I'm atheist.

Who ever made this needs to die right now.

nobody wants to read this crappy story book on their psp.

Now there's portable brainwashing!

I read this book once! Lemme save you a couple days of of your life... The good guy dies at the end. Or duz he??! DUHM DUHM DUUUUUUHM!

are you serious with this crap?

One day you will all know the truth, and that day is judgement day.

at this point I am not even talking about the homebrew.

I just want a logical debate about religion.

Believe what you want....I "believe" God created the world and its inhabitants could have been done through the big bang, spirit, clay etc However to think we were created a apes then evolved over time is a joke in it self. However I could be wrong (doubt that) Believing in Darwinism is being as gullible as any brain washed Christian.



It’s a belief/faith. Take it or leave it. We have nothing to loose.

Religion can't be science because science invovles the scientific method. The scientific method can't be applied to religion. Also science can't answer the question "where did we come from?" (as of now)

Stanley Lloyd Miller (born March 7, 1930) is an American chemist famous for his role in the Miller-Urey experiment he performed in 1953, while a graduate student. The famous experiment showed that organic substances (i.e. amino acids) could be produced in the primordial soup of ancient earth. Born in Oakland, California, he received a B.S. from University of California, Berkeley, where he was a student of Harold Urey. Miller received his Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1954, and is currently a chemistry professor emeritus at the University of California, San Diego.



Well if we go before that. Such as where did Earth come from? Big Bang is still a theory. I believe it is true. but it is yet to be proven. (by the way I don't believe in god.)

#46 , satanists are even more screwed up than christians lol , you need to be sent to a mental institution and take away the cannibal corpe and cradle of filth cd's away from you.



Also lol , not only a stanist but a nerd , throw me an evil mathematical equation or a world of warcraft evil chant lol!

post #48 was by me. forgot to put my name.

so where exactly is heaven located?

in HELL! hahaha , not funny.



Anyways christianity is a religion of the dumb , wasn't heaven supposed to be in the sky? ohh yeah only the dumb romans beleived that because the smart ones already knew about the solar system. It's like the dumb people who think that Spain thought the world was flat ( I had 2 dumb history teachers who beleived that ) , for dumb people out there , the greeks had already calculated the circumference of the Earth so they knew it was round. That's a problem in todays society , so many dumb people :S

I think this is a fantastic program! Ignore all the haters! These people need Jesus in their lives! Faith is everything!

muslims dont read the bible they read the Quran, can someone make a psp Quran tool

a lot can happen in 4.6 billion years.

You short sighted f*cks that is...if you believe in the Bible or not isn't really the issue here. It's a tool that could easily be adapted for other reference aplications. Crap like this makes me ashamed sometimes to be a gamer.

@ 35 "

On one side of the spectrum you have the belief that some invisible father figure with origins shrouded in mystery created the universe in a matter of days using magic.



then you have the more objective opinion which includes the principles of biology, evolution, physics, chemistry, astronomy and a slew of other sciences as a base of knowlege that supports a variety of theories. NONE of which mention magic of invisible men who send immortal children to earth claiming to be daddy, sonny, and some holy ghost.



We wont even get into the men who deify themselves in order to gain power, and assert dominion over others. scientist or otherwise."



The big bang theory and Evolution theory are severely flawed in 16 major points.



1.Something from nothing?

The "Big Bang", the most widely accepted theory of the beginning of the universe, states that everything developed from a small dense cloud of subatomic particles and radiation which exploded, forming hydrogen (and some helium) gas. Where did this energy/matter come from? How reasonable is it to assume it came into being from nothing? And even if it did come into being, what would cause it to explode?

We know from common experience that explosions are destructive and lead to disorder. How reasonable is it to assume that a "big bang" explosion produced the opposite effect - increasing "information", order and the formation of useful structures, such as stars and planets, and eventually people?



2. Physical laws an accident?

We know the universe is governed by several fundamental physical laws, such as electromagnetic forces, gravity, conservation of mass and energy, etc. The activities of our universe depend upon these principles like a computer program depends upon the existence of computer hardware with an instruction set. How reasonable is it to say that these great controlling principles developed by accident?

3.Order from disorder?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics may be the most verified law of science. It states that systems become more disordered over time, unless energy is supplied and directed to create order. Evolutionists says that the opposite has taken place - that order increased over time, without any directed energy. How can this be?

ASIDE: Evolutionists commonly object that the Second Law applies to closed, or isolated systems, and that the Earth is certainly not a closed system (it gets lots of raw energy from the Sun, for example). However, all systems, whether open or closed, tend to deteriorate. For example, living organisms are open systems but they all decay and die. Also, the universe in total is a closed system. To say that the chaos of the big bang has transformed itself into the human brain with its 120 trillion connections is a clear violation of the Second Law.



We should also point out that the availability of raw energy to a system is a necessary but far from sufficient condition for a local decrease in entropy to occur. Certainly the application of a blow torch to bicycle parts will not result in a bicycle being assembled - only the careful application of directed energy will, such as from the hands of a person following a plan. The presence of energy from the Sun does NOT solve the evolutionist's problem of how increasing order could occur on the Earth, contrary to the Second Law.



4. Information from Randomness?

Information theory states that "information" never arises out of randomness or chance events. Our human experience verifies this every day. How can the origin of the tremendous increase in information from simple organisms up to man be accounted for? Information is always introduced from the outside. It is impossible for natural processes to produce their own actual information, or meaning, which is what evolutionists claim has happened. Random typing might produce the string "dog", but it only means something to an intelligent observer who has applied a definition to this sequence of letters. The generation of information always requires intelligence, yet evolution claims that no intelligen

Im not gonna get too deep into this one, but i wanted to say ONE thing. top all you people who "base there beliefes on REALITY"



Thats the damn point of GOD you retards. to bleieve in him without know for a fact if hes there. cuzz if you KNEW, then there would be no purpse for faith. and it would be a false love that YOU would have for god. instead of whoopin your childs ass and MAKING him love you, would you want him to love you on his own?



The same thing applys in the fact that alot of people HATE the police, yet when they are in trouble, they call 911. give me a break.

IF there is a god, its a fact that all of you non believers will mourn and beg for him to forgive you.



And to all you people saying this is useless hombebrew....wtf? to me, 90% of homebrew out is useless, you dont see me making posts about the *****.

The more you bash and offer your flawed point of views on this subject, the more you proove the bible to becorrect. (even says that FOLLOWS will be bashed and picked on, insulted etc.) it also says that alot of people will base there beleifes off of PRIDE (i dont need god, i got me) and "What there eyes can or cannot see"



You cant see air, but you breath the ***** dont you? hahaha

Fun fact; as education increases, religion decreases. Deal with it bible-thumping-smacktards.

Your app is nicely made.



Now, with this religion "debate": It is possible for a god to have made this earth in 6 days; Now, god (and that's god not God), must've been working faster or at the same pace as the speed of light. Have any of you heard of the Twin Clock Paradox? Basically take two twins (or two clocks) leave one on earth and put another one on a spaceship that has the velocity of the speed of light. The brother in the spaceship returns in 50 years; the one on earth has aged by 50 years but the one in the spaceship has aged very little. Anyway, god is working at light speed and since time nearly stops at light speed then it is plausible for the amount of work and time that it took to create earth could've been stretched to 6 of our days (144 hours; 8640 minutes; 518400 seconds; keep in mind that our sense of time is synthetic, meaning that we had conceived it and our time is not universal).



On the other spectrum god is as feasible as Bird Man. Look back throughout time and notice that almost every single means of manipulation and enslavement have been religiously backed. Religion answers many more questions than science does simply because science is careful religion can make any claim and all it asks is to have faith.



Now, onto evolution. So you say that it is a silly notion to think that we evolved from apes? Well can you not apply that same logic to creationism? Would it not be a silly notion to think that the first male came from nothing and was fully capable and that the first female came from that of the males rib (of course, I am looking at the Christian side of things)? You must think of these things. How believable is the story of creation as oppose to evolution? At least the latter has more evidence behind it then the former (the evidence of the former is a collection of books written by humans, which are prone to error and lying).



Any counter-points or rebuttals?

ELIVS DIDNT TAKE ANY DRUGS!

I notice alot of people here who are arguing for the bible or God are saying things like " if you dont believe goto hell" , or " wait until you die" , I would just like to say that not all christians are like that and I feel mis-represented. I believe we can Logically and reasonably know that God exists , one of the greatest intellectual minds C.S Lewis wrote a fantastic book called Mere Christianity which is by far the best logical evidence to the existence of God I've seen. When it comes down to it Christians believe that God created them for a specific purpose and because we have sinned that brings apart from God. In order to restore the connection between God and Man , God sent his son Jesus to redeem mankind. Some may say well thats what you believe it works for you or that right and wrong are in the person's eyes or nothing can be known outside the scientific method that can be proven or quantified or tested with the 5 senses. It's funny because we have think called the law of human nature which gives us predefined values of right and wrong such as nazi's are bad, kindness and love are virtues, murdering babies is wrong , if that is true then how can we say right and wrong is dependant on the person? for if we steal that said persons stereo they would be complaining that we did something wrong because they know in themselves a law of morality. As for scientific testing we can not prove that to be true , numbers , words, senses , feelings we cannot prove any of these things. To go on a 10minute argument about scientific method is useless because really its a 10minute philosophical speech about science because we cannot test and scientifically prove our own words or laws of anything. We cannot prove what truth is or laws of mathematics. Anyway I believe that our God is a God of love , some say well if thats truth where does pain and suffering come from? it comes from ourselves because we persisently disobey the law of morality within us and do what is wrong instead of right.

Mass can't move at the speed of light. Only light can move that fast.



Therefore, nothing can be made at the speed of light.

*looks at my toes* I have five toes on each side... I can move my big toe and pinky toe.. but I can't individually move my toes between them... :(

I can't move them all that much, so why do I even have them :(

*looks on the internet* Why are people born deformed.. Why?



Anyway, setting aside the bashings on here.. this is good for christians who want to have an electronic version of the bible. I'm not christian myself, but I think this is a nice start towards other texts, applications, and whatnots to be worked on in the future.

@83



I wish more comments were like yours , it sickens me to see bashing of developers unless its something radical like a PS2 emulator running 100% effieciently. I wonder if christians would be bashing the same person if he released the origin of species by Darwin? I know I wouldn't.

1: not exactly an explosion, an implosion, like when a star or any other planet is made when none living chemicals combine, iron nitrogren, oxygen, etc. the universe is still growing, it hasn't stop yet.

2.a combination of any chemical creates something new, meaning any open and/or close system has the ability to create, the idea of birth would not exist, we die in our mother whom

4. does it take intellegence for two none intellegent elements to combine

5.many elements on this planet are also in space, nitrogen and many other combinations created amino acids, therefore protiens, the bases of all cell live

6.DNA and RNA is created from the residuse of the amino acid combinations which form protiens

RNA came first later DNA from virues affecting those cells

the concept of evolution bases

7. your going into the idea of neurology, so far the mind has actually evolved not to long ago. funny how a few 10 years olds and younger are in college/university



most others have virus/bacterial interfernece, a cataliyst for develpment, not all virues/bacteria are malignan

11. how does a omnivore develop its own energy procese?

13. depending on the enviroment, lizards are/became cold blooded cause of hot tempuratures, much like the differences between white man and black man, skeleton structures to survive such enviroments.

14. crom cell to other cell stuctures, much like a baby being born, every cell goes through different stages, harmones are the cause

16.wow, engineers can create a human being?, no we only need a man and a woman for that. idealy in this example you've created a work of a living thing working on a non-living object that has no combination resemblance to any ideal living combination, combining two metals give you a basic metal combination, combining a metal and a non-metal give a different resault.

17.scientist have made organs and have also the ablity to produce a human being without the use of a women



the quetions not how the earth was made, but how the universe was made?, where did our basic elements come from?, time whats time?



the most we know is more a physical aspect on a scientific/logical basis, two or more elements combining create something new, there is no need for intellgent basis for that understand, the only intellgence we need is to know where those elements came from. nothing cannot create something



genesis was writtten by Moses, he wrote the first five books, God told him that.

But a book on the history to worshiping a dead guy crazy people came up with is not worth 46MB

is there a quran version on this? please make one i will be very much appreciated



thanks in advance :)

You god people need to stop thinking your better than everyone else. You have absolutely no evidence backing a god, and yet you tell the scientific community that you won't believe them unless they prove it. They have waaaay more evidence than you do.





Moses, ah Moses. He was just walkin around in the desert, probably half dead. It is a desert! I don't think its probable to believe the words that came out of his mouth about the ten commandments. He was just crazy with exhaustion, people!



I was raised as a catholic, and I never bought into any of this crazy bulls**t. With all those rules they set up, its impossible for anyone to get into heaven, if it existed.



The world now is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AY worse than it was when Jesus was around, so why wouldn't God help us now?



And for all you evolution bashers, archaeologists just discovered a colony of bones of 3-ft tall humanoids that lived around 1600 BC. How do you explain that?

nocomment

atheist don't believe in dieties.

satan would be considered a diety.

Buluen's 16 points don't prove that evolution doesn't exist.



And we're still waiting for evidence for the existence of a almighty "god".

We just report this stuff. If someone wanted to make a PSP Kama Sutra, then we'd probably cover that too.



We might have to convince people not to crucify us for promoting something that forces you to let go of your PSP and try a new activity. Still, it's homebrew, it's free, and each person who works on a homebrew deserves respect, if only because SOMEONE out there will find a use for their homebrew, even if it doesn't happen to be you.



Now... can someone make a Flying Spaghetti Monster Bible homebrew?

illegal machine, go suck my balls and burn in hell you stupid *****.

why is everyone arguing? It's not a big deal. Just a new homebrew (or flash,whatever I'm a noob anyway). People can have there own intrests stop trying to insult them because of it. But then again you'll just insult me because I said this.

@89

I noticed you skipped #3 which is the second strongest evidence against evolution next to the law of human nature and morality.



# Order from disorder?

The Second Law of Thermodynamics may be the most verified law of science. It states that systems become more disordered over time, unless energy is supplied and directed to create order. Evolutionists says that the opposite has taken place - that order increased over time, without any directed energy. How can this be?



ASIDE: Evolutionists commonly object that the Second Law applies to closed, or isolated systems, and that the Earth is certainly not a closed system (it gets lots of raw energy from the Sun, for example). However, all systems, whether open or closed, tend to deteriorate. For example, living organisms are open systems but they all decay and die. Also, the universe in total is a closed system. To say that the chaos of the big bang has transformed itself into the human brain with its 120 trillion connections is a clear violation of the Second Law.



We should also point out that the availability of raw energy to a system is a necessary but far from sufficient condition for a local decrease in entropy to occur. Certainly the application of a blow torch to bicycle parts will not result in a bicycle being assembled - only the careful application of directed energy will, such as from the hands of a person following a plan. The presence of energy from the Sun does NOT solve the evolutionist's problem of how increasing order could occur on the Earth, contrary to the Second Law.

you guys are all goin to hell....

Intelligent design theory is based on a bunch of "arguments" saying that the evolution theory has "flaws". This seems enough to them for proving that Earth and living beings were intelligently designed by some superior will.



1. Scientists obviously don't pretend they know everything. Instead of a "flaw", this is a strength, and knowing that, they keep on making newer discoveries everyday.



2. Arguing about the "flaws" of a theory doesn't make any other theory more valuable. You have to provide evidence that your theory is the good one, not only criticize other theories.



3. Explaining that a superior will has created life, the universe and everything (©) is a way of giving up any self criticism, any ability for personal points of view. You submit your own thinking capability to some imaginary (because unproven) deity, spirit or whatever.



4. I don't believe in heaven, hell, life after death, and such religious concepts. Religious thinking is a heritage of the past, which used to be necessary when man begun to become conscious of himself and of his surrounding comrades. It developed man's abstraction ability, ability for art, and such human mental activity. Now it's time for a new step forward, we don't need religion anymore.

it says content can not be displayed do you have any advice?

wow thats a great hombrew and to shall all you sinners go !

"Intelligent design theory is based on a bunch of 'arguments' saying that the evolution theory has 'flaws'. This seems enough to them for proving that Earth and living beings were intelligently designed by some superior will"



The way you word this, you make it sound like evoloution came first. Well, buddy, you have to do some reasearch. Evoloution was created so people wont have to believe in a god and can do whatever they want without feeling responsible for their actions. You can argue here all you want, but I Guarantee

that you wont discourage any Christians away from their faith.



Take the Yucca Moth as an example (http://waynesword.palomar.edu/ww0902a.htm) It cant survive for a week with out its yucca plant aiding it. How could they evolve for millions of years and still be in this special realationship to where they REQUIRE eachother to live. I dont remember anything about things evolving together at the same pace, with eachother.



God is our only hope in this world. Peace out

this$h!t sucks

my english is very bad but this homebrew its a *****



you understand?



note:this mesge is for the creator of the pspbible tool

this wins the award for the # most usless app

I was waiting for this to happen... any possibility of a portuguese one?