Quick Jump Daily Digest
Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.
Psychologist: Gaming is worse than second hand smoke |
Listed in: News Tags: craig anderson, violent video games

According to psychologist Craig Anderson, playing a video game is more dangerous than cancer-inducing smoke.
"Facts: Meta-analyses reveal that violent video game effect sizes are larger than the effect of second hand tobacco smoke on lung cancer, the effect of lead exposure to I.Q. scores in children, and calcium intake on bone mass," Anderson said in his study. "Furthermore, the fact that so many youths are exposed to such high levels of video game violence further increases the societal costs of this risk factor."
- Anderson used a number of references for his study, which mostly consisted of himself and a colleague:
- Anderson, C.A. (in press). An Update on the Effects of Violent Video Games. Journal of Adolescence.
- Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (1997). External validity of "trivial" experiments: The case of laboratory aggression. Review of General Psychology, 1, 19-41.
- Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2001). Effects of violent video games on aggressive behavior, aggressive cognition, aggressive affect, physiological arousal, and prosocial behavior: A meta-analytic review of the scientific literature. Psychological Science, 12, 353-359.
- Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2002a). The effects of media violence on society. Science, 295, 2377-2378.
- Anderson, C.A., & Bushman, B.J. (2002b). Human Aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27-51.
- Anderson, C.A., & Carnagey, N.L. (in press). Violent evil and the general aggression model. Chapter to appear in A. Miller (Ed.) The Social Psychology of Good and Evil. New York: Guilford Publications.
- Anderson, C.A., & Huesmann, L.R. (in press). Human Aggression: A Social-Cognitive View. Chapter to appear in M.A. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications.
- Bushman, B.J., & Anderson, C.A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56, 477-489.
- Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2000). Effects of televised violence on aggression. In D. Singer & J. Singer (Eds.). Handbook of children and the media (pp. 223-254). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Rosenthal, R. (1986). Media violence, antisocial behavior, and the social consequences of small effects. Journal of Social Issues, 42, 141-154.
His colleague, B.J. Bushman, helped Anderson write a work in the past that the APA gave the following critique to: "Comments on an article by Bushman and Anderson (see record 2001-17729-001). We are concerned that Bushman and Anderson's article on media violence contains data that are incorrect or irreproducible."
We reported last month that a doctor found no link between violent video games and aggression -- it looks like Anderson didn't read that study.
Check out Anderson's study by following this link.
via Spong
| 4% of voters think this story ROCKS! |
|
|












Comments
There's a reason you can't spell psychologist without Psycho.
This is pure nonsense.
Reply
MUST take up smoking rather than using my brain in Portal 2.
now thats a good psycho.
Reply
Reply
Reply
The effect size for violent video games on violence is greater than that of second hand smoke on lung cancer or calcium intake on bone mass. Doesn't necessarily say that video games are MORE dangerous than second hand smoke (or more beneficial than calcium, for that matter...), just that more people are are exposed to violence through video games than are exposed to lung cancer through second hand smoke. He's essentially saying there's a larger 'user base' for aggression through video games than there is for lung cancer through second hand smoke.
That said, the article containing "...data that are incorrect or irreproducible" is not the same study presented after the included link and is also only shown speculated on as being "incorrect or irreproducible".
Also, if you actually read the article at http://www.computerandvideogames.com/300456/violent-games-do-not-cause-aggression-this-isnt-mickey-mouse-research/ about the guy who says there's no link between video games and aggression then you'll see that he's incredibly unprofessional, has no hard evidence to back up his claims (or his trashing of others' work in the field of video games & aggression) and quite frankly is just saying 'no' and not 'no, and here is irrefutable evidence as to why 'no' is absolute.'
THAT said, I'm not sure who I believe. To be honest, I don't think aggression is a universal effect of video games, but I do believe that it can be an effect on some people and that it can manifest more predominately in some of THOSE people.
TL:DR?
Go to school. Learn to read.
Reply
The only bad thing about games is the fact that it takes too long to get to save points... of course there's also the fact that CoD can cause you to break your controller/tv.
Reply
Only if you have anger management issues.
I can honestly say the only time I broke a controller on accident was when I stepped on my Dualshock 2...
Easily retrofitted the innards into a Dualshock 1 casing shortly afterwards.
Reply
I took a Psychology course and I too can make a random psychoanaysis of a person that I have never met!
But really, comparing it to second hand smoking is really gasping at straws. With the cost needed to treat lung cancer, treat? I mean delay the inevitable untimely death indirectly caused by other people. I could buy over 1000 games.
And that averages to about 10000 hours with multiplayer. Which only lasts for about 3 years? God damn it.
Reply
Reply
i'd like the moron who said that to tell that to a guy's face that got cancer from 2nd hand smoking.
i wanna see him NOT get punch =/
seriously this is beyond stupid.
Reply
Reply
Let me explain something that is very important in this forum, when you go to buy a game on any store, must of the store assistants tells you if the game is for you or a young kid, must of them explain to you the ESBR (Entertainment Software Rating Board).
But the real psychos here are the children parents because they buy those games knowing of the effect that can cause by playing those games. I'm sorry about this but I started playing games since the first generation of video games, so I know what I'm talking about. And Craig try to get rid of your license or diploma and start playing some video games, so you can understand what we are talking about or a good option could be, try to get some game consoles and try to test on kids and try to see for your self what video games can do for you, because I rather have my kids playing video games and doing exercises that doing drug or doing some stupid things.
Reply
Reply
Please tell me where this idiot got his diploma from, so I can call the college and ask them if this is the kind of things they teach now.
There is no comparison of the knowledge of certain death from cancer to someone having aggression management issues.
WHAT AN IDIOT!!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHA
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The only problems for me that video games cause are headaches from little kids crying that I kill them on Halo.
Reply
These anti media freaks are the only things corrupting our world. They belong in the same places the other wackjobs go. Nobody cares what your little conservative "studies" have to say, because all they show is how YOU think something like video games is harmful to people. A person who is affected negatively by any form of media has some other problem(s). Get that through your thick, close minded heads, its NOT the media.
And heres another nice little bit for your so called "study". I have been playing M rated games since I was 7 years old. No, not 17, SEVEN. Games like Resident Evil, Grand Theft Auto, and many other "inappropriate" titles. Judging by the huge amount of money and effort put into keeping these titles out of minors hands, I should have been severely affected by playing these games at such a young age. But guess what, I have never killed anyone, I have never even been in a real fight. I am very anti violent, against guns, and believe there are ways to solve problems without violence. I am also a high school graduate and currently in college, so the low IQ nonsense wont work. Can you explain to me why I have not been negatively affected by this so called "harmful" media? Please explain. If you are doing a legit study, I should be given a completely valid explanation as to exactly why I have not been affected. I know you won't give me an explanation, because you cant do that without admitting that media is harmless to any sane person, and any attempt to restrict it is 100% useless and a waste of time and money, so you go on with your little study while I sit here wondering what you will be targeting after video games. Hmm...
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
You can't compare the two things. It's an invalid argument.
Reply
Actually I dont believe in this shit, of course there are some games, that make me angry like DB:RB and SF4 just because of retarded controls, but other games are just awesome, so I dont see a reason to stop playin :)
I think this guy just got very frustrated by a game that he had to say, that games are bad :) Always the same crap, I dont mind.
Reply
Psychologist you need some pills.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Documentary - "The Marketing of Madness - Are We All Insane?" reveals the fact of psychiatry world that psychotropic drugging is a business. It exposes the truth behind the marketing schemes and scientific deceit that conceal a dangerous and often deadly sales campaign. How valid are psychiatrists' diagnosis - and how safe are the drugs?
To watch please visit - http://www.cultureunplugged.com/play/3932
Reply
when earth rots from hatred religions philosophies and wars...
it is the generation of gamers who will be sent to varios planets according to the difficulty skills you can master in games...
next they will send normal people...
then they will trash all smokers including second hand ones as they will smudge the purity and harmony of the cosmic stellar perfection of a world free of conspiracies and pollution...
a world where everyone is a god by himself...
Reply