Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

What Do You Think: Should DLC Be Free

Posted Aug 9, 2012 at 4:30PM EST by Christopher Groux

Listed in: News, Opinions & Analysis Tags: cd projekt red, dlc, piracy
Ó

Despite the fact that a developer has the potential to make a ton of money off DLC alone, Tomaszkiewicz believes in selling it for the grand price of free. How can a developer take a stand against earning some extra cash?

 

freedlbig

 

According to Konrad's statement cited by IGN, he largely believes that DLC is an ongoing example of the purchase agreement between developer and customer. He believes it should be a developers job to continue to improve their products, therefore a gamer shouldn't be charged any more than they have already paid. Not to mention with game piracy running rampant these days, he believes a developer should be thankful for those that do go out and purchase the game instead of getting it from an illegal source. The best way to thank your fans then, would be to give them free downloadable content. One final musing revolves around his thoughts that DLC isn't as meaty as the PC expansion packs of the old days, so a user shouldn't be expected to pay nearly the same amount to get two new maps.



While developers may not agree, I have to say I applaud Tomaszkiewicz for taking such a firm stand on this, and as an end user I can't help but agree. It is absolutely true that illegal action is starting to take a much bigger chunk of profit from the industry, so why not give something back to those that keep the scene alive. As someone that tends to find most DLC too expensive to invest in I have to say I love how the man thinks. Still, one does have to wonder how much money a developer loses when making free content. Maybe it's not a matter of making it free as much as it is a price reduction. I'm no expert on industry funds, but I think just by charging two dollars instead of fourteen you would still be able to profit. What do you think?  Is DLC too expensive? Should it be given as a free gift to gamers?

 

Source          

 



100% of voters think this story ROCKS!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (11) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
+1 # good questionBenoit 2012-08-09 17:54
but i don't think its a question of should dlc be free or not, but more what kind of dlc you should pay for and which should be free.

Like an extra character or alternate costumes in a fighting game should be free, but actual expansions that add several hours worth of play time are worth being paid for.

But in my opinion, DLC should either be made into full fledged expansions, or be free

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be FreeAkaiEdge 2012-08-09 18:05
I think that if it's a small add-on, like color swaps or cheats for single-player, it should be free, but big expansions...I mean, Oblivion's Shivering Isles expansion was basically another game, so it shouldn't exactly be free, right?

Even so, I think that the devs should be able to decide whether or not to make it free or to charge money for it(reasonably of course)

However, fixes, and things that should have already been in the game from the beginning, should be free and not part of paid DLCs(*cough*Dra gonbone weapons and merchant sold/craftable arrows in Skyrim's Dawnguard expansion*cough **cough*)

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be Freejmac34 2012-08-09 18:16
I will use Batman Arkham City as an example. Expansions like Harley Quinns Revenge should be paid for while the extra fighters and skin packs should be free

Reply
 

 
# RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be FreeKeith__ 2012-08-09 18:28
so - DLC should be free because you didn't steal the game to start with? Yeah, that is some fucked up logic.

Just price DLC (or make it free) based on what you are offering. Or package stuff together - pay X for all the DLC and save 20% of the combined retail price.

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be FreeDraconac 2012-08-09 18:46
I agree, it’s what they sell.
A few skins, a finished cut chapter, a new map.
NO

But an new chapter, 10 maps and 20 skins.
Yes

And it goes even further than that.
These days you have to pay for everything.
A new car? that’s 2€ please, An extra Character? 2€ Please.
What’s next? Out of ammo in Battlefield? Buy more ammo!?!

Reply
 

 
+1 # RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be FreeClad 2012-08-10 00:42
Cheat DLC and large expansion DLC should be free. Like Undead Nightmare, not something like adding a character or a few texture swaps.

Reply
 

 
# RE: What Do You Think: Should DLC Be Freekenshee 2012-08-10 04:39
I guess they mean the DLC they provide at the moment should be free.

Which is all fixes/reworks of things the game didn't do so well and added story and scenes where it felt lacking.

So basically, they make good games, and later on polish them into awesome games through free dlc. And as a customer, I'm happy they're that devoted to their games. (so far)

If they want to really add a whole new storyline to the game, instead of fix/improve what needs it, they'll charge money, and I'll happily buy it.
Or I won't, but then at least I'm sure I didn't miss an integral part of the story/game, as that is what they're perfecting with their free dlc.

I really don't want to pay for asura's wrath's ending and final fantasy XIII-2's extra story scenes, but as a fan of those stories, I need to pay some more than full price to see the full story as it was intended. I should vote with my money and not buy those, but I'll probably cave anyways...

So in short: I agree with CD project red completely :)

Reply
 

 
# Call Of DutyuSteal 2012-08-10 13:49
Call of Duty is the biggest rip off of THEM ALL. Black ops was $60 and within just 1 YEAR they had 4 doc packs for $15 each that's another $60. So every year call of Duty fans pay $120 for a game and just a few extra maps. That's why I choose not to buy another cod game besides the Vita version. Its sick how they nickel and dime use on Bullshit doc packs and CoD is not the only developer doing it.

Reply
 

 
# Not exactlyEarthBoundX5 2012-08-12 17:07
No, I don't think ALL DLC should be free. I get why DLC is charged for, I mean its additional work after all.

When its on disc DLC (made when the game was made), thats a different story. Buying DLC unlock codes is absolute bullshit. I wouldn't care as much if they had the same DLC as Day 1 just so long as it wasn't actually on disc (as being on disc kinda implies you already purchased the data).

Also, DLC pricing should change with the market. If a game drops in MSRP, so should the DLC; at least after the same length of time it took for the base game to drop. It's even easier to manage DLC price changes, so there isn't much of an excuse. In terms of sales, I think DLC is pretty good at that in the current sense.

Finally, once a game is declared dead (servers have confirmed shutdown date, support is gone, or publisher/developer goes under or is disbanded) then a game's DLC should become free regardless of anything.

Reply
 

 
# loltoddblend 2012-11-13 12:17
Should be free every one knows that! Lets take a step back...just image all the games you first experience in the past nes-gamecube through ps1-ps2 and all the side quest was gone!? Some games had side quest to make you powerful or see different endings. Now how would you feel that in order to fully get most out of those past games you had to pay for what was already in it but turned around to fool you to rip you off? Like Nintendo once said that DLC is the same thing that they did on old past console as ''SIDE QUEST BONUS AND ITEMS'' once a player explores the game. It fucked up how online content has ripped us off of full games worth our money. DLC is called the next stuff or ideas you find in a sequel of the next game you buy. But instead its used for the curtain game you have that is not fully complete to rip you off. I have played online games where in order to be powerful you need to pay real money to adjust your status like I'm not going to do that! All in all companies need to stop doing this BS DLC and fully complete the games.

Reply
 

 
# YESRobson 2012-11-18 15:18
Yes dlc should be free it's not fair they have to cost like £10 for one small dlc

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Monster Truck Jumper

Left to Die

The Empire 2

Dark Dimension

Town Drift Competition

Heroes of the Sword