paid to him in the cultic/mythological texts. This is rather common of Middle to Late Bronze Age mythology; the high god is drawn into the background whilst new warrior deities move to centre stage. In Ugarit and much of the Levant this is Baal, to the Shosu and the later Israelites this is Yahweh and his consort, and in Mesopotamia this is Marduk. These warrior-god mythologies show remarkable points of contact and are most likely reflections of the same arche-myth."



Essentially, worshipping the Christian deity as the only god is logically equal to worshipping Poseidon as the only god and attributing the acts of other Greek deities to him.

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword