Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

Close Up Shot Of The PSP Camera - UPDATED

Posted Jun 28, 2006 at 3:13AM EST by QJ Staff

Listed in: Accessories Tags: Photoshop, PS2, psp accessories, PSP Camera, psp gift ideas, Sony
Ó


PSP Camera



UPDATE 1: Having analysed the image in Photoshop since reading the comments below, I still think the inscription reads 1.3MP. As far as pricing goes, my statements on the $50 price point were merely conjecture (as should be apparent in the article). We'll be contacting Sony for clarification on both issues shortly. Thanks for being vigilant guys!


I've also since been informed by people in the know that a 1.3MP camera could in fact be capable of simple facial recognition.


The PSP camera is one elusive little gal, she's often hidden in shadows and known to move so fast it's almost impossible to get a clear shot of her, but we've managed to track one down. As you can see from the inscription on the device it's likely it'll be a 1.3 mega pixel camera, and it's pretty teeny too. The camera resolution suggests that you won't be taking snapshots and printing them out at huge sizes for friends and family, but it should work well enough with the PSP's relatively low screen resolution. Now that we've actually got a good look at the device we've got to wonder just what sort of gameplay functionality, if any the device will have. Unlike the PS2 Eye Toy we won't be able to move about in front of this camera, and since our fingers will be busy pushing buttons that leaves only our faces, and it's unlikely that a 1.3 mega pixel camera has the sensitivity to pick up subtle facial expressions. Whether or not this confines the camera to video conferencing and multimedia applications is anyones guess, as is the price on this baby, but it's unlikely to cost more than $50, especially when you consider the Eye Toy + 1 game bundle costs about that much.

So what do you guys think, will gamers snap it up, or leave this peripheral in the dust?

Via IT Media



This story sucks? This story rocks!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (0) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# ...mbslrm 2006-06-28 04:12
Amazing....

Reply
 

 
# Multimedia PotentialGuest 2006-06-28 04:14
I agree that it may not have much to offer as far as gameplay input. However, the ability to take Web-friendly photos and short video clips makes it a nifty item. Especially if it is capable of videoconferenci ng. Sadly, most of this functionality is going to require a newer firmware, so my 1.5 and I will patiently wait for a motivated homebrew coder who wants to port Skype to the PSP!

Reply
 

 
# smallGuest 2006-06-28 04:17
very small and nice. though i dont think i want one.

Reply
 

 
# DIYGuest 2006-06-28 04:18
Just wait a couple of weeks and there will be someone who made a DIY webcam, its doesnt seem that hard to me?

Reply
 

 
# One word.Guest 2006-06-28 04:19
Pointless.

Reply
 

 
# ewww?Guest 2006-06-28 04:20
1.3 mega pixel

helllll no

Reply
 

 
# what?Guest 2006-06-28 04:26
1.3 megapixles..... thats *****e! my phone has a better camera than that - who is going to bother paying for somthinng that most mobile phones have built into them for free? sony mess up once again ho hum

Reply
 

 
# Cheap...Guest 2006-06-28 04:27
Looks cheap to me. Silver paint on plastic? If I get it, it'll be only for the motion JPEG video conferencing.

Reply
 

 
# listen sony u *****sGuest 2006-06-28 04:33
The PSP hackers owned you understood?? you can put those sorry excuses for us to upgrade to 3.0 or whatever ***** version u make in your ASS! you messed with the PSP users too much, thought you control everything - but in reality you don't control *****. Sony you lost, no matter how many things u patch, or how many people you hire - you will NEVER WIN, so just stop it already because you only bring losses to yourself.

Reply
 

 
# *****.Guest 2006-06-28 04:36
Why pay for this when my sexy W810i has a 2.0 megapixel camera built in? I just dont understand the logic of Sony sometimes.....stupid nubs.

Reply
 

 
# step forward....Guest 2006-06-28 04:40
Its a step forward........ Soon after, Logitech (and people like that) will relese something much better!

Reply
 

 
# crapGuest 2006-06-28 04:40
this camera is crap 1.3 mega pixel same as cell phones, theres cameras that cost about the same as this that have much higher mega pixel. sony should at least make this 3.0 mega pixel because you cant see crap with 1.3 meag pixels.

Reply
 

 
# lmao at u noobsGuest 2006-06-28 04:44
it says its likely as in this is speculation what the resolution is...noone can say ***** till its released so why dont u lot shut up and wait

Reply
 

 
# More features requireGuest 2006-06-28 04:49
will this be able to do video call or something like that

Reply
 

 
# That thing suckGuest 2006-06-28 05:00
Why would I get that when my Korean imported cell phone have 10 megaxiels resolution.

Reply
 

 
# I dig itGuest 2006-06-28 05:02
And will be getting one :->

Reply
 

 
# no need for a video cameraGuest 2006-06-28 05:02
I don't care about video conferencing...unless that one company does hook us up with psp phone..that might be cool.



But anyway, Im way more interested in what they can do with games. I'm kind of confounded as to how the psp will use this in games. The original eyetoy was pretty cool with games. And it seems like they could do all sorts of things in the next gen if sony would put a few more resources into it. But I don't get what you can do if it's all about facial expression and probably swaying your neck around. They didn't really offer up much in their interview with ign. There was that one pic of the girl using her head to help bridge the way for some lemmings, but that's not too exciting.

Reply
 

 
# looky hereGuest 2006-06-28 05:03
how can you say 1.3 mp is bad most fone people advertise "1.3 MP!" and are hyped when japanese fones already have 8-9 MP. In america 1.3 is big in ever where else around the world with third gen technology its crap but i think we're all frum america

Reply
 

 
# Oh boyGuest 2006-06-28 05:04
My god. I don't think they will "improve" it with more pixels. Shown is shown is thrown (on the market).

I'm really disappointed this time. I thought I could get a real multimedia device. Now this is a piece of sh*t.

1.3 MP that is really low. Even for the "low" resulution of the PSP screen. If it's really that bad I won't buy it.

Reply
 

 
# looky hereGuest 2006-06-28 05:05
how can you say 1.3 mp is bad most fone people advertise "1.3 MP!" and are hyped when japanese fones already have 8-9 MP. In america 1.3 is big in ever where else around the world with third gen technology its crap but i think we're all frum america

Reply
 

 
# want a cookie?Guest 2006-06-28 05:07
wow. your electronic leash that big brother has provided to u to keep track of you at all times has a better camera built-in with a higher mega-pixel count...AND it was imported from korea...big *****in' deal. u feel special? congratulations numbnuts.

Reply
 

 
# to #13Guest 2006-06-28 05:07
why you laughing at the so called noob when your actually a noob. this camera is the prtotype of the real camera thats going to come out later this year, you know what it say on the camera it says 1.3 mega pixel so why would sony change it to a higher mega pixel when there trying to make a 1.3 mega pixel camera.

Reply
 

 
# 1.3MP isn't that horrible, guysVipre77 2006-06-28 05:10
1280x1024 resolution is what 1.3MP translates to. Strictly looking at the resolution, that's good enough for a desktop wallpaper on most people's computer screens. The quality of that 1280x1024 image is another story altogether. What do you expect for $50? You're not going to be a professional photographer with such a piece of equipment. And, no, there is no phone on the market in the US that beats that kind of resolution for $50. It's only $50 because you have to sign a minimum one year phone plan unless you're on a pay-as-you-go plan, but then you don't get the big discount on the phone. Either way, you're paying a lot more for that phone than $50. Cell phone companies often lose money on the phone itself and make it up in airtime, accessory, and other add-on sales. It works just like the video game console biz.

Reply
 

 
# i think it's coolJx1 2006-06-28 05:12
nice addition, mostly for small video feeds and clips to store, but not for photography.

I'm not all that dissapointed with this, not sure why everybody starts hating on sony for stuff like this. Look for the uses before criticizing.



j-

Reply
 

 
# .FLai 2006-06-28 05:15
gamers will snap it up if it doesn't need a firmware upgrade

Reply
 

 
# ookmylastresort77 2006-06-28 05:18
im gonna wait and see if there are any third party cameras developed

Reply
 

 
# What?Guest 2006-06-28 05:19
1.3 MP good? Hell I had a 1.3 MP Cam in a Siemens Phone. That was sh'tty. I mean really sh'tty. I don't think it makes great pictures to use as wallpapers. Btw you would have to resize them (zoom in means a loss of quality) because I don't think they make this cam a 16:9 cam. That would be really ridiculous.

I got a Sony K750i it has a 2.0 MP cam with auto-focus. This is acceptable quality for a cell phone. But hey, the PSP is 20 times bigger with much more possibilities and a better chipset. So 3-5 MP shouldn't really be the problem.



Just think about how many people would buy a PSP to have a digital camera AND a gaming-device. So what the hell do those people at Sony think they do? They lose a giant market. No new PSP customers because of this.

Reply
 

 
# CoolGuest 2006-06-28 05:20
That looks nice,but i have a Benq 8.2 megapixel,bough t it for just 95$

Reply
 

 
# I thougth it was already being used for gamesTheProfessor 2006-06-28 05:22
I saw an IGN article a while back where they play with some demos with the psp eyetoy at E3. They thought it wasn't very sensitive but later claimed it was because of the low right at E3.



This will definitely be used for gaming. I wouldn't be surprise if it also came bundled with a mini game compilation.

Reply
 

 
# u got 2 be kidding me.Guest 2006-06-28 05:28
this is the gayest thing sony did i mean come on.that camera 1.3 is the suckeist thing in the world. sony lost the battle to nintendo and should just give up soooooooooo

up yours sony!!!!!!

lets leave this peripheral in the dust.

Reply
 

 
# GB..... remember that????Guest 2006-06-28 05:29
Nintendo did it already,they had the Gameboy Camara long time ago.... maybe it wasnt a 1.3 megapixel Camara,but they had the idea.... that shows you how behind Sony is when it comes to stuff like this.

I think if they could do video email or chat...it may be a good idea....but I cant see anygames with the small PSp Eyetoy..... IMO

Reply
 

 
# here's the articleTheProfessor 2006-06-28 05:31
http://uk.psp.ign.com/articles/707/707756p1.html

Reply
 

 
# luis, is not about who is firstTheProfessor 2006-06-28 05:45
Is about when the technology is ready. Think online gaming. When the dreamcast and the PS2 tried it, it just wasn't time for it. Console gamers weren't connected and lag was terrible with 56k connections.



Live came in at the right time. The tech was ready just like the tech for motion sensing is now ready for mainstream. Remember is usually not the invertors or first comers that profit, it's the ones with the right product at the right time (IPOD, Playstation, Google, XBL, Windows).

Reply
 

 
# sorry to tell you thisGuest 2006-06-28 05:50
QJ messed up i just made a super high resolution image of the front cover and red eyed it and you can see that the bottom right of the camera says 3 MEGA PIXELS engraved into it

not 1.3

Reply
 

 
# Eh.nevercominghome 2006-06-28 05:57
I'd get it if it was around $30.

Which I KNOW it won't be, and

I refuse to spend more then $30

on a 1.3 MP Camera. No matter

what features it has. My $15

webcam has 3.0 MP's.



C'mon Sony.

Reply
 

 
# camera - google talkGuest 2006-06-28 05:58
dood seriously skype and video google talk would be nice.

we only need skype to prank call for the rest of the year for free.

Reply
 

 
# to number 10PHae 2006-06-28 06:01
How dare you call sony nubs,really what the ***** is a nub.Are you calling them some sort of crappy anlouge stick.Sony are the people who made our precious psp cameras.

Reply
 

 
# RubbishGuest 2006-06-28 06:04
Thats rubbish my phone has a better camera then that and it was free on contract.

Reply
 

 
# ...plastik 2006-06-28 06:06
Most phones have a better camera. This is truly pathetic

Reply
 

 
# think about thisGuest 2006-06-28 06:08
if sony released this and it does well release a more expensive model with more mp which even featured a 3g sim/usim card slot for video calls and when you think of mem stick could be a 2/4gb digital video camera with games and maybe even portable video editing then that would be sweet cause cheapos who dont want added features could get this and others could get the advance model

Reply
 

 
# 1.3 MP No thanksGuest 2006-06-28 06:12
1.3 MP, this is way behind in technology and big too. They better come up with some good games or software for this to compensate for it.

Reply
 

 
# holy ***** its 3MPGuest 2006-06-28 06:12
well ill be damned 34 is right, it is a 3 megapixel. Plain as day in all its pixelated glory when you zoom in in ms picture and fax veiwer. 50 bucks wouldnt be bad for it then, itd save me some hassel of finding a way to cary both my 3mp camera and psp around

Reply
 

 
# AwfulGuest 2006-06-28 06:13
The article is riddled with misinformation and grammatical errors: I've seen highschoolers with better english skills.



And just to let you know, the Eyetoy with the PS2 game Kinetic is available for 29.99 at BestBuy. You might also note that the hardware is completely different though. The material and manufacturing cost couldn't possibly be the same, while the the demand of the product would definitely affect the cost as well. Stick to facts instead of speculation next time.

Reply
 

 
# it better be cheap.....overflow.tiff 2006-06-28 06:14
because this is not much of a peripheral thanks to my thoughts on eyetoy.

i'd not buy PSP EyeToy unless it came with a demo disc with demo games on it like ps2 eyetoy, and it needs more use, not just gaming.



QJ.net already said something about a usbcam.prx in the 2.7 Firmware. cuz did we forget about:

http://pspupdates.qj.net/Sony-hiding-a-few-things-with-the-2-7-firmware-/pg/49/aid/30347

Reply
 

 
# Sweet!Guest 2006-06-28 06:20
Thats a sweet peice of hardware! 1.3 pixels tho?..C'mon now. Well whatever i'd get it anyway. I hope later they come out with better(3.0 pixels) cams.

Reply
 

 
# GB Camera....Guest 2006-06-28 06:29
I hope Sony includes an extra roll of thermal tape with their add-on B&W printer :P Oh the fun to be had...JOY

Reply
 

 
# 3.0 MPNerd 2006-06-28 06:46
i've zoomed in too..and i do believe it could actully say 3MP. when i first saw the pic i thought the '1' did like a bit small compared to the 3..its just crazy how there appears to be a '1' and a '.' what are the odds? lol

Reply
 

 
# GB camera...please..Guest 2006-06-28 06:50
I'd like to inform the ninty fans that the GB camera was a static camera that was never really used with gaming as much as a program built into it to manipulate pictures. Sony's eye toy on the other hand has been used for gaming since day one on the ps2 and will continue to be used for gaming on psp and ps3. I hate to break it to you but Eye Toy is hardly stolen like people choose to believe Sony relies on.

Reply
 

 
# uselessGuest 2006-06-28 06:50
If 1.3mp is the real resolution, that's crap. You can buy a complete 2.0mp camera for that much. I can't even think of a use for this camera that's, well.... useful. When's something useful coming out like the GPS or the PS1 emulator? They might require f.w. 3.0, but at least there may be some reason to "upgrade."

Reply
 

 
# to everyone elseGuest 2006-06-28 06:56
The eye toy is a gaming peripheral first and foremost. It's been that way on the ps2 for years now, and it'll be that way on the psp. The point is not to have a cool digital video camera, it's to use it with games. That's the focus of the technology. Sure sony could have made a full on video camera for the psp, but they wanted a camera with the fuctionality of the eye toy that's affordable enough to package with games.

Reply
 

 
# 1.3MP =/funetik 2006-06-28 06:56
I could draw a more detailed picture with a felt tip pen held between my ass cheeks.

Reply
 

 
# slickGuest 2006-06-28 06:58
that rest really well with the psp's design....really really well.



Now all we need is a close up of the GPS dongle...

Reply
 

 
# how big is 1.3 mp?Guest 2006-06-28 07:09
nocomment

Reply
 

 
# cooGuest 2006-06-28 07:17
1.3 mp that is crap. im stil going to be getting one though. lets just hope sony improve the resolution of this little gem

Reply
 

 
# ok okGuest 2006-06-28 07:18
with a change of monitors, upping the contrast on the monitor and brightness, i see now the tiny grey slivers representing the 1 and the . thats barely there, you would think that the refraction of light would hit them the same as the rest, also whats with the 5 at the end? im hoping thats just an s.... so to comment, if this is undoctored then i think that 1.3 is a lil bit of a rip for 50, 3mp sounds reasonable at the least

Reply
 

 
# 3 MEGA PIXELS!!!Guest 2006-06-28 07:20
i zoomed in too and it is it says A3 MegaPixel. but its weird to have the letter A beside 3 with no space.

Reply
 

 
# hmmmmm.Guest 2006-06-28 07:25
i wonder if you will be able to take actual photos and videos with this. if you can i would most definetly buy them . and the best thing is is tha ti wont have to update my 1.5 since by the time it comes otu i will have 2.71 via devhook :-D

Reply
 

 
# haha IDIOTS!!!Shatterdome 2006-06-28 07:35
Once again you idiots don't understand specs, just like the TFLOPS....geez



1.3 megapixels will take pictures at a resolution of 1280X960, guess what, that's a higher resolution than the HD that everyone goes on about(720p, 1080i/p is 1920x1080) ....that's also prolly a higher res then your monitor is set at right now....



This is more then enough for a portable device and will take pictures just fine, you only need super high megapixels for printing out posters n sh*t, f*cking idiot noob consumers....you guys get hung up on flashy terms so easly, but never truly understand what it's used for....

Reply
 

 
# althoughemmortal 2006-06-28 07:45
he said it very flamingly lol, shatterdome is right, besides most cellphones do not have a better camera than this, my brother has one of the few expensive phones on the market the T-Mobile mda and it has the same thing (korean phones and other places that's a different story). However lets be honest if this came out at 5 megapixels and therefore costed $200 as anything that is 5 megapixels and portable (especially as small as it needs to be, becuase its only an attachment) does, no1 would have purchades it, thats why SONY did that.

Reply
 

 
# Yay for 58Guest 2006-06-28 07:48
of course they could make a better cam. but you must think of processing power available, as it affects the speed of operation. But I do hope that at least it has a decent quality lens and CCD. (Yay I past my driving test)

Reply
 

 
# YeahGuest 2006-06-28 07:51
And 59

Reply
 

 
# needs version 2.70 or higher...until hackedGuest 2006-06-28 07:54
I know this because the .prx files for 2.70 include ones for the gps and digital camera. And it is a nice addition. A firmware upgrade would be bad, but honestly, by then we will have full access to other firmwares most likely.



I agree with shatterdome, you people need to pay attention to what you will actually use it for. Yes, it is not the very best in the world but why the hell would you need that, or even expect to get that for 50-100$????



I love the idea of the camera, i like how small it is, looks durable, but I may wait for a second one to be made like it. Video would be nice i suppose.



can't wait to try it some day



DarkPacMan77

Reply
 

 
# FilmingGuest 2006-06-28 07:56
Can you film with this camera too?

Reply
 

 
# MicroMachines.v4.EUR.PSP-4FuNGuest 2006-06-28 08:00
MicroMachines.v4.EUR.PSP-4FuN

Reply
 

 
# hmm....Guest 2006-06-28 08:23
if i was to guess, i would say sony has already made a 8 megapixel camera for the psp. they will get every1 hyped up about the 1.3, then a few months later release 2, then a few months later, 3, ect. they would make more money doing that. people would end up with 8 cameras for the psp, as they get better and better, the people need to upgrade their psp cameras cuz you cant be seen around with one of those old peices of garbage. i think gps would be ALOT more useful then a camera though. the only thing is, with a psp gps, wouldnt you feel a bit violated? people can track you. a gps satalite is a computer and can be hacked.....

--jchaike

Reply
 

 
# Once again in case anyone hasn't zoomed in it's a 3 MP cameraTheProfessor 2006-06-28 08:33
Save the picture and zoom it. That line that looks like a 1 is actually from a square next to the three from what I can see. Thanks for the people who pointed it out first.



Hey Chris I think it's your responsibility to clarify this.

Reply
 

 
# Ok now I think this is fake.CarXCrashXHearts 2006-06-28 08:44
I surely think this is fake now. First of all, the letters on it. Zoom into them, and they look like they were scratched into the paint. Horribly as well. Second, What the Hell is that big, white plate under it??? Third, look near the eye of the camera, to the right, the paint looks crumbled up a little bit and is falling off. It's either this thing is fake, or Sony's making the worst piece of ***** camera ever.



By the way, it's 1.3 Megapixels. To the people who think it's 3, you're wrong, because even when you zoom into it, you can still see "1.3." Also, you may believe the 1 and the period aren't supposed to be there, but as I said, I think these numbers and letters are all scratched in there. I mean, just look at them when you zoom into them.



I don't even hope this is real. I surely hope that this is fake and that Sony is actually making something better. This camera is horrible.

Reply
 

 
# Concerning resolution and price.Chris C 2006-06-28 08:48
I've updated the article with my thoughts on the matter, as stated above, we'll be contacting Sony for clarification on the matter.

Reply
 

 
# Well..Monoloco 2006-06-28 09:05
1.3 isn't great outside of the PSP, but you've got to remember the PSP is a 0.13-megapixel device...so at the very least the pictures would look pretty much as superb as they possible could on the PSP's screen...now on the computer would be another story but still, I wouldn't dismiss this as a complete waste.

Reply
 

 
# Eye toy is about half the resolutionChris C 2006-06-28 09:10
The Ps2 Eye Toy operates at about half the resolution of this baby, so that should put things in perspective.

Reply
 

 
# not sureGuest 2006-06-28 09:14
if it was real, wouldn't it be silver gray? like the psp's silver rim and all psp accessoires? like talkman mic, remote control, etc....



would also not need the paper beneath it if he could photoshop his 3d image 9or whatever) onto the edited talkman photo...

Reply
 

 
# not about pixels...Guest 2006-06-28 09:19
can't you all see this is not about pixels, but about seeing peoples faces when you frag them with maybe SOCOM 2 or other new games online, great!!

Reply
 

 
# rqtqettwetGuest 2006-06-28 09:35
agree #72

Reply
 

 
# PRX files from socom..Guest 2006-06-28 09:36
So is there a way to take the prx files from socom and incorporate them into their own homebrew program for 1.5 psp's using devhook of course.. and create a voice-chat program..?

Reply
 

 
# HUHH !!!!??Guest 2006-06-28 09:39
hold on ive zoomed in too And i saw 1.3 wich kinda suck i wont get it if its 1.3...i say lets wait and see the only point of arguing about this is if the sony ppl go on Qj.net to read the comments of psp owner so they could get an idea but as bold as they are i dont think they do...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAA HAAHAHAHHA!!!!

Reply
 

 
# new pic!!!Guest 2006-06-28 09:47
look at these new pic here



http://www.joystiq.com/2006/05/12/e3-psp-camera/

Reply
 

 
# questionGuest 2006-06-28 09:52
do u think we can take pics of ourselves and upload it 2 our cpu's?

Reply
 

 
# you idiots! it's 13 megapixels! LOL JKGuest 2006-06-28 09:56
nocomment

Reply
 

 
# ...soopergooman 2006-06-28 10:07
BOO HOO to all you who think 1.3 megapixels isn't enuff. WWhat were you expecting 8? hell no. The human eye only see's at 5 mgapix's or so, so quit ur complaining. Also, if you remember the 2.71 update, well the cam support is in that apparently(go digging for it) so, me well, I will definitely buy this add-on, and for those of you who think that they'll nbever upgrade to 3.0 or wattteva the hell the update will be, I think that you will eventually when you see all the cool stuff you can use ur psp with the ps3.



I think I will try to hack together my mini cam to werk with the usb of the psp. hell its got the same folder setup as the psp, and I can just drag the folder over and it shows up in the "digital camera" folder. No problems/no worries. I have 2 psp's, 1.5&2.71.....nahnah

Reply
 

 
# LOL!Guest 2006-06-28 10:13
#79: The human eye only see's at 5 mgapix's or so, so quit ur complaining.



LOL!

The human eye does not build images via pixels, so it can't be a 5MP Eye! The byonic eye maybe, but not a human eye made of tissue. That's made me giggle! ^_^



On topic, 1.3Mp for a PSP isn't bad at all. 1 thing I don't like...it's got a chrome effect...=[

Reply
 

 
# LOL!WDUK 2006-06-28 10:16
#79: The human eye only see's at 5 mgapix's or so, so quit ur complaining.



LOL!

The human eye does not build images via pixels, so it can't be a 5MP Eye! The byonic eye maybe, but not a human eye made of tissue. That's made me giggle! ^_^



On topic, 1.3Mp for a PSP isn't bad at all. 1 thing I don't like...it's got a chrome effect...=[

Reply
 

 
# only a camera not a video.Guest 2006-06-28 10:17
its only a camera,its better if its a video cam. im gonna get the sony ericsson p990i,its much better.

Reply
 

 
# KoolGuest 2006-06-28 10:18
Any idea when it'll be released?

Reply
 

 
# i think it is 3BULL3TPR00F 2006-06-28 10:24
after reading the other posts, it really does look like it says 3 MP.



if you look at the engraving, the supposed 1 is smaller than than the other letters, and is not engraved as deep as the others. It looks more like a scratch than a 1.

Reply
 

 
# damnRaiderX 2006-06-28 10:26
when i saw 3 mega pixles, i was like "YEA!" cuz thats not bad for the PSP, but I have a good camera that already takes all the pics i need, and I have a phone that has a 1.3MP camera, why would I waste my time with a PSP one?



now for those that want the PSP cam, 1.3MP isnt bad, especially if this thing turns out to be $50. 1.3MP can make out faces perfectly fine.



and its got no video, my phone can take video.



so unless there are some games that can really benefit form this camera, i wont buy it.

Reply
 

 
# 1.3mp isnt that badGuest 2006-06-28 10:30
your phone has a *****y screen with *****y graphics so the 1.3 photos and vids look really *****y. the psp has a nice screen with nice graphics and the stuff every one says about the 1.3 resolution, it should look fine. i'd spend 50 bucks on it.

Reply
 

 
# your eye sees 500 megapixelsGuest 2006-06-28 11:16
no 79 its not only 5 mega pixels its 500 google it for yourself. the camera is 3 megapixels the thing you see that looks like a one is where the 3 megapixels sign is indented zoom in for yourself

Reply
 

 
# ---Guest 2006-06-28 11:42
1.3 megapixel come on sony you can do better than that ..............

Reply
 

 
# -Guest 2006-06-28 12:02
no 87 it says 1.3 man u can see the 1"."3

Reply
 

 
# ..Guest 2006-06-28 12:11
The camera will be perfect for augmented reality games.

Reply
 

 
# RememberGuest 2006-06-28 12:17
Well guys keep in mind that this is likely a prototype..it might be better when it actually released...

Reply
 

 
# >>agrees with 91Guest 2006-06-28 12:39
Yah, could be like the PS3 was when it was first coming out. Remember how man y concept designs THAT bad boy had???...LOL...As for the popularity of it, it might make the PSP more appealing for a short while. Since it plugs into the USB slot, it might even be able to be used as webcam, who knows. If so it would have that dual purpose effect that I for one look for in all electronics. What I think, and only a thought, is if it doesn't sell well as a PSP peripheral, then it will still have that appeal as a potential web cam device(video chat, conferencing, etc.). I mean Sony's not dumb, they will always an ace up their sleeve. If it's affordable enough, then I'll probably go out and buy it. I'd have to say it will be around 30-45 US dollars.

Reply
 

 
# hey thats not true... i sawGuest 2006-06-28 13:00
wraAAAA!!!! blablabla ...blablavlabla sony blahhhhhhhblalb lablalbla.....1.3 RABLABLABLABLAB LA ..MP ..MP3? BLA!!!! blablablabl RAAAAQ bla bla 3 mp blabla blaaaaaaahh!!!!

bla bla.... okay...

Reply
 

 
# It is 1.3 Mega Pixelsraikura 2006-06-28 13:37
I found a dutch website which specifically says that its 1.3 megapixels. Check it out here: http://www.gamersnet.nl/index.php?display=newsitem&id=9243

Reply
 

 
# funny!!!Guest 2006-06-28 14:18
better look for a third party,sony needs some competition.remember that the gameboy had the camera and the printer back in the day,although the pix sucks.

Reply
 

 
# looks like P.S. to meGuest 2006-06-28 14:43
the "1" looks like the "L" from megapixel. Like the tail of the L was erased... from existence. so I think its a fake. Unless its 3mp, I'll wait.

Reply
 

 
# To soopergoomanGuest 2006-06-28 14:45
"BOO HOO to all you who think 1.3 megapixels isn't enuff. WWhat were you expecting 8?"



No, we were expecting at least 3, you can get a 3MP camera from Aiptek for 40 bucks!

Reply
 

 
# HA #51Guest 2006-06-28 14:54
LMFAO LOL!

Reply
 

 
# imagineGuest 2006-06-28 15:04
what if it was 13 mega pixels

Reply
 

 
# thats to badlansingone 2006-06-28 15:08
its to bad if its 1.3 i thought it was going to be 3.0 or even 2.5 but not 1.3. its to bad i thought it would be cool if you could take pictures and you could put them on your PC and print them and have video chat to a PS2 or PS3, but all that would suck on a 1.3. it could be a photoshop job made just to make a bunch of people angry, well can't know till sony responds (if thay do)

Reply
 

 
# 1.3 MP...very weak!Guest 2006-06-28 15:13
This has to be a fake...why would Sony, the maker of the Stylish PSP make a camera that does not even fit properly to the top? Not match the color? And take low MP photos? Sony has a cel phone that takes 3 MP for crying out loud. Sony is way better than this. I would but the camera if it had at least 3 MP, so at least you could use it as a camera?

Reply
 

 
# ññaGuest 2006-06-28 15:26
cha...

Reply
 

 
# You people Arnt patientGuest 2006-06-28 19:07
I think You guys shoulld just wait a while until it really comes Out because your crappy talk isnt going to last long. and no one gives a ***** what you think its sony "like no other"

Reply
 

 
# niceGuest 2006-06-28 19:36
looks awesome, to have a camera on psp. i wonder if it'll support video like some camera phones do? maybe not... oh well, if i didn't have a 1.5 i might consider buying it. maybe if they can find an exploit in 2.71... and then put in in devhook...

Reply
 

 
# blah...Guest 2006-06-28 21:27
i will buy this cam for my PSP just for fun. my POS webcam is even worst.



it is nice to have, and not necessary I have to buy it for my PSP. my camera phone is a 2MP camera. it is alright. i just can't wait to get a k800i from SE.

Reply
 

 
# 1.3MP is enoughchipxsd 2006-06-28 23:13
Come on, who want's to take photos with a toy like PSP? This camera will be used to have fun with, not taking profesional photos with it...



It will probably be used for video calling, online gaming (players could see each other's expressions) ... and probably for some PSP community (forums, pspmails, pspblogs ...), where you could communicate with other PSP owners around the world.



just a thought

Reply
 

 
# The beginningmikekearn 2006-06-28 23:17
What people seem to generally fail to realize is this is not guaranteed to be what Sony eventually releases in the end, nor is it likely to be your only option. Sony, despite what people may think, isn't stupid. After all, you wouldn't be here unless you are interested in the PSP in the first place, right? They have to balance the abilities of the camera with those of the PSP, and making it take pictures far better than the PSP can easily display doesn't make much sense. If you want a good camera, why would you buy an attachment like this? The have to keep costs down, power consumption down, and size down to fit in with the PSP.



Even if Sony does manage to screw up something big time, when has that ever stopped third-party companies from coming out with an equal-but-cheaper or even SUPERIOR product? Just look at some of the early batteries that came out, things like that weren't initially from Sony.



So, instead of flaming or making insults (omg sony ur gay my fone is beter), perhaps you should give suggestions on how things can be made better, or give insightful reasons (with supporting evidence) on how a company, which is asexual by nature, is gay.

Reply
 

 
# work that outGuest 2006-06-29 00:37
The text on the camera is fake, the "1" and the "." have been added!!



I am very good at identifying what is real and what is fake (my job depends on it). I can determain what is fake by close examination...therefore i believe this un-necessary "1" and "." have been added just to spice things up in the forums.



IT READS "3 MEGA PIXEL" (take my word for it)

Reply
 

 
# lmaoGuest 2006-06-29 04:39
@Yoshi.









Yeah right...

Reply
 

 
# 3.0Guest 2006-06-29 04:48
to me it looks like it says 3 mega pixels

Reply
 

 
# So what if 1.3MPGuest 2006-06-29 05:21
Does any one noticed that it looks like it can be rotated?

Does any one remember that most of American phones are usually at 1.3MP (my w810i being one of the exceptions, I LOVE IT) and people use them to take photos, also dont forget that is going to be used for gaming primary and IT IS OPTIONAL if you dont like it dont take it.

Reply
 

 
# i mean, wthGuest 2006-06-29 07:16
ok, to you ppl tryin to compare this to a camera phone's size and the MP camer to the psp size and MP camera, the psp didnt originally START with the chip set into the psp. the entire camera is set INTO that little silver thing. while with a phone, more than half the space is devoted to the camera itself, like the W810. STOP comparing this, STOP dissing sony and STOP *****ing about it. If you hate sony so much, WHY THE ***** DID YOU BUY THE PSP?!?! the camera is an OPTIONAL peripheral, so its not like you NEED to get it to play all the new games. if you dont want it, then dont even read the article. and with all you 1.5'ers out there, stop living in the past and get past the illegality of dl's ISO's to play. like hell they are just 'back-ups'. You not paying for all these games is serisouly affecting sony's income, and they will have to dig into their PS3 fund just to balence out for the psp's losses due to you assfaces out there. THAT is a major reason that the PS3 is gonna have such a high price. they lost too much with the psp, along side the PS3 itself. hell, at very least, get a second psp to play the 2.0+ games. what the ***** you guys.

Reply
 

 
# cam phoneGuest 2006-06-29 09:39
http://imageserver4.textamerica.com/user.images.x/87/IMG_337787/Big/_0918/T40409181809281.jpg



look @ the image quality of 1.3 mega pixels pretty good quality.



MYSPACE PICS W00t

Reply
 

 
# crappy cameraGuest 2006-06-29 13:19
that camera looks so crappy,i agree with #101

Reply
 

 
# Responce to #79Guest 2006-06-29 15:25
ok well, first off even if the eye isent a bionical one, "By some estimates, your eyes have an effective resolution of more than 500 megapixels." so the 5 MP's isent even close.. dont belive me? read here -> http://www.camcorderspot.com/pixels-photos-and-moore/

Reply
 

 
# ....Guest 2006-06-29 16:48
im telling you i still think its 3mp.. its the lighting that makes you think its one.. since there is an oval engraved around the area of the words.. and there is no other signs of the oval ending cept for the known 1.. which COULD perhaps be the ending on the oval..



lets not think of it as a handy way.. lets think of it as a new bling for the psp. ahahah

Reply
 

 
# CameraGuest 2006-07-03 07:54
Even though it is cheapy looking, if its kike the same price as a game £30, like how the eye toy for the psp was aroun £40 then i would probably buy it,

Reply
 

 
# listenGuest 2006-07-12 18:59
i think that it says 3 mega pixels and oh well if it is only 1.3 cuz wen it comes out ill b gettin it...and seriously i agree with 106 people arent gonna b taking professional photos with dis so go and buy 1

Reply
 

 
# koolGuest 2006-08-15 05:21
whats wrong with it its better than nothing and ill buy it to take pictures and ***** when im on vacation and videochat i mean you guys are pretty dam greedy i mean look at everything psp's can already do i just hope they come out with a damn keypad. thats what we really need from sony

Reply
 

 
# wont sellGuest 2006-08-27 12:42
Too bad for Sony, another pointless product on the market. Sigh i have 2 mpix on my phone!

Reply
 

 
# Great StuffGuest 2006-09-01 02:37
**********Does Anyone Know where you can Preorer the Camera From ?**********

Reply
 

 
# WHERE CAN I PRE ORDER THE CAMERA FROM FOR THE PSPGuest 2006-09-01 04:29
??

Reply
 

 
# i think its a 1.3Guest 2006-09-01 05:58
you can blaintly see the the dot in the middle of the two numbers.1.3 is not a bad picutre quality but you would expect better but i would get it.

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword