Quick Jump Daily Digest

Thank you for your interest in the Quick Jump Daily Digest. Get notified of all new content on QJ in our free Daily Digest. To subscribe, enter your email address below and click the subscribe button.


Email Address:


Email will come from "donotreply@caputomedia.com". Please whitelist this email address.

Cancel and Return to page

PoV: Why DLC needs to be free

Posted Apr 1, 2011 at 3:30PM EST by Carl B

Listed in: Xbox 360 Tags: Activision, call of duty, dlc
Ó

 

Call-Of-Duty-Black-Ops

Ever since Internet connection on home consoles became a standard, the downloadable content market has been an extremely popular method for publishers to make gamers pay for extras that should have been in the game in the first place. DLC is not worth paying for, and here's why.

 

Most DLC is terribly over-priced. Take, for example, map packs that Activision distributes for their Call of Duty games; gamers get a handful of maps for the high price of $15.00. These maps not only add absolutely nothing to the gameplay, but I guarantee that each one was already completed when the game released -- they just didn't include them with the game so they could exploit millions of gamers.

 

Another tragic example of this was incorporated in the recent Madden title, Madden NFL '11. In the mode called "Madden Ultimate Team," players purchase booster packs containing card versions of NFL players. With these cards, they can put together a team to play against other players online with. Aside from how horribly implemented this mode was, Electronic Arts actually had booster packs on sale for real money. I got really into Madden Ultimate Team on PS3 and I almost bought the most expensive booster pack, which contains top-tier players such as Peyton Manning and Drew Brees. Luckily I stopped myself before I did, but that can't be said for millions of gamers that wasted their money on this type of DLC.

 

The only time I've seen paid-for DLC done right is with the Fallout games. Fallout 3 had several DLC add-ons, and each added significant hours onto the game. Each one costed around $9.99, but it was evident that these add-ons were developed well after the main game was finished. Fallout: New Vegas will also have similar add-ons.

 

In the end, it's up to you to decide whether or not you want to waste $15 on a new map pack or a game mode that should have been in the full game to begin with. The best DLC is free, and when it isn't free, it's usually thrown into a "Game of the Year" edition of the game, ala Borderlands and Fallout 3.

 

Sound off in the comments and let us know your stance on DLC, and continue the discussion on the forum.



100% of voters think this story ROCKS!
Vote Now!    This story ROCKS! (8) This story SUCKS!! (0)




Become a Member of QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can sign up for nightly updates.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link at the top right!

Comments 


 
# RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeTirsoJRP 2011-04-01 16:48
You should have mentioned "DLC" that are included in the disk, ex: StreetFighter4.

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeDJ PON-3 2011-04-01 20:44
-Cough- ...and Marvel vs Capcom 3.

Reply
 

 
# Actually...Nep 2011-04-01 23:51
Those type of "DLC" are actually unlock codes. The content is already on the disc, but what you're paying for is the key to have access to them. In the end, no matter what you call them, they are still shady business strategies.

Reply
 

 
# RE: #Actually...professor x 2011-04-02 21:29
it depends, some dlc is like what you said unlock codes / hex values that edit the save data, while others are actually an add on to the base program (game/ disc) map packs. ;-)

the thing i have to say is that this is a capatalist society and the economy is screwed up badly. people need money to consume items and companys need money to produce items.If it makes them more money then they will charge you a leg for dlc after you pay an arm and a leg for the game its self.

what i see as a problem with this is when companys take all the money from the people; people will have no more money to spend on the companys products resulting in no customers and a serplus of products. this will either put the companys out of buisness or they will have a spike in their prices and fees so they could possibly stay in buisness

ps please excuse my spelling

Reply
 

 
# they should lower the priceDave 2011-04-01 16:56
if they would lower the price of the actual game then maybe i wouldn't have such a prob paying for dlc but now i think they are just making these games short knowing that they are going to get us to pay more $$$ for dlc

Reply
 

 
+1 # agreed! Hands down!lessmasterdark 2011-04-01 16:58
I totally agree, but what do you expect? most of the developers only cares about $$$$money$$$$, especially Activison. (Fxxx Activison, the ultimate game killer company)

Reply
 

 
# ...SeRosiS 2011-04-01 17:12
Hey, you forgot to mention Mass Effect in the "DLC I can accept paying for" category.

Possibly Dead Space, but I haven't had a chance to check out its DLC yet.

Reply
 

 
# RE: ...Carl B 2011-04-01 17:15
That would go under the GOTY edition stuff... I got the PS3 version with all the DLC already on it.

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: ...SeRosiS 2011-04-01 17:44
Quoting Carl B:
That would go under the GOTY edition stuff... I got the PS3 version with all the DLC already on it.


That doesn't change the fact that the DLC at the time was worth the price, just because it was released as a bundle on the PS3 doesn't bring its value down.

Reply
 

 
# Undead NightmareOwNeR_OHG 2011-04-01 17:34
The Undead Nightmare pack and the Undead Collection were both worth it in my opinion. $10 for zombies and a complete single player story you can't be that. Add another $5 and you get every single Read Dead DLC now that is a steal. Activision needs to take a page out of Rockstar's book and produce DLC worthy of our hard earned money. Maps aren't worth $15 when I get a whole new campaign for $10.

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: Undead NightmarePS360 Owner1 2011-04-01 19:46
Yup, RDR games were totally worth it.

RDR Undead came with the paid DLC packs, so it was more than just one game/pack.

Awesome.

People on Co-Op mode sometimes get ahead of themselves and kill their own team members.

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freePS360 Owner1 2011-04-01 19:14
Who's PoV?

Anyway, I like his vision, if the content is already on the disc it should be free and if released afterwards too.

But if it's DLC-games (arcades, indies, etc), then obviously devs will need to charge money to make profit.

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeCarl B 2011-04-01 20:19
Point of view.

Reply
 

 
# RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeDeltaDAWG 2011-04-01 20:11
Yet, at the same time you still paid for and got a game that was 100% complete and what you thought (at the time) was a worthy value to purchase.

So because they release some DLC and ask for some money, all of a sudden you have a game that is not complete? Now you demand that you receive all of that games resources for life at no additional cost?

No doubt, I agree that $15 for a map pack is ridiculous so in that case, don't buy it.

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeAssassinXCV 2011-04-02 02:52
"hey lets make a game"

"ok"

"yeah, lets have a good campaign, and a multiplayer for it too"

"sure. you get right on that"

"okay, the game is complete!"

"wait, dont send it out for production, i've got an idea to make us some more cash"

"really? what is it?"

"well, how about we just sell the campaign on the disk for the same price we were going to sell it and the multiplayer, and then sell the multi player addon as DLC"

"heh, yeah, advertising a game with only a campaign for $60 will make the game seem really good, with quality campaign ideas and story; it will get everyone to buy it >:)"

"But won't people hate our company?"

"who cares? we'll be FILTHY FUCKING RICH after they buy this half assed game, even if they dont buy the DLC"

^^^Activition's Plan For the Future^^^

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeDeltaDAWG 2011-04-04 01:29
Everything in that post was speculation, fiction and fantasy at best.

Reply
 

 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freexDoRanger 2011-04-27 21:33
i thought it was pretty funny haha. but yeah they would never sell multiplayer as a add-on unless its just mini-games that maybe 10 year old would get

Reply
 

 
-1 # £45/$60 is plenty!Wunjo_69 2011-04-02 06:06
Why not for free? That's the way it always used to work as far as I remember. Even these days, people like valve release updates & expansions to thier games like left 4 dead for free, whereas on the xbox version it's all paid for.

Reply
 

 
# RE: £45/$60 is plenty!DeltaDAWG 2011-04-04 01:31
Nope. It did not "always" work that way. I can remember buying games on 5.25" floppy disk that was an expansion pack paying full retail for it. Usually at half the price of the original full game.

Some are free, some aren't. Nothing has changed.

If someone thinks it's a rip off then don't buy it.

Reply
 

 
# trueynot 2011-04-02 03:20
i liked dlc from gears of war it came in separate disk after a few years later

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeNakedFaerie 2011-04-02 04:22
DLC sucks. It should be in the game to start with.
The worst is the DLC on disc. Now you should NEVER pay for that. It should already be in the game.
They are making you pay for something you already own.

IF they want to make DLC then make it AFTER the game is released and NONE of it on the disc. It should be a complete addon and nothing to do with the current story.
And make it free. If you want to keep happy customers then keep them happy and give them what they want.

Reply
 

 
# RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeRowaa 2011-04-02 07:40
I view DLC as service of product, which, naturally, is included in original price. id Software released 3.10 for Quake II with full new game mode (CTF), tons of maps and new players models for free, Microsoft releases service packs for Windows for free. Actually most gaming publishers did so, because it increases value of game and makes new buyers for original release, until someone thought that they could make nice extra buck with it. Naturally, greed taken over and many followed.

Reply
 

 
+2 # RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freeKeith_ 2011-04-02 17:07
wow - what a bunch of whiny bitches.

"i should get all the DLC for free. and the game should be cheaper - no wait - the game should be free. And i should be given a PS3, no - 2 of them - for free as well. this way i can have one in the game room and one in the bedroom"

hasn't anyone ever heard of supply and demand? if you're dumb enough to piss away $10 or $15 or $50 or whatever for crappy DLC, then it is your own fault. maybe if more people said "no thanks", then they would lower the prices. instead people see DLC, and go right for the credit card like lemmings.

some DLC is worth it - the star wars force unleashed 2 bonus level was .99. a fair price. you could say the game was too short to begin with, but then (once again) wait and don't buy the freaking game on day 1. you can then find out if the game is a 5-10 hour game, you wait til the price drops. if the game is a 100-200 hour game, then you decide if you want to spend $60, or once again, wait for a price drop.

the mora of this rant - just because a company releases something, you don't have to buy it.

Reply
 

 
-1 # RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freevizard00 2011-04-02 23:45
DLC should be free as we buy their game and make em sell more , also DLC make their game survice longer as we DL dlc's we will continue to play and they will sell more copies ,

DLC should be included and unlockable so more fun and no booring...

sry for my eng

Reply
 

 
# ...Mickle 2011-04-04 19:29
if you bought a Pc would you expect your upgrades for free? Well that's EXACTLY the same as what people are expecting here, but if i bought a Pc that didn't work as well as advertised the f#cking right i'd expect an upgrade plus extra for the hassle. But as long as they selling you a complete game then the DLC is made by teams who have to be paid a wage for the extra hours put into it so why should the give it away for free? I mean before online consoles if your game was buggy would you expect them to send you a free disk/cartridge with the updates? It's only cos people are so used to getting stuff for free now you think you pay once and get everything free forever.

Reply
 

 
# RE: PoV: Why DLC needs to be freePootnam 2011-04-09 17:25
This article is pointless. Developers would not make DLC if it was free to download.

You want free games? Get an eye patch and a parrot.

Reply
 

Add comment

Security code
Refresh


Welcome to QJ.Net!

If you want your comments to go live without waiting for moderation, you need to be logged in. Being logged in has its benefits:
  • Logged in members do not wait for their comments to be approved.
  • Logged in members can create Profiles to be seen by other users.
So why wait? Create an account or login now! It's easy, quick, and free.

To get started, use the LOGIN boxes, or the REGISTER link below!



Want to learn more about the team who brings you the QJ news?

Read about them now!


RSS Feeds Follow us on Twitter Find us on Facebook
Login:

HOT FLASH GAMES

Turbo Rally

Bakugan ATV Offroad

Duty Hill 2

Pork Must Arrive TD

Mechwarrior 3D

Ice Racing 3D
PoV Categories

iPad
iPhone
MMORPG
Nintendo 3DS
Nintendo DS
PC Gaming
PS Vita
PS3
PSP
Wii
Xbox 360

Sitemap